Odd. There was a Sherriff parked in the cemetery next to my house. I've been here 9 years and never seen a Sherriff there, or parked anywhere other than a courthouse in Peabody. :/
Also, I can CONFIRM that a Defense Attorney is an Officer of the Court. Justice accepted third party information from a Defense Attorney "as an officer of the court".
Well....I reserved all rights, then I asked who the injured party was, the Justice replied "The Commonwealth". I said "Then as a condition for appeal, I demand $2 million in security for costs for the arbitrary granting of personhood to the Commonwealth." He said "motion denied". I said "it wasn't a motion, it was a demand for security for costs for the arbitrary granting of personhood to the Commonwealth". He said "We do not accept oral motions, you can put it in writing..." Then issued a date for a motions hearing.
.I reserved all rights, then I asked who the injured party was, the Justice replied "The Commonwealth"
The "commonwealth"? :-o ,,,,,,What's their address, postal code and date of birth :/
Chris Evan, I have to tell you I'm a bit confused. What is your intent with this move? Are you planning to take this to trial? If you reserved all rights, why did you let him speak/proceed? Why answer his questions? Where were your questions? :/
But is not filling motions JOINDER? Since this a bit different to what you have taught, I am trying to understand how would one proceed after securing cost, and why.
The fact that they are proceeding means joinder is presumed. They will fie the motions, YOU are simply exercising rights EVERYONE has.
Remember that the Court already has it's money (in trust) now. They will be like a beast who has a full belly. They won't be so tempted to eat you now.