Only my FRIENDS can see it. You'd best ask one of them to share it :D
Michael Atkins
Help!!!!! Pete or Tara or Ceit plssssss
Scott Duncan
OK... I'll make it public TEMPORARILY. :D
Scott Duncan
Only Friends of friends though.
Scott Duncan
In the 1990s Tara Duncan and Claudia Christian could have been twins they look so much alike. Tara often wondered why Sci-Fi geeks used to hit on her all the time :D
Pete Daoust
Maybe I should call Deborah, and let her know that something is COMING! :/
Pete Daoust
Yeah, come on QUATLOOS, get your shit together :D
Scott Duncan
Here's the thing about the people in charge; They don't GIVE orders, they TAKE them. I can ONLY give orders to TRUSTEES, AFTER I TAKE THEM.
The fucking QUEEN TAKES ORDERS from PARLIAMENT.
Scott Duncan
Surety moves with the debt.
Pete Daoust
So from where you take orders, Scott ?
Scott Duncan
Captains.
Scott Duncan
My job is to enable them to do theirs. Only THEY know that on a day-to-day basis
Anibal Jose Baez
Scott Duncan I have a few questions. I am trying to understand how things are organized at the top. Nobility, Bankers, Law Society, Illuminati. I am not sure if all those are "just a bunch of guys," or if there actually rivalry, and division among these groups. Can you give some insight onto how these groups coexist, and how "authority" is organized?
Scott Duncan
Illuminati is on its own. It INFESTS the others.
That's the part you are missing.
Scott Duncan
Illuminati do not acquire wealth unless it is to build something.
Scott Duncan
Illuminati do not acquire power, unless it is to facilitate something
Scott Duncan
Illuminati acquire KNOWLEDGE, and make sure EVERYONE can have it.
Pete Daoust
A bunch of bad bad bad guys, sort of !! :D
Scott Duncan
The worst.
Scott Duncan
Pirates are FUN!
...but we're still the baddies!
https://youtu.be/hn1VxaMEjRU
Scott Duncan
Knowledge is a "Sin" to 80% of the population, remember!
Scott Duncan
KNOWLEDGE is the "Original Sin". That's the first message in the bibles of the Piece-of-Shit Christians, Piece-of-Shit Muslims, and Piece-of-Shit Jews. Knowledge is bad, and if you try to KNOW anything, we will make you suffer.
Look at the bullshit they sell!
"GOD" kills over 14 MILLION people in all the "bibles" combined. You are repeatedly told He's "Loving" and "Good"; Satan COULD arguably have killed 10...that's less than your average american soldier doing a tour in Iraq, but you are told Satan is "Evil".
This is what 80% of the world is teaching their children TODAY!
No wonder all of you become such lying duplicitous disingenuous creatures! The only ones who can't see it is all of YOU.
Oh you can PRETEND to, yet everything I point to all seems brand new to all of you! These things are obvious to me, but "NEW" to you, so NO, I assure you, you DON"T understand the damage these garbage religions do. They really are responsible for ALL the misery in the world.
It's also WHY you think wrong and value the wrong things.
Scott Duncan
Piece-of-Shit Christians, Piece-of-Shit Muslims, and Piece-of-Shit Jews = The cause of ALL misery in the world. No one locust is responsible for the swarm. It's the swarm that means you harm, not the locust.
Let that sink in.
Maximus Legis
Sunk in way back :-/
Harry Wombat
Scott Duncan: In this forum, and many others, there is a member called Lou Manotti. I mention this because none of you seem to get the joke. Say the name, Lou Manotti, out loud. I'm making fun of your belief in the Illuminati.
Please help me understand the above comment. :/
I'm really scratching my head on this one. :/
Scott Duncan
Hey, remember how I told you that you are too stupid to be of any use?
...well, that.
Harry Wombat
....as in the Illuminati are a fact and not a BELIEF?
Ok. I think I get it. Am I wrong again? :)
Harry Wombat
^^ Fuck :/
Scott Duncan
ALWAYS assume you are wrong, that way you can be right at least once.
Harry Wombat
:)
Age Thomson
Scott Duncan
You wrote:
" It is your RIGHT to DEMAND PROOF that you have any OBLIGATION to PERFORM and/or give compensation to, ANY PARTY. This is self-evident and is an inalienable RIGHT legally (that means you can sell it). You exercise this RIGHT with the question, "By what AUTHORITY"? "
and,
"We learned, �In VOID we TRUST�. You have one UNALIENABLE RIGHT. The RIGHT NOT to CONTRACT."
I'm looking at the inalienable/unalienable words in the above, and there is an error that I see in the Blacks dictionary.
From Blacks:
UNALIENABLE
unalienable,adj. See INALIENABLE.
INALIENABLE
inalienable,adj. Not transferable or assignable <inalienable property interests>. � Also termed unalienable.
Age Thomson
fuck, I wasn't done that post and it posted on me....
So the question was, since there are no synonyms or homonyms in law, how can one sell an inalienable right?
Pete Daoust
By invoicing those who wants it :D
Age Thomson
Should it be alienable?
ALIENABLE
Capable of being transferred to the ownership of another; transferable <an alienable property interest>. �
alienability,n.
Pete Daoust
No. Keep it non-transferable :P
Age Thomson
I am just operating on the assumption that I do not know what any of the words mean, and looking up everything. Now I have what appears to be conflicting statements.
Age Thomson
If it is non transferable Pete Daoust then this doesn't appear to be right.
"This is self-evident and is an inalienable RIGHT legally (that means you can sell it)."
Pete Daoust
"INALIENABLE.... can't be seize :)
Age Thomson
SEIZE
seize,vb.1. To forcibly take possession (of a person or property).2. to place (someone) in possession. 3. To be in possession (of property).4. To be informed of or aware of (something). See SEISIN; SEIZURE.
Ok. That makes sense. But how can it be sold if it is not transferable or assignable?
Pete Daoust
You can ask for money if someone wants to contract with your person.
And if you do, the other party has to PAY or try to find someone else to fuck around with. This is your right.
Age Thomson
While I agree that what you are saying is correct, I am still seeing a contradiction with the wording above. I just want to resolve that contradiction.
Scott Duncan
I take it that the "Definition" they gave is from the latest Black's Law?
I know this, because that's the LAW SOCIETY'S latest gimmick; Point to other words. Look up "PERSON" in that same dictionary, and try not to go "OH, FUCK OFF"! :D
Scott Duncan
The last two editions were written that way (I'm sad to say) as a direct result of the Free-Dumbers. I'm not kidding. Menard is DIRECTLY responsible for this. It's why I sought him out in the first place.
Read Comments
Michael Atkins
Scott Duncan
Michael Atkins
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Pete Daoust
Pete Daoust
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Pete Daoust
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Anibal Jose Baez
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Pete Daoust
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan
Maximus Legis
Harry Wombat
Scott Duncan
Harry Wombat
Harry Wombat
Scott Duncan
Harry Wombat
Age Thomson
Age Thomson
Pete Daoust
Age Thomson
Pete Daoust
Age Thomson
Age Thomson
Pete Daoust
Age Thomson
Pete Daoust
Age Thomson
Scott Duncan
Scott Duncan