The Tender For Law

Volume 13

Mar 03, 2016 2:58 PM

Lou Manotti

T?lis B?auns reminds us, that you are all susceptible to sliding into your own self-created palace of bullshit.

As you know (or maybe not) Scott Duncan is trying to get across that it is both morally and ethically sound, to harm police. He does a good job! Go see at REASONS we need a NATIONAL KICK-A-COP-IN-THE-FACE DAY! (Personally, I'd enjoy that holiday, way more than Christmas), and he intends to do the same with Lawyers, here. It's pretty easy with cops. Just point to the videos. Done. It's very easy to convince people that cousin Jim-Bob the State Trooper isn't such a good guy, and that his death might benefit the community as a whole. You will also know he will get a paid vacation and no consequence for crimes you and I would get 15 years for. Face it. These days it's pretty easy to hate cops.

Lawyers are a bit harder. Cousin Moishe and Uncle Shlomo don't seem like people who should be killed. They have this De facto "Victim" status they would be granted, were we just to arbitrarily start putting bullets in their heads. You need to learn a few things first.

You need to learn how things work, and then learn how the LAW SOCIETY exploits it. To that end, materials will be posted here, over the next few days. These are being posted in order to assist you, in your quest to find "proof" of what is being said here.

As you are told repeatedly; NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN. You simply believe bullshit you are programmed to accept as "truth".

This playlist is covering AGENCY. The Fender was actually the first to discuss it here (go look), but wasn't actually covered much beyond that.

Over the next few days, I intend to rectify that.

"The Law of Agency," with University of Virginia School of Law Vice Dean George Geis

youtube.com

Vice Dean George Geis talks about the law of agency during a mock class for admitted students in 2012.

Read Comments
Unique ID: 462493170453287_953351081367491
Unique Facebook User ID:
366697126854837
Last Updated:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/L_tsPzj27-0?list=PLNQ4SG301UbqL436BfwIG-HJRgCPFTqKV&autoplay=1
Type of Post:
video
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments

Lou Manotti

Perhaps you can assist us in resolving a mystery then.

Why don't people like Dean C. Clifford, Robert-Arthur: Menard, Sino General, John Spirit, of anyone who speaks of "law", tell you about AGENCY?

Is it because they are ignorant, or do they deliberately omit it?

Lou Manotti

I listen to everything you say, Pete Daoust, and then I dismiss it. Scott Duncan has hundreds of "studies" he reviews. Then he dismisses it. "Where is the peer review"?

They are the same thing. You are one big french bundle of confirmation bias. (https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/confirmation_bias.htm)

This means that it is not reasonable, by your very nature, to presume you have the right answer.

You don't by the way.

Anibal Jose Baez

I do not know why Dean and Friends ignore and/or omit the Law of Agency. I can speculate, based on my own experience.

In my case, I had no idea about the Law of Agency, until Scott wrote that article. And I would had not been able to understand it, IF I had not been paying attention since the beginning of the group.

Within the "freedumb movements" you mostly hear/read about laws related to the Constitutions, Magna Carta, Common Law, Natural Law, but NEVER Law of Agency.

One of the things the programming does to many in these "movements," is to want to ignore and/or DETACH yourself from "the system." You want to pretend you are NOT part of it. So, the idea of being an AGENT of the government is not something a programmed mind wants to do. You don't see yourself as the ADMINISTRATOR/AGENT for the person.

I experienced some of this myself. Something like the "Notice of Mistake" may reinforce that idea, to the still confused. The notice it's a complete detachment. You are not even saying you are the Administrator/Agent, one is asking for evidence of such claim.

So, they either ignore the Law of Agency, because they have never heard of it and/or bother looking, and/or because the programming finds to much an inconvenience to place yourself in the position of AGENT without surety within the system. It's easier to "run" and pretend you are not part of it.

Again, this is all speculation, based on my own experiences.

Michael Atkins

I have never met Menard or cliford. But I have met a free dumber who runs peace maker society here in Manitoba. Essentially a Menard clone selling claim of rights packages for 1500 bucks. Everytime I try to explain the issue with agency or tender for law it is met with insane violent reaction. He has threatened me oN numerous occasions. But refuses to answer the questions. Except with a lame one line response similar to this not is legal tender cannot compel one to act. And the argument dissolves into threat against me even a threat of a libel suit. At any rate it appears belief is a strong component of this issue. These men and women believe so strongly in wrong thinking and belief that they won't even have a discussion about it. Fuck I'm rambling and not answering the question. In summary this piece of shit ripped off a bunch of men and women by selling them magic parchments and is keeping all the money. So having willfully committed fraud and stolen the money admitting it at this point is too much so they just start threatening

Michael Atkins

I have read some seriously free dumb stuff from peacemakers society too. Like the founder got busted growing cannabis in his apartment. But because he put the right to grow cannabis in his claim of right bs he now thinks he has the lawful right to grow cannabis despite having signed for the apartment etc.

Scott Duncan

They don't even have the option of buying my silence, now. Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson waived that option on behalf of the Law Society.

Too bad, too. $700,000.00 is only a fraction of the damage I've caused to the society as a whole.

They should be quite upset that Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson acted without authorization. Too late now.

Buying my silence is a bargain at twice the price!

Scott Duncan

Ok, I realize that I may be leaving the Law Society with no remedy. I'll reinstate the tender. I have to add the shit-stain removal fee, incurred by their agent Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.

They can buy my silence for $901,250.19

Next month, it doubles, because fuck you.