Maximus Legis
There is no remedy for him and he is also of the misconception that he has the right to the value of the security of the person which he didn't create. He is an unwitting agent by tacit consent, whos signature facilitates any transfer of value regarding the security of the person for the government.
He says there is a distinction in law between a man and woman and an artificial being , no there's not they assume and presume you to be the artificial being they control by hoodwinking you into being surety for it. It's up to you to make the distinction .
He's very confused and talks about a little knowledge being dangerous in the wrong hands, he is the epitomy of that.