The Tender For Law

Volume 14

Jun 10, 2016 7:20 PM

Pete Daoust

Ok.....City of Terrebonne didn't like that LIEN of $4,039,000.00

So they've brought the matter to court.

I was there, in court, this morning telling the judge:

I WANT THESE BILLS OF EXCHANGE BACK AND I PROMISE TO PAY.

I am saying this since minute one dear judge.

The judge ordered City of Terrebonne to come back next friday with these bills of exchange, so they can give them back to me, so I can PAY :D

The lawyer brought that maybe City of Terrebonne don't have them anymore, and they would have to bring photocopies....

I said NO PROBLEM, I will ACCEPT photocopies, but I will have to PAY with $20 bills photocopies....

The judge looked at me and his head said yes... :/

To be continued next week :D (friday)

The lawyer made several phone calls trying to find the bills of exchange......I smell a PROBLEM.... :D

Not my fault :/

I have NO surety in all this, Notice of Mistake already been filed....

City of Terrebonne just want the lien to be cancelled, I said NO PROBLEM, give back these bills of exchange they seems to be refusing, I will PAY these tickets, and CANCEL THAT FUCKING LIEN..... :/

Erich Kirov, Gilberto de Piento, Daniel J Wentz,

Read Comments

Anibal Jose Baez

This is truly something. Pete you've got them by the balls!

Does anyone else see what is being unmasked here?

Will they admit the TENDER FOR LAW that money provides is FRAUD by REFUSING these Bills of Exchange? :D

Pete Daoust

:D

Public servant refusing to deliver property

337 Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.

Pete Daoust

Destroying documents of title

340 Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels, conceals or obliterates

(a) a document of title to goods or lands,

(b) a valuable security or testamentary instrument, or

(c) a judicial or official document,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 300.

Pete Daoust

Fraudulent concealment

341 Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, takes, obtains, removes or conceals anything is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 301.

Pete Daoust

Even in French, it's beautiful :P

Employ� public qui refuse de remettre des biens

337 Est coupable d�un acte criminel et passible d�un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans quiconque, �tant ou ayant �t� employ� au service de Sa Majest� du chef du Canada ou d�une province, ou au service d�une municipalit�, et charg�, en vertu de cet emploi, de la r�ception, de la garde, de la gestion ou du contr�le d�une chose, refuse ou omet de remettre cette chose � une personne qui est autoris�e � la r�clamer et qui, effectivement, la r�clame.

S.R., ch. C-34, art. 297.

Pete Daoust

I am dealing with threats, harassement, intimidation, criminal and illegal behaviours since the beginning of this affair. And now this competent and fair judge!!!!....you got to understand my excitement about it. I couldn't shut up, I had to share with him my excitement :/

Natasha Tutino

Oh I can bring out the full corporate slave Nat if that means it will help. I've had to develop other relationships of 'stfu and listen'. I kept a few suits from the RBitCh days. Kent Barrett I wasn't clear; that's just not classy enough. Gimme a bella v-neck slim fit. Already better lol.

Natasha Tutino

I have cleary UNDERSTOOD atleast this from day one: law is made to fuck us, this I always knew. As easy as a procedure can be, so can shooting yourself in foot because of one single sensational word. NO cut corners. NO half assing. What's the fuck Kent?

Anibal Jose Baez

<< ALIENATE, aliene, alien. This is a generic term applicable to the various methods of transferring property from one person to another. Lord Coke, says, (1 Inst. 118 b,) alien cometh of the verb alienate, that is, alienum facere vel ex nostro dominio in alienum trawferre sive rem aliquam in dominium alterius transferre. These methods vary, according to the nature of the property to be conveyed and the particular objects the conveyance is designed to accomplish. It has been held, that under a prohibition to alienate, long leases are comprehended.>>

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/alienate

Pete Daoust

They want me to believe that they've trashed them. But they will never say it.

And as per a phone conversation from july 2015, City of Terrebonne didn't want to return these BoE's because that would bind them LEGALLY to some sort of mysterious shit. And now they pull out another reason.

All this under a sworn affidavit. It's just fascinating :/

Pete Daoust

Joelle Spirit, in my mind, I WILL FUCKING WIN :P

And I don't care what ANYONE might say......ANYONE :P

I don't even have to prepare anything...... IT IS IN MY FUCKING BLOOD :P

UNACCEPTABLE......it's fucking FRAUD......so it's UNACCEPTABLE, period.

Wanna fight? ...let's FUCKING FIGHT :P

Pete Daoust

Just received the audio of the court hearing, the first one, june the 10th with judge Andr� Pr�vost, the "fair and competent" JUSTICE :D

The justice ORDERED city of Terrebonne to bring back the ORIGINALS on the next friday. And he put an emphasis on the fact that he will be in that room on ne t friday.