Scott Duncan
Eamonn, your interrogative makes too many presumptions.
There is a TENDER FOR "LEGAL" attached to money. If you are GIVEN a $20 bill and then told 6 weeks later that you have to suck my dick because you Possessed that 20 dollar bill, you would suddenly be saying "go fuck yourself! I didn't consent to that". You wouldn't be saying "What facts or evidence is there for any warrant of agency for the principal".
Make it more basic. Focus on REALITY. Pretending to be a lawyer is useful if you are auditioning for a role on television/movies, but here in real life, it does nothing but serve the Law Society, and screw you over.
When you talk in court, like a lawyer, and you are RIGHT, the court knows they are being spoken to by someone else.
It's why "Scott Duncan says Hi" is such a scary *mic drop*.
Focus on reality. "what facts or evidence is there for any warrant of agency for the principal" is NOT something you would EVER say to anyone outside a courtroom. If you did, you'd receive many requests to cease and desist being such a faggot. :P