:/

:(

It's a sad day for humanity.

Thanks for everything, Scott ! As I told you before, I can't give up what I learned here, so I won't. It still may not be enough, but I'll make the best use I can of everything I learned over the past few years and hopefully be able to give some value to all that knowledge...

I knew one day David-Paul Sip was going to fuck us all. Thank you for taking away the most valuable place for knowledge and truth of the Internet you IDIOT!

Anyone that has NOT been repaying a DEBT owed to Scott, by making questions to government officials/Law Society and sharing it here, or playing Battlefield 2142, do not come here to give your bullshit "thanks" to Scott. Take your programmed "thanks" elsewhere. In reality, you "thank" by DOING, not just "giving thanks," which in reality equals to NOTHING, and FUCK YOU!

"Are you trying to influence this court"? Is telling the truth would influence this court dear justice? :/

WTF!!!!! :/

I'll find you guys on better parts of the Internet. More secure and private. Thx for efforts.

Mother f***** f****** f*** f*** face

I guess looking COOL and SMART was your focus, Mister Sip ? :/

I fucked up in ways that I cannot begin to foresee. :( I didn't even realize how badly I screwed up until Scott and Tara explained it to me. And all because I beleived I knew what the word indluence meant. I believed I was being accused of something wrong.

How about the part of "Masters ask questions, and SLAVES answer"? Why would you answer fucking questions? That is The Tender for Law 101, first fucking class.

Bet he lookled ike f****** DereK Moron in that stupid f****** city council meeting what a f****** retard

I was focussed on "showing them". I was focussed on the wrong things. I can't fix this. That is the worst part.

Why would you do this to Scott, and Tara?

WHY?

I was unprepared Anibal. There was a "consent order" before the court. I was not expecting to be asked anything, especially without council present.

FUUUUUUUUUUK YOOOUU

I am not a victim Quatloosers. I am not Scott. I am not Pete. The fact that I screwed up does NOT make me a victim. I learned a hard lesson today, one that I'll be reminded of for quite sometime. :(

Well fuck.

What an irresponsible idiot. Plus, look what you have done. You have taken KNOWLEDGE away from me (us). You have no idea how much contempt I feel for you right now. You are helping to shut down the best part of my life.

Being focussed on "showing them" = "feeling good". That was NEVER the goal here, but it is reality.

DELUSIONAL = Stay AWAY from a fucking court!

What were you doing in there?

Jesus fucking christ.

WHAT WERE YOU DOING IN THERE, FOCUS

I am aware of what I have done Anibal. Is this unforgivable? It feels that way. I never thought it would be me in this position. I was there with my mother to ensure that the "consent order" was submitted into the court as agreed. I was not expecting to be addressed.

Okay Pete. I'll try but I'm feeling like shit.

"I was not expecting to be addressed" WHY IN THE FUCK HAVE YOU OPENED YOUR FUCKING MOUTH THEN? :/

Fuck Sip, just fucking fuck! This was coming.

You are NOT aware of what have you done. And yes, it's unforgivable. You are a delusional fuckwit. Soon you'll start acting like a victim. Mark my words.

Trying to look "cool" and "smart" will get you killed buddy, in ANY "club". Especially if you're not part of that "club". Ask Rick Carne ? :P

After 3+ hours on the phone with Scott this afternoon I am aware of the short term repercussions. I have gift wrapped this for them with my response. I am the second example which gives these courts a reason to assert there is "a pattern". Gail Marie was isolated. A coincidence.

That's correct Pete. The Justice was not pleased by seeing Scott`s name in my earlier affidavits.

If I led this court to believe that I was trying to look "cool" and "smart" in front of this court, that was a mistake and please forgive me :P

If I deserve to be hung by the balls for three days on that streetlight post, ALL the members of the Tender for Law will support that punishment :P .....right guys?

Earlier affidavits? Mmm....what?

Scott made it clear that "Mistake" will not work because I answered that it was not my "intent" to "influence" the court.

The goal is not that it work, the goal is to TELL THE FUCKING TRUTH :P You've made a mistake, right?

Fuiuuuuuuccccckkkkkk!

And the mistake was to want to look "cool" and "smart", right?

Okay I'm focussing Pete. YES that is correct. It's one way to put it.

You weren't even invited in there, right? :/

:/ Me and my mother were named in my brother's application.

I always TRUST the justice, until the justice BREACH that trust. And the only way the justice can breach that trust, is by being incompetent and/or unfair. I don't care what ANYONE may say. That's how I go in, on INVITATION.... :P

So you've begged to go in there, and played the "cool/smart" card :-o

Seriously? :/

Did I "beg" Pete? We were "compelled". I was told my CONSENT did not matter by a Justice.

Anyways, I don't have enough info on that thing to go further, but playing "cool & smart" in a club you're not part of is STUPID. I guess you know now, right Mister Sip? :D

Scott Duncan, this has NOTHING to do with what you're teaching in here. You can not control all the idiots in Toronto, that's just impossible ?

The census guy just passed ?

He was about 20 years old. Poor guy :D

I just said: "I don't know" and.....I don't know (a bit louder) and he just left :/

Ok, lets come back to the "Mister Sip trying to look "cool & smart" in a club he's not part of. :/

What would you think would happen in an Italilian Cafe filled with mobsters, Mister Sip? :/

Why are you addressing me as "Mister"? I would be very dead.

Well he got half right..

You acted as a Mister, not my fault, right? :/

MY NAME is on this. MY NAME has JOINDER with your stupidity.

I did allow myself to be attourned so there is that Pete.

Attourned ? :/

Not only was there ATTORNMENT you WAIVED THE BENEFIT OF AGENCY.

NOW there is a PUBLIC RECORD with MY FUCKING NAME on it.

:(

...in a AFFIDAVIT that YOU SWORE OUT. Why? because you thought Saturday morning cartoons are real.

I don't get the affidavit part? ...why Scott's name in an affidavit, Mr. Sip? :/

EVERYTHING that this group teaches and represents is now tainted with the ULTIMATE SHIT-STAIN, that I can't respond to.

Trying to look "cool & smart" Pete :/ Fuck!

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Submit

Have you mentionned anywhere on these affidavits "The Tender for Law group? :/

It frighten me just to ask that question, but fuck, anything is possible with your ilk, I guess :/

I want to see that affidavit ! :/

Is this shit is in regards with a family fight over money? :D

Post the audio.

Now it's a big giant shit-stain.

This is the ONE case they DON'T have to purge my name from the record. This is exactly what the Attorney General's Office wants.

The ONLY record that shows "Scott Duncan" on it will be this one. That one fact alone destroys the power this group has.

To this day, the Quatlosers still cite Gail Marie as one of my "victims" and she got tired of being called to refute that lie. Now she tells that lie. David-Paul Sip will do the same thing 3 years from now. YOU ARE ALL THE SAME.

I've always suspected he's a cop or agent of some sort.

Why would you attribute to malice, something that can be explained by stupidity?

He should amend the affidavit and take the perjury hit..a little damage control? but he pays a price..(probably fuck that up too)..nevermind..

Yes. We actually covered that. I determined he would fuck it up before I even explained the plan.

All that's left is for David-Paul Sip to start lying about me, and what I say, and yet another waste-of-time tale will conclude. Robert Menard blames the free-dumbers for the lies he tells. Anything I do to defend myself from the accusation, will just look like Menard's responses. The power that this group has, WAS that it was the TRUTH. Now there is a PUBLIC RECORD of a shit-stain, WITH MY NAME ON IT.

All this for a fight between members of the same family over FUCKING MONEY/DEBT? :/

Over Money Pete. Actually CONTROL of the money. My brother did not accept our father's wishes naming us executors. He would not contest the will. Instead he chose an end around alleging all sorts of lies.

This should have been fucking easy, why all this fuck up? :/ .....oh yes, "cool and smart" :/

This has NOTHING to do with THE TENDER FOR LAW group, but it will always be a shit-stain on the work.

Dean, Derek, David....I see a correlation with the letter 'D'.

That's right Leigh Collins! Focus on patterns that aren't there! That'll help! ***sarcasm self-test complete***

"Scott Duncan says Hi" isn't going to scare them anymore. This is all they needed. MY name attached to malice in the courtroom. Congratulations David-Paul Sip! You managed to do what the Attorney General and the Law Society couldn't, for 20 years. EVERY lawyer who digs up the past record gets frightened... Now there is a beacon of hope for them, in David-Paul Sip. NOW they have something to point to. Continuing this group is now pointless.

The advantage I had over the Quatlosers, Menard, Clifford, Kook-of-Gaia, the Piece-of-Shit Christians, is because I told you the TRUTH. NO VICTIMS was my claim. Gail Blackman now plays "Scott Duncan" victim, and I call her a lying cowardly cunt who would be much improved with an axe in her face. It's the only way to clean that shit-stain. Now there are TWO examples. I won't bother going through the process I did with that stupid cunt. I'm done. It's just a matter of time before David-Paul Sip starts singing the same song Gail Blackman is. YOU ARE ALL THE SAME. I kept my promise. It wasted a LOT of time.

Scott, I won't deny that a lot of time has been wasted here. But I think that maybe the value of the time spent is being somewhat understated. Your claim to telling the TRUTH, and having NO VICTIMS is not in the past-tense. There is simply one more 'example' that can be easily taken out of context and used against the work here. But those are essentially just LIES. And what else is new from the Law Society? If the Law Society had simply hired a few patsies when TTFL first started, to spend a few months in the group, and then purposely fail in court, throwing around the name Scott Duncan and TTFL group, would that have similarly painted TTFL as a waste of time? If so, I think we're giving in to these pieces-of-shit too easily. I won't deny the lackluster performance of the group. I mentioned a long time ago, that one of the most surprising things about TTFL was how few people seem to be paying attention; how few people seem to be following your work. For anyone not up to speed on what that work is, it may be some of the most important, relevant, and imminent work our species is currently involved with, if only for the future accomplishments that may be made possible on its account. What is that work? Scott Duncan has told the truth; in a world of lies and ignorance. Scott, when I inquired as to how much of our precious time we really must spend refuting the bullshit made up by idiots, the response was quite one-sided. Their bullshit has to be stood up against, EVERYTIME. You say you've kept your promise; well for four years I've been witness to it, and then some. You've done more, and risked more, than anyone I will likely ever know. I would never claim you owe anything to anyone here. Quite the contrary, to you a debt is almost certainly owed, one that I think you would accept. One I would likely never be able to repay, but should certainly spend the rest of my life trying to, and in your eyes, would probably fail to. But as I understand it, that's what The Tender For Law is. A place where we can point to the out-of-context/half-truth 'examples' that the Law Society uses, and cut through their bullshit. Publicly show people the obvious(or not so) non-sequiturs and straw-men that they use to get away with their pretense. Shine the light of truth on their deception-through-ignorance. Whether David-Paul Sip, or any other man or woman does or doesn't start singing the same song as Gail, or any other for that matter, doesn't change the truth, nor this public record of that truth, which is visible for any thinking individual to see. And from our side of this thing, it seems to me that their positions, no matter what they are, can't be the defining factor of whether or not TTFL is a success or not. Had I not been attracted to the flame of truth this group represents, there's really no telling what bullshit I would have blindly wandered into. But I was, and one of the most important things I've learned, is the value of ASKING the question. Not just having a question, but the act of actually asking it. So I have to ask Scott: Is there no way to maintain/hold/save the value of this group? Must we really concede that David-Paul Sip's ignorant, mistaken public statements are all it takes to taint this pantheon of truth? Can the conditions of this test not be changed, so to speak? If anyone is a master of doing so, its you.

ALL true (Thanks, BTW), but now the expansion of knowledge stops. All of this is true, FOR YOU. YOU who has learned these past 4 years. Go back to the time when you knew nothing. This would be no different than a Dean Clifford, or a Kook-of-Gaia venue, in your mind. All of these things you mention, are true, Steven, but they are only true because of TIME and EXPERIENCE. Nobody new will experience this. THE TENDER FOR LAW has power, and frightens the law society, because it is UNIMPEACHABLE. "THE WHOLE TRUTH and NO VICTIMS" is the claim we can all make, and nullify EVERY FREE-DUMBER who dares counter us. It's hard enough to convince the programmed ignorant masses, of this truth. Now I have to fight off the actions of TWO idiots. One thought she could pick-and-choose the parts of what I say, and mix it with the nice free-dumber's shit. The other thought being "cool' in front of strangers was more important, and attached MY NAME to it. Pete Daoust has done amazing things, and is smart enough to grasp what I am saying here. He only SOUNDS dumb :P Notice he doesn't care how smart the court thinks he is? He knows that he is speaking to the RECORD, not the court. Records don't care how "cool" or "smart" you sound. The ONLY thing that got Pete Daoust listening to me, is that he ONLY FOUND TRUTH here, and there were NO VICTIMS. My name is attached to a public record now. David-Paul Sip doesn't understand the truth, so doesn't know how to respond, when asked about it. "Are you trying to influence this court?" is a legitimate process question. YES is the correct answer. The only reason ANY PARTY is before the court, is to INFLUENCE it. Since the LEGAL DEFINITION is the ONLY DEFINITION THAT COUNTS, IN COURT (Despite recent lies to the contrary, by the redoubtable Larken Rose), let's look at what INFLUENCE means LEGALLY http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/influence First, INFLUENCE is PROPER or IMPROPER, with PROPER being PRESUMED. EVERY action in court is PRESUMED to be PROPER unless the presiding authority declares otherwise. For the record, the CORRECT "Cool and smart" response to "Are you trying to influence this court, is "PROPERLY SO, as is my duty". "No" is the wrong answer. "That is not my intent" is quite possibly THE WORST answer. As I said, you NEVER EVER EVER say the word INTENT in court. EVER. let ANYONE except you, use the word, because the burden of proving INTENT is not yours. EVER. Saying "That was not my intent", EXCLUDES THE POSSIBILITY from that point on. If you do not INTEND to "influence" the court, you are there to harm and/or impose burden on it. That is MORE than enough evidence to SHOW CAUSE, and that's what's happening here. They didn't even have to cheat. They win. The reason they fear ME, is that they have to cheat to "beat" me. I'm BETTER than they are. It's just a fact. I acted Pro Se when they didn't cheat. I won every time. I can do this, because I know more than pretty much EVERY lawyer out there. A lesson many have learned the hard way. Those days are over. Now they just lie when it suits them. ...except when they don't need to. The lesson: DO NOT USE THE WORD *INTENT* IN COURT! EVER! EVER! Not even once. If nothing else, remember that. And stop trying to speak above your station. It's obvious to who you are speaking to, and it will ALWAYS be used against you in court. ALWAYS! They WANT you to pretend to be smart. They WANT you to try "act like one of them". It's why Pete Daoust is never trapped by them. He is HONEST. He doesn't try to pretend he knows more than he does. He also know WHY HE IS THERE! If he was asked "Are you trying to influence this court", he would answer, "Hellos? I ams just beings trying to finds the party with havings the SURETY"... or something like that. HE TELLS THE TRUTH. ALWAYS! He does not pick and choose when he's honest, and when he's trying to "look cool". My "superpower" is TRUTH. If you are ALWAYS TRUTHFUL, the court cannot INFLUENCE you, because to do so, would be to accept lies. Most of you live day to day lying all the time, so you don't know how to stop. That's why they don't have to cheat in court... YOU WILL LIE. You don't know how not to. It's how you are programmed. Pete Daoust couldn't believe that, when I told him, those many years ago, so he stopped, and looked. He saw I was right. It changed him forever. For 18 months, he listened ONLY to me, and what I had to say. He did that, because I told the truth, and had NO VICTIMS. The ability to claim NO VICTIMS is what sets me above the Menards, Cliffords and piss-drinkin' trannies out there. Unless you have done what Pete Daoust did, you have NO BUSINESS BEING IN A COURT ROOM WITHOUT AGENCY. NONE! You can't do ANY of what Pete Daoust does, unless you can STOP LYING. Do what Pete did! Count the times you lie, every day. You will be amazed at how many times you do. Pete was. So he stopped. That's when everything I wrote made sense to him. It was obvious, and he wondered how he lived so long and not noticed. ...then he remembered; He didn't know he was lying all the time. He knows how to stop. You don't. STAY OUT OF COURT. You are NOT me, and you are NOT Pete Daoust! You are YOU, and you lie all the time. ALL of you.

Fuck David-Paul Sip. I'm off learning some (cool) stuff Scott taught us . Meanwhile, you in court trying to sound cool. Fuck, this is why i stay to myself as much as possible. I guess it's time to read the white paper to Hermicity . Fuck, I hate you right now.

"Scott Duncan says Hi" is the "Mic Drop", not the opening line." --- duh really? I mentionned this somewhere above. It's so frustrating as a noOb. So frustrating. Because EVEN I FUCKING UNDERSTAND THIS. I accept EVERY TROLLING AND OR CORRECTION i get in this whole process in order TO REPROGRAM. ffs. I hope you sleep like shit. It's 2:15 am and I'm reacting because of you. Ugh.

Biggest loss facebook will have ever seen. I NEVER thought ANY OF THIS was on FB. I finally find somewhere that makes FB worth while...and POOF. Pete Daoust I will be break knee caps if someone pulls some shit like this on you.

I know it's somehow offends people that I know more than they do. Pretending that's not true is always costly. Remember, always; YOU ARE NOT ME. Also: DON'T TALK TO ANY "GROUP" OF PEOPLE BY PRETENDING YOU ARE "ONE OF THEM"! Don't go to court trying to talk like a Lawyer! Don't go to a group of back people, trying to talk like black people.. SAME THING! You will just sound offensive. (Speaking Frenglish to French-Speaking people is OK, and will only make you sound cool. Honest!) Pete Daoust doesn't "try to sound smart" by talking like them. He stays TRUE TO HIMSELF. If you think talking like a Lawyer makes you "sound smart", it doesn't . The FIRST lesson in THE TENDER FOR LAW is that YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WORDS MEAN! Add to that, the fact that ONLY THE LEGAL DEFINITION COUNTS IN EVERY INTERACTION WITH THE COURT, and you have a recipe for disaster. Pete Daoust is honest, and when he speaks to the court, he speaks as HIMSELF.He doesn't want to "impress" anyone. He is compelled to attend, under the threat of violence. He has questions. He's asking. ...because some weird scientist, on the internet with his own fleet of boats, showed him some very unsettling things that go against everything he'd been told. He wanted to know! He is a good man, and wants to do the right thing...and it turns out he's been lied to about a lot of things. This makes "doing the right thing" an ambiguous task! He's also noticed that he's the only one concerned with right and wrong. ...so he's demanding answers. "Accountability", if you will! He has a goal. He wants answers. He's been alive for over half of a century, and in all that time, it seems the only one to tell him the truth, is some stranger on the internet, with an agenda. Let that sink in! I've said for years that the only reason I'm here, is because having people know the truth serves my agenda, and I'm the ONLY ONE to tell Pete Daoust the truth. Everyone else is lying, or parroting lies they "believe". I am literally the ONLY ONE telling the truth. The sad reality is that you are all evil and stupid. You are programmed that way. I'm the only one who will tell you about it. Everyone else is too evil and/or stupid to do that. Pete Daoust doesn't want to be evil and stupid, so he's doing something about it. Trying to "look cool" to a bunch of strangers with Arts degrees, who think they OWN you, is stupid. These are EVIL people who meddle in the affairs of the people they think they own, in order to profit. You are evil and stupid. It's your default state. I know this, because that's how you are programmed. I wasn't. None of you seem to grasp the difference, or believe I'm not like you. Reality does not care what you believe/comprehend. It's been almost 4 years now! I have shown you! If I say you are evil and stupid, then it's TRUE! STOP BEING EVIL AND STUPID! Pete Daoust did. The rest of you? ...not so much. So let's do it the Pete Daoust way, shall we! DO NOTHING unless you are SURE that what you will be doing is not: 1: Evil 2: Stupid Apply it to your EVERY action, EVERY day, and in about 18 months, you will be ready to START doing something. Until then, you are just evil and stupid.

Why would you want to go cheer at stupid? That would be all you'll get to do. He attorned.

Is this where you were going Anibal? https://youtu.be/UQv7Tr8HbGE