I am interested in all things legally pertaining to liberty. Per chance I came across the name of your page on a random thread, read your description, and found it interesting.
Look up the LEGAL definition of LIBERTY and see how stupid you sound.
I remind you that you actually QUALIFIED your statement with "LEGALLY". You literally asked for this.
You expect disagreement? Argument perhaps? I know precisely the meaning of the words I used, and used them as I intended.
I care not for the permission of the captain, parley, or death.
So that's what you mean by " I am interested in all things legally pertaining to liberty. "; I care not for the permission of the captain, parley, or death?
That would mean you are either drunk or mentally ill.
Neither. I'm a free man, I don't ask for permission. Speak with me, or not, that is your decision. It was yourself who decided to bring sea talk into the mix. By legally pertaining to liberty I mean simply law, and case law pertaining to cases won in favor of the defendant.
...and when it comes to GOVERNMENT, MONEY or LAW, the LEGAL definition is the ONLY definition that matters. There was no "sea talk". That is the LEGAL definition of LIBERTY.
This group has provided evidence so many times that the general population is completely retarded and can't handle the fact that it is completely retarded
For future reference: If you are a complete stranger who chooses to engage me, know that the second you do, at least 10 others are reading and gathering as much information as they can about you.
It's REALLY hard to remain objective and treat everyone the same, even though you all are.
I think Scott used the term semi-evolved chimp. I can relate and must admit looking into information gathered at TTFL and TATE (hope you won't mind the liberties taken with the acronym of the other page Scott), both have helped me in my evolution. The older you are the longer and deeper the programming and hence the harder to overcome.
Thin skin and thick skulls... Not a good combination in this group. It is a shame, a willingness to learn seems so foreign to those seeking to join. I enjoy observing these interactions, and at the same time almost despise that it has to happen.
That whole crowd seem to be of the opinion that anyone who mentions the term PERSON or questions the workings of the legal system fall under the Freeman umbrella and aren't worthy of a rational discussion...
Christian chap is in a Freeman on the land failures group... Says it all...
What's with this "what works" crap? They keep going on about that.
YOU PAY FOR THESE "LAWS" and you aren't getting what you paid for. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY POSITION!
What "works" has never been ANYTHING I have EVER posted, yet these stupid twits insist that's what I do.
If any of you are "friends" with these twits, you aren't wanted here.
Why do people have to lie about me, or what I teach? Someone explain that to me? I get that you all have some bullshit that you love, and get mad that I always destroy that bullshit, but do you have to lie about me?
They also do that "Scott Duncan lied" crap. It is squawked by everyone from sewer ellie to Andrew D'Spyder Pig, and they never actually say what this "lie" is. What mental illness is that?