John Affidavit Fernandes

Jan 07, 2016 5:26 PM
Hahaha, I have an idea..... Can I use the security of the person I happen to have to discharge these public debts?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1466381186994351
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2016 5:26 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jan 08, 2016 3:03 AM
SECURITY FOR COSTS. Apparently my CONSENT as an ESTATE TRUSTEE does not matter. Apparently BENEFICIARIES have STANDING now :/ Well it seems the only REASONABLE thing for the TRUSTEE corporation to do is secure costs on behalf of DAVID PAUL SIP.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jan 08, 2016 3:03 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Jan 10, 2016 10:11 AM
Dean Kory 8 hrs � Early reports are that Dean Clifford has just been sentenced to 21 months behind bars... (A Travesty Indeed!) ...and just a reminder to all of you who were saying..."So if Dean is so right, why is he in jail?.."


Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Jan 10, 2016 10:11 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 11, 2016 1:49 PM
A short version of the "Joinder for Idiots" article :D Because, as we all know, cop's unique job is to create "joinder", right ? :D https://www.facebook.com/N8vBeauties/videos/899120953457049/?fref=nf

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 11, 2016 1:49 PM
https://video.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xaf1/v/t42.1790-2/11916017_899121313457013_456859741_n.mp4?efg=eyJybHIiOjMwMCwicmxhIjo1MTIsInZlbmNvZGVfdGFnIjoidjFfNDAwX2NyZl8yN19tYWluXzMuMF9zZCJ9&rl=300&vabr=119&oh=2914c3df4220f14a0fa84c8b80ed9af7&oe=56F29F46
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Jan 12, 2016 11:35 AM
The epicentre...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Jan 12, 2016 11:35 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 14, 2016 12:07 AM
5 Years ago. This is the conception. Good times :D Just LOOK. Look at the whole chat. It's a foreshadowing of every stupid question you idiots ask, today. It's just so tiresome. You lost. We won. Deal with it.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 14, 2016 12:07 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 14, 2016 3:54 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 14, 2016 3:54 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 14, 2016 11:27 PM
NO, NO, NO! OMFGDeanCliffordWhatTheFuckIsTeMatterWithYou! NEVER USE THE STATEMENT OF LIVE BIRTH FOR ANYTHING! EVER! AT BEST it is PROOF of your RIGHT to LIEN YOUR NAME! It's THEIR FORM. It's THEIR RULES. USING THE STATEMENT OF LIVE BIRTH AS EVIDENCE IS JOINDER! LOOK AT THE ACTS THAT GOVERN IT! IT SAYS SO RIGHT ON THE FUCKING FORM! NO, John! NO! Stop telling people to do that!?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 14, 2016 11:27 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/xw3yTo1wCpw?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Steven Sharp

Jan 15, 2016 7:51 AM
Much better.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01557021437704E+016
Last Updated: Jan 15, 2016 7:51 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Jan 18, 2016 3:03 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Jan 18, 2016 3:03 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Jan 22, 2016 4:57 PM
My instincts suggest to me that the church or law society would have been behind this...?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Jan 22, 2016 4:57 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Jan 24, 2016 11:17 AM
Notice how the piece of shit lawyer for N.O.R.M.L. indicates through a hand gesture that the speaker is "crazy" for suggesting why he thinks smoking pot isn't illegal. The speaker keeps repeating that there is no mens rea (intent to injure someone) and the lawyer will never address the statement directly.


Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Jan 24, 2016 11:17 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jan 27, 2016 9:09 PM
�I do think blockchain is a massive opportunity,� Linda Mantia, executive vice-president of digital, payments and cards at Royal Bank, said during a panel discussion on FINANCIAL DISRUPTION in Toronto late last year. :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jan 27, 2016 9:09 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Jan 28, 2016 11:49 AM
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-isnt-dead/ "Bitcoin is an important part of the free Internet and to freedom in general. The media despises bitcoin and is constantly announcing its death. It does this for the same reason it hates Internet free speech; it represents a world beyond the media�s control."

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Jan 28, 2016 11:49 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 29, 2016 3:31 AM
Hey, I wanted to PAY.......they wanted to steal.....not my fault :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 29, 2016 3:31 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Jan 31, 2016 12:57 PM
To state the obvious....

Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Jan 31, 2016 12:57 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Jan 31, 2016 1:13 PM
Scrooge McDuck knows a few things... Particularly from minute 7:35...

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jan 31, 2016 1:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/BAFSrKqIKdc?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Feb 01, 2016 4:57 PM
This is a LIE that I consider to be of the same magnitude as JUDGE = JUSTICE. Members in the Tender fo Law would have never become aware of this had it not been for Scott. So perhaps this article will make for a fun eye opening discussion that will point other's to where to look for proof that WOMEN do not have "rights". Just writing that still leaves me shaking my head :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Feb 01, 2016 4:57 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 02, 2016 12:39 AM
Opppssss.... :/ An "unidentifiable" agent from City of Terrebonne is in tantrum mode. Apparently that lien has been registered without the RIGHT to do so. It is made in bad faith, and it is frivolous :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2016 12:39 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Feb 02, 2016 4:41 PM
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt3090252/ I watched this documentary yesterday... Some of us may be familiar with the story... It's about archaeologists digging up a T-Rex and paying the land owner in order to claim ownership and take it away to preserve it. Unknown to them though, the land they dug it up from was land held IN TRUST by the government for the native American Sioux tribe of which the "land owner" was a descendant and thus a BENEFICIARY... A long legal battle ensued and I won't spoil the ending... Very interesting from the legal/trust point of view if anyone wants to have a look...

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2016 4:41 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Feb 02, 2016 4:49 PM
Meanwhile in Ireland, a group of activists known as Integrity Ireland have delivered this notice of citizens arrest to the guards/Irish cops... Just wondering what people's thoughts are on it...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2016 4:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Feb 04, 2016 1:52 PM
From the "It's all surety and accounting" Department. I got a Water Bill in the mail dated 1/26/2016 which was for less than the previous bill. So, my curiosity got the better of me and I dived into the numbers to see what was adjusted. Long story short (and I can go into the numbers if you like), they didn't deduct any interest that was due on the account, only principle that was due. Also, it seems to take more than one billing cycle for them to do this. So....since this is true and I have the math to prove it, what is the surety for the interest?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Feb 04, 2016 1:52 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steph Boucher

Feb 09, 2016 4:08 AM
https://youtu.be/SIGKll2TbPs Someone as been listening to Scott and added his own bullshit sauce. ;(


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015465506394E+016
Last Updated: Feb 09, 2016 4:08 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Landon Christopher

Feb 09, 2016 5:49 PM
Here's an interesting reminder memo. :-) any thoughts?


Unique Facebook User ID: 708109789265840
Last Updated: Feb 09, 2016 5:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Alan Day

Feb 09, 2016 11:33 PM
My employer ( my person still has a job) has recently informed us that they are implementing a fingerprinting system. This is in order to clock on and off and get paid apparently. Im not really keen on this idea for various reasons ie. Security, where is it stored etc. Short of quitting is there anything that can be done to perhaps stop this?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528582498372E+016
Last Updated: Feb 09, 2016 11:33 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Feb 10, 2016 4:19 AM
I couldn't believe my eyes for a second and had to read it twice to realize it was true... The other day I picked up a book that, after an initial glance, promised to be apologetics for US history. I do this from time to time to both better understand how the "other side" thinks, and to understand "their" arguments. The book is called: A Pocket History of The United States by Allen Nevins and Henry Steele Commager (Washington Square Press) first published in 1943. A number of pages in, the book started discussing paper money (rag money) created by each state, and then, on page 99, the very last paragraph... "Since the rag money was a full tender for debts owed to other states,...." I was beside myself. Never before, and until now, I had never heard of anyone besides Scott explain that the use of money was a tender for anything. *** While this is 101 to us, it was quite a surprise to come across and I was so exited I "just had to share". It's still sinking in that at least two non Tender For Law members understood/understand the connection between the use of money and a legal tender.


Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Feb 10, 2016 4:19 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Gilberto de Piento

Feb 10, 2016 10:24 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1429304667394277
Last Updated: Feb 10, 2016 10:24 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Feb 10, 2016 4:43 PM
I smell some bullshit here and notice some weasel phraseology in response to my inquiry as to whether or not Ontario is some common law jurisdiction. I'd appreciate help breaking this apart. My intention was to have an "official" communique from the Attorney General's office to establish that Ontario is indeed a common law jurisdiction. It seems to raise more questions than it answers. My hope here is to put some "powerful" questions to him that will either "force" him to lie (due to his oath to protect the law society), or, have him admit some facts that may serve me/us in the future. Here's the response: **** Thank you for your recent inquiry to the Ministry of the Attorney General�s web site about whether Ontario is a common law jurisdiction. I have been asked to respond on behalf of the Ministry. It is accurate to say that Ontario is a common law jurisdiction, that is, a territory with applicable law based in part on the common law. The expression �common law� refers to the law developed over the years by judges in deciding court cases. The expression is usually used to distinguish this body of law from �statute law�, i.e. the law adopted in statutes passed by the Legislature or by Parliament for Canada as a whole. However, statute law prevails over common law, so the Legislature can change the common law by passing legislation. The Legislature�s powers are limited by the Constitution both as to the division of legislative powers between the federal and the provincial government, and by individual rights protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. For example, much of the law about contracts is common law; it arises from court decisions about individual lawsuits that involved contracts. However, the Legislature has passed the Sale of Goods Act (in the late 19th century) and the Consumer Protection Act (in the mid-20th century) to clarify or to improve the rules about contracts, or to make them more accessible to the general public. In most cases a mix of sources of the law will apply to any situation. Legal rules are not more or less valid because they have more or less common law or statutory content. The Ministry of the Attorney General publishes several general guides to the law online. General legal information is available at Justice Ontario, the Ministry�s legal information site. To access Justice Ontario, please visit our website at: www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/justice-ont/ A source of both court decisions and the text of statutes for all of Canada � federal government and the provinces � is www.canlii.org, a product of the Federation of Law Societies. Once again, thank you for contacting the Ministry. John D. Gregory General Counsel Justice Policy Development Branch Policy and Innovation Division Ministry of the Attorney General

Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Feb 10, 2016 4:43 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 13, 2016 10:33 PM
The world is just a tiny bit better today :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 13, 2016 10:33 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




David-Paul Sip

Feb 18, 2016 4:37 PM
�But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.�

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Feb 18, 2016 4:37 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Feb 19, 2016 2:58 PM
�It has finally come to this. After years of arguments by virtually every industry specialist that back doors will be a bigger boon to hackers and to our nation�s enemies than publishing our nuclear codes and giving the keys to all of our military weapons to the Russians and the Chinese, our government has chosen, once again, not to listen to the minds that have created the glue that holds this world together.�

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Feb 19, 2016 2:58 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Michael Atkins

Feb 20, 2016 1:02 AM
Something strange going on..... I got sucked into an afternoon of reading Quatloos. They seem very hesitant to comment on Pete Daoust activities....... hesitant is not the correct word either. No mention of what Pete has been doing. They typically do their slimiest to debunk FMOTL so why are they silent on what Pete has been up too.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152158474006E+016
Last Updated: Feb 20, 2016 1:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Feb 21, 2016 1:12 AM
Oh Fuck! :/ Robert Menard > Canadian Monetary & Economic Reform Yesterday at 6:57pm Are you a political activist? Agent of social change? Are you an entrepreneur or new product developer? Author? Healer? Philosopher? Live an alternative life style? Musical or Comedic Artist? Opinionated asshat? Researcher, budding journalist or reporter? Alternative media operator? Are you inspiring and encouraging? Are you weird? Do you have a unique story to share? Do you crave justice? Do you have an event to advertise? Are you dealing with government bullies and need some public awareness of your plight and struggle? Empowermentality is a new web based radio show hosted by Robert Menard and Derek Govini. Half hour segments will cover a wide range of topics, from art and alternative lifestyle options, current events, debates on community issues, social justice, law, government, money, interviews with authority and/or public figures, and generally our place as temporary sentient beings in the infinite cosmos. Pretty much any topic with a focus on being inspiring and empowering, well seasoned with humour. Regular co-hosts and correspondents will include world renown comedians, rising musicians, unknown poets and maybe a puppet. We want to present interesting, inspiring and positive stories, ideas and products. We are always looking for guests to share their stories, art, products, ideas, and efforts. We are also auditioning for re-occurring correspondents, co-hosts and content producers. Please contact Rob at theempowermentalityshow@gmail.com and let us know how we can help you! https://www.facebook.com/groups/516573461732032/permalink/1058617797527593/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Feb 21, 2016 1:12 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Feb 21, 2016 8:03 PM
I found this on the Internet. Is it true?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Feb 21, 2016 8:03 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None






Scott Duncan

Feb 22, 2016 4:13 PM
I have it on good authority, that Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson is being pressured by his handlers to do damage control on my whole Lien-Your-Name thing. It seems it is becoming more popular now. Did you know there are people reading THE TENDER FOR LAW, who have never messaged, and are not "friends" with any members? Well it's true! In fact they outnumber you all by 10x! I know this, because we get messages at least once a week, thanking me for giving the answer they were looking for. Those heroes are all liening their names. So Dan Lien-your-name Wilson [ https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100011220335020 ] (Remember to screen-cap!) has created a brand new profile and is talking about "Illegal Liens". He also has the misplaced Tyrian Lanister quote "When you tear out a man�s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you�re only telling the world that you fear what he might say", as is MY not tolerating his lies is somehow "cutting out his tongue". Mister Wilson, if I ever cut out your tongue, it will be to watch you drown in your own fluids, not because of any "fear" I might have. Nothing you have to say "frightens" me. I also have NO obligation to provide a platform for your lies. What I say is correct, and true, and anything that is said, which contradicts what I say, in ANY way, is by its very nature, A LIE! TL;DR: I'm telling the truth, and Dan Wilson is lying. It's just that simple. Let's refute any lies he's going to tell about LIENS, by covering what he is sure to omit. I'll dumb it down to the point where it hurts, so you won't be confused, so you'd better appreciate this. 1: IF YOU LIEN IT, YOU OWN IT. THAT'S WHAT A LIEN IS; OWNERSHIP OF TITLE. YOU NOW HAVE SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY. 2: IF YOU LIEN YOUR NAME, YOU OWN IT. YOU ARE THE SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER THAT NAME. YOU DIDN'T MAKE IT, BUT YOU OWN IT. IT'S YOUR FUCKING RIGHT. 3: IF ANYONE ATTEMPTS TO USE THAT NAME, FOR ANY PURPOSE, WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SECURE IT! THAT'S IT. PERIOD! YOU DON'T NEED A STRANGER'S FUCKING "PERMISSION" DO DO ANYTHING WITH YOUR PROPERTY! YOU OWN IT! THE END! ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE, IS LYING TO YOU! WHEN THEY TELL THAT LIE, THE RESPONSE SHOULD ALWAYS BE "THAT NAME IS OWNED (Secured)", and there CAN only be ONE lawful administrator, which will NEVER CHANGE. IT CAN'T. So when Dan Lien-your-name Wilson starts quoting acts, codes, and statutes, remind him that I FUCKING OWN IT trumps all those magic parchments that arise from it.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 22, 2016 4:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Feb 24, 2016 6:10 PM
The appeal contended that, among other issues, Quebec Court Judge Carol St-Cyr opted for a jail term over a deferred sentence to make an example of Thibault to dissuade others from committing fraud and breach of trust "to make an example of Thibault to dissuade others from committing fraud and breach of trust" Ok, again !!! .... :D "to make an example of Thibault to dissuade others from committing fraud and breach of trust" :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 24, 2016 6:10 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 25, 2016 1:19 AM
Look Dan-Lien-The-Camper-Wilson !!!! :D Now, how are they going to sell that camper ? I have EVERYTHING on videotape :D They have been PROPERLY noticed, all of them :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 25, 2016 1:19 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 25, 2016 1:38 AM
Oh, Dan-Lien-The-Bailiff_Wilson, look at this one. This Stranger thought that it was a good idea to enter my home while no one was in the home without my express or tacit consent :/ He was AWARE, he was NOTICED about everything that will happen, if he would do such a thing. So, et voila....this is where we are now..... $10 millions.....would you like to see all the registered mail letters he received before the lien ? I did followed the LAW, the whole way through..... Would you like to see more ? :/ ....I have more to show


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 25, 2016 1:38 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 26, 2016 12:28 PM
Hey, City of Terrebonne, (I know they are reading, I have a rat inside their castle), in two days you'll receive the first invoice about that TIME you are taking from MY LIFE. Since you've suspended the drivers licence, two hours of MY LIFE, you know that life I have?....anyways, two hours of my life are yours, you took them by force, aka forcing business on my person. It will be around $60k / month, non-negotiable of course. (Two hours per day.....yes, weekends too :P ) And guess what will happen if you refuse to PAY ? :D I have your CONSENT, it's written in the Charter. .. :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 26, 2016 12:28 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Feb 26, 2016 12:42 PM
More from the "Justice Policy Development Branch" (don't look at me, i don't make this shit up). :) Have fun boys and girls. :P Thank you for your follow-up correspondence about �the common law� in Canada. You ask if the common law can be accurately described as �the law of the land�. My own reaction is that this would not be a useful description of the common law. �The law of the land� suggests to me a rule of law or a set of laws that must be obeyed. It would be mandatory and of general application. The common law is not such a law. It is more of an underlying, private, gap-filling collection of rules of law that allow relations among the people who live here to be conducted in predictable and fair ways - at least in principle. When the common law does not meet that expectation, governments often step in and change it by statute. The example I used in my earlier correspondence was consumer protection legislation. Occupiers� liability legislation is another example. It is certainly fair to say that the Constitution of Canada is the law of the land, and other laws must conform to it in order to be valid. But the Constitution is not the common law, it is a statute. Not only must other statutes conform to the Constitution, but courts must interpret the common law in accordance with it. Once again, thank you for contacting the Ministry. John D. Gregory General Counsel Justice Policy Development Branch Policy Division Ministry of the Attorney General


Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Feb 26, 2016 12:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Feb 26, 2016 6:39 PM
What was it Scott Duncan said last year? �The Plaintiffs appear to be of the view that,..., they can simply come to Court and ask the Court to declare that the Minister of Finance and the Government of Canada are required to do certain things under the Bank Act, and that they have abdicated their constitutional duties, and allowed international private entities to trump the interests of Canadians,� https://www.facebook.com/groups/516573461732032/permalink/1062643517125021/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Feb 26, 2016 6:39 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Feb 27, 2016 3:33 PM
A question I asked the holder of the Birth Certificate (Department of Public Health): 1. So I am clear, this also would mean that the Birth Certificate is NOT a security, correct? His answer: Correct, a birth certificate is not a security.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Feb 27, 2016 3:33 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Daniel J Wentz

Feb 28, 2016 12:33 PM
fuck it. I'm putting this here. It will have the most pairs of eyes that find this relevant, reading. After a few Technical difficulties, which Scotty the Engineer fixed, we are now steaming south, pretending to be another vessel that is NOT "HMCS Little Piece of Crap". I'm not saying who we appear to be. People will guess if they track everything, but there is nothing to be gained by giving it away. So yay, us!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02021762657264E+016
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2016 12:33 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Feb 28, 2016 5:03 PM
Something for the curios eyes of AGENTS of all sorts, and readers in general. For more than 3 years now: - Have you noticed that the members of The Tender for Law are NOT into "sovereign citizen" and/or "Freedumber" scams/frauds of wanting something for nothing? Noticed that the ones that did try to use this knowledge for those purposes, are no longer in the group? - Have you noticed that Scott Duncan has NEVER asked for a single dollar (donations) for any of the things shared here? At the contrary, he has given some of us the ability to MAKE money. But don't worry. It's not YOUR MASTER's money, so it's cool! :D - Have you noticed that "sovereign citizens" and/or "Freedumbers" go to prision, while the members of The Tender for Law are out FREE? - Have you noticed that NONE of the members of The Tender for Law are charging money for seminars, nor for any information acquired here? - Have you noticed that we have been taught here that EVERYONE is to obey the law, and that includes GOVERNMENT, and the LAW SOCIETIES? - Have you noticed that we have been taught to ALWAYS keep our promises, follow thru our contracts? And YES, that includes DEBTS that we SIGNED voluntarily to repay. But we also learned that there are public debts we did not create, and that we are not surety for those. The PRINCIPAL is SURETY. It's not our fault, it's the law! Do these folks here sound like "terrorists"? :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2016 5:03 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 29, 2016 3:24 AM
While all the thinking people have been replacing money and changing the world, The Free-Dumbers and Piece-of-Shit Christians have been trying to build "nations", so they might want to look at the OPEN stuff that ACTUAL thought and knowledge produces, because "faith" in pretend sky-daddies, and sunday circle-jerks aren't doing it for them! In fact I would LOVE it If Dean Clifford's 'Earthsc.com" adopts it! That way, when he's out in 2019, he can choke on the #ScottIsAlwaysRight. *Cue Beer Commercial Music* Cool crisp, and all natural, the #ScottIsAlwaysRight we produce here at THE TENDER FOR LAW is just like the #ScottIsAlwaysRight you remember from 2009. Dean can Choke on it like the penis he is surely choking on now.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 29, 2016 3:24 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Feb 29, 2016 4:23 AM
"Joy ordered the restraints removed and RESERVED THE RIGHT to expound on the matter in writing." Well if a "Justice" can reserve THE right then it would certainly be reasonable and/or acceptable for someone to reserve ALL rights in that court room :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Feb 29, 2016 4:23 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Mike Friesen

Feb 29, 2016 11:20 AM
I thought you all would get a kick out of this. I laughed so hard I almost fell off the toilet.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02032812977741E+016
Last Updated: Feb 29, 2016 11:20 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 01, 2016 4:33 PM
Hey, Quatloosers, City of Terrebonne, and all other assorted clueless morons..... :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 01, 2016 4:33 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 01, 2016 5:20 PM
In the SPIRIT OF : DID YOU KNOW ? Qu�bec is the only Province, and the only North-American jurisdiction, to have included ECONOMIC and Social rights in a FUNDAMENTAL �LAW�, The charter of human rights and freedoms. IT TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER LAWS.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 01, 2016 5:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 02, 2016 11:53 AM
Hey, Quatloosers, GO FUCK YOURSELVES :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 02, 2016 11:53 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steven Sharp

Mar 02, 2016 2:32 PM
"DO NOT DISTORT, OMIT, EDIT, OR CONCEAL WHAT I SAY! DO NOT CHANGE THE WORDS BECAUSE IT SOUNDS "COOLER". ABOVE ALL, DO NOT LIE ABOUT WHAT I SAY! STOP SPREADING LIES. IF YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO KNOW YOU ARE LYING, YOU ARE LYING FOR SOMEBODY ELSE!" -Scott Duncan I have a question as regards the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, specifically the part about deriving works(the "DO NOT DISTORT, OMIT, EDIT, OR CONCEAL WHAT I SAY!" part). I often wish to quote one of Scott or Tara's published 'Notes', to shut down some idiotic discussion in some other forum. But the relevant quote is often buried half-way down the Note-For-Idiots. I'm wondering if its acceptable to quote a line or paragraph from one of those notes(which would be distorting/omitting/editing/possibly concealing) as long as I link directly to the original work? If not, is there no other option then just posting the link, and hoping people read and dig through it to find the part I found relevant?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01557021437704E+016
Last Updated: Mar 02, 2016 2:32 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Mar 02, 2016 6:16 PM
"Law society citations allege comments Levant made in the column were �inappropriate and unbecoming� for a lawyer and violated the Law Society of Alberta�s code of conduct." Hmmm...okay then what comments and/or behaviour IS becoming of a lawyer? This doesn't seem worse than stealing from taxpayers (see ATTORNEY GENERAL money). :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Mar 02, 2016 6:16 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 03, 2016 11:32 AM
Hey, Quatloosers, GO FUCK YOURSELVES !! ...because, ...reasons :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 03, 2016 11:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lou Manotti

Mar 03, 2016 2:58 PM
T?lis B?auns reminds us, that you are all susceptible to sliding into your own self-created palace of bullshit. As you know (or maybe not) Scott Duncan is trying to get across that it is both morally and ethically sound, to harm police. He does a good job! Go see at REASONS we need a NATIONAL KICK-A-COP-IN-THE-FACE DAY! (Personally, I'd enjoy that holiday, way more than Christmas), and he intends to do the same with Lawyers, here. It's pretty easy with cops. Just point to the videos. Done. It's very easy to convince people that cousin Jim-Bob the State Trooper isn't such a good guy, and that his death might benefit the community as a whole. You will also know he will get a paid vacation and no consequence for crimes you and I would get 15 years for. Face it. These days it's pretty easy to hate cops. Lawyers are a bit harder. Cousin Moishe and Uncle Shlomo don't seem like people who should be killed. They have this De facto "Victim" status they would be granted, were we just to arbitrarily start putting bullets in their heads. You need to learn a few things first. You need to learn how things work, and then learn how the LAW SOCIETY exploits it. To that end, materials will be posted here, over the next few days. These are being posted in order to assist you, in your quest to find "proof" of what is being said here. As you are told repeatedly; NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN. You simply believe bullshit you are programmed to accept as "truth". This playlist is covering AGENCY. The Fender was actually the first to discuss it here (go look), but wasn't actually covered much beyond that. Over the next few days, I intend to rectify that.

Unique Facebook User ID: 366697126854837
Last Updated: Mar 03, 2016 2:58 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/L_tsPzj27-0?list=PLNQ4SG301UbqL436BfwIG-HJRgCPFTqKV&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Lou Manotti

Mar 03, 2016 8:15 PM
It was mentioned by a member, that the concept of ATTORNEY GENERAL MONEY was not well known; so this is to clean up any misconceptions and to make a few things clear. In order for any money to be useful, it must be ACCEPTED by all PARTIES. Since every country that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) touches is in receivership, any money created must comply with the IMF's receivership rules. As with everything the U.S. dollar touches, the rules are designed to exploit the ignorant. For hundreds of years corporations have made their own money as a matter of course. What did you think "in-store credit" was? However, in order for money to be "LEGAL" it MUST have the following: It must have a signature making a promise It must have a signature endorsing that promise It must be received by a TRUSTEE Every document you submit for court is stamped "Received". As you were taught, there are no homonyms in law, and there are no synonyms in law. Legally, "Received" is a banking term. The only PARTIES LEGALLY allowed to exchange this money are LAWYERS. This ATTORNEY GENERAL MONEY makes up the bulk of a lawyer's fee, and it comes directly out of your share of the CONSOLIDATED RESERVE FUND. That guy, Derek Moran (who likes to circle-jerk to ACTS, CODES and STATUTES) will likely be able to point you to where you can substantiate this; but trust me when I say, that the primary mandate of GOVERNMENT is CHARITY. If you really want to send your head for a spin, look up the LEGAL definition of "charity". Then ask yourself why there needs to be a legal definition for a distinctly common word. The GOVERNMENT is obligated to look after the cattle owned by the LAW SOCIETY. ATTORNEY GENERAL MONEY is literally open betting with your lives. It's all happening right in front of you, and you didn't even see the money. This is true universally. If there are two signatures, and the TRUSTEE is MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, then that is MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES MONEY. All of these are simply the trading of SECURITIES. Nothing is being traded except your future time. The money must come from somewhere, but it always ends up in the pocket of a lawyer. Their client may pay them a million dollars, but from that they'll get another nine million in ATTORNEY GENERAL MONEY. That's why trials cost as much as they do. Think about that from your own experience: A wedding is harder to arrange than a court hearing, and you can do that for less than fifty thousand dollars - and that's INCLUDES Venue, support staff, and Catering! That's RETAIL pricing, too! The bill you get from a lawyer gets multiplied the second you pay it. Because a lawyer can cash that paid invoice in for all the ATTORNEY GENERAL MONEY he generated. You, the lowly CITIZEN and loyal tax payer, are the ones who pick up the tab. You've already contributed to the "loose change bowl" that is the CONSOLIDATED REVENUE FUND. Since Scott Duncan has been so public about all of these things, you will find that the courts dislike the modern pro se litigant, as they ask too many uncomfortable questions. People are saying this is wrong, and they always seem to do it through AGENCY. After three years it should become obvious that no lawyer, ACTING as a LAWYER, and no government official, ACTING as a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL, will ever say Scott Duncan is wrong - but they will never say he is right. The minute they say he is right, they are admitting to FRAUD. Scott Duncan knows this. In fact, he briefed the LAW SOCIETY and the ATTORNEY GENERAL four years ago as to what he intended to do. I hope this little expansion regarding the nature of ATTORNEY GENERAL MONEY, has also expanded your knowledge; and will prompt you to start asking GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS and the LAW SOCIETY the really uncomfortable questions. If you truly want to give Scott Duncan VALUE, this is how you do it. Remember what he told you about receiving VALUE: "Take what you need and give the rest to everyone." Start asking questions. If you get stuck, post your questions here. Inform all PARTIES you communicate with, that you intend to publish. You should not have to hide your intent, because as Scott also says, "The good guys don't hide."


Unique Facebook User ID: 366697126854837
Last Updated: Mar 03, 2016 8:15 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Mar 04, 2016 6:43 PM
�These findings are both staggering and sobering. Over many years hundreds of children have fallen victim to child predators wrapped in the AUTHORITY and INTEGRITY of an HONORABLE faith,� the grand jury wrote. Is it a coincidence that the same words are often used to describe the "good" courts?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Mar 04, 2016 6:43 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 06, 2016 10:31 AM
Here is your progress after 3 years.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 06, 2016 10:31 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 06, 2016 2:15 PM
Found this on the internet :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 06, 2016 2:15 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 06, 2016 8:32 PM
David-Paul Sip was trying to find "proof" that INCLUDES excludes everything else, legally. Derek Moran was jerking off on some case law you might be interested in.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 06, 2016 8:32 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Steph Boucher

Mar 07, 2016 5:56 AM
"The Supreme Court of Canada formally became the Court of last resort for criminal appeals in 1933 and for all other appeals in 1949. The last decisions of the Judicial Committee on cases from Canada were made in the mid-1950s, as a result of their being heard in a court of first instance prior to 1949. The increase in the importance of the court was mirrored by the numbers of its members. The court was established first with six judges, and these were augmented by an additional member in 1927. It was in 1949 that the bench reached its current composition, of nine Justices." How can you go from 6 Judges to 9 Justices?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015465506394E+016
Last Updated: Mar 07, 2016 5:56 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Mar 07, 2016 3:05 PM
So, there's an administrative hearing for EAMONN O BRIEN on Wednesday morning. Notice of mistake is in the case file... Driving offences (7 in total, 2 made up) Deriving from when I was selling that speaker last year, if anyone recalls... They always clock up as many charges as possible so on the day the justice is "willing to drop these lesser serious ones" so as to appear to give the defendant a good deal... I'll keep you posted... Only one question I need answering this time...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Mar 07, 2016 3:05 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Mar 07, 2016 5:56 PM
A few words on the subject of "gratitude". As I've said countless times before, the reason I go through all this effort to ensure you know the truth, is that I have an agenda. I haven't exactly made it a state secret either. That said, many of you are extremely 'grateful'. I have no idea why. If some stranger showed up, out of nowhere, and showed me that virtually everything I see, hear, think and believe is a lie, and that I'm incapable of critical thought, I don't think I'd be that overjoyed. That's what your reaction is supposed to be. You're supposed to be angry. You're supposed to use that anger as motivation to either, confirm or refute, what I have said. Those who attempt to refute me are attempting to refute reality, and they fail every time. Those who attempt to confirm what I say are always really hurt that I was right. For some reason my knowing as much as I do, really hurts people's feelings. A disturbing number of people are frightened by it. There is nothing I can do about that. The fear reaction is an evolutionary response designed to alert you to danger. The danger has always been there though. Many of you fail to grasp that, even though you have this new insight, nothing in reality has changed - you just know more. Currently this group has fewer than forty members. I still think that's too many. The fewer people there are here, the fewer "shit stains" can show up. However, the group is public, and anyone can read it. The gold is in the comments, and there is almost four years' of information to go through. Many people review this information. In fact, hundreds do. Sometimes people message me, and they unwittingly end up in "We get letters". But what about those who don't end up in this unfortunate category? What of the ones that actually receive the answers they are seeking, instead of the abuse those trying to game the system might receive? Those with a legitimate question, I always answer; and if it's information all of you can use, I usually request they publish the question in the group. The rest I help out, as best I can, with the limited mental resources they possess. I'm sure you thought that was condescending (that means talking down to people :) ). That doesn't change the fact that it's true. Your AGENTS made me. I was sold as raw material to your AGENTS. Your AGENTS gave me the knowledge, and the abilities, to simply know more than the rest of you. This is simply a fact. I am a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far. So are you. I don't possess any mental powers that you don't. I was, however, programmed differently at a key age - with intent. I literally have "after market" upgrades, and for twenty years I did my job very, very well. Of course I did. I couldn't help it. The problem is that when you're young and you have these advantages, you are by your very nature, incapable of avoiding the trap of thinking wrong and valuing the wrong things. At the time, your AGENTS were those I considered my benefactors. Had I not dared asked, "Have we the right?" those many years ago, it would probably be me directing the war against the FREE-DUMBERS and the "Sovereign Citizens"; and I'm sure I would have purged all of them as efficiently as I purged people in government that might have been able to help. It was my job. And...as I stated before, I was very, very good at it. Everyone should keep this in mind when they talk about how grateful they are, because the weapons I use against the government today, are the ones that worked against me those many years ago. What prompted me to ask "Have we the right?" It would be easier to list the alphabet agencies that didn't employ my services during my heyday. What did I get in return? - access to technology years, sometimes decades, ahead of everyone else. You take a lot of things for granted these days like open source software and hardware. Even in the late 1980's when the Gnu Public License (GPL) was in its infancy, you could get access to the software, but you'd need to drop $60,000 for the hardware to run it. Now I can buy a supercomputer for $5. Think about that. In 1989, a Raspberry Pi Zero, which is a $5 computer, would blow away every computer in existence. Except back then to use a computer, you really had to know what you were doing. In 1990 I regarded the Internet as the closest thing to social paradise humanity had ever achieved. The difference is that, back then in order to even 'be' on the Internet, you had to be an academic (studying at a well-funded university) or you had to really know what you were doing. Now any idiot can get on the Internet. I mention these historical facts to give you perspective. That for which you are feeling gratitude, doesn't exist. When you succeed, I succeed, but not in the ways you think. You are effectively a shell fired from a cannon. Each success that you have is a devastating blow. Those tasked to respond to such attacks tend not to feel the impact until months after the fact. When I explain law, and get you asking the right people the hard questions, I am firing a weapon. Unfortunately I rely on your crippled brains as the guidance system. I'm always very happy when you succeed. Again, not for the reasons you might think. Understand that I know what goes on behind the scenes when you do these things. Their abilities to react are limited. .. ...which brings me to a digression I feel is necessary. When you say, "Scott Duncan says 'hi'", you are literally signing your attack with my name. That frightens a lot of "higher ups". The problem is the higher-ups in question are two generations removed from those that made me. I think more of us survived than was intended. Dan and Donna are still here, which is surprising because they "failed" their training/tests. I'm what happens when they "succeed". Keep that in mind when you say, "Scott Duncan says 'Hi'", because I am a terrifying relic, from a less politically correct time; a time which produced many things the government would very much like to forget and/or make disappear. I'm not going to try to discourage you from saying, "Scott Duncan says 'Hi'", because let's face it...it's hilarious on several different levels. Just pay some mind to the reactions the receiver of this NOTICE might have. ...I digress. Back to gratitude. I'm really, really happy that I can solve your problems. I'm even happier when you realize that YOU didn't create them. I'm really happy I gave you an understanding you didn't have before - but I don't really care. Just last night I received an "I'm so grateful" phone call. It was a woman too! You'd think by now she'd know how to properly express her 'gratitude'. It's really, really simple. Choose one of the designated uniforms (naughty school girl, porno secretary, slutty nuclear physicist) and memorize your lines (1: That hurts mister, 2: Do it harder, 3: I've been a bad girl) - and then just show up :) Seriously, how fucking hard is that??? ...otherwise, fuck off with your gratitude! It benefits me in no way whatsoever! The woman that called last night said, "I just had to thank you", to which I responded, "Why?" How do I benefit from that? I don't get smarter, or richer - hell I don't even get stress-relieving sex out of it! I had to explain very slowly that the reason she "just had to thank me" is that she's running a debt relief program. It's why I don't accept any of your "thanks". You're running a program, which means you're telling a lie. When you are "thankful" to me, YOU ARE LYING! When you are "grateful" to me, YOU ARE LYING! I know this, because I've heard it a million times before, and I know how the program works. There are no words you could speak in expression of this alleged gratitude, that Andrew D'Spyder-Pig(tm) hasn't also said. I've heard it all before, and your words are as worthless as the fat tub-of-shit who uttered them previously is. If you want to show gratitude, send me some bacon made from the hide of a genuine Spyder-pig. Otherwise, I don't want to hear it. I don't care if you're grateful. You're exploded ordinance. Your work is done, and you benefitted. That's the way things should be. You do a job...and you get paid! You volunteered to do a job for me - and you got paid. The transaction is complete. Ask yourself why you feel the need to communicate something I have made a concerted effort to NOTIFY you, that I do not want. I do not VALUE your thanks. I VALUE your actions. I VALUE you doing things that haven't been done before. I VALUE the results of the knowledge I've given you - as it should be. You think wrong and you value the wrong things. Of all my Scottisms(tm), that one is the crown. If you accept that as truth, then you must also accept that as the one who told you, I don't think wrong and I don't value the wrong things. The reason it's so easy to make any one of you look evil and stupid, is that you're evil and stupid. You value the things that evil and stupid people do. That's what makes you evil and stupid. Why do you think I would want thanks from someone who is evil and stupid? If you happen to be male, or a female who doesn't feel like feeding any of my many addictions, then learn to express proper gratitude. Pete Daoust thanks me by actually doing something. Michael Atkins thanks me by actually doing something. Eamonn O'Brien thanks me by actually doing something. That's the gratitude I VALUE. That's thanks that actually means something. ..and that's what makes "You're welcome" more than just a mere platitude. It's one of the things that motivates me and keeps me going. I've shown you almost everything you're capable of understanding at this point. I have built, and am building, things that cannot be used yet, because there are not enough people who understand. All of you are still taking inventory of what was stolen from you. I can assure you that is a waste of time. You're not qualified to understand what was stolen from you; and if you think you're angry now, wait until you are qualified. I keep stressing the point. I am fundamentally no different than you. We're all semi-evolved chimps that made it this far. Everything else is "shit we made up". Yet, I am demonstrably "more" than you. The only reason this is true is that I was manufactured by your government. In order to do the jobs I was being groomed for, they couldn't steal from me what they stole from you. No matter how hard I try, I cannot conceptualize living life through your crippled eyes. You have a myriad of programs and filters that were socially-engineered into you by long-dead strangers. Each generation adds to these programs, and now I'm considered rude and crazy, when I point out the fact that I live in a world where it's perfectly normal to be "an adult with an imaginary friend". You have been robbed, and you claim to feel gratitude for the efforts I have put forth to demonstrate this. If this is true, then try to get back what was stolen from you. Trust me when I say it's going to be one of the most difficult repossessions ever, but I promise you it's worth the effort. If you're feeling compelled by gratitude, ask yourself why. I've written extensively about how much I don't give a shit, so I get the irony, but that doesn't address the actual point. You are running a program. It is a program somebody put there. That somebody is long-dead so you can't call them to account. What you can do, is call to account those who would dare exploit it today. There are a lot of people that do. Virtually every agent in the "Justice System" exploits that program to some degree. It's why they never got rid of it. It's too useful. In order to social-engineer on a large scale, and to embed a program that deeply, you require man power, infrastructure (like schools and churches), and a hierarchy to dictate policy. And, it needs to start from childhood. It's costly, and it consumes resources, so the end result had better be worth it. The fact that such a program exists at all, proves that it clearly is. It's part of a much larger program which I have labelled, "Everybody knows". You've seen examples of "Everybody knows". They're not hard to spot if you know what to look for. If "everybody knows" something, and this thing that "everybody knows" is absurd upon further examination, you are looking at the by-product of the larger "Everybody knows" program. For the longest time, everybody knew that you don't question religion, or you don't talk about your salary, or you don't ask who somebody voted for; and when questioned they'll angrily respond, it's "common knowledge", "everybody knows", you "do/don't do that". You must always be cautious of by-products from the "Everybody knows" program. A lot of time, effort, resources and money, are churned out daily to maintain the copy of "Everybody knows" that's running in your empty, little head right now. All of you are crippled by your own love of some bullshit belief, and if you want any hope for the future, you might start with getting rid of those bullshit beliefs. Every one of you that calls to "thank me", because they "JUST HAD TO", has never produced an answer when I ask why they "just had to". None of you ever stop and question why you "believe" what you do! I don't know what it's like to run the programs you have. My very nature prohibits me from understanding your experience in any meaningful way. I was literally created to maintain the programs you are currently running. What's even more frightening, is that I was a more sophisticated version of what existed before. Not only was I built to maintain these things, I was built to deploy new ones. It keeps me up at night, wondering if my profound love of computer science, is nothing but a program somebody put there. Then I remember it's the government. They're not that smart - they never were; because in the end, I'm the failed by-product of ambitious idiots. One's a drooling vegetable - the rest are dead. I lament the fact that I had a hand in so few of their deaths. I learned a long time ago that it's pointless to target old people. Target what they leave behind. Engineer circumstances so their children implode. Impede them every step of the way. It's surprisingly easy to do, and a hell of a lot of fun. As I said to my grateful caller last night, "I'm not a good man, I'm an honest man". It is vital that you understand they're not the same thing. You presume they are at your own peril. ...and now the point. These urges where you "just have to thank me" are a program designed to trigger an endorphin response. You quite correctly realize that a debt has been incurred, and you very mistakenly think the utterance of the words, "Oh thank you, kind sir" somehow discharges this debt. If anything, your thanks acknowledges and perfects the debt...and when I say, "You're welcome", I mean you're welcome to the debt. It's yours, and you still hold it. If nothing else, I am a man who collects his debts, no matter how long it takes. So yes, I'm awesome. I already know that. You don't need to tell me. I've led a life that would make most of you weep with envy. I have a standard of living better than 98% of the planet, and better than the richest in all of recorded history. I've shown you the advantages you have today, that no humans have ever had. I made the grandiose claim that you could be your own bank, and make your own money, and that it would be better than any bank or money that exists today. It's all new to you. Everything new to you, is at least five years old to me. It's just the way it has always been. I don't know life without it. I never will. So you have something I will never have - an experience that I can never have. Think about it. Whenever I show you something "new" it's suddenly everywhere, and there's a shitload of information about it too. Even if you joined this group when I started it, Bitcoin was almost three year's old at the time. I told you that the blockchain was the point, not the currency. Then Ethereum shows up, proving my point. All of this happened right in front of you, yet I have no special powers. I don't possess any mental powers you don't. The reason you perceive such a huge difference between us, is that you are hobbled by countless programs which most of you are far too old to purge. There's hope for your children though. The simple ethic of "take what you need and give the rest to everyone" is the first value you should instill in children. Imagine if "wars" were fought on that basis. Imagine if the hostile act was donating your nation's surplus to your enemy. If every child was taught to take what it needs, and to give the rest to everyone, it would destroy all those evil programs you're currently running. They'd become laughable relics two generations from now. As soon as I say it, you know it's true; but it will never happen because it takes time, effort, resources, manpower and materials, to maintain those programs you're currently running. Most of all it costs MONEY. Lots of money. It's automated, and it's self-maintaining, but you have to feed it money to keep it alive. It all comes down to money. What you know as "law" is the by-product of money. LEGAL = SURETY and ACCOUNTING, the rules of which are TENDERED through that ACCOUNTING. This one simple fact has never been told to you by anybody else. As soon as I say it, you know it's true. If it doesn't instantly "click" for you, you're likely one of those who will fall into the crowd that attempts to "disprove what I say". Attempts to do that are foolish, because it will only help me, and will only help you look evil and stupid. Don't let me discourage you from trying though. The reason you were never taught this is that the people aware of this, are paid not to tell you. I, on the other hand, am not paid, so I tell you. See how that works? Every lawyer that was called to the bar, is paid not to tell you. Every chartered accountant that sets PUBLIC POLICY, is paid not to tell you. Every revenue collecting AGENCY of the GOVERNMENT, is paid not to tell you. Every "Justice", pretending to be a judge, is paid not to tell you. Again...I'm not paid. It's very difficult to "pay" me. I won't accept money that was taken by force from others. I refuse to benefit from the proceeds of crime. The government can't pay me. They once paid me in the only way that they could - through concessions, POLICIES and UNDERTAKINGS, which were supposed to be in place for my lifetime, but are now suddenly forgotten and/or ignored. This means the government can't even pay me that way. If you're wondering why, refer to that whole, "fool me once" adage. This isn't really difficult. I hope this post makes my position on the whole "gratitude" thing as unambiguous as possible. I've tried really hard to get the message across. Yes, I get it. Your life has changed, and I saved you from <insert peril here>, and you just had to thank me. Good. I accept your acknowledgement of the debt you owe me. Unlike the government, I'm not hampered by any ACT, CODE or STATUTE as regards the debt owed to me. This means I can literally base my interest rate on my mood, and I do charge interest on my debts. I advise you not to leave the debt open for too long, because if I achieve my goal of becoming really, really old, other people's corpses are going to be really VALUABLE to me, and may eventually become the only way to pay that debt. Who knows what the future holds? Oh wait...I do. If you really want to thank me, put forth the effort to figure out what it is that I value; because at the moment you're not qualified to be asking that question. Be warned that one is a time-consuming rabbit-hole that I guarantee will fundamentally change you - and probably not for the better. You can take solace in the knowledge that the mere effort benefits me every time. You, however, are the one that pays the price. Don't say I didn't warn you, and you discover what I value at your own peril. Otherwise, you can thank me by taking what you have learned, and ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING. Let me say that again, just so we're clear. You are not qualified to thank me in any other way -- so, take what I have taught you, and ACTUALLY FUCKING DO SOMETHING! TL;DR: Do shit. Cue Shia LaBeouf:

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 07, 2016 5:56 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/os6U77Hhm_s?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 08, 2016 4:55 PM
From the : � Am I a property/slave � department. I think that COMMUNICATION is very important, so I do communicate�.this will be sent to the City of Terrebonne today, because I really want to COOPERATE, this ain�t a joke, I really do :/ Mirabel, le 8 Mars 2016. PAR COURRIER ENREGISTR� : RN089099542CA TERREBONNE / ANNICK GILBERT COUR MUNICIPALE DE TERREBONNE 3630 RUE EMILE-ROY TERREBONNE QC J7M 1A1 TOUS DROITS R�SERV�S / SANS PR�JUDICE VOTRE DOSSIER : PIERRE DAOUST ou DAOUST PIERRE Ch�re Ville de Terrebonne et Cour Municipal de Terrebonne et ANNICK GILBERT Comme vous le savez, je suis l�homme qui poss�de la personnalit� juridique nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST ayant le num�ro d�inscription 1196604112851. Je suis l�homme qui a droit � la s�ret�, l�int�grit� et la libert� de cette personne. Depuis la premi�re seconde dans cette affaire, je DEMANDE pour la s�ret�, car selon la Charte des Droits et Libert�s du Qu�bec, j�y ai droit. Je crois, peut-�tre � tort, que je suis un homme libre. Mais si jamais j�ai tort, et que je suis une de vos propri�t�s, et/ou un de vos esclaves, n�h�sitez pas � me le signifier. Je PROMETS que je vais ACHETER et PAYER toutes dettes que vous pourriez cr�er, si, effectivement, je vous appartiens, je pourrai m�me vous faire un double des clefs de ma demeure, pour que vous puissiez y p�n�trer comme bon vous sembles. Je respecte et reconnais votre serment d�office. Bien � VOUS PAR : Pierre, L�homme qui POSS�DE la personnalit� Juridique. Seul Administrateur Autoris� pour l�Entit� L�gal, et/ou la Personne L�gal, et/ou la Personnalit� Juridique nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST ayant le num�ro d�inscription 1196604112851. TOUS DROITS R�SERV�S / SANS PR�JUDICE 514-XXX-XXXX


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 08, 2016 4:55 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Mar 11, 2016 6:31 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Mar 11, 2016 6:31 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 11, 2016 12:31 PM
Ok, this just in :D City of Terrebonne sent "special agents" to VERIFY if it's TRUE that I am taking the train :D Come on guys, that train station is filled with cctv's, fuck me!!! :D p.s. THERE'S A FUCKING RAT IN YOUR BACKYARD. Did you really believed that I was going to BILL non-existent shit, REALLY ? :/ *Someone please screen-capture this :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 11, 2016 12:31 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Gilberto de Piento

Mar 12, 2016 1:53 AM
As promised. We get letters! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1429304667394277
Last Updated: Mar 12, 2016 1:53 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Gilberto de Piento

Mar 13, 2016 3:01 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1429304667394277
Last Updated: Mar 13, 2016 3:01 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 13, 2016 1:57 PM
Hellos!! :P ....ECHOS...echo...echo...echo... :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 13, 2016 1:57 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 13, 2016 2:28 PM
I asked the Question yesterday, to Michel Lebrun, ex-lawyer from Le Barreau du Quebec. He likes to tell everyone that he resigned from Le Barreau. We know he got pushed overboard, but he really like to tell folks that he resigned, anyways. Yesterday he was doing a presentation on HOW and WHY there's no LAWS in Quebec. It was very professional, and the man knows his shit......and he is not wrong in his line of thinking. Quebec never signed that 1982 thing (Constitution of Canada), so therefor, there�s no constitution in Quebec, so how in the fuck there can be any laws��but ok�. He doesn�t talk about MONEY, he doesn�t talk about �This Note is LEGAL Tender�. Because if he would, all his presentation would be falling apart :D Anyways�..question times Me: Is it true that the Quebec Charter takes precedence on ALL other laws, here in Quebec? Him: Well, hummm, you know, well�there�s no laws, heu (you see me going here :D) So he went at his white board with these pens, and thrown a 15 minutes answer at me, and before I could do anything, called a cigarette break :D So of course when I came back from that break, I made sure to pose the question again :D But again, he couldn�t answer, because it would have thrown all his presentation apart, see? :D So, I have decided to ask about surety :P His answer: It is impossible for me to answer that question, it�s too large :/ So I told them about me using that surety for the last 4 years, and then he went and sat down :/ I asked him, ARE YOU STILL HOOKED TO LE BARREAU DU QUEBEC ? ��he hesitated, and said a shy no. And then the guy who organized that thing got up and started yelling at everyone :-o he just wanted folks who agrees with them about Quebec having no laws.......a LAWLESS QUEBEC sort of..... So I got up and left, before I start painting the wall with his open skull :D Here's their website (I just went there to question that lawyer) :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 13, 2016 2:28 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 14, 2016 7:12 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 14, 2016 7:12 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 14, 2016 10:59 AM
What's up Mark Whellum?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 14, 2016 10:59 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 14, 2016 3:45 PM
Shane Pennell, what's up? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 14, 2016 3:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 15, 2016 4:36 AM
#ScottIsAlwaysRight


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 15, 2016 4:36 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 15, 2016 5:53 PM
Aaron Milne Hi, what's up ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 15, 2016 5:53 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 15, 2016 8:09 PM
The QUATLOOSERS "special" invitation thread. GET IN !!!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 15, 2016 8:09 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Mar 15, 2016 9:52 PM
A notary public/commissioner of affidavits thread. I suspect that a number of you are having difficulty getting documents notarized. I know I am. I recall (hopefully correctly - i can't find the thread) Scott saying something to the effect that a corporation can appoint a notary if it does business between provinces. I haven't had much success figuring out how to get that title recognized, or exactly how I/we would go about establishing a notary public within a corporation. I do have some ideas, but, they are on shaky unsure ground. I am hoping that within this thread we can clear some, if not all of this up. ****** I have been researching (with my chimp brain) to figure some of this out. This was interesting: "Effective December 31, 2012, the Commissioners and Other Persons Who May Take Affidavits regulation will replace the current statutory designations of commissioners for taking affidavits by virtue of office. Commissioners by virtue of office may take affidavits without applying to the Ministry of the Attorney General for a commissioner appointment." Hmmm. So if I have a "COMMISSION by VIRTUE of OFFICE, I can "take" affidavits. That lead me back to Black's Law Dictionary and it's definition of commission. The word reminds me of Scott and his navy and commissioning officers. Here's what Black's Law says about COMMISSION: commission, n. (l4c) 1. A warrant or authority, from the government or a court, that empowers the person named to execute official acts <the student received his commission to the U.S. Navy after graduation>. 2. The authority under which a person transacts business for another <the client gave her attorney express commission to sign the contract>. 3. A body of persons acting under lawful authority to perform certain public services <the Federal Communications Com�mission>. #2 above seems like the appropriate path to resolve this affidavit business, but I am still somewhat unsure. Here's my thoughts so far: 1) My corporation has the AUTHORITY to create an office and to appoint someone to that office. 2) My corporation can grant the AUTHORITY for that person to "take" affidavits. 3) Although a SEAL is not required, it is preferred. Having said that, i know, from being here that there are no homonyms or synonyms in law and that a commissioner for taking affidavits is not the same as a notary public. Yet, I wonder if they have the same effect, at least for my/our purposes (taking affidavits).

Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Mar 15, 2016 9:52 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 15, 2016 11:19 PM
Pete Daoust how low are you dropping the bar here? I just saw you admit a serious woofucker! It's true! Her page had the words "Holistic" and "Synergy" on it! ...beside each other! Like this: "Holistic Synergy". I shit you not! go look! https://www.facebook.com/thehopecoach


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 15, 2016 11:19 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 16, 2016 6:23 AM
Remember... NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2016 6:23 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 16, 2016 3:21 PM
Ray Trusty !! What's up? :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2016 3:21 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Quarantine Logan

Mar 16, 2016 7:10 PM
Why are they attempting to drag your person to court Pete Daoust?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527928876273E+016
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2016 7:10 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Quarantine Logan

Mar 16, 2016 11:15 PM
Scott Duncan Can a PBC also be an LLC or do they both need to be in the title in order for it to count? I can't seem to be able to phrase it properly for google.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527928876273E+016
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2016 11:15 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 16, 2016 11:37 PM
You can join this group, Natasha Tutino ;) You will be able to speak to Scott Duncan directly here :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2016 11:37 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Natasha Tutino

Mar 16, 2016 11:40 PM
Scott Duncan; thank you. Too bad. I said it. ---and thank you for allowing me to pick all your brains. All of them.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02034898801492E+016
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2016 11:40 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2016 12:58 PM
Oh well......this administration have stolen $117 Billions during its reign. You can see it in the Quebec Financial statements, you can find them in the Edgar Search thing. :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2016 12:58 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 18, 2016 10:15 AM
Richard Harrison, why you want in?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 18, 2016 10:15 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 18, 2016 4:13 PM
Graeme Berke, what's up? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 18, 2016 4:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Mar 18, 2016 11:26 PM
Ok, Jim James and Brandon Nash, are you side by side ? :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 18, 2016 11:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None






Quarantine Logan

Mar 19, 2016 5:46 PM
Pete, you know this guy?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527928876273E+016
Last Updated: Mar 19, 2016 5:46 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 19, 2016 7:16 PM
Rick Deschenes, why you want in ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 19, 2016 7:16 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Mar 19, 2016 9:13 PM
Thoughts...is this an example of it's not hidden, or, is it a fake? If true, it's damaging evidence that reveals corruption. :/ https://www.facebook.com/jrgates54/videos/10156733509280294/


Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Mar 19, 2016 9:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Mar 20, 2016 1:38 AM
Oh look, Scott was right again. :) If you don't know Scott Duncan, you might think his ability to accurately "predict" the future was due to "Woofuckery".

Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Mar 20, 2016 1:38 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Mar 21, 2016 3:21 PM
Thomas V Kennedy! He "discovered" me in REASONS we need a NATIONAL KICK-A-COP-IN-THE-FACE DAY! I dragged him here. You guys know where my best writing is, better than I do.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2016 3:21 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Bart Foley

Mar 21, 2016 3:51 PM
Irish Water....First notice Date 15 January 2015 Dear John Tierney - Chief Executive Offier of IRISH WATER Notice of Demand for Information from Irish Water The person I happen to possess, BARTHOLOMEW JOHN FOLEY and / or such other indentification Irish Water have addressed me as, has recieved a bill of exchange, Account number xxxx, WPRN xxxx, and I would like to take care of this matter as quickly as I can. As outlined in the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 (ECHR Act) as passed into law in Irelandin the year 2003, section 1, Article 5.1, Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. 1. Can I use the Security of Person to discharge the public debt you mailed to the person I possess? 2. I am asking you and request from you instructions on how to discharge this public debt? 3. If I am wrong and do not have the right to the security of person and cannot discharge public debts per the bill of exchange act 1882, please notify me in writing or by email immediately and I will Pay. Rest assured that I will take care of this matter as soon as I recieve a response. By: Me Sole Authorised Administrator for BART FOLEY Birth Certificate Number: xxxxx PPSN: xxxx All rights resevered, Non-Aussumpsit and without prejudice


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530964229254E+016
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2016 3:51 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lou Manotti

Mar 21, 2016 8:07 PM
#ScottIsAlwaysRight has come to an end. :( https://www.facebook.com/roguesupport.scott/posts/1308218499244619/


Unique Facebook User ID: 366697126854837
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2016 8:07 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 21, 2016 8:18 PM
Wisdom from a Monarchy. ...I know, right? Irony. Monarchies don't stay around by being stupid.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2016 8:18 PM
https://video.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xpt1/v/t42.1790-2/12894141_597586403726722_778583315_n.mp4?efg=eyJybHIiOjMwMCwicmxhIjo5NTgsInZlbmNvZGVfdGFnIjoic3ZlX3NkIn0%3D&rl=300&vabr=101&oh=71a9ceaab1bffd213efc27167d25a6c3&oe=56F1E0FE
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Graeme Berke

Mar 22, 2016 5:20 AM
Peace Officer vs. Police Officer.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02042920215554E+016
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2016 5:20 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Graeme Berke

Mar 22, 2016 5:50 AM
Law vs. Legislation.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02042920215554E+016
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2016 5:50 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Mar 22, 2016 1:20 PM
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT Dear PUBLIC, It is publicly known that City of TERREBONNE has created a debt of $8,140,000.00 CAD to be paid to 9175-2790 Quebec Inc IN TRSUT, who act as TRUSTEE for FTP PRIVATE TRUST. FTP PRIVATE TRUST intend to use 90% of that MONEY, to buy adequate equipment for ALL elementary schools within the boundaries of the TERREBONNE municipality. After a quick survey, it appears that elementary schools of the TERREBONNE is administrative zone, are poorly equipped which affects children�s education. Some official even says that the situation is considered as being BAD. We are busy translating this public announcement as we speak, and as soon as it is translated in the official language of Qu�bec, this PUBLIC ANNOUCEMENT will be shared shortly after with mainstream media. With LOVE. AUTHORIZED BY: FTP PRIVATE TRUST ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2016 1:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Mar 22, 2016 3:30 PM
I wonder why....

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2016 3:30 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 22, 2016 3:56 PM
What's up, Garrett Winter ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2016 3:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 22, 2016 7:05 PM
Let's see if I can get a "Killer" thread going like I could 3 years ago. For the past couple of months, a couple of lawyers had the misfortune of engaging me, and a bunch of THE TENDER FOR LAW alumni. Needless to say, it didn't go well for them, and it opened a lot of people's eyes. Natasha Tutino found it eye-opening. She'll never look at a lawyer the same again! All with TWO questions: 1: What does an ATTORNEY ATTORN? 2: Does the LAW SOCIETY claim OWNERSHIP of ALL INDIVIDUALS? For the latest wave of new people, we have an AXIOM: LEGAL=The "Law" of SURETY and ACCOUNTING. If you study that AXIOM, you will understand EVERY LEGAL DOCUMENT ON EARTH. Look up the LEGAL definitions of EVERY word. ESPECIALLY if you think you know what it means. that's the LEGAL definition. That's a first layer of lies that lawyers tell. They will ALWAYS try to convince you that you are speaking in "Common Meanings" and will even produce dictionaries and give you the precise COMMON definition. Natasha Tutino recently witnessed this. NEVER ACCEPT THAT THEY ARE SPEAKING ENGLISH! IT'S ALL LEGALESE! ALL OF IT! IT'S A LAWYER! IT CAN ONLY be "LEGAL";It CANNOT BE ANYTHING ELSE. EVER. <----remember that! ...but I digress. I was going to use Derek Moran, but he turned out to be too stupid, so I'm going to try again with all of you. So let's start. We are going after the MOST hidden of all the "none of this is hidden" things I've shown you. This is a TRAINING exercise, so you can find and confirm EVERYTHING LEGAL that I say. Yes this literally is the hardest one. Let's start with "Societies". What is the LEGAL definition of "society"? If the SPCA is a SOCIETY for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, what's the LAW Society for? Let's answer these questions.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2016 7:05 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Mar 23, 2016 12:22 PM
Court today.... Lets ask why this exists AND secure costs based on it" Word "person" is not construed to include Commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions. Commonwealth v. Voight (Mass. App. Ct. 1990), 28 Mass. App. Ct. 769, 556 N.E.2d 115, 1990 Mass. App. LEXIS 350.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 23, 2016 12:22 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 23, 2016 12:54 PM
What's up Greg Thornton? :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 23, 2016 12:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 23, 2016 1:01 PM
One of my ADORABLE daughter (she really is :D ), got EXPULSED from school yesterday :-o Now, to return to school, she has to do a written REFLEXION on what is �COLLABORATION� Fuck, it�s almost like they ASK for it :/ I might be busy for the next 48 hours, because I think thi is one heck of a GREAT opportunity for my daughter to learn what COLLABORATION is�..so if you don�t see me much in here, that�s the REASON. p.s. I can�t wait for them to COLLABORATE with me by faxing me their financial statements so I can pin point to my daughter how much DEBTS gets created so she can have an education here in Quebec. And I hope I won�t find ANY corruption in these financial statements :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 23, 2016 1:01 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 23, 2016 11:56 PM
#TaxationIsTheft

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 23, 2016 11:56 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YwHGaZm2rY4?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2016 2:36 AM
WOW!!!... I am blown away :D A lawyer from City of Terrebonne sent via registered mail, one of the three bills of exchange :D Simply saying: "You will find included the document that you considered being a bill of exchange. This PAYMENT method being not accepted, you will find on the back accepted payment method. (signature) Marc Brochu Lawyer :D OMFG!!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2016 2:36 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2016 6:14 PM
Greg Hopkins, what,s up ?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2016 6:14 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 24, 2016 9:56 PM
I think I have a way to make instructional videos without appearing on video. EVERY aspect of life is in this game, so I think we shall experiment, and see what we can produce. It's like a ready-made stage.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2016 9:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 25, 2016 12:01 AM
What's up, Louis Montmarquet ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2016 12:01 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 25, 2016 12:09 AM
Lee Charles Gilliam53rd, What's up? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2016 12:09 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 25, 2016 3:53 PM
:D ......LISTEN :P https://www.facebook.com/io9.com/videos/10154118941811694/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2016 3:53 PM
https://video.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xfa1/v/t42.1790-2/12895180_640888166050575_489400812_n.mp4?efg=eyJybHIiOjMwMCwicmxhIjo1MTIsInZlbmNvZGVfdGFnIjoic3ZlX3NkIn0%3D&rl=300&vabr=159&oh=f8f9701bca4d9a9ec1cb73498f7c257a&oe=56F80718
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 25, 2016 4:50 PM
So this was sent......keep a copy of it in case I might disapear or something :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2016 4:50 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Brandon Nash

Mar 25, 2016 8:49 PM
Are we allowed to share the material in the file section?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1539239462993083
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2016 8:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 26, 2016 3:59 AM
Dan Lien-your-Name Wilson keeps creating profiles for me to block! He must be trying to distract you from THIS! That article that gave him his name!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2016 3:59 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Brandon Nash

Mar 26, 2016 6:17 PM
Check this out.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1539239462993083
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2016 6:17 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 27, 2016 2:42 AM
Hey, I have a QUESTION :/ At page 33, Table 12, I see a "Fines, forfeitures and recoveries" revenu fund in this table. I see that Quebec collected, from these "Fines, forfeitures and recoveries" $560 Millions in 2012 $591 Millions in 2013 $656 Millions in 2014 $686 Millions in 2015 And.....the forcast for 2016 is $727 Millions.......so here's my question... How in the fuck they KNOW they will reach $727 Millions in "Fines, forfeitures and recoveries"? If you then go at page 37, table 13. See what was the COST for "JUSTICE" in Quebec. Compare these numbers with funds collected from "Fines, forfeitures and recoveries" WHAT IN THE FUCK IS "JUSTICE"? Is it the sum of all, what they call themselves JUDGES ? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/722803/000117625615000219/exhibit99-1.htm

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 27, 2016 2:42 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 27, 2016 10:53 PM
Adam Thomas, I have finished the typing I had to do, it's all you now..... :) What does Scott Duncan omits waayyyy too much? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 27, 2016 10:53 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 29, 2016 10:18 AM
So Scott Duncan, there's no Public Benefit Corporation into existence in Quebec that has as a mandate to help men and women having their RIGHTS respected. Should I create one? :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2016 10:18 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


John Affidavit Fernandes

Mar 29, 2016 11:10 AM
From the 2016 Federal Budget

Unique Facebook User ID: 1466381186994351
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2016 11:10 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 29, 2016 2:28 PM
I had to post this, no choice :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2016 2:28 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 30, 2016 12:38 AM
David Jones-Cook, what's up? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2016 12:38 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 30, 2016 10:26 AM
Hey, City of Terrebonne, it's BILLING day, just sayin' :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2016 10:26 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Carne

Mar 30, 2016 4:35 PM
It would appear that Trent GoodFraudy has hijacked the Notice of Mistake with with no attribution to Scott Duncan


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02020218971784E+016
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2016 4:35 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Mar 30, 2016 8:54 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2016 8:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 1:25 PM
Mark Byrne, What,s up? :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 1:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 1:25 PM
Dave Quesnel, what's up? :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 1:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 1:25 PM
Power Manyhats, what's up?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 1:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 1:26 PM
Farron Vaughan, what's up? :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 1:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 2:25 PM
What,s up Wendy Louise Talbot? :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 2:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 2:25 PM
What's up Michele Carbello?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 2:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 31, 2016 4:35 PM
Angie Poe Ray, what happened? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2016 4:35 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None