The Tender For Law

Volume 12

Oct 15, 2015 4:49 PM

Read Comments

Maximus Legis

That's nice and talks of some of the truth that Scott Duncan tells us.

However he is the only one who tells the truth because.

1. He knows the truth. 2. He has great integrity. 3. He's the only one with both of the above qualities AND big enough balls !

Scott Duncan

This is FINE work! Everything in it is true.

Impressive! You have been paying attention! I recommend EVERYONE read this for an informative and accurate read!

...and it says so many nice things about me, I was sad when it ended! :(

Time to grade it:

F-

Sorry, but NONE of that answers WHY I"M THE ONLY ONE. Pete Daoust Is VERY close but doesn't have a reasonable answer. He still sees me as this comic-book super-genius who's plan will be obvious over time. "NO, I HAVE NOT TURNED 'GOOD'!" - MISSY, Dr Who S09E01 - 'The Magicians Apprentice'. <---eerie parallel.

The answer to this question is something you are going to need in 2016 if you have ANY plans on benefiting. Otherwise you are no different than a Piece-of-Shit Christian having "faith". (I remind you that Piece-of-Shit Christians have their children raped by priests because they can't believe a 'man of god' would butt-fuck their little boy)

My honesty serves as notice, these days, nothing more. I keep my promises, even when EVERYONE ELSE doesn't. That's ONLY FOR ME. It has nothing to do with you, and it has NOTHING to do with being "good". I'm BETTER. I can only claim that if it's TRUE.

That's not "good".

That simply means you, and everything about you takes second place to promises I made. That means all the worst things you can dream up.

I would kill your children without a second thought, just to keep my promises.

Does that frighten you?

It should. It's CERTAINLY not "normal"!

I mention this, because it's connected to the fact that I was kicked out of the club for daring to ask "have we the right"?

Connect the two. If I was kicked out for having a scrap of empathy, WHO DO YOU THINK IS IN THE FUCKING CLUB?

I'm one of the "Nice" ones, and I'M LITERALLY A FUCKING PIRATE! I command a FLEET of pirates! REALLY! HERE IN REALITY!

...until 2016, that is. I'm not Admiral after that date (Unless I'm ordered to extend, and even then it's limited to 180 days. The Captains call it the "snooze alarm" because they have to order it every 60 days and they can't do it more than three times; Get a new Admiral, or the fleet dissolves.), and I will decide my OWN fate.

That's something none of you are able to do yet, so until you clue in, we're going to start a war. Don't worry if you've never started a war before. I'll walk you through it. It's stupidly easy, and a hell of a lot of fun! :D

...but I digress.

You have only confirmed THAT I'm the only one, not WHY I'm the only one. The sheer numbers are Fermi Paradox-grade huge! Look at Facebook! OVER A BILLION people, and I'm the ONLY ONE telling the truth? REALLY?

Why am I so fucking special?

Even using the 1 in a billion scale, that means there are at least 5 others like me. Where are they?

Do you REALLY think I'm THAT FUCKING UNIQUE? REALLY? That's a REASONABLE thing to BELIEVE, is it? REALLY?

All you do is confirm what I say. You have not answered the question! These are searches you need to do YOURSELF! You will get NO answers from me. Midnight December 31st 2011 was when your chance for THAT level of guidance started. ALL of you spent it the wrong way... with notable exceptions.

EVERYTHING you have learned from me is just PRESCHOOL training. THIS. ALL of this is just so you are READY to learn how to seize what's yours. "With great power comes great responsibility" is not just some spider-man-ripped-off-origin-story-catch-phrase; It's how you hold onto power. The cowards 4 generations ago, leveraged AGENCY and removed surety from themselves, but the "responsibility" part is built LEGALLY into any receivership. LEGAL=ACCOUNTING+SURETY <---WHY AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO TELLS THIS SIMPLE TRUTH?

Steph Boucher

Because there is no commercial intent or breach of contract in you doing so. EVERYONE else as LEGAL contracts = commercial agreements = surety/liability = value on the line. And it's all verifiable... You have little to no use of a broken contractual structure based on trust that as no trust worthiness and that ON TOP OF THAT, they frauded you.

Saying the TRUTH would sink the boat, you are on the way out with an alternative that is proven to WORK for the first time in history.

No one benifiting on the boat wants to sink their life line...they will drown slowly.

That is the WHY I can see.

Scott Duncan

But that's just observing "them". They've already made up a pretend history for me. It's ready to go! EVERYONE says "government are crooks", and they get lied to, over, and over, and over again... But when government says ANYTHING about an INDIVIDUAL, EVERYONE BELIEVES IT! Why is that?

It's WHY I tell you to ASK THE HARD QUESTIONS, by REGISTERED MAIL. THAT'S the threat! They can say I'm a serial killer that rapes/eats babies... I haven't had "child molester" thrown at me yet, but I'm sure it's coming, but it won't matter because YOU will know, and if you keep your promise to express your thanks to ME by telling everyone you know, HOW you know what I'm saying is true.

...but we are no closer to the answer here. WHY AM I THE ONLY ONE! If your "answer" could theoretically answer "Why am I only one of 3", then you HAVE THE WRONG ANSWER.

Steph Boucher

I try to imagine myself saying to this shady figure asking me;

-"Do you know a person named Scott Duncan.he is a crazy dangerous person. He is suspected of rape of underage citizen, if you have any information you have to disclose them now, otherwise..."

- well I don't know any person that is not a piece of paper. What are you talking about seriously?

- this Scott Duncan wants to start a war, he is pro death of lawyers and enforcement authorities also, he's a threat and if you are his friend and help him, you can be complicit is his criminal behavior!

- for the friend part... you are wrong I am not anyones friend. (Hehe) I have no idea how a piece of paper can cause such havoc. I do read sometime Creative Common text that refer to a scott duncan but this has nothing to do with the person I administrate, you should ask the administrator of the person you are looking for. All these text and/or letters are as available to me as they are to you... otherwise that I have NO Authority over anything you are refering to or asking questions about...

- Now you have to tell me why this alleged criminal did not do what he is suspected to have done, what do you have to say for that... he could be all that I am describing, No?

-Well... no because.... [insert correct answer]

I will ponder on this.

Michael Atkins

Damn I am always hesitant to contribute cause I just don'/t think I know. Is it because you do right by Alexander and you are a direct line descendant and you are trying to reestablish the honors of your title"?

Pete Daoust

I GOT IT !!!!! (again) :/

Telling the truth = starving and/or dying.

Telling the truth in a corrupt program doesn't work.

Telling the truth will get you DELETED.

Now, who wants to get "deleted" ?

Of course if you have, let say.....mmmhhh....oh yes, 700, 0000 bitcoin you won't give a flying fuck :D

I hope this it it, or I am jumping off the fucking bridge :/

Landon Christopher

you belonged to a club that had the authority, not the right, when you questioned if they had the right they perhaps knew you were a man that could not be bought and paid and at that point branded you as an uncontrollable free thinker who was dangerous to them and their authority and could or had the potential to expose them for hiding behind agencies with authority that insulated them by removing surety and liability?

Scott Duncan

I don't actually gauge my success by my assets. Assets are only useful when you need them, otherwise they are liabilities.

I SHOULD have been deleted by 27, if history is any sort of guide ...I'm approaching 50. Since my 30th birthday, I have always had the feeling I was living on borrowed time, and I have LONG AGO accepted that being "deleted" is my fate.

The trick is to find the government worker who made the decision to 'delete" you and "Delete" one of their children. Spouses aren't useful, and would be considered a relief to most government workers, if they were suddenly "deleted". Children, on the other hand make them stop.

The best part: NO WAITING! Your suspect list comes "pre-padded", and they KNOW why their children are being relieved of their existence. :D

...I do all this shit through agency, so I can never be sure, but I'm pretty sure I'm alive because in the 1980's, kids died.

THAT is success.

If I live to 300, THAT will be a HUGE success.

I also see farther ahead, and need to consider what that world will be like. Years invested in study means I know intimately about the machines that your lives are on, but know nothing about. I have knowledge none of you have the TIME to acquire! I was almost too old in 1979! EVERYONE fought me. My father's unintentionally famous quote "Scott, you live in a fantasy world. You watch too much Star Trek and there will NEVER be computers everywhere" is what made me realize I've already won. I realized my father, a world-renowned civil engineer, fails to grasp the exponential function...

...and he is "above average" compared to what's out there. The government's "smartest" is no more a threat to me than the world's smartest chimpanzee.

I have something you can't have, because it's impossible to get now, and it cannot be taken away.

THAT is success. Do what others can't. LOOK AHEAD and BUILD on what you know, not what you "believe".

I BELIEVED Ian Scott's agents would keep their LEGALLY BINDING WORD, but they decided it was just easier to alter the court record than to comply with their part of the agreement. BELIEF will ALWAYS lead to failure.

I am no longer focused on my own interests. I am focused on the interests of those who ACTUALLY care for me; Those who have SHOWN that they think right, and value the RIGHT things.

"GOOD" comes as a result. NO I'm not "GOOD" <--best "Missy" voice.

Chris Evan

About Ian Scott (from Wikipedia): "He accepted a teaching position at York University, and remained in the public eye as a political panelist on television until a devastating stroke in 1993 made speech difficult for him. He developed aphasia following the stroke, and was forced to end his legal career."

It makes me think that "someone" made speech difficult for him. :D I may be way off....but in the same way Scott has said "thumbs and eyes".

Scott Duncan

It's a wikipedia article about the Order of Canada. I thought it was self-evident, but you're American, so... who's to say what you grasp?

Just trust me when I say "It's a wikipedia article about the Order of Canada". I know you don't get that (as indicated by the question); You will simply have to trust me on this one. ;)

Landon Christopher

Is it because of Ian Scott and his agents that the truth has been shared outside of the structure built to contain it? If I understand this correctly the truth no matter how painful is always by its very nature GOOD and this is the result?

Scott Duncan

You're on the right path! You have the mechanism right, but you have applied it in the wrong way. You are on the right path.

Time and the exponential function must ALWAYS be part of your thought process. You will be amazed at how far that gets you.

Landon Christopher

I am thinking about everything you have said here on this thread, I admire you and I don't know you, this is weird for me. I think I see what you are getting at when most make a decision, it is based on our level of awareness which is at a fixed point for that moment but when we factor in time and the exponential function things become much clearer and accurate. whats really strange is when I read your writings I feel deprogrammed, do you do this on purpose?

Steph Boucher

In order to connect things they need to exist. When you point to information that you don't charge for, it always relates to reality and exponential function is a proof of that.

Everyone else cannot tell the truth BECAUSE they talk about fiction and unreality. That is why claim false claim would arise against you and people would believe it...

But does that explain deeply why everyone else is not saying the truth? I don't think so other the inescapable fact that it's either or it isn't (to relate to CS,as in binary 1 or 0, and cannot be 1 and 0 at once) One relate to reality the other is irrelevant.

I don't know if that would save you from false accusations.

Scott Duncan

EVERY accusation against me is false. EVERY SINGLE ONE. That is REALITY, even if the whole world BELIEVES otherwise.

People do not like REALITY. They like it when reality is altered to suit them (concrete towers vs huts and holes in rock) but they hate reality itself. Reality is for "smart people", and you only need them when you need a problem solved...

...and people DO NOT like smart people. They hate them as much as they hate reality. People want "smart" to solve problems, and then they want "smart" to go away.

...they LOVE retards. Make no mistake! There are more "autistic" kids, because they changed the definition of "autistic", and called it "science" and all you idiots believe it. LOTS of "special-needs" schools paid for with your donations and tax dollars...

...exactly NOTHING for "gifted" children. This is what the MAJORITY values. You can SEE it, here in REALITY.

That's a connection they don't want people making; MONEY is the "middle-man" between the deluded majority, and REALITY. Roman numerals allow accounting, with no risk of ACTUAL math being "discovered". This is an automated "middle-man" to math. It's a mechanism that you will find EVERYWHERE that law or money touches.

Accusations are BY DEFAULT, false, here in REALITY. Overcoming that default state requires MONEY. LOTS of money. WHO'S PAYING? Are they paying of their own free will? WHO BENEFITS from accusing me?

MONEY can be used to measure REALITY, if you know how. I'm actually being PAID to stay on Facebook! ...but not with any money the Government/Bank/Law Society has any hand in! :D

David-Paul Sip

Fuck...typing as I think here. So because he contributed to the legal matrix Scott UNDERSTANDS the mechanism by which it operates VERY clearly. His understanding is what allows him to tell the TRUTH since his knowledge is a first hand experience. Others are only able to guess and pass this off as knowledge at best.

Plus there's the "only time the Admiral ever lost in court is when they cheated" which makes telling the truth easy. The legal matrix is unable to entrap and/or enslave him so because of what he knows he also has no reason to LIE.

Chris Evan

Here is the full comment:

Scott Duncan It is a FACT that I am the ONLY ONE WHO TELLS THE TRUTH about LAW and MONEY. THE ONLY ONE, out of BILLIONS.

Not only is it a FACT, I'm the one who MADE IT THAT WAY. So claiming, inferring, or implying there is another, is a claim that conflicts with REALITY.

Anibal Jose Baez

Ok, I think I've got it. Scott Duncan is the only one to tell the truth in the Internet, because parts of the truth have been copyrighted (stolen) by the law society, and Scott figured a way, thru Creative Commons, to be able to say that truth. He created it that way. Now, he is using everything he was taught by the Club to fuck them. And it's ALL LAWFUL and LEGAL!!! :D

Anibal Jose Baez

So, you are the only man in the Internet to tell the truth because you are an Illuminati that took a blood oath to never lie, you are the only one within your society who's allowed to tell the truth under license. Your life, and many others, depends on it. Since the majority thinks wrong, and values the wrong things, the Illuminati gets a bad rap, while here in reality are humanity's only true chance for rational thought, understanding, and learning compassion for our fellow man, and to value always telling the truth.

Scott Duncan

My replacement will relieve me on Midnight of December 31st 2015.

I intend to abuse my authority until then :D My work here is ALMOST DONE.

I think I'll try "abusing authority" for a while, since It's so fucking hip these days.

Landon Christopher

It makes no difference to me who you are, when I started the adventure of reading the information you have shared Scott it was because I was desperately looking for truth all these years and wanted to be responsible, this journey from innocence to experience has been a wild ride for me, I was never content to just drift through life, I always remained open and receptive to new concepts, values and beliefs. This knowledge you have shared has systematically reorganized my thought processes to a new awakening, I am using this time as a tool to rid the ignorance and share as much as i can with others. Yesterday I was reviewing all day and most of the night and I realized that there were questions that I did not know that needed to be asked in order to understand. This light has gone off in my head and I can't shut it off. Is this weird or what?

David-Paul Sip

My brain feels like it's going to burst. I'm glad I didn't read this yesterday. I must confess Scott, when we were talking about "Lou Minotti" and then you had me Google the meaning of Illuminati, after I read the definition, you admitted you were Illuminati.

I didn't question this because that meaning describes you better than anything I could attempt to offer. I also did not ACCEPT this because to do so would be to simply BELIEVE you and yet I knew that there is no possible way for me to VERIFY such a claim.

David-Paul Sip

I had even been previously exposed to the possibility that the Illuminati were not EVIL, so reading the meaning certainly expanded this possibility, but I had already abandoned any belief that such men or a group even existed.

So when you told me that you were Iluminati I failed to make the connection to one very important thing...that you have always told us that you would only tell us the TRUTH. To say you were Iluminati and not be would have been a LIE. I MISSED THIS.

Scott Duncan

The GREAT thing about the scientific method is that you can always reproduce the results.

A difficult task when secrecy was the mandate, and suddenly a guy who thinks "TELL EVERYONE" is the default position regarding knowledge, is in charge.

It's all I've ever done. I'm a desperation option. If I'm involved, it means the people in charge are desperate, and it means the problem WILL be solved.

This is what I have always done. I don't know how to do much else.

It's a life path that does not forgive error, and the fact that I still have a pulse is all I need to show that I am VERY good at it.

We're almost gone.

I intend to fix that.

David-Paul Sip

And to learn that THIS is connected to the burning question "WHY AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT TELLS THE TRUTH?" Oh man!

I accepted that since the definition so acurately described you that you may as well be. I thought it was interesting but that you were kidding. I did not think you literally meant that you were Iluminati. :o

David-Paul Sip

For those that haven't taken the time I will share the exercise I went through with the Admiral starting with this

"The Illuminati (plural of Latin illuminatus, "enlightened") is a name given to several groups, both real and fictitious. Historically, the name usually refers to the Bavarian Illuminati, an Enlightenment-era secret society founded on May 1, 1776. The society's goals were to OPPOSE SUPERSTITION, OBSCURANTISM, RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE OVER PUBLIC LIFE AND ABUSES OF STATE POWER. "The order of the day," they wrote in their general statutes, "is to put an end to the machinations of the purveyors of injustice, to control them without dominating them."[1] The Illuminati�along with Freemasonry and other secret societies�were outlawed through edict, by the Bavarian ruler, Charles Theodore, with the encouragement of the Roman Catholic Church, in 1784, 1785, 1787 and 1790.[2] In the several years following, the group was vilified by conservative and religious critics who claimed that they continued underground and were responsible for the French Revolution."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati

David-Paul Sip

"Obscurantism (/?b?skj??r?nt?sm/) is the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or the full details of some matter from becoming known. There are two common historical and intellectual denotations to Obscurantism: (1) deliberately restricting knowledge � opposition to the dissemination of knowledge, a policy of withholding knowledge from the state schools for the public; and, (2) deliberate obscurity � an abstruse style (as in literature and art) characterized by deliberate vagueness.[1][2] The adjective-name Obscurantist identifies the man or woman who actively opposes social reform and enlightenment, a type of anti-intellectual.[3]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantism

Scott Duncan

Maybe one of you dipshits can help me...

...where did the "reptile" thing come from? I've searched everywhere for an answer to this one.

I am a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far. So are you.

There's no such thing as a sentient reptile, and there never will be.

Anibal Jose Baez

I am finally understanding a few things I could not "get" before your last note, Admiral. It's going to be fun to go back and, re-read older things now, mostly things from the very beginning of my entrance to this group, I am sure I need to get back to. This is very encouraging.

Landon Christopher

I read this today. The goal of maxims is to bring LIGHT to the DARKNESS, to hold up TRUTH as the standard of fairness and thereby insure justice for everyone. Without the maxims we have no guides, no standards to promote peaceful understanding. Purposely using words with a hidden meaning, hoping others will depend on the common meaning reasonable people would expect the words to mean, thereby gaining an advantage over others, is dishonest. Courts are not free to rule any way the judge pleases. Judges must obey the law and stay within the boundaries established by maxims such as this. However there are no more judges only justices, why do I have a tingly feeling that the courts have been hijacked and this is why Scott promises to tell the truth?

Landon Christopher

In an attempt to purge info that I have seen/watched from others I would like to ask some questions so I can move on and prioritize my learning, so I am seeking value added comments this may be helpful for others I hope, is this ok and should I do this in a thread by itself?