The Tender For Law

Volume 13

Mar 23, 2016 6:25 PM

Jo Xappie

I don't think we answered Scott Duncan's 2nd question: Does the Law Society claim OWNERSHIP of all INDIVIDUALS?

Scott Duncan said look at the LEGAL DEFINITION ALL WORDS!

When you look at the legal definition of INDIVIDUAL, Black's Law states: Individual. As a noun, this term denotes a single person as distinguished from a group or class, and also, very commonly, a private or natural person as distinguished from a partnership, corporation, or association; but it is said that this restrictive signification is not necessarily inherent in the word, and that it may, in proper cases, include artificial persons. See also Person.

The last statement says it all. If an INDIVIDUAL can be considered to include (not includes, so not limiting) an artificial person, then when the Crown representing the government comes forward making a claim, it is PRESUMED that they OWN THE INDIVIDUAL, and by default are presuming the individual is the artificial person. That's where you need to break the presumption and clarify your status. So when the LSUC states they own ALL INDIVIDUALS, it is true unless the presumption is broken.