evidence...not proofs!

This is strange, here, they cannot compel a wife to testify against a husband and vice versa.

There's a fucking SIGNATURE on this piece of paper....look !! :P

So therefor, it's PROOF :P

Proof of Surety?

They have surety for the FRAUD, yes :D

Me Jonathan Rabchuck is SURETY for that FRAUD :P

UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED !!!.....no, really ? :/

How incompetent can one be ? :/

I wonder what Lou Manotti would think of this ? :D

Shared as directed. :)

UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED! :D Who's the injured party again? You CAN'T have an ACCUSED without an injured party.

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/C/CorpusDelicti.aspx

Hey, Agents, if you can't see with this that the Law Society wants to make me one of their PROPERTIES, you are what's WRONG with this FRAUD. This is FACTS, this is not some idiot beliefs, but FACTS. You have it in front of your eyes now. And it will be soon, PUBLIC RECORD :P

THERE'S NO "INJURED PARTY", not even one bit........

Will this be breaking point? Why are they asking the wife to be witness? Witness us force your husband to be surety?

Well, the first question is: Why in the fuck the ACCUSED is UNIDENTIFIABLE ? :D

They even got me naked three times, and looked into my anus :D

They saw my PENIS, no really.... :/

The ACCUSED is UNIDENTIFIABLE, but we know he has small hemoroids, and we know he has a beautiful penis, brown eyes, one tattoo, 5' 11", 200LBS, brownish hair, white skin, a niggeresque nose, speaks French, and English, we know the address of his person, we know the inscription number of his person, we know his wife's name, but the ACCUSED IS FUCKING "UNIDENTIFIABLE" These nutcases needs to see a psychiatrist......seriously :/ If they don't THEY WILL HARM OTHERS.......right? :/

Wow. I am mouthless. These rat bastards are declaring war.

It's happening all over... globally. Pete Daoust isn't the only one.

I am just may be the wrong customer, that's all :D

Or one of them :/

Lien the court file ti cover security for costs. And ask when you are going to be paid for this harassment

No worries......I have a PLAN :D

In R. v National Post, the Supreme Court of Canada equated corpus delicti with actus reus: e�quate ??kw?t/ verb consider (one thing) to be the same as or equivalent to another. ^^ This sounds close to a synonym and/or homonym. Actus Reus Definition: Latin: a prohibited act. :/ Actus Reus doesn't require an injured party? Well isn't that convenient? Apparently it only requires that a PERSON does something that is PROHIBITED.

Demand to know who the accused and injured parties are. And demand that the person your wife has be paid 500 an hour. To be covered up front. I cannot understand the nature and cause of these proceedings

Good I can't wait to see the aftermath of this plan. Law society members gonna be paying for public debt.

Magical parchments??

Your question is ambiguous.

Magical parchments! :-)

Pete, If the woman you love is being asked to INFORM the court, shouldn't she get paid?

^^ In her currency, through her bank managed by her trust?

I am the fucking SOLE authorized administrator for this marriage certificate. And guess what? ...this certificate has an INSCRIPTION number. There's a TRUST in the way. Before they get to my wife they will have to publicly affirm that I am their slave.

Before they get to us all, once we are properly weaponized, they will have to affirm that they consider ALL of us to be their slaves. ;)

Harry are you a Piece-of-Shit Christian?

Why do you ask? See how I deflected SURETY there? ;)

Because you have 2 videos on your page (https://www.facebook.com/harry.nosedwombat/about) that lead me to think that you are a Piece-of-Shit Christian

Oh that. I tried to stop that guy from TAGGING "me" . The truth is Menard suggested a slew of people (years ago) for me to befriend to learn and Maha Fortune was one of them and the next thing you know I was tagged in that PIECE OF SHIT CHRISTIAN RANT. :/ I forgot about it. I almost never visit my own page. Time for house cleaning.

But the question stands....

Holy Parchments Batman!

Maybe the PIERRE DAOUST in this court case, is NOT PIERRE DAOUST 1196604112851 :D Unfortunatly, the PIERRE DAOUST 1196604112851 is the only one I have in my possession :P .....any other PIERRE DAOUST into existence, I have no fucking clue on who they may be, and/or ARE :/

No, seriously, the accused is unide......ok, nevermind :/

Hey, Sino General, you should share this stuff with Quatloopers :D

The PIERRE DAOUST on your piece of paper is not the PIERRE DAOUST on their piece of paper...

Well, as of Oct. the 16th 2015, they don't even have a PIERRE DAOUST on their piece of paper, they have a UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED, right ? :/

They have their dicks in their hands by the sounds of it, and they don't know what to do with it... ?

They could dismiss the charges.

They need an INFORMANT to IDENTIFY you. AGENCY at its worst.

I have been searching the web (mostly with google) about: Accus� non identifiable Unidentifiable accused non identifiable accused. And nothing :/

Am I the first one in the universe ? :D

Ceit, you're one heck of a web searcher ENGINE, if I recall, right? :D

Give me a few minutes...

LOL :D

It seems to primarily be an Indian thing. https://www.google.ca/#q=%22unidentifiable+accused%22+legal+

Oh shit, maybe Sino General could help? ......oh wait :/

What is the exact phrase that is used on the paperwork that your wife received?

I said INDIAN, not NATIVE :p

*Bump

This shit has been pushed to july the 14th 2016 :/ And they won't call Nad this time :D

They now know who OWNS her :P

:D

That stranger (the crown attorney) wanted to speak with MY wife IN PRIVATE. No really !!!!.... Who the fuck this guy thinks he is ? :/

My guess is Law Society SCUM that claims authority over all individuals. :/

But they can't SUBSTANTIATE the claim :D

HAHAHAHA.....that stranger was a bit disturbed, that day :D

They wont. Substantiate..

Exactly.....and it removes this authority they so want :D

I've seen it, in this small office where they try to fuck us, with deals..... This guy was shaking, his hands were trembling, he was disturbed.... :D

The crown attorney?

Yes....

He might be in held ACCOUNTABLE! lol :)

Scott Duncan is correct when he says that Pete Daoust is the only one of you who gets what he says. This is very impressive, and has certainly convinced us(The folks who "drive" the Lou Manotti account)!

Again, this is very impressive.

^^ I was going to start a new post, but, that option is apparently no longer an option. :/ I was hoping to start a thread that would/could potentially be extremely helpful to all. I was going to post this: What is it that Pete has learned/understood that all of us have missed so completely that it renders us indistinguishable from the masses?

I'm going through the history, and can find no example of you writing anything helpful. The trend appears consistent.

Here,s how it went, EXACTLY how it went.......I think it's worth to share it :D Me and Nad were sitting outside the court room, waiting. This stranger (crown attorney) came to us, looked at Nad and said, Are you NAD ? Nad said yes. The strager said, can I talk to you in private ? Nad said yes, she got up and this stranger wants her to go in that little room with him. So, of course I got up and entered that room with Nad. Stranger: I want to talk to her in private, can you get out please ? Me: no, I am staying here, she is MY wife (I should have said "she is mine", but whatever...) Stranger: You have to get out. Me: I have all the good reasons to believe that I have the RIGHT to stay. Me: Do I have the right to stay? Stranger: NO Me: I looked at Nad and said: REMEMBER HE SAID THAT. Nad: Ok, I will So I got up, and while I was going to get out, that stranger said: Ok, you can stay in :D Me: So you just lied, right? I HAVE THE RIGHT TO STAY? Stranger: Nad, we won't need you here today, you can leave if you want, I have no idea why you've been asked to come here today :D I KNOW for a fact, that if I wouldn't go in there with Nad, this stranger would have take ADVANTAGE of her, he would had lied to her, and PROFIT from her..... :P

This is exactly why i tend to shut the fuck up and listen.

Hence the request for the thread. :/ I missed almost a year here, and am still "catching up".

" 4). They�ve found Government ID�s 5). They�ve used these ID�s without my consent and without telling me WHO was the party with surety." This was a TRAFFIC OFFENCE, oui Pete? Was it the Driver's Licence they used?

No....criminal charges :P

Victimless criminal charges

WTF! You were pulled over and refused to give them Government ID and it became CRIMINAL charges? :/ Did I miss something...For what?

I did not refuse to give IDs, I just wanted to know WHO will be surety for this commercial deal first.....

"Yes peace officer, I,ll GIVE my name, but first tell me WHO is surety for this affair" :D Peace officer: GIVE ME YOUR NAME (yelling) ME: GO AND GET YOU A NAME' I KEEP MINE :P 2 seconds after that, I was in handcuffs :/

And asking a question is criminal now? :/

The crown knows this......because in this small office, back in November, I did asked the same question. The crown said.....Well, you asked for surety later at the cops's station :D I said, NO, that is the first question I asked the cop, when he pulled me over.......he said NO, I said YES..... I was alone with him, in this small office :D

And the shirt I had on :D look..... :D

Fuuuuuuuuuuck! Man you're really fucking them up. Lol! And then there's your affidavit which says nothing about what happened. This must be so frustrating for them :D

They seems not happy :/ .....but it's not my fault :/

Lol! BEST SHIRT EVER!

They also wrote in their police report: "The guy keeps saying he is the Sole Authorized Administrator for his name" :D

Seriously if I was this CROWN I'd be asking WHY this PERSON doesn't write what happened in his affidavit?

If I would be this crown, I would drop these charges :/ ....and go fish for another fish :/

There's plenty

But he's "just doing his job" after all :/

No he's not.....

everyone is to OBEY the law

You need to get a pic of Pete holding that mug while wearing that shirt... That'll definitely break the internet...

"...the crown thinks that my wife is one of their slaves, maybe they haven�t studied the MARRIAGE TRUST. " Pete, or anyone for that matter, can you point me to where I can learn more and understand this MARRIAGE TRUST?

Yes. Here :/

Lol! Alright then. I was wondering if this had been discussed before. It seems very important to understand given that there is a LICENSE that comes with this shit :/

Of course it IS a TRUST therefore it is a SUPERIOR JURISDICTION to any fucking license if my understanding is correct.

I am the only one who can administrate this TRUST. And my wife's person is in it :D

So I answer ALL questions :P

I could weaponize Nad big time with this shit :D