This is truly something. Pete you've got them by the balls!
Does anyone else see what is being unmasked here?
Will they admit the TENDER FOR LAW that money provides is FRAUD by REFUSING these Bills of Exchange? :D
Should they REFUSE these Bills of Exchange, they would give Pete LEGAL PROOF he is considered a SLAVE, and LEGALLY Pete can kill them after that! :D True story! Not his fault either!
How in the fuck do I remove that red X ? :/
Ceit, the password is M0ls0nLight& , can you remove it for me? ...and don't share this password with anyone please.
Thanks :/
You should raise the concern that the Lawyer is engaged in fraud, and that you would prefer he communicate with your AGENT (Me), as you do not wish to deal with disreputable organizations like the Law Society. :D
This is what happens when you're not in for a free ride......I am not in to get free stuff, I am in for the TRUTH......nothing else....I hope it's clear :P
:D
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337 Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.
Destroying documents of title
340 Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels, conceals or obliterates
(a) a document of title to goods or lands,
(b) a valuable security or testamentary instrument, or
(c) a judicial or official document,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 300.
Fraudulent concealment
341 Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, takes, obtains, removes or conceals anything is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 301.
Even in French, it's beautiful :P
Employ� public qui refuse de remettre des biens
337 Est coupable d�un acte criminel et passible d�un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans quiconque, �tant ou ayant �t� employ� au service de Sa Majest� du chef du Canada ou d�une province, ou au service d�une municipalit�, et charg�, en vertu de cet emploi, de la r�ception, de la garde, de la gestion ou du contr�le d�une chose, refuse ou omet de remettre cette chose � une personne qui est autoris�e � la r�clamer et qui, effectivement, la r�clame.
S.R., ch. C-34, art. 297.
So to make sure there was no confusion and/or controversy, I have communicated a few facts to the judge yesterday night. Because I hate when it gets confused.. :/
Seriously, this judge ESTABLISHED, last week, competency and fairness in there. I felt it. So I first told him my great appreciation on it, and the great relief it makes for me and my family.
I am dealing with threats, harassement, intimidation, criminal and illegal behaviours since the beginning of this affair. And now this competent and fair judge!!!!....you got to understand my excitement about it. I couldn't shut up, I had to share with him my excitement :/
Oh I can bring out the full corporate slave Nat if that means it will help. I've had to develop other relationships of 'stfu and listen'. I kept a few suits from the RBitCh days. Kent Barrett I wasn't clear; that's just not classy enough. Gimme a bella v-neck slim fit. Already better lol.
I have cleary UNDERSTOOD atleast this from day one: law is made to fuck us, this I always knew. As easy as a procedure can be, so can shooting yourself in foot because of one single sensational word. NO cut corners. NO half assing. What's the fuck Kent?
ALERT-ALERT !!!
Terrebonne just admitted via email to the judge, and cc me, that they won't be able to bring these BoEs. They've "disposed" them :/
So they, through affidavit, are trying to explain WHY :-o
<<What is DISPOSE?
To alienate or direct the ownership of property, as disposition by will.Used also of the determination of suits. Called a word of large extent. >>
http://thelawdictionary.org/dispose/
<< ALIENATE, aliene, alien. This is a generic term applicable to the various methods of transferring property from one person to another. Lord Coke, says, (1 Inst. 118 b,) alien cometh of the verb alienate, that is, alienum facere vel ex nostro dominio in alienum trawferre sive rem aliquam in dominium alterius transferre. These methods vary, according to the nature of the property to be conveyed and the particular objects the conveyance is designed to accomplish. It has been held, that under a prohibition to alienate, long leases are comprehended.>>
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/alienate
They want me to believe that they've trashed them. But they will never say it.
And as per a phone conversation from july 2015, City of Terrebonne didn't want to return these BoE's because that would bind them LEGALLY to some sort of mysterious shit. And now they pull out another reason.
All this under a sworn affidavit. It's just fascinating :/
Joelle Spirit, in my mind, I WILL FUCKING WIN :P
And I don't care what ANYONE might say......ANYONE :P
I don't even have to prepare anything...... IT IS IN MY FUCKING BLOOD :P
UNACCEPTABLE......it's fucking FRAUD......so it's UNACCEPTABLE, period.
Wanna fight? ...let's FUCKING FIGHT :P
Dear JUSTICE, I am fighting at least once a week with these stupid sovereign citizens, who claims that there's no LAWS in Quebec, and right now these fraudster are making them RIGHT !!!! :-o
Just received the audio of the court hearing, the first one, june the 10th with judge Andr� Pr�vost, the "fair and competent" JUSTICE :D
The justice ORDERED city of Terrebonne to bring back the ORIGINALS on the next friday. And he put an emphasis on the fact that he will be in that room on ne t friday.
I have reasons to believe JUSTICE LABELLE is either legally incompetent, or hurting your interest. Did you expressed your wishes for the Justice to be recused?
No....I wanted to push as far as I could.....I wanted to saybas much as possible on the record. This lasted for more than an hour. That record will be useful. My goal hasen't changed, I am in for the truth....