Scott Duncan
"They also seem to think a lien against themselves under an act of the provincial legislature somehow magically supersedes Canada" - He just lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies.
Today he lies about what I "think". A damaged security is a damaged security. Pretending "magic authority powers" changes that is fine, but then why worry about ANY lien then? If a lien is nullified by invisible magic authority powers, then a lien, by its very nature, cannot cause injury or liability for that matter.
Lying is saying that I think it "supersedes" ANYTHING. All I want is proof that I have ANY surety in that "Magic Canada Parchment" you cite.
Such a claim is a claim of OWNERSHIP. If ANY man or woman claims ownership of ME, I claim the right under that same "authority" to slit their children's throat. They consent.
What? I don't have that right?
You mean I can't exercise a right someone else doesn't have?
What if I delegate it! Can I get crew to slit their children's throats, for claiming to own me?
No?
EXACTLY! NEITHER DOES THE LAW SOCIETY!
You don't get to claim a magic parchment binds you to servitude, no matter how many armed thugs you have.