The Tender For Law

Volume 13

Mar 23, 2016 12:22 PM

Chris Evan

Court today....

Lets ask why this exists AND secure costs based on it"

Word "person" is not construed to include Commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions. Commonwealth v. Voight (Mass. App. Ct. 1990), 28 Mass. App. Ct. 769, 556 N.E.2d 115, 1990 Mass. App. LEXIS 350.

Read Comments

Chris Evan

Well....I reserved all rights, then I asked who the injured party was, the Justice replied "The Commonwealth". I said "Then as a condition for appeal, I demand $2 million in security for costs for the arbitrary granting of personhood to the Commonwealth." He said "motion denied". I said "it wasn't a motion, it was a demand for security for costs for the arbitrary granting of personhood to the Commonwealth". He said "We do not accept oral motions, you can put it in writing..." Then issued a date for a motions hearing.

Anibal Jose Baez

Chris Evan, I have to tell you I'm a bit confused. What is your intent with this move? Are you planning to take this to trial? If you reserved all rights, why did you let him speak/proceed? Why answer his questions? Where were your questions? :/

Scott Duncan

The fact that they are proceeding means joinder is presumed. They will fie the motions, YOU are simply exercising rights EVERYONE has.

Remember that the Court already has it's money (in trust) now. They will be like a beast who has a full belly. They won't be so tempted to eat you now.