David-Paul Sip
Everywhere I look it seems I am reminded of Scott Duncan :)
"The decision states that there was no evidence to suggest why Kan did not activate his camera, but Weidmark wrote that �IT IS REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE� he was trying to conceal his actions. "
A parasitical lying sack-of-shit is the focus of this article, and there are other significant aspects deserving of comment but �it is (or is not) reasonable to conclude� is one of my favourites when constructing an affirmation.
Toronto cop preyed on vulnerable people in fake ticket scheme | Toronto Star
thestar.com
Disciplinary decision notes that those ticketed included �the homeless and others with mental illness.�