The Tender For Law

Volume 12

Oct 28, 2015 4:14 PM

Eamonn O Brien

Just catching up with a couple of threads here... So Scott is acting chairman of the Illuminati... A society established to fight the abuse of state power, superstition and religious control over the masses.

I've a few of questions...

1. Is it right to assume that the dis-information about the Illuminati that is out there is the work of the very people the society is trying to fight? I'll be honest, until I read the Wikipedia entry for the Illuminati, I was under the impression that they were the bad guys, the state power, the overpowering control behind governments... Now it would appear they are the opposite... My own ignorance is to blame on that one though...

2. What was the purpose of the setup of The Tender for Law group to teach us to think right and thus gather worldwide agents for the building of a trustless banking network?

3. Also, do you guys know who killed Kennedy? :p

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

1: Piece-of-Shit Christians.

2: Having people aware, serves my agenda. You are still a cog in a Noble's machine... you just made a lateral move! This group is but a TINY piece of a LIFETIME'S work.

3: We did.

Scott Duncan

He was one of us. He intended to do EXACTLY what I'm doing now with this group, actually.

...except he made OTHER promises. You don't get to do that, no matter how "right" you think you are. You don't break promises. It's that simple. If you want to be a "rebel", that's fine! I, myself ENCOURAGE it!

...but above all, you KEEP YOUR PROMISES! If you have a promise to a banker, YOU KEEP IT. You KEEP IT AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT... because, make no mistake, it surely does.

Scott Duncan

No, just the banking system. WE AREN'T HIDDEN. That's the BIGGEST lie told about Illuminati. We were SECRET when we had to hide from Piece-of-Shit Christians.

We hide when we are among them for OBVIOUS reasons.

Kennedy was WORKING for the Banking system when he became President. He TRULY believed that he could "fix the system from the inside", and he was wrong. Just like everyone else who thinks "fix the system from the inside" is a valid concept. It isn't and those who believe it IS valid, always fail. There are no exceptions to this rule. Illuminati Rule #1 - Keep your Oaths/Promises

Scott Duncan

Eamonn you have to understand that the things you think Illuminati are afraid of, aren't what we are afraid of.

None of us are afraid of "exposure". We're afraid of being killed by adults with imaginary friends, and since there are only about 400 of us left, I'd say that fear was a rational one.

Scott Duncan

HUGELY misunderstanding.

If you are being "monitored" it would be as a warning system; A "Canary in the mine", as it were.

If I wanted to know these details about you, I could absolutely see what you had for lunch, if you eat out... the thing is, that takes, time, effort, skill, knowledge, and it ALWAYS COSTS MONEY...

...and you aren't worth that much. :P

Scott Duncan

Eamonn... It's SO simple. All we do is see if someone hurts/kills you, and if they DO, we capture that someone and ask pointed questions.

It's a simple mechanism that we've used for hundreds of years.

You don't get to un-learn this shit. Learning what I teach, is a ONE WAY trip. You expose yourself by merely doing THAT. People like you who ask what you do, AREN'T SUPPOSED TO EXIST anymore.

...we simply leverage that negative for our personal benefit.

Scott Duncan

The guy/girl we capture only gets one question: "Who issued your instructions"?

They are NOT going to have any more useful information.

...then the real drama starts.

Sadly, you are largely incidental in the whole scheme of things. I only tell you the truth. It's not always good news.

David-Paul Sip

MAN UP Buttercup :P Did you BELIEVE that learning the TRUTH would do anything else. Why do you think folks react to the truth so violently and with such hostility? When folks are confronted with the truth the call it ANYTHING and EVERYTHING but...the truth, and then call the "messenger" a lot of other names too.

Scott Duncan

WHY? We have to do it to stay alive. It's NOT GREAT.

I'm in charge, and that's NOT a good thing either. It means THEIR accounting is in play. In 2016, I get to do EVERYTHING that they have done for the past 300 years.

I'm best suited for the tasks that are coming. I've warned repeatedly, that your thanks and admiration of me is both a lie, and sorely misplaced.

I will be signing execution orders for people's children, and I will be proud when I do it. If THEY did it, I GET TO DO IT.

I was supposed to hold the post for 5 years... It will likely be longer, and I'm planning for it.

You didn't KNOW you were putting yourself in harm's way?

REALLY?

Do you not read what Pete is doing?

What exactly did you think you were doing? Help me out here.

Eamonn O Brien

I came to learn about law. I don't fully understand what we're doing going forward... I know that crypto currencies can only help the current situation but recent revelations actually have me fearing for my life now. Im shaking.

Eamonn O Brien

I took one way trip to mean I can't un-learn it, which is fine, I can still play by the rules with that knowledge. I never contemplated that I was putting myself in danger. There's hundreds if not thousands of people in Ireland who know about the PERSON etc...

Scott Duncan

Telling me what goes through your head will help ME in the future.

I don't HAVE your programming I will NEVER know what it's like to be you, or to be one of you, the Programmed.

I'm the NEXT wave. We have our own money. We have power and we have INFLUENCE. All the ingredients necessary to start a war.

It will be the FIRST one in history to NOT be a Banker's war.

We have more than our parents EVER had. Information moves faster than ANY war machine. Above all else, I am, to the core, a computer scientist.

I intend to weaponize every single one of them.

Scott Duncan

Captain Erich has crew that get's really mad when you address me by that title. I get a complaint about it weekly.

"He's OUR admiral, not theirs" is a line I read often. I read them often, because Erich is a pussy that likes to pass-the-buck.

Maximus Legis

We're all different Kent my way has kept me alive thus far. I was shot and hit in the thigh albeit with a .22 air rifle hunting pellet and my instinct when I saw where the barrel was situated was to run towards it without a thought, he paid. That's me that's the way I am, Im not you. Right or wrong that's how I react to violence upon me.

Chris Evan

A few months back, you said to move from Massachusetts. I took that as a serious warning and we are moving in a few months. Are there any Illuminati in Massachusetts, or did they see the writing that you see on the wall and left?

Scott Duncan

Eamonn O Brien, I'm sure you're probably annoyed by all this, but since you have attracted the attention of the Quatlosers, let me give you a little primer.

These are LAW SOCIETY scum who pretend to be "exposing FRAUD". If you want an organization that exposes fraud, look for anything Ralph Nader has touched, or look to the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) - they actually put their money where their mouth is. It may be my "ego" or "God complex" but I like to think that I've taught all of you how to read LAW SOCIETY "weasel speak".

Notice in this particular link it's not Eamonn that is mentioned, it is me. Then there's a short description of how bad/wrong I am, followed by a disclaimer about how they haven't actually looked into anything. Think about that. If they haven't looked into anything, why is Max giggling about a name they have made up? It's not really that hard to "look into" what I "believe", by reading THE TENDER FOR LAW. Notice the Herculean effort written as a preamble to diminish what I've taught you. It can't be "right"? You must be mindless followers...and that's the thing. You all know it's not true.

Those who seek mindless followers certainly do not encourage critical thinking; and neither do people "selling" beliefs. ANY BELIEFS. That's the goal of this whole preamble - to focus on belief and to ignore reality. The entire thread that follows is a collection of questions based on presumption and belief. That's what you get from LAW SOCIETY scum. The last thing they want is to trigger the Streisand Effect.

With a few hours on Google, it doesn't take much to find that I have infrastructure all over the world, and that it has been there a very long time. My only public presence is right here, on Facebook; and the only place I currently write is also here on Facebook. Yet, I have infrastructure all over the world. All that and no public presence...what's it for? Oh that's right, I used it to build a banking network.

Money is slowly, but surely, being replaced; with LEGAL infrastructure not far behind. The more ignorant, or aged members of the LAW SOCIETY, will very quickly slap the "crazy" label on me, and will not give it another thought. Those kind aren't a threat to me. People with specific intent to write about MY intent, in a diminished capacity, want you to have a presumption. I point out reality. Reality and presumption don't mix. This preamble isn't for you, or for the "walk-in" traffic, this is for lawyers. They don't want the lawyers thinking this is anything worth looking at. Such tactics are expensive, time-consuming, and are short-lived to be sure. I wonder why he didn't mention Illuminati or my Navy. You'd think that anybody trying to slap the "crazy" label on me would open with those.

I'm not a fan of smear campaigns, but I am a fan of telling the truth. The ethics of the Quatlosers is a little more fluid; so be sure to do screen grabs. As for the "influence" that I have, please keep in mind that this is part of a lifetime's work, so I know what I'm talking about here; I only need to "influence" sixteen people. That's it. Sixteen. So far I have failed. Pete's about as close as you come, and he's already attracting an uncomfortable amount of attention. The more astute of the LAW SOCIETY scum, reading what the Quatlosers are saying, will be looking more closely.

Remember what I said. Any ATTORNEY GENERAL or LAW SOCIETY scum who claims that they don't know who Scott Duncan is, IS LYING TO YOU, or are too old and/or unaware. Those are the only two options. If it's LAW SOCIETY scum with a Queen's Council designation (QC), and they claim to not know the name Scott Duncan, they are LYING, or just too fucking old. If they are ATTORNEY GENERAL or LAW SOCIETY scum, and they stepped into a court after 1996, they know the name, Scott Duncan.

I still remember JUSTICE NORDHEIMMER's look of disapproval and amusement as I played the poor, poor, Pro Se Defendant, for the fourth time in front of him. If this is me with "little" influence one might consider it a terrifying thought that the time is rapidly approaching when I no longer have to abide by agreed upon...restrictions.

All this in an effort to publicly shame Eamonn, because he dared ask questions and to do what is right. Only LAW SOCIETY scum would ridicule such a thing. These pieces-of-shit are the first of many to come, Eamonn; for if in their discussion "for their amusement" they are trying to infer and/or imply that you have lost your faculties, then they are publicly admitting they are ridiculing the mentally infirm. Let that sink in. I have no "influence", and you're deluded brain-washed cult members who have lost control of their faculties - and they're going to stop their noble fight against FRAUD to ridicule the brain-damage I've inflicted on you. You must be mentally ill, and they love ridiculing the mentally ill. They said it themselves. They're doing it for their "amusement". This is the public face of LAW SOCIETY scum. They are far worse when they think nobody's looking.

Scott Duncan

With the exception of Steve Krupnik, every single LAW SOCIETY member that I ever knew, thought disturbingly similarly to my father, that my "head was in the clouds", and that what I discussed was Science Fiction and fantasy. Five years later they see that I got it exactly right. This means I had tiny cameras and recorders five years ahead of the rest of you. While you were still recording to tape, I was recording to hard drives over networks. Those unfortunate lawyers who attracted my attention know this lesson all too well.

When you first saw THE TENDER FOR LAW, what I described seemed like Science Fiction, like my head was "in the clouds", only I showed you step-by-step how to accomplish what I was saying. I know this because I did this with lawyers. Steve Krupnik was the lawyer I did it with, where there were witnesses and lots, and lots, and lots, and lots of recordings - both audio and video. I have so much that I am currently not allowed to use. When the Quatlosers read this, they can go back and inform their LAW SOCIETY handlers, because in 2016 I am going to be using what I have acquired over the past twenty years, to rip the lives of lawyers apart. For each action a LAW SOCIETY scum member does against me, another LAW SOCIETY member pays the price.

Be advised that every lawyer that has engaged me, did so OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL, and all were cautioned. Anything a LAW SOCIETY member says to and/or about me, will be used against them. You may consider that your caution as well. I keep the secrets I choose to keep, and I have no fealty to the LAW SOCIETY.

Speaking of which, as the LAW SOCIETY clearly endorses the behaviour of ridiculing the mentally infirm for their amusement, I shall henceforth presume that is the LAW SOCIETY's official position. When I start quoting this as the LAW SOCIETY's official position, people will demand substantiation for such an outrageous claim. That will lead them to Quatloos and/or here. Since I have already instructed everyone to take screen captures, there's no cost to me when I suggest that a little self-censorship might serve the LAW SOCIETY's needs in the long run.

Eamonn, it offends me on levels you don't even understand, that they're attempting to belittle your efforts. They know you can't un-learn what I teach, but they'll always try. They always try through AGENCY, and the beauty is they can keep it "in house". LAW SOCIETY scum like those at Quatloos, and the likes of Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson, are expendable, and their leash-holders will happily throw them under the bus to save their own asses. The Quatlosers should be aware of this when they choose to engage me, or anyone who TRUSTS me. Lead, follow, or get out of the way! Notice how the agent for the LAW SOCIETY labelled an identifiable group as mentally ill, and ridiculed them as their example of "leading".

In the past three years I promised to tell you the truth. These truths are self-evident. These truths are dangerous. These truths target the very core of your beliefs and identity. Keep in mind that a doctor cannot declare anyone LEGALLY insane, but LAW SOCIETY scum can. In fact that's the only way to be declared LEGALLY INSANE. They only need someone with a license to say it's true; and they keep making up shit as they go along. Before Rain Man, no one had heard the words autism/autistic. Now any kid that doesn't pay attention is considered "autistic". That's what happens when you declare made-up bullshit to be true; the connections you DON'T see are what inevitably comes, because now made-up shit makes it look as though there's an autism epidemic. A cum-slut from Playboy led an army of anti-vaxxers to "liberate" measles and polio. That's what happens when things that are true, and things that are LEGALLY true, diverge. Here in the real world, these things kill people.

So go ahead, Quatlosers, ridicule the "crazy" and "mentally infirm", because that amusement comes at a price; and it won't be me you're paying the debt to. It will come from your LAW SOCIETY handlers. Those in the upper echelons of LAW SOCIETY scum, will find this scenario eerily familiar. You see, the Quatlosers won't pay the price immediately. Their leash-holders will even encourage them. They'll be the LAW SOCIETY's "Canary in the mine"; but already, steps are in motion to limit the LAW SOCIETY's exposure. Like white blood cells attacking bacteria "challenges" will start to appear professionally. Unrelated LAW SOCIETY activities won't seem to go your way. Suddenly a JUSTICE will rule that you're not entitled to costs at an alarmingly more frequent rate than it has been in the past, all the while you get to act as the plausibly deniable lightening rod for the shit storm you are clearly begging for. Make no mistake, ridiculing myself and these people for your "amusement" comes at a price, and I'm not the one who's going to be sending the bill. It's all about SURETY and ACCOUNTING, remember.

Scott Duncan

Since it's 2015, I can even give them a graceful exit!

"On further review, this guy is clearly crazy, and we should not draw attention to him. We have deleted all threads mentioning Scott Duncan... That's D-U-N-C-A-N". You can add my name to the "bad words" list too! :D

Anibal Jose Baez

With Scott, Quatloos ALWAYS puts a disclaimer like " I haven't read everything, but..." And then they just straight out lie about anything. They have made an effort within their circle to brand Scott Duncan as an erred guru, and the members of this group with the "freemen that want shit for free," or mindless cult followers.

Pete Daoust

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A "PUBLIC DOCUMENT" TO ME?

PAR QUELLE AUTORIT� ATTACHEZ-VOUS LE "NOM" D�RIVANT D'UN DOCUMENT PUBLIC A "MOI" ?

BY WHAT AUTORITY YOU ARE MAKING "ME" ONE OF YOUR SLAVES?

PAR QUELLE AUTORIT� FAITES VOUS DE "MOI" UN DE VOS ESCLAVES?

Court of Qu�bec (St-J�rome) Room RC-06 November the 16th 2015 CASE NO. 700-01-133003-148

David-Paul Sip

It's a fact Anibal. You and Pete do not and/or did not have the luxury of thinking you know what these words mean. For those of us that encounter these words every day it is extremely difficult to read anything without thinking we know the meaning of the words being used.

Tara Duncan

People usually learn their first language by having others speak to them in that language. By inference and association we begin to navigate our way around the language. This word, or group of words, produces this result. Some things are instinct. Others are learned.

We have always made the point that people whose first language is other than English have a natural advantage in truly learning what English words mean. Why is that, though?

First non-English speakers have to find the definitions for all the words as they have no existing frame of reference. They also have little or no experience with the cause/effect of using certain words; hence they can't automatically insert a word into a sentence randomly because it normally is used in this context. If they are highly motivated to acquire information being offered in English, they make a greater effort because 1) They want to be able to assimilate the information, and 2) After a time they are ridiculed, or left behind, if they consistently fail to grasp the meanings.

And yes, while the native English speakers among you can lament it is easier for non-native speakers to learn this information, you should also know that your arrogance, laziness and apathy are what is holding you back. If successful, the newcomers will have learned all the information being offered, as well as having properly learned a second (or third, or fourth) language.

For the last three years everyone has had access to the same information. I have personally tried to illustrate the importance of being able to speak/write at least one language properly, and frankly I have been repeatedly shit on by virtually everyone who has even bothered to read what I write. Most of you will notice that the non-native English speakers are the people who normally read what I write.

I say again, the non-English speakers in this group have been relatively successful in understanding new information AND learning a completely new language. Anyone who considers this an advantage overall, and complains about it, is just looking for yet another reason why they can excuse themselves for failing, and will only attract my unwavering contempt.

Tara Duncan

Never, ever, try to remember things by envisioning yourself wearing them (unless it's clothing). Especially if it involves tomatoes, cucumbers or Camembert wheels. There is no situation where this turns out well.