The Tender For Law

Volume 14

Jun 25, 2016 11:01 PM

Pete Daoust

I have a "NEW" question :D

So, FORENSIC ACCOUNTING is needed�..

Two bills of exchange were sent to City of Terrebonne in order for two debts to be discharged.

These two bills of exchange were sent Feb. the 16th 2015 via Registered mail RW970279860CA.

They were received by City of Terrebonne, stapled to a Notice, notifying what I do, how I do it and why I am doing it. There was also a birth certificate stapled to them, and an act of birth.

The Notice also notified City of Terrebonne that if these two bills of exchange were to be refused, to just send them back and that I would PAY.

I have no idea WHO opened this envelop, and the only information I have so far is that these two bills of exchange were disposed of.

No one wants to tell me where, no one wants to RETURN them to me, and City of Terrebonne still want me to PAY these debts.

I have tried everything I could to have them back, and promised numerous times that I would PAY if these were to be refused and returned.

I can only believe that FRAUD is being committed, in the name of the SOVEREIGN. Again, I also have proofs (signed) that City of Terrebonne is doing all this in the name of the SOVEREIGN.

I have asked WHO was this Sovereign, and no answers came back.

The ONLY Sovereign I know of is Her Majesty the Queen.

Since FRAUD seems to be committed by City of Terrebonne, I have good reasons to believe that an AGENT should investigate this matter. I can no longer communicate with City of Terrebonne's lawyers because I can't participate to this FRAUD.

If such AGENT would like to take this matter to hand, what exactly does this AGENT needs from me?

Thanks Pete.

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

Surety of the person is a fundamental right here, in Qu�bec. City of Terrebonne seems to have no problems spending PUBLIC funds to commit this fraud, also the JUSTICE seems to have no problems ASSISTING them in this fraud, using PUBLIC funds.

So I see no problems using this surety so this AGENT could benefit from it, right? :/

Again, I have proofs of what is being said here :/

Scott Duncan

He doesn't. They will just blatantly lie at this point and threaten you, saying "what are you gonna do about it"?

When I say, it's OK to kill Law Society members this is why.

I could slaughter a Lawyer and their family and feel NOTHING, except maybe a feeling of validation that I'd made the world a better place.