Nov 03, 2015 1:35 AM

This is just a guess but it looks like someone is trying to get out of a mortgage. She is trying to get the bank to show where the debt originated.

Where the debt originated? :/

Yes

That's irrelevant. WHO IS SURETY

She is...

And she seems to be a person....

With Pete. She is

People will try to associate ME with shit like this.

This is what the free-dumbers do. Try to get out of a Mortgage

They tried it with me as well.

Mortgage are privately contracted. She's is not asking question who really own her house and/or to be given the original copy of her contract as it worth money and is HER property and/or if she can discharge public debt with the surety of the person....

She seem to be trying to get out of private contract on basis... well who cares why it's for selfish reason it seems like, sorta as if she's part of the Club and she feels entitled to it. I sorta clinched at "Executrix" and tried to remember when the Admiral mentioned that word... I'm going to look up that word like immediately after this. I maybe have missed he day where that was mentioned.

Why can't people honor their voluntary contracts?

Check Asterix at the same time :D

I use that!

Where does it say the bank can keep the principal when the agreement has been completed and discharged?

No where :D

But, the agreement MUST be completed, right? :)

If one does not go back and ask for the principal to be returned, what happens to that money? Do the banks keep it?

They might SPEND it!! :D

I wonder what Royal Bank is going to spend my principal on? I discharged a mortgage in 2007. Maybe I should ask them. ?

Not sure how many of you are from Ontario but Jessie McLean from the Toronto star is investigating some police corruption and payoffs. Could make for an interesting read in the very near future!

I don't think you get the mechanics here.

It's all MONEY OF ACCOUNT. There is no "principal".

You were just given a fee schedule. Look at your mortgage; NOWHERE does it say "loan" and the Principal is DEFINED. Go look again.

You should be seeking your CONSIDERATION. You did a LOT to discharge that debt, what did you get in return?

I got nothing in return. That hardly seems fair, but I was and still am ignorant, but I am working on it. Scott what Acts and Statutes are worthy of time? I know you have said a number of times not to waste time on club house rules. I really want to understand all of this better and focus my attention. Ontario Canada.

Start with the BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT.

Then BANK OF CANADA Act.

Then the BILLS OF EXCHANGE act.

Do they make any sort of veiled-reference to the birth certificate in the Bills of Exchange Act?" Everything seems so concealed, mixed up and hidden all over the place.

NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN.

We are registered as a negotiable security interest through an operation law and this bond allows for discharge and setoff of public debts (taxes), would we send to the Registrar General and say here you signed it and are qualified to do the accounting please take care of this?

IF the birth certificate ultimately ends up creating a crown organization what type of organization is it under this receivership?

...a secured one!

secured by the creation of this negotiable security interest? They instead try and get us to ignorantly provide the value and sweep us all up as if we are government actors performing a function of government. Would a lien prevent these law society lawyers from attempting to do commerce with the person we have knowing that the attorney general cannot act as a banker for them?

Yes.

sorry for all the questions...

Does liening the name remove all benefits to the name like Drivers license ?

That would be up to the GRANTOR. Theoretically I don't have the BENEFIT of CREDIT, but I have VALUE, so they GRANT me the benefit.

All LIENING does, is claim the EQUITABLE VALUE.

I guess it would seeing as I am saying I am a man and will not be attorned into a jurisdiction by threat of violence.

Would this public benefit corporation also serve the dual role of acting as trustee for a private trust?

Yes. this means you can designate OFFICERS in the corporation to ACT as TRUSTEE.

And the public has no jurisdiction over private agreements

None.

Trust law is the highest law.

:D

Tara may be the President of Rogue Support Inc., but I'm the ACTING President.

When I stop, She's the ACTING president.

Always be the ACTING party, so you have no SURETY.

ACTING :D

Notice that the second you start asking uncomfortable questions of government, you end up talking to an "ACTING Supervisor"?

That's why.

When they send you to an ACTING DIRECTOR/MANAGER/SUPERVISOR, it means you have struck a nerve.

NEVER accept a NO from someone who doesn't have the authority to give a YES.

ACTING lol! ^ THIS Nugget is a pretty big one :D

What you guys call a "docket" in English, it's a ROLE in French.

Is PIERRE DAOUST on the ROLE? ....no, it's UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED that's on the ROLE today :D

Best assign an ACTING administrator. :D

So UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED will ACT, in this ROLE :D

AGENCY, Pete...don't get anywhere near these people, they WILL just make it up as they go along and grab you as surety. EVERYONE IS TO FOLLOW THE LAW, have they followed the law Pete? There are no magic good courts, this is where agency comes into play.

Are you saying they will make me one of their SLAVES and/or PROPERTIES ? :D

Yes. And they will deny they are doing it too.

Ho!!!

Hee! :D

They deny everything they are doing while they do it. :/