Mar 06, 2016 8:32 PM

Scott Duncan

David-Paul Sip was trying to find "proof" that INCLUDES excludes everything else, legally.

Derek Moran was jerking off on some case law you might be interested in.

pbs.twimg.com

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

Mar 06, 2016 8:37 PM

�every one�, �person� and �owner� � quiconque �, � individu �, � personne � et � propri�taire � �every one�, �person� and �owner�, and similar expressions, MEANS HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION;

Yup. that works. :D

Pete Daoust

Mar 06, 2016 10:08 PM

....this "and similar expressions" cracks me up :D

Scott Duncan

Mar 07, 2016 12:45 AM

Law is hysterical, until you realize it's all made by pseudo-intellects who have no real worth in the real world, and they really mean it, to the point where they will send thugs to enforce it.

David-Paul Sip

Mar 07, 2016 5:22 PM

The definition that I still find funny and that I can say opened my eyes and led me to start questioning again is:

"Canada, for greater certainty, INCLUDES the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada; (Canada)" http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/i-21/page-4.html#h-30

It's tough to beat " �every one�, �person� and �owner�, and similar expressions, MEANS HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION" with the understanding I have gained in the last two years in the Tender for Law.