The Tender For Law

Volume 13

Feb 22, 2016 4:13 PM

Scott Duncan

I have it on good authority, that Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson is being pressured by his handlers to do damage control on my whole Lien-Your-Name thing. It seems it is becoming more popular now.

Did you know there are people reading THE TENDER FOR LAW, who have never messaged, and are not "friends" with any members? Well it's true! In fact they outnumber you all by 10x! I know this, because we get messages at least once a week, thanking me for giving the answer they were looking for. Those heroes are all liening their names.

So Dan Lien-your-name Wilson [ https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100011220335020 ] (Remember to screen-cap!) has created a brand new profile and is talking about "Illegal Liens". He also has the misplaced Tyrian Lanister quote "When you tear out a man�s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you�re only telling the world that you fear what he might say", as is MY not tolerating his lies is somehow "cutting out his tongue". Mister Wilson, if I ever cut out your tongue, it will be to watch you drown in your own fluids, not because of any "fear" I might have. Nothing you have to say "frightens" me. I also have NO obligation to provide a platform for your lies. What I say is correct, and true, and anything that is said, which contradicts what I say, in ANY way, is by its very nature, A LIE!

TL;DR: I'm telling the truth, and Dan Wilson is lying. It's just that simple.

Let's refute any lies he's going to tell about LIENS, by covering what he is sure to omit. I'll dumb it down to the point where it hurts, so you won't be confused, so you'd better appreciate this.

1: IF YOU LIEN IT, YOU OWN IT. THAT'S WHAT A LIEN IS; OWNERSHIP OF TITLE. YOU NOW HAVE SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY.

2: IF YOU LIEN YOUR NAME, YOU OWN IT. YOU ARE THE SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER THAT NAME. YOU DIDN'T MAKE IT, BUT YOU OWN IT. IT'S YOUR FUCKING RIGHT.

3: IF ANYONE ATTEMPTS TO USE THAT NAME, FOR ANY PURPOSE, WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SECURE IT!

THAT'S IT. PERIOD!

YOU DON'T NEED A STRANGER'S FUCKING "PERMISSION" DO DO ANYTHING WITH YOUR PROPERTY! YOU OWN IT! THE END! ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE, IS LYING TO YOU! WHEN THEY TELL THAT LIE, THE RESPONSE SHOULD ALWAYS BE "THAT NAME IS OWNED (Secured)", and there CAN only be ONE lawful administrator, which will NEVER CHANGE. IT CAN'T.

So when Dan Lien-your-name Wilson starts quoting acts, codes, and statutes, remind him that I FUCKING OWN IT trumps all those magic parchments that arise from it.

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

Lawyers are trying the desperate tactic of LYING ABOUT WHAT I SAY. You've seen it before, except when Lawyers lie about what I say, people BELIEVE them, because they lie with "AUTHORITY".

This is when you need to confront these assholes HEAD ON! Michael Atkins and David-Paul Sip have been practicing. :D

Stay focused on REALITY. You are a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far. Everything else is shit we made. THAT is reality. The rest is up to you.

Here in REALITY, the LAW SOCIETY is claiming to own you. This makes it OK to kill them, really. Slavery is illegal, so if they are claiming that I am a slave then so be it. It is your RIGHT (which you have clearly reserved) to do anything necessary, including killing, to escape that slavery. Even the "law" agrees. :D

Scott Duncan

Money is based on PROMISES, which means so is "law". (LEGAL=The "LAW" of SURETY AND ACCOUNTING)

Your money is only as good as your law, and your law is only as good as your money.

I PAID for that "Law" and I didn't get what I paid for. I intend to collect.

Scott Duncan

"A valid PPSA/hypothec requires a security agreement containing the intent to pledge collateral signed by the debtor. Better remove it quick before they sue and get an order for costs and damages." - Notice how he COMPLETELY IGNORES THE FACTS! PETE'S NAME IS HIS PROPERTY. THE END. UNLESS YOU AUTHORIZE IT, NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO USE YOUR PROPERTY FOR ANYTHING!

Scott Duncan

This always goes the same way.

He'll Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and Lie and lie and then delete everything. Watch for it :D

Chris Evan

Another interesting observation I've noticed about that Dan Wilson account (in the past) is that he spends a lot of time on freedumber pages. (I get tagged in them sometimes) He is only here because of you Scott, but he combs freedumber pages a lot.

....almost as if he is making sure what you teach is contained here. :/

David-Paul Sip

"A valid PPSA/hypothec requires a security agreement containing the intent to pledge collateral signed by the debtor. Better remove it quick before they sue and get an order for costs and damages." -Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson

Hmmmm...well it's nearly been a month since City of Terrebonne wrote that letter. I have good reasons to believe that City of Terrebonne won't be doing any such thing.

Pete Daoust

A valid PPSA/hypothec requires a security agreement containing the intent to pledge collateral signed by the debtor. Better remove it quick before they sue and get an order for costs and damages.

Her Majesty, with the advice and CONSENT of the National Assembly of Qu�bec, enacts as follows:

Sa Majest�, de l'avis et du consentement de l'Assembl�e nationale du Qu�bec, d�cr�te ce qui suit:

Me, the Man, has the RIGHT to the SURETY of MY person.

Me, the Man, has the RIGHT to the INTEGRITY of MY person.

Me, the Man, has the RIGHT to the LIBERTY of MY person.

Me, the MAN, has the RIGHT to my fucking LIFE, every minutes of it� :P

Here�s your SECURITY FUCKING AGREEMENT, Dan Wilson :P

Fuck you Dan Wilson, go fuck yourself :P

Pete Daoust

Oh, and I AM FUCKING READY TO EXPLAIN THIS SHIT evrerywhere�.

And I�ll supply the Kleenex for those who will cry, in any court room��.so come on LAWYERS��come on CITY OF TERREBONNE, I AM FUCKING READY��

Fucking pussies :P

Pete. ALL FUCKING RIGHTS RESERVED :P

Scott Duncan

The piece of shit will say "But majik authoitee powerz" and ignore that part.

In other news, I have a team of debt collectors, and they use what's called being "dan wilsoned". This is where the collectors announce they are here to collect the bill, and proceed to repeatedly kick the lawyer in the face until the bill is paid. As you may realize, it is very difficult to pay a bill while one is being repeatedly kicked in the face, and that's why you should pay your bills before I send debt collectors. :D

If I send debt collectors, it's because I care more about kicking you in the face than I do about any outstanding debt..

Scott Duncan

Let's cover OTHER lies Dan Wilson and the Law Society like to lie about. They do it ALL the time.

DEFINITIONS.

Here's a tip. ONLY LEGAL DEFINITIONS ARE USED WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT. ONLY LEGAL definitions.

So when they lie and say SECURITY OF THE PERSON refers to "A person's safety", and hope you buy it. Here in REALITY, the LEGAL definition of SECURITY is different! Let's go look, remembering the THERE ARE NO HOMONYMS IN LAW, and there are no SYNONYMS in law.*

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/Security.aspx

*Black's 10 just makes shit up and puts recursive definitions.

Michael Atkins

"(S)ecurity ... would normally be expected to relate to a pledge to guarantee fulfillment of some type of obligation." Person An entity recognized by the law as separate and independent, with legal rights and existence including the ability to sue and be sued, to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by lawyer and, generally, other powers incidental to the full expression of the entity in law.

Scott Duncan

Some nasty friends of mine want to make a video series where they kidnap or home-invade a lawyer or justice, set up a tripod and camera, and start asking questions!

...and beat the answers out of them.

When they beat the same answer out of 3 lawyers, they can post an educational video :D They will even give the law society CREDIT for content :D

Michael Atkins

In summary. The crown creates a legal personality without consent or a meeting of the minds. Has an elaborate education system in place to brainwash YOU to be security for the legal personality they created. Fuckers

Pete Daoust

Hey, Dan-Lien-Your-Name-Wilson, why don't you call the City of Terrebonne, and tell them ?

"Hey, dat boy need a sucurity heugreement from YOUs to have the RIGHT to register a lien on Yous" :D

GO....CALL THEM, and don't forget the "Scott Duncan says HELLOSSS" schtick....

:D

I'll show up there, with Her Majesty and the whole fucking Assembly National of Qu�bec with ME. :D ....with a kleenex box, of course....

Pete Daoust

Hey, QUATLOOSERS.....wtf?? :D

I am, as the Sole Authorized Administrator of the NAME I have in my possession, racking up one heck of a BILL.

Each day that passes = $2000.00, since January the 22nd 2016.

I will LIEN if these cowards doesn't PAY.

Want to know why? ......BECAUSE FUCK OFF, THAT'S WHY :P

There's already a $4 million lien on these rapist....and they are whining about it......wait.....the whining is just getting warmed up :P

FORCING business on ME, and/or MY name, isn't a good idea.

Violate MY rights, isn't a good idea.

Taking stuff that has been given to FTP TRUST, isn't a good idea.

And I have Her Majesty, and the whole fucking Assembly National of Qu�bec that backs me up :D

Put this in your forum, full of WISDOM......spread it....

You may believe that I am one of your properties all you want, I DON'T CARE.....Her Majesty and the whole fucking assembly National of Quebec says the complete opposite.....not my fault :P

Pete Daoust

I must have asked a hundred times, those who�s supposed to ANSWER, not one single answer came.

I did transformed several remittance vouchers into bills of exchange.

I told them A HUNDRED time that if they refuse, just send back these bills of exchange and I PROMISE I WILL PAY. No bills of exchange came back

NOT EVEN ONE�..and I have sent a lot���.

�..and these Quatloosers are saying that I have a BELIEF ? �.really ? :/

I promised, in writing, and signed, on the phone (audio available), on FUCKING VIDEO (it�s on youtube) that I WILL FUCKING PAY if it�s refused and these bills of exchange are given back�..

WHAT IN THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU, QUATLOOSERS ?

Scott Duncan

"Apparently TFL still hasn't learned that you can't lien without the debtor's permission. You'd think they'd clue up when one of their members had an order for $22,500 against them for doing the exact same thing:" - Saying the same thing over and over, won't make it relevant. It is TRUE that you require the DEBTOR'S PERMISSION! ABSOLUTELY!

Now, how would you PROVE that you have the debtor's permission? PRODUCE A CONTRACT.

If commerce is IMPOSED, you ALWAYS have the right to lien, TO SECURE COSTS. If an "Authority" is endorsing the imposed contract, that AUTHORITY is giving permission through its own AGENCY.

If Wal-Mart attempts to impose commerce, I inform the AGENT that Wal-Mart will be billed. It is your RIGHT to SECURE COSTS.

I'll say it again, IT IS YOUR RIGHT TO SECURE COSTS.

It's true both times. ;)

ANYONE and EVERYONE who says it is NOT your LEGAL RIGHT to SECURE COSTS, IS LYING TO YOU. PERIOD!

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=157730117944332&id=100011220335020&notif_t=story_reshare

Scott Duncan

"They also seem to think a lien against themselves under an act of the provincial legislature somehow magically supersedes Canada" - He just lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies, and lies.

Today he lies about what I "think". A damaged security is a damaged security. Pretending "magic authority powers" changes that is fine, but then why worry about ANY lien then? If a lien is nullified by invisible magic authority powers, then a lien, by its very nature, cannot cause injury or liability for that matter.

Lying is saying that I think it "supersedes" ANYTHING. All I want is proof that I have ANY surety in that "Magic Canada Parchment" you cite.

Such a claim is a claim of OWNERSHIP. If ANY man or woman claims ownership of ME, I claim the right under that same "authority" to slit their children's throat. They consent.

What? I don't have that right?

You mean I can't exercise a right someone else doesn't have?

What if I delegate it! Can I get crew to slit their children's throats, for claiming to own me?

No?

EXACTLY! NEITHER DOES THE LAW SOCIETY!

You don't get to claim a magic parchment binds you to servitude, no matter how many armed thugs you have.

Scott Duncan

Now he's resorted to "We have a gang of armed thugs, and they will tell you what right you have.

This is why it's OK to kill lawyers.

"Scott still seems to think he can opt-out of constitutional provincial and federal legislation. He thinks a contract can stop the police and military from enforcing national and provincial law."

He then cites the oxymoronic "Illegal Agreement": An illegal agreement, under the common law of contract, is one that the courts will not enforce because the purpose of the agreement is to achieve an illegal end.

Violating my rights is an illegal end.

Claiming I have obligations for which there is no contract is an illegal end.

The courts are corrupt, virtually GUARANTEEING an illegal end.

If Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson wants to declare that the courts AREN'T corrupt, I will deem that a declaration from The Law Society of Upper Canada, and shall further deem it as an invitation to refute their claim that the courts are not corrupt.

Dan Wilson ALSO accepts that he is addressed SOLELY as an AGENT of the Law Society of Upper Canada, as he has presented himself as such.

THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA agrees that this invitation by their AGENT waives any protection they may have from existing contracts and/or undertakings.

So go ahead Dan. Tell me the courts are not corrupt. You want to make LEGAL declarations, then YOU are SPEAKING AS AGENT you piece of shit.

Scott Duncan

"Scott seems to think some "Law Society" is all-powerful and writes the laws, when in fact it's the legislatures that created the law societies and tell them what they can and can't do" - Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.

I'm just going to quote him now.

Before I respond, stop for a minute and ponder the actions of this man. He created this profile JUST FOR ME, and it's not the first time he's done that. Does this seem rational to you? Is this something ANY of you, the readers, have ever even pondered doing?

No?

Why not?

Is it because you think that is the behavior of a psychopath? If you do, congratulate yourself for having a sound mind. You would be correct.

In fact I hypothesize that 100% of profiles created to target one specific party, are created by psychopaths.

In the end he ALWAYS resorts to "Magic Authority Powers" and "We have a gang of thugs with guns, so we're right". He got there quicker than usual...

...than usual. Yes, he's done it repeatedly. Why?

Why do this demonstrably idiotic and psychopathic thing?

Magic Authority Powerz and we gots gunz. <---ALL of Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson's responses distilled into one line. The rest is Ad Hominem.

Scott Duncan

The LAW SOCIETY has NOTHING to do with LAW.

They are the ones claiming OWNERSHIP over you. The people who own Burger King's Cows have nothing to do with Policy or Process implemented by Burger King. It's the same thing. They claim to OWN you , and under the rules of Burger King (Government) They SELL you.

That's why I can LEGALLY claim Levitt's eyes and thumbs. I simply cite the same "right" they claim ownership over me with. :D

In fact ANYONE claiming OWNERSHIP of me OR my Person consents to me killing them...under that same "authority".

Either I have "rights" or I don't.

Don't like me exposing your Law Society's Fraud, Dan? They probably should have kept their word then! I STILL haven't breached that contract, and you are about to write a cheque for the Law Society that you can't cover.

You are GRANTING ME PERMISSION to POST those contracts. I ACCEPT YOUR CREDENTIALS. Govern yourself accordingly. ;)

Anyway, we've already reached "Magic Authority Powers" and "we'll send our thugs after you"... we all get that. Saying it again, doesn't make it true.

Scott Duncan

"Yes, Scott, at the end of the day armed thugs decide what law gets enforced. What are your magic parchments going to do about it? Do you really think begging the provincial legislature (using the PPSA act) is how you somehow prove their authority doesn't exist? If anything when you use the act it implies your submission to and recognition of the authority. lol. And if it did remove their authority, why wouldn't they just change the law so it doesn't?" - Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.

So now it's "Better do what the magic parchments say"

and then thinks that's a double-edged sword and tries to "use it against me". Sadly he has a lawyer's mentality. They can't help it. They are ONLY concerned about the immediate problem. Their CLIENT is the one who's supposed to look at the "big picture". This is best for "practicing law", but not for situations like this.

Notice he is not DENYING acting on behalf of the Law Society, here. Look how DESPERATE he is to STOP you from liening your name. Why? Why does he care?

Seriously, the TPP is about to be ratified, and I am where he focuses his "Legal" efforts?

Why is he SO CONCERNED that he literally threatens you with a gang of armed thugs, to try convince you it's "wrong"?

Does ANY of this behavior seem rational to you?

BTW: it's 2016. My silence about LAW is for sale. Opening bid is $700, 000 for lifetime silence.This figure doubles every month. Perhaps a collection plate can go around to law firms. Buy early and SAVE SAVE SAVE! :D

Cash Only.

Scott Duncan

The problem with making a living as a lawyer, is that it taints your thought process so much that they don't realize how stupid they will look afterward.

The Rogue Support page ALWAYS talks about what's coming, that I discreetly have my dirty little fingers in. We're building TAMPER-PROOF WEBSITES YOU CAN'T SHUT DOWN!

We're building contracts INTO money. All "unproven technology", that you ignorant Law Society twits will have to pay to try. Google "Blockchain as a service". THAT'S your fucking"unproven technology", you non-contributing, parasitic ZEROS.

See, with each of these Dan Wilson engagements, I always point out that while it's both Illegal and Unlawful to kill lawyers, it IS ethically sound to do so.

If you ever have to resort to cannibalism to survive, kill the lawyer first. All you will lose is dead weight, and it will be the first REAL contribution it has ever made.

Scott Duncan

"Hey Scott. "Seriously, the TPP is about to be ratified, and I am where he focuses his "Legal" efforts?" YOU WROTE ABOUT ME FIRST. I'M JUST RESPONDING. I HAVEN'T COMMENTED ON YOUR SHIT FOR MONTHS, STUPID. Consider how much you mention me, I must be your biggest fear." - Hey, remember how I don't wield double-edged swords?

You are not someone who was addressed, EVER. You are a caricature; A joke icon. You are a placeholder for a stereotype.

You REALLY create a profile to respond to the reference to the many others you create and delete?

Exactly where would "fear" come into that? What exactly am I supposed to be "afraid" of? You creating another stalker profile? You lying?

You do that anyway. YOU and the LAW society have EVERYTHING to fear from me.

I'm targeting MONEY. The part that hurts the most. ALL money. ESPECIALLY ATTORNEY GENERAL Money. The money you use to exchange cattle with. Those magic parchments that have two signatures and a trustee. THAT is what you are afraid of. You are afraid the same way a fraud artist who bilked a little old lady out of her life savings, is afraid of the guy telling the little old lady about ponzi schemes.

You (and the Law Society) Fear ME because of the damage I have done, can do ,and WILL do. I seem "crazy" yet I have clearly been "Upper Echelon" trained... how is that possible? If a stranger came aboard an AQUILAE vessel and started citing Covenants and claiming rights... I'll be honest, that'd scare the living crap out of ME.

But Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson is not somebody like that. He's of an ilk I am all too familiar with.

So, what's more REASONABLE to "believe", that I'm "afraid", or that I'm just furthering my agenda? :D

Scott Duncan

*AHEM*

I SEEM TO HAVE STRUCK A NERVE, I WONDER WHAT IT IS?!

That's your cue, simu-drones! Best guesses, but be prepared to substantiate your position.

Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson is., above all else, a teaching tool. It's what he has always been used for since the first dialogue... which was clearly initiated by a psychopath.

Don't believe me? LOOK! :D

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/714163491952919/?hc_location=ufi

Scott Duncan

"Scott seems to think Pete won't lose if the city sues him to remove the hypothec/PPSA. Just remember that." - Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.

So, the outcome is predetermined! Oh goody!

There is no "lose". If he has the obligation, PROVE IT. If it's "Proven" that they don't give a shit about that question, then they will have the public to face...

...some of them victims of the Law Society. When people find they have laboured thinking they have rights, and it's SHOWN to it's not the case and tough shit, that's when you can expect the violence to start.

It's the people who are watching this case, you and the Law Society need to be afraid of Dan. There are a LOT more than those exposed to The Tender For Law.

Oops!

Chris Evan

Correct me if I am wrong, but the PPSA, or UCC in the States, exists solely to make a claim. It was put there by bankers so that bankers could claim stuff that was collateralized....legally But, by making the Act available to bankers, it had to be made available to everyone. ....or at least have that appearance (as there seems to be 2 standards, I'm getting pretty damn close to sure on this).

Fast forward. My TIME seems to be negotiable to some strangers. I think it belongs to me, so I claim it, but to remove any doubt, I create a corporation to claim it because otherwise it would seem circular.

If my time does, in fact, belong to me and my name does, in fact, belong to me, why wouldn't it be wise to use an Act that was created by bankers and authorized by public trustees to secure whats mine?

Dan-Lien-Your-Name-Wilson, does any of this look wrong? :/

Pete Daoust

The ONLY things there's to lose are:

My right to life My right to the surety of my person My right to the integrity of my person My right to the liberty of my person.

And if I lose those, it means I never had them in the first place.

I am READY for that :P

Scott Duncan

Pay attention, Dan.

I know what he says is beyond your comprehension, so I'll explain what happens if your predetermined outcome happens, and what it will result in.

Let's look at it from MY perspective. I'm most qualified. I have been a "fixer" for the Law Society. I'm who they contracted to fix things in the 1990's. Since I am a byproduct of fucked up 1970's Government Programs I was especially qualified, and had the approval of the Attorney General.

My 1990's were literally an adventure that could never be made into book or film, because you simply wouldn't believe it. I lived it knowing that these moments will never come again. I had no equal, either.

Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson, and the Quatlosers, as agents of the Law Society, are IN FACT waiving any and all protections of secrecy and/or agreed public testimony negotiated by The Law Society of Upper Canada, The Ministry of the Attorney General and Myself. Thanks for that.

Again, you are acting outside your pay grade. I won't violate those contracts, no matter how many times your leash-holders do. Now you are granting me permission in your capacities as agents of the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Unless, of course, you AREN'T members! :D They can revoke your licence. That will CERTAINLY pass provable surety to ME.

...you'll starve though. :D That's what you get for feeding yourself with a money-for-bullshit scheme. Sad part is, you're all too stupid to know that this is what you are doing. They WILL throw you under the bus, and you KNOW I'm right. You might want to give Bruce Smith (Of Smith Lyons fame) a heads-up that you are engaging me, as this covers agreements we made in the 1990's. This is with a BANK... I'm not going to say WHICH bank, but they go by the initials C.I.B.C. This is just the first of HUNDREDS of HUGE agreements you are granting me leave to reveal, in your capacity as AGENT for the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Want to lie about what the Law Society does? FINE! THIS is the result. Want something to fear? THIS IS IT. FIND OUT WHO I AM. Start With Ian Scott! You are not qualified to assess the damage I will cause.

If you are smart, you will shut your fucking pie-holes and get some guidance, because EVERY time you people contradict me, I will expose a BIGGER one. The Bruce Smith/CIBC agreement IS MY SMALLEST ONE.

I STRONGLY SUGGEST you seek instructions from someone with executive authority in The Law Society of Upper Canada. Let them know what you are doing, because I am bringing outside parties in now.

Scott Duncan

Bruce Smith and CIBC will not like you acting on the law society's behalf, Quatlosers/Dan. Guess who they will go after, when I disclose? NOT ME. Why am I so sure? I UNDERSTAND MY CONTRACTS. I can declare you AGENT because I UNDERSTAND my contracts, and I OBEY THE LAW to the letter. EVERY CONTRACT I HAVE WITH THE LAW SOCIETY SAYS I CAN DECLARE A LAWYER AN AGENT! NO restrictions on how that applies. That's why SMART lawyers give me a WIDE BERTH. It's not a fight they can win.

Scott Duncan

OK, so keep in mind, this is coming from the lawyer who created a throwaway account to lie about me. He did this with intent...

"Scott, I'm not debating your endless crap. Find someone else to bother. All I care about is what happens in reality and in the public record. I'll await the case results. As Pete says, whatever happens we get closer to truth, and that's all that matters. Good luck."

REALLY?

Scott Duncan

Go tell your fucking leash holders to drop $700, 000 in cash off at my agent's door [2909-210 Victoria] to buy my silence. I promise it will go directly into trust. The price doubles every month. On April 1st, the price doubles. ($1,400,000) I'm giving the remainder of February as a COURTESY ;)

There's NO DEBATE. My entire life is PROOF that there is NO DEBATE. Your ilk should have just kept your promises. it doesn't matter if the AGENTS making those promises are dead/retired/retarded.

Respond YES SIR, if you understand. YES SIR ONLY. Any other response will be deemed permission BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, to publish ANY AND ALL agreements made with MYSELF. You may delete the profile after you do.

See, I'm not debating either. Go tell your master, bitch.

Scott Duncan

On the 27th, I still OWN the fleet, but Erich is Admiral. Copernicus should be in the water by then too. :D I can dedicate ALL my effort to the public dismantling of the Law Society. Kids smarter than me have the money shit covered.

We are a LITTLE behind schedule, but I'm not disappointed with my progress. I'll have LOTS of time to dedicate to it :D

Scott Duncan

That's a LIFETIME of silence. You KNOW ALREADY that I will keep my word! Donating $700, 000 to a trust for my silence is a bargain at TWICE the price... which it will be monthly. If you wait until APRIL, you will have to split it. I will not PROFIT. It's just what you owe AQUILAE. $700,000. The OTHER $700,000 is to go to the EFF.

Every month, it will not only become more expensive to shut me up, I'LL MAKE HARDER AND HARDER TO PAY ME. MONEY AND UNDERTAKINGS is the price of silence.

Again, NOT NEGOTIABLE.

Scott Duncan

Think about this, dear reader. This man created a profile to tell me he's "not debating" my "endless crap". Now tell me, dear reader, have you EVER created a facebook profile to tell someone they aren't going to do something? Ever? Even once?

Have you ever walked into a law office explicitly to tell a lawyer you aren't going to hire him/her?

This Saturday morning cartoon motivation you claim is driving you is believed by you and you alone. I GUARANTEE nobody else thinks this way.

"Scott, I'm not debating your endless crap. Find someone else to bother. All I care about is what happens in reality and in the public record. I'll await the case results. As Pete says, whatever happens we get closer to truth, and that's all that matters. Good luck." -Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.

Scott Duncan

How do you fight this, Dan? Even if I see "Yes Sir" and a bag of cash, and ALL that I publish vanishes... Pete Daoust still knows. It's a running gag, remember?

Right now, you have security through obscurity, but you are burning that up faster than you think!

The terms get worse as time goes on. All I will do is write words, but you will pay the price for them.

I've built things a lawyer is simply too stupid to grasp. REAL things, that are changing EVERYTHING.

KILLING me won't even stop what I have started, and I have so many dead-man switches I'm amazed I keep track of them all.

No matter. You've given your answer.

"Hey Scott, I actually created this account to talk to Trent Goodbaudy and numerous other pseudolegal people, as your crew has testified, not you, sorry. If you hadn't made a post about me linking my profile we would never have spoken at all. Stop stalking me, weirdo."

Clearly a lie, because I didn't actually KNOW the profile's location when I made the original post. Somebody handed it to me. Look at the edit history for confirmation of this. As demonstrated by in this and many other threads, I will ALWAYS use you as a teaching tool. Everyone finds these exchanges VERY educational.

...and seriously, the ONLY thing on your timeline, is me. Trent Goodfraudy? Fuck you. That idiot white trash must be doing something that bothers your leash holders, because it is not possible that have any meaningful discourse with that piece-of-shit christian white trash fraud.

Anyway, you did NOT respond "Yes Sir" and vanish as you should have and THEREFORE: You have refused on behalf of the Law Society, and I accept your credentials and authority in this matter.

Now it's time to wish YOU "good Luck". ;)

Scott Duncan

You just brush it off as "delusions of grandeur". I WANT you to.

Quote all the case law you like. I know you are too stupid to get it, but these are EXISTING terms I can leverage. You are AGENT and are addressed as such. Your ONLY recognized interaction with me is in the capacity of AGENT of the Law Society of Upper Canada. You re bound because under those agreements I HAVE THE RIGHT TO.

So quote all the case law you like, but that doesn't change the fact that your LICENCE binds you. You are Agent. Your licence says so. You are DRIVING, your licence says so.

As I said, you'd best ask if I'm just crazy, or if someone COMPETENT at damage control can cover this, because you really are, very publicly digging a hole for the Law Society. It doesn't matter if you "believe" I'm "crazy".

The Internet never forgets. Soon even deleting won't be possible. Let that sink in. THAT'S NEXT. Documents that CANNOT BE DELETED.

And this is just the beginning

Scott Duncan

"Scott apparently still believes in the #freedumber idea that failure to respond to an offer creates a binding contract. This is false. See Felthouse v Bindley" - Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson declining the GENEROUS offer to the Law Society I made.

Not courteous at all!

And he lies about what I "believe", AGAIN.

Hey Dan, your leash holders have bound you to shit you don't know about. Don't worry, though! Most people haven't read the Motor Vehicle Act but they still have a driver's licence.

I know, in your limited experience, that it is REASONABLE to BELIEVE I have "delusions of grandeur", but that doesn't change reality.

It's up to the AGENT to understand their duties and obligations of their master. You are welcome to BELIEVE what you like. Here in reality, you and the Law Society will NOT be able to plead ignorance.

Yuo have NOTICE. You have a LICENCE. I win. It says so in contracts I'm soon going to talk about, with YOU (Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson) as SURETY for it.

Fuck it. You AND anyone licenced by the Law Society of Upper Canada, over at the Quatlosers, too.

I negotiated that DECADES ago. Believe what you like, Dan. Reality won't care.

Scott Duncan

All members of THE TENDER FOR LAW, it's time to speak up.

Comment. Question. If you are a member of this group, SPEAK THE FUCK UP!

I had better see EVERY member in here, or you won't be a member much longer. You can watch from the outside.

Speak Up. NOW.

Scott Duncan

He literally LIES about what I "believe" and uses #Freedumber. He Lies and brags that he will never have an original thought (Lawyers can't by their nature). The training and successful methods of practicing Law necessitate the termination of ANY original thought.

"You're a Lawyer. You've never had an original thought in your life" <---they really hate that one, because they know it's true. Really.

Scott Duncan

Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson: You have waived any and all offers I have made tonight to the Law Society of Upper Canada.

THEREFORE: My silence is no longer for sale. NO COMMERCE IS EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

The Law Society has refused through their agent(s) implicitly, and we accept that refusal.

All offers to purchase my silence are hereby revoked.

Scott Duncan

The Law Society has WAIVED ALL their protections via their AGENT(S)! (Thanks Dan/Quatlosers!) so yes, it will be more epic than you can possibly imagine.

Each and every disclosure I will pass surety to Dan and the Quatlosers. They are about to begin a LONG and PAINFUL lesson.

Scott Duncan

Hey Dan/Quatlosers! I STRONGLY SUGGEST you prepare your answer to WHY DIDN'T YOU CALL US! Because it doesn't really matter what you BELIEVE. What matters is what IS. I really have prepared a lifetime for this. This isn't hyperbole, as those who ACTUALLY KNOW me will testify.

Steve Krupnik is the next party you are accepting surety for, as you are waiving any discretion that has been negotiated. (AQUILAE s.90-125) ...90125... Yes, like the Yes album. It's a coincidence.

If you decide I might just be scary enough to call upstairs, be sure to quote that. You may signal your understanding with "YES SIR".

Michael Atkins

This is a Law Society knee jerk reaction to calling them out about Quatloosers not mentioning Pete. So they sent in Dan Lien your Name Wilson to do some much needed damage control. "Go back in and create an account and set the record straight". Those are his handlers instructions.

Scott Duncan

DAN LIEN-YOUR-NAME WILSON SAYS: "I was admittedly browsing TFL because I was bored. Only Pete was involved in anything worth commenting about. In my opinion people should avoid playing fast-and-loose with liens Jail time hasn't yet happened in Canada as it has in the US, but there is precedent for $22,500 in costs which is pretty significant. With the openly-stated intent of TFL to "destroy government", "kill lawyers", etc., and a lien against a public entity, they could possibly make a successful case that the filing is vexatious, which could increase the award, or even terroristic, which could lead to criminal charges, but that's worst-case... A lot of expression is protected. I don't wish ill on anyone, so I felt obligated to say my piece about how I believe Pete's position is unsustainable. I'm actually kind of excited that he's going to go through with it because it will be educational and show us all more about how the system works. I had no intention of going on at length or getting into the dozens of other topics you raised, but I'm willing to entertain a few where there's mutual interest and time allows. I can't say I agree with all of your theories. I'm no lawyer, I just have an unhealthy obsession with law right now, but I'm sure you'll believe otherwise with zero evidence. Anyone who disagrees with THE Admiral just HAS to be paid for it..."

" because the punishments are potentially severe." - BIG SCARY THINGS WILL HAPPEN IF YOU EXERCISE YOUR RIGHTS! YOU HAD BETTER NOT DO ANYTHING YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO DO, BECAUSE SCARY STUFF! :D

" so I felt obligated to say my piece about how I believe Pete's position is unsustainable" - Because we asked you? My MOST public position is that I do not care about you or your stupid Quatlosers' opinion. You have NOTHING of value to say. It's not even a question! Obsessed with law? BULLSHIT! LIES!

Not a lawyer? THEN YOU WORK FOR ONE. I ONLY address you as AGENT for the LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA. If you do not have LICENCE to do so, you are committing FRAUD by speaking to me.

Scott Duncan

"because it will be educational and show us all more about how the system works." - We KNOW how the system works. I told them. They are simply VERIFYING. You really are a psychopath, if you aren't acting as agent for the Law Society. Having a Psychopath's motivation where the ONLY thing on your timeline is... me. This is TRUE, and REAL right now. ANYONE can look and see it's true. You made a stalker profile, because you are "obsessed with law", and you have been lying to/about me for OVER a year.

...and you still think ANYONE believes these pathetic responses? REALLY?

I would LOVE to see who is dumb enough to believe this crap. :D

Dan Lien-your-Name Wilson, please produce 3 people who believe that bullshit excuse you just posted.

You are NOT anonymous to the Law Society. YOU have surety for it, and that is what I will tell them when they claim I "breached a trust". This is pretty fucking public, so all my NOTICE obligations are covered.

Obsessed with "law"?

GOOD. I'm about to deal out a lesson you will not be able to beg your way out of ;)

Tara Duncan

"I'm no lawyer, I just have an unhealthy obsession with law right now"

It's of course just my opinion, but this statement is disturbing. This may seem like a reasonable comment, but think about other situations where you might not be compelled to take such a person's advice.

"You can trust my dietary advice...I have an unhealthy obsession with eating." You can trust my advice on vaccinating your children...I have an unhealthy interest in researching the dangers of this practice."

When someone takes an "unhealthy" interest in my business, I do wonder about their motivation for so doing. For instance, while you might stop and help someone who has fallen in the street, you don't usually prowl the nooks and crannies to find people to help. When people say they are trying to protect you, it's always good to determine their motivations. In most cases you can expect them to have reasons.

It's important to verify as much information as you can before blindly believing anything. Several years with Scott should have at least taught you that. I'd be interested to uncover what Dan Wilson's motivation is regarding his kind concern for your well-being.

Scott Duncan

I was lead to believe that when I earned the rank of Admiral it would be all barking orders and boat-bunnies.

Well I became Admiral... Oh there were boat bunnies, but my powers of "ordering" are a fucking joke :/

Scott Duncan

Too late.I made my "Understanding" very clear. He just kept lying, and lying, and lying, and lying, and lying, and lying, and lying.

Now he's bound The Law Society and over a hundred lawyers to an existing clause.

I'm doing it in good faith.If Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson chooses to ignore my terms, he has surety for it.

Unless the Law Society takes action to stop it, I'm continuing full speed ahead.

Dramatis person�: His name was Bruce Smith. <-Staff. Typing now. 20 of them.

Bruce Smith is NOT going to be happy.

Scott Duncan

Dramatis person�: It's time to tell some stories. I'm free to now.

If an email is now considered "Legal Service", then Dan Lien-Your Name Wilson's actions are agency. Fuck you all.

I'm coming.

https://youtu.be/GoVLhUxhdSw

Scott Duncan

It's what the Quatlosers do. They try desperately to attach this shit to me.

I pay my mortgages. ALWAYS.

If you conjure a mortgage into existence, like Levitt did, I can lien your ass.

If I sign it, I consented. If they breach a contract it is my right to secure it. Saying otherwise is a lie.

If you impose commerce on me, I do NOT need your fucking permission to secure costs.

If you keep generating costs, you are granting me permission to lien it. I don't need your permission to secure costs.

Scott Duncan

When the Law Society starts screaming "breach of trust", I'm pointing them at the Quatlosers, and I'm pointing them here.

Then they will be instructed to suck it up. To the lawyers who's lives I'll ruin: You should have stepped up when you were asked. You already made your choice and I warned you all. You agreed, remember? You ALL know I can prove it too. Remember ALL THOSE CAMERAS? They were in the room for a reason. It's not just a hobby ;)

Same with recordings. ;)

What do you think, Bruce? The entire ADR Sessions playable by EVERYONE? When these recordings were made, you couldn't even imagine the possibility, but I know in hindsight you now know I saw it coming before EVERYONE. It's just what I do. I make people who listen to me, OBSCENELY rich. When you know what's coming, you can spent a pittance and it will become a fortune, EVERY time.

I'm building the infrastructure to BUY that ability off of me.

At any given time there are MAYBE 20 people who are ACTUALLY listening to me. The rest of you only get bits and pieces.

I've built quite the war-chest and it's time to start a proactive assault on the Law Society.

I will only write words and point you to things. Any violence that occurs will come from those who realize what you do to them. I intend to show them.

Scott Duncan

If Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson is telling the truth, and he's just a random internet stalker, then it's just unfortunate that the Law Society is going to have to endure what's coming, but he and the Quatlosers have surety!

You don't get to breach contracts and oaths because you don't like them anymore. One of your weaselly agents sent armed thugs after me.

YOU DO NOT get to point guns at me to cover up fraud

YOU DO NOT get to alter court records to cover up fraud

YOU DO NOT get to steal from me to cover up fraud.

Now one of your (presumed) agents (On Information and Reasonable Belief) has waived your remaining protections, and what I have deemed a reasonable time, has passed (As Agreed) with no representative of the Law Society offering any refutation to that presumption. There is now NO BINDING AGREEMENT PREVENTING ME FROM TESTIFYING TO PAST EVENTS.

I hereby claim my right to avail myself of the benefit.

Scott Duncan

It's 2016. I can do what I like! I'd sell the Law Society out for a Twinkie at this point, So a Quatloser is WAY better. They have tried for years to associate me with Free-Dumbers. They are constantly lying about me, and what I say, so now they are surety for their actions!

Got a BAR licence? I get to leverage it. I don't care of you are 2 times removed from the fucking party. Quatlosers who are members of a LAW SOCIETY AND are LICENCED to "practice Law"... well your leash-holders and I have a contract that says I can leverage your licence for JUST THIS PURPOSE. I've given LOTS of notice so you guys literally asked for it.

Lou Manotti

Why is he trying to cite AUTHORITIES if he's not a lawyer?

He's even lying about Pete's LEGAL compliance.

They really do nothing but lie!

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=158048027912541&id=100011220335020&comment_id=158057624578248&comment_tracking={%22tn%22%3A%22R%22}&pnref=story

Anibal Jose Baez

<<Why is he trying to cite AUTHORITIES if he's not a lawyer?>>

Lou Manotti, I see a clear attempt from "Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson" to maintain alive the believe in "authority" in those "Justices" to the most ignorant of the readers. He wants these readers to BELIEVE that a RIGHT that your person has, such as SECURING/placing a LIEN in the fucking name, it's been done "without real authority," which is implied to be all those "magic parchments" from the Law Society being recited by Dan.

"Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson" interactions with Scott Duncan have definitively helped me understand better WHY I can place a lien/secure the name, and how to do it, step by step.

Hey, SLAVE HANDLERS, I know WHY I can SECURE/LIEN the name... because FUCK YOU! That's why! And I'll have to thank Satoshi, because after I place a LIEN in the name and then some try to starve the name, I will have OTHER kind of MONEY that I can use, so I can keep singing "Because, FUCK YOU!"

Chris Evan

ok...here is what I have:

MGL ch 4 sect 7:

Twenty-third, "Person" or "whoever" shall include corporations, societies, associations and partnerships.

Word "person" is not apt to describe municipality. Howard v. Chicopee (Mass. 1937), 299 Mass. 115, 12 N.E.2d 106, 1937 Mass. LEXIS 980.

Word "person" is not construed to include Commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions. Commonwealth v. Voight (Mass. App. Ct. 1990), 28 Mass. App. Ct. 769, 556 N.E.2d 115, 1990 Mass. App. LEXIS 350.

Inclusion of corporation in definition of word "person" does not extend to municipal corporations. Commonwealth v. Voight (Mass. App. Ct. 1990), 28 Mass. App. Ct. 769, 556 N.E.2d 115, 1990 Mass. App. LEXIS 350.

Permit applicants' suit against a town under ALM GL c 12, � 11I was dismissed, as � 11I provides redress against "any person or persons," and the definition of "person" in ALM GL c 4, � 7 does not include the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or any of its subdivisions. Kennie v. Town of Dennis Natural Res. Dep't (Mass. Super. Ct. Dec. 29, 2005), 2005 Mass. Super. LEXIS 672, aff'd, (Mass. App. Ct. 2007), 69 Mass. App. Ct. 158, 866 N.E.2d 983, 2007 Mass. App. LEXIS 614, vacated, (Mass. 2008), 451 Mass. 754, 889 N.E.2d 936, 2008 Mass. LEXIS 493.

Scott Duncan

Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson's position in a nutshell:

1: People with MaGIcK AuTH0rITy PoWErZ can impose contracts on you, because reasons.

2: It's really bad to lien the imposed contract because...reasons.

And bad stuff will happen.

Well he's constant!

Scott Duncan

Hey Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson, since you are claiming not to be part of the Law Society, would you mind if they were all justifiably killed in front of their parasite families?

I mean, it's just a gang of strangers. What do YOU care?

Anibal Jose Baez

Dan says he cares for strangers, in a "legal" kind of way. He is like the "Jesus" of "law." The scripture of the all mighty "Law Society," as it appears in the Gospel of Dan! "You are slaves, because we have guns and magic parchments, so suck it up!"

Scott Duncan

"The obligation for all persons, natural and artificial, to abide by provincial and federal legislation isn't considered a contract in any provincial or federal court or with any provincial or federal law enforcement." - PERSONS have obligations do they? PERSONS are pieces of paper. Pretending otherwise ignores reality. Now you are pretending. Like Piece-of-Shit Christians.

Dan loves pretend shit, and he wants you to love it too, or armed thugs will hurt you...because that's just the way it is.

OK, fine. Dan Lien-Your-Name-Wilson's position is "That's just the way it is". I spent 3 years telling ALL of you "the way it is". Every time, he Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, and Lied, when I was telling you "the way it is".

...now suddenly. Dats just duh way it iz!

He pretends he didn't lie because, well he deleted all the posts!

Suddenly he's NOT part of any innocent little "law society", and he's JUST like "Law Jesus".

Oh, and he's "not debating your endless crap"...and then tries to keep lying.

Now he's trying to lie to Pete!

First he's trying to attach Gail Blackman to ME, when here is REALITY Gail failed because she trie to mix and match what I say, with what Dean says, and added a little woofuckery and tea leaves.

Also, nobody on Facebook is my "crew".

EVERY man and Woman who served under me these past 3 years are BETTER than ANY of you. ESPECIALLY Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson. Who, I'm told just belched out another lie.

"Re: "who is the surety for these "natural or artificial persons"? - Persons are constructively applied to men and women. Where persons go, you go. If you don't provide a person one can easily be provided, e.g. John Doe. The only difference between a natural person created by the state or country (citizen) and a stateless or unidentified person is the citizen has more available civil rights and benefits. Everyone is considered to have equal obligations to criminal law." - Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.

"Persons are constructively applied to men and women" - Just ignore the arbitrary presumption of a right to do that. nothing to see here, move along to the next sentence! QUICKLY! DON'T THINK JUST GO!

"Everyone is considered to have equal obligations to criminal law" - Which has nothing to do with ANYTHING I talk about. "Criminal Law"? What the fuck is that? I know of a Criminal CODE, but no LAW.

Scott Duncan

And now Dan Lien-Your-name Wilson is back to "Dats just duh way it iz". He keeps telling you to say "suck it up".

Yet everything I say will happen, happens. I don't accept "that's just the way it is". I DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

BETTER people than ANY OF YOU are DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

...and we are going to kick a few faces along the way! We'll get away with it too! It turns out that if you make people rich, they look the other way!

I can hurt and kill people with money. I have lots of money. I made it. It's there to hurt people, and it's going to.

At this point, even killing me won't stop it. In fact I don't mention ANYTHING if there was even the remote chance ANY of you could stop it.

WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR MONEY!

WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR LAW!

WE'RE COMING FOR THE SURETY!

...and THAT'S THE WAY IT IS. SUCK IT UP!

Should have bought my silence while you had the chance! :D

It doesn't MATTER what you think. It doesn't MATTER what you feel. It doesn't MATTER what you BELIEVE It doesn't MATTER what you SAY.

Reality doesn't care. Computer Science DOESN'T CARE. 2+2=4 No matter how "arrogant" you think I am. No mater how much my track record of being right hurts your fragile feelings, 2+2 will ALWAYS equal 4. ALWAYS! Pretend it doesn't all you like! Reality DOESN'T CARE.

The ONLY people who actively oppose this, are people selling fraud, and the ignorant (The people selling fraud, need these. The more, the better ). They will NEVER do anything remotely close to what I, and people much like me, have done.

It's happening right in front of you. Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson has excuses and lies. He will never do ANYTHING of value. Even if he tries... I win. The public record speaks for itself.

Why is Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson so frightened of me?

I do all this public work, because I'm frightened.

G-20? That frightened me. My "crime" was living in the neighborhood.

Court records blatantly altered and nobody called to account... That frightened me.

TPP, SOPA and other examples of codified feudalism.. VERY frightening.

EVERYTHING at the Attorney General's Office frightens me.

I'm quite open about it! My motives are clear!

...so why do I frighten Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson?

Does ANYBODY believe his "Law Jesus" crap? ANYONE? I'd really like to know! It's a serious question.

Chris Evan

ok...so he deleted everything else, but now this:

"Who's the surety for persons?" - Ultimately persons, be they citizens, John Does, stateless individuals, corporations, trusts, etc., rise and fall within the interconnected municipal, provincial, national and (through treaties) international legal fiction world of paper, so you could say the government created them and is responsible for them. These persons are then forced upon men, and we are enslaved to our own insane machine, for better and worse, as long as people keep participating. There may indeed come a time when humanity embraces self-sustainability and individualism and it all comes crashing down. There could also be an ultraviolent dictatorship installed on a global scale. It could go a lot of ways. Things change over the ages. What we have now may or may not last long. Either way flying through space on this rock is interesting as fuck.

Scott Duncan

Why do you think LEARNING is a motivation of his?

You were reading the same Facebook he was!

Did you learn? YES?

Did he? NO! In fact his ONLY contribution has been lies and "suck it up. that's just the way it is". Ever.

If anyone can show him making ANY other contribution than that, I'll unblock him right now.

...but you can't.

Pete Daoust

In the financial statment of Quebec, for 2014 I think (can't confirm I am not with my laptop) the budget for the Quebec JUSTICE, court and shit, was $620 millions, and that same year $632 millions has been collected in tickets and fines in Quebec...

The year before was similar. ..