So, Lise Thibeault she's a criminal because she breached the trust and committed fraud, right ? :/

"Police generally lay criminal charges but anyone who has reasonable grounds to believe someone has committed an offence can go to a Justice of the Peace or provincial court judge, who determine if a summons or warrant should be issued to compel an accused person to come to court to answer the charge." I am amazed how information which confirms something Admiral Scott has previously told me seems to appear out of nowhere, perhaps because I am aware of it now, and as the admiral would say..."Nothing has changed"

Rocco STILL looks like a zombie, and his "big win" STILL hasn't done shit.

You Keep Bad Company - A TENDER FOR LAW EXCLUSIVE! A conversation sprung up this week on my timeline, and it has been buried. You will find the thread Here ->[https://www.facebook.com/roguesupport.scott/posts/1223275807738889?comment_id=1223290467737423]. This is the first of several examples I'm going to use in this particular article. Before I do, I'm going to establish some facts that people still seem to have a difficult time accepting, the first and foremost being that I am not one of you. I am demonstrably different and/or better than you in every measurable way, and I demonstrate it time, and time, again. I think more efficiently than you; and I know more than you. To be painfully clear, this is something I demonstrate time, and time, again. A sizable percentage of you will think I am "arrogant" for writing this. Whereas here in reality, my distinction from the rest of you is a demonstrable and unavoidable fact. You'll be required to keep that fact in your head as you read this article. In the aforementioned example we have the pleasure of dealing with some input from "Mike Friesen". This exchange came up when he mentioned that he was "a personal friend" of Dean Clifford. You will notice in that exchange, that he feebly tries to justify just how duplicitous he is in regard to this "personal friendship". The dialogue in which illustrates that I, as a complete stranger on the Internet, show more respect for Mister Friesen than this "personal friend". Here's where my inherent difference from all of you comes in. This word "friend" that people use -- I don't think it means what they think it means. You can always measure the decay of a society's integrity be examining the court system. It starts with members of the LAW SOCIETY referring to other members as "my friend". It gets used in day-to-day conversation as part of your job; and every time it's used as part of your job, it's a lie. Lying repeatedly about friends diminishes the meaning of the word; until in the end it's virtually meaningless. Of course Mr. Friesen thinks I'm somehow in the wrong for pointing out this reality. I'm thankful I haven't wasted any personal time with Mr. Friesen. The same cannot be said for Gail Marie. I was recently making fun of her ideas/site here [https://www.facebook.com/roguesupport.scott/posts/1223275807738889] Gail Marie has lots and lots of "friends". All of them say I'm "mean". While Gail, on the surface, agrees with everything I"m saying, she appears to be too cowardly to say so to her friends. Because she doesn't want to hurt her "friends'" feelings, she has decided that "rational" is too mean, and has embraced New Age Woo and Psycho-Babble. I even did a post about it so we could make fun of it. It also led to a comprehensive ban on the word "quantum" throughout the fleet. (Seriously...what is it with that word?) You pay a price at the best of times, when you use words that you demonstrably don't know the meaning of...especially if you say those words to me. I DO know what the words mean, and I will call out anyone who misuses them. Especially if there's money involved. Legalese is a massive forest of redefined words. Many of you have become victims of this situation. So why do you attempt to diminish and redefine the word, "friend"? I literally treat strangers better than their friends treat them. I've shown you proof in this article. People keep trying to "friend" me; and I have over 400 "followers" which presumably are the people who tried to "friend" me (who are now my stalkers), plus the two or three cops that are left watching me (you guys know you were hired because you're stupid, right?). All of the above do so for their own reasons, and all because I dare tell the truth. Why aren't your friends doing that? I'll tell you why. You keep bad company. You think wrong, and you value the wrong things. This is why the majority is always wrong. It's the core mechanism. You are taught from childhood that thinking wrong is a virtue, and valuing the wrong things is your duty. If the majority thinks this way, what possible chance can they have of even stumbling on the right answer? I don't set standards that are too high. It's just that your "friends" lower the bar. When I refuse to accept your diminished, diluted version of friendship, you get hostile because I won't accept that your pretend friend is the same as a real friend...and you don't want to accept the ugly reality that you don't have any real friends. ...And that you don't know anything. So far in the short miserable time on earth, the only one that has actually told you the truth, is some weird stranger on the Internet who is addressed as Admiral, thus revealing the final truth. You're on your own, and you know nothing; and the ones who have answers do not have time for you. I'm nearing the end of my time here in the public. I'm in the last ninety days. After that, I owe nobody, and you're all on your own. As I've stated for three years now: It doesn't matter how much you've learned It doesn't matter how good it makes you feel It doesn't matter if I have "changed your life" It doesn't matter if you're "grateful" ...We're still not "friends". When I'm gone, these "friends" of yours will be all you've got. They will return the same amount of value as they did before you "discovered" me; and they are why we can never, ever, be friends. You keep bad company. When strangers on the Internet give you more value than those you call "friend", I suggest you step back and take stock of your life. For, despite what the Piece-of-Shit Christians say, you don't get another life after this one. You're here for a short time, and your insignificant life has no meaning. That is life's meaning. The meaning of life, is to give life meaning. Friends and loved-ones give life meaning. I know I have to explain that, because none of your friends or loved-ones appear to be anything but meaningless. I've watched the world's population double in my lifetime, and I'll probably observe this again. A child born today will more likely be exposed to "friend" in the context of Facebook than they will in real life. I knew what the Internet would become in the 1980's, as nay-saying friends and family will sheepishly admit. Nobody around me could see it. Children born today will never know a world without it. I honestly thought at the time that when the Internet reaches its 2.0 phase, it will have elevated humanity. I remember as a child, seeing Star Trek, and looking forward to the time where ignorance was no longer valued --where we all set out collectively to know more than we did before, where everyone was welcomed, everyone belonged, and where everyone knew how the technology worked. Well it didn't really work out that way, did it? I spent a lifetime preparing for a glorious future that, thanks to all of you, is now doomed never to happen - at least not within my lifetime. I had true friends in the 80's, and I don't think I valued them as much as I should have. In 1989, if you wanted a computer to work, you had to know everything about it. Our collective quest for understanding mirrored that of Star Trek, and look what the computer scientists have delivered. You live in the best of times, and the worst of times. Kind of like Germany in 1933. Only this time you have technology that could single-handedly defeat the allies, the Nazis and the Japanese all at once. Your cell phone contains more computational power than existed on the planet during World War II. World War II was a time that friends were what kept you alive, and I've seen it form bonds that lasted decades. My grandfather's coffin was carried by myself, my father, and my grandfather's friends. I could see the pain of loss in these aged men's faces, and I can't help but think that people from that time were made of sterner stuff than we are. Because now "friend" seems to be something you ask for on Facebook. Your "friendship" can be removed with a single mouse-click. Look around at those you call friend, and ask yourself why you consider them your friend. Material benefit does not count. Rich people tend not to have friends for that very reason. Those are the only friends they get. So why are your friends, your friends? I've spent a lifetime studying the human condition. Myself, and a few real friends, have spent the last twenty years attempting to decompile the human brain. It would terrify you how much we know. We all want to know, collectively as friends, and individually, how our meatware works; and not through pseudo-science like psychiatry or psychology. I'm talking about actual science. Computer science. As I write this, we as a species, are capable of tracking every single neuron in the brain through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the latest smart phone is more powerful than the computer performing the calculations on an MRI machine. Seriously, this shit's five years away from being an app on your phone. As far as we know, the human brain is the most complex thing in the galaxy. We really are at the top of the food chain; and yet we can't retain the value of "friend". Everything I've told you these past three years is the truth. None of it is hidden, and it is easily verified. This means you don't get to pick-and-choose the parts you agree with. In short, if you think I'm wrong, you're wrong. When you realize that, you will find that I do not forgive people intentionally being wrong. It didn't matter if you "sincerely believed it". You were shown it was wrong by the only one who tells you the truth, and you deliberately ignored it. From that point on, you formed the intent to be wrong.; and that is not anything I am under any obligation to forgive. The prodigal son is an example of injustice and hypocrisy, and part of the reason I refer to Piece-of-Shit Christians as "Piece-of-Shit Christians". The Prodigal Son is a stupid story. I have explained why it's a stupid story, and I guarantee there's at least one Piece-of-Shit Christian reading this and thinking, "I agree with a lot of what Scott says...but not that". This doesn't make me less right. It's teaching Piece-of-Shit Christians that betrayal is ok, as long as you're sorry for it; after which you are entitled to just as much as those who actually did the work, and didn't fuck anyone around. Seriously, what kind of a diseased mind adopts that as a value system? It's the same diseased minds that think it's perfectly normal to be an adult with an imaginary friend. You don't get to cherry-pick what I say, but it's of no consequence to me if you think there's value in clinging to delusion. It's your time that's being wasted - not mine. Everyone who took the time to listen to everything that I say, and accept everything I say as the truth/facts, could see what's coming, and they became very, very rich in the process. They haven't squandered their new-found wealth. I find myself in an odd position. I'm farther ahead than I expected to be. I'm approaching the half-century mark. I was forced into a career where the life expectancy of the average male was 27 years. I did not do that myself. I did it because I had friends. I had people who love me. And I had ME, and that is an asset NOBODY else has. I think right, and I value the right things. I sacrificed everything, and live in a cage of my own making, to pay a debt to those friends, and to those who love me. To those people I say, remember "the plan"; love outlasts death. You people tried to sell me a concept of "friend" where the recipient would barely be affected if you were to die tomorrow. This has been a profound experience for me. Don't get me wrong. Using a technology that didn't exist twenty years ago (which I understand intimately), people outside my strange, dark world, have actually penetrated it in good, and bad, ways. People know the name, Derek Moran, as much as they know the name Pete Daoust. I mention those two names because those names represent the biggest failure, and biggest success (in that order), in THE TENDER FOR LAW. Pete dedicated 18 months to not only studying what I say, but in fact verifying what I say. He has a unique advantage because, being a native French speaker, he is forced to translate English words. Conversely, Derek Moran, doesn't have to translate what I say, and he has become a toxic virus that spreads everywhere, prompting people to worship clubhouse rules for a club in which they are not members. Cows don't work for Burger King. They're the product. The same is true with the legal system. Derek Moran tries to get people to worship these clubhouse rules, and the club in question isn't even bothering to follow them anymore. That brings me to the NOTICE part: My CONTRACTS and DEBTS to the ATTORNEY GENERAL expire in 2016. Any NOTICES I give must be given within 20 days of that expiry, and I think I'm well within that window. I hereby NOTIFY the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, and those AGENTS therein who dared call themselves "friend", that I owe no DEBT to you now, and my obligations expire within the end of the year. You have forfeited all RIGHT to negotiation or CONSIDERATION, and are hereby ORDERED to settle all CLAIMS by AQUILAE and/or its TRUSTEES before January 1st, 2016. Should these debts not be settled by January 1st, 2016, I hereby CLAIM THE RIGHT to PUBLICLY DISCLOSE any and all interaction with the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA and/or the GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO by myself and/or JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN. I hereby rescind any and all signatures binding myself and/or JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN to secrecy and/or non-disclosure. I hereby CLAIM THE RIGHT to monetize any and all TESTIMONY regarding said obligations for non-disclosure and/or secrecy. These terms are not open to negotiation. ...I digress. I wrote the above NOTICE because it's actually relevant to this. I did a lot of great work, for a lot of the wrong things. It wasted my 20's playing "secret agent", and all the while I was targeting the wrong people. People who could have helped. I was very good at my job, because it turns out, the GOVERNMENT was smart enough to realize that I'd be too busy congratulating myself on how clever I was, to notice exactly what I was doing. I ended up solving a lot of uncomfortable problems for them, and now you're paying the price. For that, I can't be forgiven, but I can tell you the truth. It doesn't matter if you like it. It doesn't matter if you believe it; and in hindsight I realize I committed this horrible crime against you because I kept bad company. So like Ollie North I'm arming the Contras through ill-gotten gain (I even have the hot secretary), I consider my DEBT to all of you, PAID. I expected at this point you'd be asking the right questions by now, but it seems I have VASTLY underestimated how much your ilk cherish your delusions and/or programming. But even with that being true, I have demonstrably given you more than any "friend" ever did. I don't have many friends, but the ones I do have I value, and they worked very hard for the title. Can you say that about your "friends"? Take a look at the company you're keeping. Try to objectively analyze how your life would be affected if any of these "friends" were gone. I'm mentioning this to show you what you've been robbed of, because what has been stolen from you by the LAW SOCIETY, is more than you're able to comprehend. If I were to try to explain it to you, you wouldn't be able to understand it, because we don't have a common frame of reference. I know the mechanism of your programming. You don't. You can't. You ARE the program. More specifically you are the malware that robs you of actual thought. You are the mechanism that tells you to value the wrong things, and it's as direct and invasive as robo-roach [https://youtu.be/EsrorUT_Svc]; and here is the irony - the roach is not capable of understanding that anything's happening to it. Its brain simply lacks the complexity necessary to know the difference. It doesn't experience "mental trauma", and with these wonderfully horrible products of computer science, you can literally "drive a roach to death". You are NO different, in the Law Society's eyes. I mention this because that's what your government wants for YOU; To be stupid, unaware, and valuing bullshit. They were doing just fine until this "internet thing" came up, and you were able to quickly exchange information. As late as 1997, people were amazed that you could send an email half-way around the world for free. Now it's "officially" a "human right". You all take this amazing thing for granted. Wars have trouble starting because information moves faster than the war machines. This is something humanity has never had before; and allows me to stay somewhat relevant because I'm one of the few people left from the "early days" who knows what to do with all this shit, or how it all works. Stop keeping bad company. They're killing you. Stop accommodating delusion for the sake of "friendship". ...and stop pretending you weren't lied to. Seriously, a stranger on the Internet should not be able to give you more value than your "friend". Tagged but can't talk? GOOD! You had your chance. Now you and your bullshit can just sit and read. Bullshit has no voice here.

Look at THIS gem! THIS cunt and her ilk are part of the problem! ANY CORRECT information/knowledge, this cunt got from ME. It doesn't matter if she heard from lying free-dumbers or Piece-of-Shit Christians first. IT STILL CAME FROM ME! ...she'd disagree. To acknowledge reality would be to admit delusion on her part. "LUCID DREAMERS" are always under the delusion they are awake. They live their lives rationalizing to avoid being butt-hurt. I DEFY ANYONE ON THAT LIST TO COUNTER THAT POSITION!

From the WTF department

TRIPLE YOUR MONEY BACK!

He's always SO CLOSE. :D OK SIMU-DRONES! POP QUIZ! :D He's at SECURITY OF THE PERSON, but he STILL hasn't grasped AGENCY. WHERE IS HE WRONG in this video? GO!

Can we take this from the top? The person I happen to have received a SUMMONS today for a citation. Incidentally, the vehicles involved are property of SGMI....no matter. Can we go through this slowly? As you recall, I fucked it up (or maybe not, maybe they are this corrupt) last time. There are 3 charges Step 1, deposit 3 Birth Certificates into the Court File. Step 2, Notify all parties involved of the mistake in surety. Other interesting fact...this citation was issued on July 20, it didn't come into the persons mailbox until Aug 7, and was immediately Refused for Cause and returned to the court that the instructions said to send it to. The citation has not posted to the Drivers License account still.

I came across this post today. And since this is "costume time" for most (with the exception of some TTFL memebers! :D ), I thought I would share this from the Mothball's department! :D

ARE YOU A DEAN CLIFFORD or ROBERT MENARD victim? Did you want to join the TENDER FOR LAW without doing the whole Battlefield 2142 thing? YOU'RE IN LUCK! We are taking FREE-DUMB VICTIM STORIES! I have no victims, but Menard and Clifford DO! I'LL TAKE THOSE! I'm collecting VICTIMS. Head on over to THE TENDER FOR LAW! :D TELL YOUR TALE! We've been here for YEARS, and you STILL can't join unless I say so! The free-dumbers HATE that group because: 1: I give the ACTUAL answers, that they don't 2: They can't join. Ever. VICTIMS ONLY! ...AND NO PIECE-OF-SHIT CHRISTIANS! <--I mean that. Your belief in Zombie-Rape-Baby-Jesus CAUSED ALL OF THIS, and you are too stupid/ignorant to notice. Imaginary Zombie Rape-baby Jesus may "Forgive" you, but WE DON'T. Lot's of MENARD and Clifford Fun on Lou Manotti's timeline! As always, the gold is in the comments! Menard and Clifford are cowards who delete comments after a few hours, so be sure to screencap!

If it TOUCHES the Law Society/Courts/Government, REMEMBER THIS RULE!

I just had the urge to leave this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl0e5DrYLyY&feature=youtube_gdata_player

I am in the process of writing a book, yes, you hear it right, I AM WRITING A FUCKING BOOK. Tara Duncan gave me that confidence, I KNOW I can do it now. The book title is : AFFIDAVIT / AFFIRMATION SOLENNELLE This book will be a long AFFIDAVIT of my experiment of these last 4 years. It will be written exactly as an AFFIDAVIT, point by point. The goal was/is to determine, without ANY doubts, on whether I am FREE, or a SLAVE, and I have to admit that my belief was that the system would prove to me that I was FREE, but unfortunately, so far, the system prove the contrary, I AM A SLAVE. All these proofs were provided to me by the system itself, I still have 2 experiments to go through in these next few weeks to conclude this experiment, and then I�ll be able to publish that book. I will give the opportunity to ANYONE in that book, to take everything in this book AGAINST ME. This long AFFIDAVIT will present the TRUTH, and I am ready to spend the rest of my time in jail if ever I am lying in this book. I will not accept MONEY from the sale of this book, I am ready to give these rights to anyone, so if you feel for it, there�s your chance :D I am not in for the MONEY, I am in for the TRUTH. I want this book to be published in French, and then whoever would want to translate it, it�s going to be up to them. Lots of NAMES will APPEAR in this book, lots of them �.especially those who BELIEVE that I am their slave. Here�s how this book will start�.. :D 1. I am Pierre, I am the man who is in possession of the Legal Entity, and/or Legal person, and/or Juridical Personality named PIERRE DAOUST inscription number 1196604112851. 2. I have spent my life so far, in a free State, named Quebec. Free State having some treaties with a Country named CANADA. 3. �.. :D I have no idea what this will bring as a result, but EVERYONE will know the truth, WE ARE SLAVES, there will be no doubts, and I will give a special THANKS to ALL these agents, cops, judges, lawyers who brought these PROOFS to me on a silver plate. After that, I might lien the NAME :D

"Any drivers who sign up for the project will be required to carry a G license, have a $5 million insurance policy, and be responsible for any accidents should a police investigation conclude that they are at fault." Look at the fucking SURETY with the AVs (autonomous vehicles). So ONTARIO wants folks to remain as "drivers" even though they are no longer driving? :/

Mission accepted. Scott is right and tells the truth.

And now we revisit this scam-in-plain sight with JUSTICES/JUDGES. Dan Lien-your-Name Wilson drew attention to this, when he graciously showed all of you that the COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT only mentions "judges", and that a "JUSTICE" is NOT A JUDGE. GO CHECK! They are NOT THE SAME THING! ONTARIO HAS NO JUDGES. NONE! NOT EVEN ONE! The Toronto Star has NO liability when they use "Judge/Judges" instead of "Justice". They are ORDERED to by the Law society. The ONLY time they use the title "Justice" is when they are referring to a specific individual. Think long and hard about that. THIS is done ON PURPOSE.

I do not know very much about the Country of CANADA, but, isn't this clearly nepotism?

THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about. MONEY, and the hidden-in-plain-sight contract that is tendered daily. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. On the subject of liars:IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN, YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE! YOUR DELUSIONS ARE WHAT CAUSED ALL OF THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE. YOU HARM OTHERS WITH THOSE DELUSIONS. ADULTS WITH IMAGINARY FRIENDS ARE NOT ADULTS! THIS IS NOT A CHILDREN'S FORUM! You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D ...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted. Unless otherwise stated, BY DEFAULT, anything Scott. and/or Tara Duncan publishes, in THE TENDER FOR LAW, is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License: 1) You MUST say where it came from (Tara, Myself, or THE TENDER FOR LAW group) 2) You CANNOT derive works from it 3) You CANNOT MAKE MONEY off it. Make all the money you like off of "Scottisms" TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES. PEREMPTORY NOTICE: ALL WRITINGS PUBLISHED HERE BY AQUILAE AND/OR ITS TRUSTEES AND/OR ITS GRANTORS, ARE, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, PUBLISHED under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Have you tried to join and been IGNORED? GOOD! That's what's supposed to happen! If you don't have a ROGUESUPPORT BATTLEFIELD 2142 SOLDIERNAME, YOU DON"T GET IN! You had 2 years. Go fuck yourself. WORK for it. Read the group and figure out how. EARN YOUR VOICE HERE! Also: Jimmy Hoffa; Call your office.

THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about. MONEY, and the hidden-in-plain-sight contract that is tendered daily. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. On the subject of liars:IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN, YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE! YOUR DELUSIONS ARE WHAT CAUSED ALL OF THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE. YOU HARM OTHERS WITH THOSE DELUSIONS. ADULTS WITH IMAGINARY FRIENDS ARE NOT ADULTS! THIS IS NOT A CHILDREN'S FORUM! ...I digress You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D ...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted. Unless otherwise stated, BY DEFAULT, anything Scott. and/or Tara Duncan publishes, in THE TENDER FOR LAW, is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License: 1) You MUST say where it came from (Tara, Myself, or THE TENDER FOR LAW group) 2) You CANNOT derive works from it 3) You CANNOT MAKE MONEY off it. Make all the money you like off of "Scottisms" TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES. PEREMPTORY NOTICE: ALL WRITINGS PUBLISHED HERE BY AQUILAE AND/OR ITS TRUSTEES AND/OR ITS GRANTORS, ARE, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, PUBLISHED under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Have you tried to join and been IGNORED? GOOD! That's what's supposed to happen! If you don't have a ROGUESUPPORT BATTLEFIELD 2142 SOLDIERNAME, YOU DON"T GET IN! You had 2 years. Go fuck yourself. WORK for it. Read the group and figure out how. EARN YOUR VOICE HERE! Also: Jimmy Hoffa; Call your office.

WE ARE COMING... ...BACK

Off to court....lets see how this one goes.

<<�Transactions to exchange traditional currencies for units of the bitcoin virtual currency (and vice versa) constitute the supply of services� under the bloc�s law �since they consist of the exchange of different means of payment,� the court ruled. As such they are exempt from value-added taxes, it said.>>

Questions that will help ME purge and bring ME some clarity, and perhaps some others. Is this Statement of Birth authentication process people are going on about worth doing or just stupid and do the parallels in brackets I inserted from reading this group make any sense? Please place this on the autopsy table and explore. This is my limited understanding of it so far when you have possession of the authenticated live birth statement you now possess the name and the knowledge and/or information and the rights (first hand) that the informant (accusation) originally granted as grantor (information/knowledge) bringing it from the public to the private? (Rather than being the Carrier of, it�s now been delivered to the beneficiary) so if you possess the knowledge (the document) you have first hand knowledge rather than hearsay and own the fruit of your labor thereof if you can remain in the private. Would this perfect the title and/or make the claim to it? Would this brass ring that binds it and attached at the provincial/state level authenticating the signature, act as a seal and not allow them to open/administrate in the public without our permission? (Affirmation sent registered mail to Registrar General making the claim and removing presumptions is good enough they can�t rebut they are not a person)

Notice of FRAUD Case No. 700-01-133003-148 UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED. Ok�. 1). They�ve handcuffed me. (Oct. 2014) 2). They�ve brought me into a cage. 3). They�ve searched my pockets and suitcase 4). They�ve found Government ID�s 5). They�ve used these ID�s without my consent and without telling me WHO was the party with surety. 6). They�ve took PICTURES of my face by force 7). They�ve asked me several times for my NAME, I always answered: I am pierre, the man who possess the legal entity named PIERRE DAOUST inscription 1196604112851, and its SOLE authorized Administrator and asked WHERE IS SURETY. They even WROTE this in their police report, trying to make me look like a crazy guy :D 8). They asked me to follow them so they could take my fingerprints, I said no thanks, they said we are five here, and we will take your fingerprints by force, and rest assure that we will take your fingerprints, like it or not. So I said well, in spite of myself, I will follow you. 9). I NEVER gave my signature to any of their stuff. 10). They�ve wrote four traffic tickets in the name of PIERRE DAOUST. How in the fuck the ACCUSED can be UNIDENTIFIABLE after this ? :D 11). I asked for surety again, they laughed and said, what the fuck are you on with this surety thing, I said ARE YOU GOING TO VIOLATE THE RIGHT TO THE SURETY TO ME ?, they said, not only us we will, but the JUDGE will too. I said, thanks for the information. 12) They brought me in front of the judge, I have lost it at that point and yelled WHERE THE FUCK IS SURETY�..they made me sleep there, and the day after, I have managed to get out, without surety�..all that, happened in October 2014. 13). When I got back home, I have sent an AFFIDAVIT, telling them EXACTLY who I am, with a Notice of MISTAKE hook to it, and a SURETY BOND (Birth Certificate) hook to it too. These document has been sent registered mail, attentioned to JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, CASE NUMBER 700-01-133003-148 14) April 24th 2015, I was there, in court, room RC-02, in St-Jerome Quebec. (Some of you can order the transcript, that would be fun ) 15). To make a long story short, that was the �pro-forma� The justice told me that the party with surety will be present for the hearing, on nov.16th 2015. 16) I have gave the JUSTICE a copy of these three documents he received via registered mail, because I asked him if he read them, and he said no I haven�t seen them :/ 17). Again, that day, I said I AM pierre, the MAN who possesses the juridical personality named PIERRE DAOUST inscription number 1196604112851, no one argued to this� :P 18). They know EXACTLY who I am, they received two AFFIDAVIT on this matter. 19) . OK, so my wife received this week a �Subpoena to Witness� :D They are COMMANDING my wife to be there on Nov. the 16th, so she can act as a witness for the crown. For the case number 700-01-133003-148 that has an UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED. 20) I am not making that up, they, as of October the 16th 2015, still have a fucking UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED�..look, I�ll post pictures of the subpoena�. :D 21). Now, I wonder what these Quatloos super genius will think of that ? �..please share this, as far as you can�.this shit will be FULLY PUBLIC as of now�. 22). THIS IS PURE FRAUD��not only there�s a huge mistake with this case, but now they are committing FRAUD�.the crown thinks that my wife is one of their slaves, maybe they haven�t studied the MARRIAGE TRUST. My wife�s person gets administrate by ME, They will have to go over me to get to my wife. The only option for them now is to declare PUBLICLY that I am their property, there�s no way out. This will make one heck of an exciting ENDING, for the book I am almost finished with�. No really, they, after a full year, tons of pictures, traffic tickets written, finger prints taken, affidavit received, birth certificate received, ME telling them in their face WHO THE FUCK I AM, they still have a FUCKING UNIDENTIFIABLE ACCUSED�. HERE: �.you fucking FRAUDSTERS�. I AM Pierre, I am the man who possesses the Juridical Personality named PIERRE DAOUST inscription number 1196604112851. THIS IS WHO THE FUCK I AM, Her Majesty the Queen ENACTED this, in the Quebec�s Charter of Rights and Freedom��..bunch of LIARS�.. I-AM-COMING !!!!!!!!!!!.....you will bring ALL the proofs I need that you really believe that I AM YOUR SLAVE��..and it will be PUBLIC RECORD. AGAIN, WHO IS THE PARTY WITH SURETY for case n. 700-01-133003-148. That�s ALL there is, SURETY and who accounts for it��bring it on, IT�S YOUR JOB, that�s why we are PAYING you for, dear JUSTICE. FRAUD = CRIMINAL CHARGES, right? :/

These "driver's" license will be obsolete one way or the other it seems :D

Landon Christopher's last question was about the STATEMENT OF LIVE BIRTH, so let's look at the form itself! Take what you have learned, and see what it says! :D

Just catching up with a couple of threads here... So Scott is acting chairman of the Illuminati... A society established to fight the abuse of state power, superstition and religious control over the masses. I've a few of questions... 1. Is it right to assume that the dis-information about the Illuminati that is out there is the work of the very people the society is trying to fight? I'll be honest, until I read the Wikipedia entry for the Illuminati, I was under the impression that they were the bad guys, the state power, the overpowering control behind governments... Now it would appear they are the opposite... My own ignorance is to blame on that one though... 2. What was the purpose of the setup of The Tender for Law group to teach us to think right and thus gather worldwide agents for the building of a trustless banking network? 3. Also, do you guys know who killed Kennedy? :p

'I made a MISTAKE,' Linda Jeffrey says. Me thinks it was not a MISTAKE that she chose to use this word ;) A litle more that a year and a half ago BEFORE I joined the Tender for Law I would not have NOTICEd this word.

"Trust, but verify." The first time I ever read those words was here, and obviously they came from Scott Duncan. I share this, because we have a few new members since last year, and some have not had the opportunity to even reach at the begging of this group to read things, thus missing perhaps some things that have been publicly verified by members of this group. Things nobody here knew even existed... like SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR. :D And it was Scott Duncan who taught us about the AGENT within. Becoming part of this group to follow Scott's teachings has become "a must" part of my life, for many reasons. And I have had the opportunity to verify a few things, to the point of PROOF. You know, a SIGNATURE. Last year, I set out to, as a COURTESY, inform via NOTICE to a few AGENCIES, and the PRINCIPAL, that the Sole Authorized Administrator was now in town. Now think about this: if SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR was some "freeman" or crazy thing, would a public official such as... the State Comptroller, even acknowledge such TITLE? If it's something "crazy," why would even respond to such communication? Yes. VERIFIED! Hell, they even gave INSTRUCTIONS to the AGENT on what to do with some documents that were attached. So, Quatloosers, who is "crazy" now? Scott Duncan, or the State Comptroller? Hahaha! :D

THE TRUST (MATH) MACHINE!!! Front cover of the Economist!

Derek Moran gets his own porn site. He will be jerking off to clubhouse rules permanently.

This is legal GOLD! What do they mean when they say the 6 day-old baby was NOT a PERSON yet? :D Hahaha! Oh, man! Either babies magically turn into persons, OR the PERSON is something the baby would had HAVE. Which one is it? :D

Found this on the internet. Is it me or this makes no sense? What is the INTENT here?

But the Federal Reserve says it has "no intrinsic value." Hahaha!

A former ATTORNEY GENERAL would like you to know that... "If I told you that most people in jail are innocent, you might roll your eyes at presumed lefty claptrap. But this is a fact, not a conspiracy theory. Stats Canada: �On any given day in Canada, there are more adults in custody awaiting trial or sentencing in provincial/territorial facilities than there are adults serving a sentence.�

Everywhere I look it seems I am reminded of Scott Duncan :) "The decision states that there was no evidence to suggest why Kan did not activate his camera, but Weidmark wrote that �IT IS REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE� he was trying to conceal his actions. " A parasitical lying sack-of-shit is the focus of this article, and there are other significant aspects deserving of comment but �it is (or is not) reasonable to conclude� is one of my favourites when constructing an affirmation.

Dean Clifford 4 hrs � Edited � Awwww, no Mr.Bates in court today, no jurisdiction, and no sentencing. Whoops! Shitty deal. On the bright side, bail conditions are gone. Sorry to disappoint all my detractors HOW?

From the "ALL COPS WANTS TO DO IS CREATE JOINDER" dept. :D

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/imf-director-tells-banks-do-not-worry-about-bitcoin-blockchain/ Them's fightin' words! ?

What does the term "Working Under the Table" mean ? :D What in the actual fuck is that TABLE represents? Why a TABLE? :P What's OVER the TABLE that doesn't exist UNDER it? (From the Peanut Butter dept.) :P

CONSPIRACY ALERT!!!! :-o WHY in the fucking fuck EVERYONE in here is now Lou Manotti's facebook friend and NOT ME ? Are you guys RACISTS? .....even the spic is.... :/ :(

Check this out!

The "Pete is going to court on Nov. the 16th 2015" thread :D

AARON WOULD HAVE BEEN 29 TODAY

In the spirit of posting something that helps me because it might help others, I put forward the following: I posted a comment some time back, where I related part of a conversation I had with Scott Duncan. In that post, I mentioned that he is the only man who had ever taken the time with me to actually look up the definition of a word before resuming the conversation. Well, recently, that same word came up in another conversation I was having with someone else and guess what.... I had forgotten the precise definition. One of the things we are learning here is how damn important it is to be precise. So I had to go and look up that word again. But is that it? It was not so long ago, for me anyways, that yes, that would be it. But now, you see, I am putting some of the pieces together. I can "see" that my brain is actually running a program.... (thanks Scott) And I can "see" some of how it is working, and I can also see some of that "filter" in action. So in order to carry on into the next revision I wanted to make a change. I think that it is horrible that I forgot. It is small and insignificant on the surface sure, but when you dig a little deeper it really stings. Look at it this way... Here is a man whose time is very precious, and he gave me some of that time, for free, without asking anything in return... To impart something important unto me. So now, a year later, I had forgot something. I mean, if I let that pass it is like shitting on him for his efforts isn't it? So Fuck that. I want to figure out why, these words that I thought I knew but meant something other than what I thought, seem to slip back into the wrong category again with forgetfullness. I had invested the time and energy into looking something up only to have it slip away. I have experienced this more than once now, and now that I am watching for glitches in my thinking, I see them all over the place. How many are there that I don't see (yet). So I began a couple months ago looking into ways that computer science can help me solve this problem I am having. It is the answer to everything right? Although I have not got it totally sorted (yet) I think I am far enough along with this little experiment on myself to report back to anyone who cares to read this, what I have found. When investigating "forgetting" and learning tools, I came across a computer program that is using an algorithm to anticipate the precise point in which someone is about to forget a fact and it then brings it back up again for study/review. You can dig into the articles on their site if you want, just google supermemo and go from there. Overall, the idea is this. I determine what I want to learn and remember, and I feed that into the program. Then I trust the program to bring that back to my attention when I am about to forget it. In this way, I can be precise about what I want to keep, and what I want to let fall from my mind. Having said that, I still think that a program like this is a crutch. Although, if I were to draw a comparison, I think of it like a guy that has been in a wheelchair for years, and now needs to walk... Let him use the crutch until he can do it on his own. I know that I was/am broken. I know now that I've been lied to all my life. I cannot unlearn what I have been shown. What I can do though is put the effort into NOT doing that to others. I see now, since being exposed to Scott/Tara and the rest of the Tender For Law group, the damage that inflicts. I do NOT want to be a raindrop that contributes to the flood. So with more work, perhaps I will purge the rest of the crap, and retain the gold.

Lol-ing at this... Yes, I said lol...

Can a savings account be seized without a court order? I've not heard a word from the CRA since my 2012 court case, they have now seized my savings account which I was using as deposit only and immediately removing the balance as well as transferring Group RRSP's monthly for withdrawl. Like a good admin I checked the p.o. box and no notice was given, the bank claimed to have a court order which I demanded a copy, turns out not to be a court order it's an unsigned form. In the past the CRA had sent a remittance voucher so currently I have nothing to administrate.

Relying heavily on a divorce case. http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2015/2015abqb700/2015abqb700.html I've not heard of this Peter of England.

No reason to worry if you're not doing anything wrong :/

All of your GIF's belong to them! Now you can be SURETY for posting someone else's GIF's in the US! Coming soon to "Canada"!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3307965/Laughing-law-Rioters-refuse-names-police-court-set-free-asked-come-year.html Lots goin on in this article... Where does one start?!

What..............the fuck?

The Muslims are coming...wait! They were already here.

Hahaha! If Scott Duncan crashes a party, it might look like this!

The Mentally Ill thread: Somewhere, and I think it was Stuart Stone, someone said that legally mentally ill requires a member of the Law Society making an accusation which needs to be endorsed by a Doctor. I have not found this information. Where can I find this information?

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/ghostsec-isis-bitcoin-wallet-worth-3-million/ Poster children for the technology's security... ?

LEGALLY a SIGNATURE IS PROOF OF CONSENT/UNDERSTANDING. NOTHING MORE. A SIGNATURE IS ONLY USED FOR THOSE TWO THINGS! EVER! IF YOU CLAIM YOU HAVE USED YOUR SIGNATURE FOR ANY OTHER REASON, YOU ARE EITHER LYING, OR YOU HAVE BEEN SCAMMED! -Scott Duncan

Work with the President of the Treasury Board to ensure accounting consistency between the Estimates and the Public Accounts. Ensure that Agents of Parliament are properly funded and accountable only to Parliament, not the government of the day, in collaboration with the President of the Treasury Board. These MANDATE LETTERS MENTION ALOT OF ACCOUNTING - See more at: http://pm.gc.ca/eng/leader-government-house-commons-mandate-letter#sthash.SHM12CYz.dpuf

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/satoshi-nakamoto-not-eligible-nobel-prize/ I had my suit picked out ?

From the "We've already won" department...

Hey, we all know that Dean Clifford and Rob Menard didn't listened to Scott Duncan, about Bitcoin :D But I am sitting here and wonder about HOW MANY LISTENED ? :D And what kind of crazy wealth these folks have and WHAT are they going to do with it..... :P Imagine 10 of us having 200,000 Bitcoin each, or 300,000, and doing what's RIGHT with it :D Just a thought..... ...go fuck yourselves Quatloosers :P QQQUUUAAAAATTTLLOOOSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D Ok, nevermind, this is just crazy talk.... :P

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/breaking-european-union-crisis-meeting-planned-to-call-for-control-of-virtual-currencies-after-paris-attacks/ "Can't we just turn off the server?" "We're looking into it..."

Oh man..... :D "What kind of commands did they give this individual?," :D Told you, we are SLAVES to them :P

The "Pete will have to face a bailiff on december the first 2015" thread Let see how I am going to fuck up this one good !!! :D EVERYONE is invited, bring your cameras :D p.s. I might take a break between the 25th and 26th of december :/

Stirrin' up the hive! :D

Scott you said nothing is hidden. What are they referring to with "SPECIAL SECURITY" in section 425. of the Bank Act, is that the birth certificate they are referring to?

Hey, remember when I was "crazy" telling you can be your own bank?

If you are not an instant fan of this woman, you are just a bad person.

Hmmmmmmm....So this happened after posting this: "You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW" I referenced both Scott and The Tender For Law here. I also said it is not our money but theirs. He who owns makes they rules Did I touch a nerve perhaps? This was done whilst having a very brief discussion about LEGAL TENDER and Crypto Currency to a couple of members of that group. That facebook group was brought to my attention today by a Mark Whellum who isn't a member but is following The Tender For Law. I think he wanted to stir a bit with info he has gathered from here. I could be wrong on that though

I'm not scared often, but I feel the need to be candid and let you know I'm getting somewhat scared now because I know the war is coming. My question is: What do I need to do within this month to prepare as best that i can?

"In the post, written as a letter to their new baby, Zuckerberg and Chan also pledged to donate 99 per cent of their Facebook shares � currently valued at US$45 billion � to charity, starting the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE." I think Aquilae would be a worthy recipient since they are IN REALITY making the world a bette place, but that's just crazy talk :D

"Police found a number of weapons...including a Russian anti-tank rifle capable of piercing body armour with a range of three kilometres." Bonus points for kidnapping a member of the law society. This guy had the right idea but poor execution, lol!

POSTED ON A THREAD DEAN CLIFFORD WAS LYING ON: I do believe Dean Clifford is trying to say Scott Duncan knows nothing about Law and Money. Strange. I could have sworn we watched him literally MAKE NEW MONEY. Oh that's right, Dean said he was "crazy". Those of us who listened want for nothing. Dean robbed you with his lies and will continue to do so, it seems. Here in REALITY, if your signature is not on it, IT'S NOT YOUR MONEY. Dean will lie to you about what a signature means. Here in REALITY it means Understanding and SURETY. Dean Clifford thinks all other trusts, contracts or property rights, except his, should be ignored. Scott Duncan just explains what the Legal Documents are. He claims no "magic" or "authority" in them. It's irrelevant, really. The record is clear: Dean Clifford sells bullshit. Literally SELLS it (I think the Hamilton Seminar folk need a refund) and what did it get you? ). Scott Duncan gave ANSWERS and a way out. Those that listened to him in 2010 became comically wealthy off of the money (500 BTC) Scott Duncan GAVE them when he taught them how to receive their first payment. For those curious; That's about $180,000 USD today. Dean Clifford wasn't interested, and proceeded to hide what Scott Duncan was doing. I believe "crazy" was the word he used? Now, here he is, lying about money and law, again. THE TENDER FOR LAW has answered every question and shown everyone what to do. Three years that group has been around. Dean was even IN it for the first year; Right up until he was carted off to the Fortress of Remand! :D Waste your time listening to Wolverine Cosplay Guy, or listen to those who tell you the truth. Your choice. As Scott Duncan often says, "Reality doesn't care what you believe". In reality, Scott Duncan showed you YEARS ago, how to make your own currency and bank. Now the pinned post is some cute chick explaining it. Ask yourself what the next 5 years will be like for Dean Clifford and his ever growing stack of lies. It's pretty predictable. Now ask yourself what Scott Duncan's same half-decade will be like. I watched that man secure people's futures. He asked nothing in return. NOTHING. He asks for your time and attention. He doesn't want to hear about your delusions or beliefs (Those are why you are being exploited) and won't let you pick and choose the parts you like. 2016 will be a VERY interesting year. We have NO obligations, oaths, or undertakings outside our original mandate. This means Scott Duncan is free to do as he wishes. No restrictions. It means he can tell you things he hasn't told you before. If you thought building your own currency/bank was "crazy", you're going to think the insanity of this next 3 years, lacks a word describing that level of "crazy"; Banks and Currencies are just the start. Next comes the deployment of the OVERLAY network! Don't know/care what that is? YOUR LOSS! Free isn't good enough for you people, it seems. We NEED this part adopted/deployed, so we will PAY you to use it. USE it. Nothing else. No ads. No spyware. No catch. ALL of it will be OPEN SOURCE so you can TRUST and VERIFY what you are running is acting ONLY in your interest, and ONLY at your request. You will be providing key infrastructure that cannot be spied on, or shut down, by ANYONE. It will connect you to 3 "black" networks so you can be untraceable and have instant access to "deep web" sites. It will also be the only place where you can get the next opportunities. Bitcoin was a freebie. Like a crack dealer. The next ones you are going to have to work for. Listen to a lying butt-hurt free-dumber, or listen to THE TENDER FOR LAW. The internet NEVER forgets. Tell us, Dean...

received a letter from QRA asking for the informations below: Your home phone number: _______ _______________ Your work phone number: _______ _______________ Of course they want this on there form and sent via the supposedly pre-addressed envelope (that wasn't there) so they can take care of the file. "They add..." If you do not provide us with those informations or documents aseked in the 30 days following ..... We will have to treat your declarations according to the informations we already have. :D They're funny!

If anyone is interested in Scott Duncan's gold nuggets.... This file is ONLY Scott's comments, with links back to the appropriate thread for reference purposes only.

Security Protection; assurance; indemnification. The term security is usually applied to a deposit, lien, or mortgage voluntarily given by a debtor to a creditor to guarantee payment of a debt. Security furnishes the creditor with a resource to be sold or possessed in case of the debtor's failure to meet his or her financial obligation. In addition, a person who becomes a surety for another is sometimes referred to as a "security."

Shit, I am not on the list :/ Maybe next year :D 40th anniversary of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms The Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse honours 40 human rights defenders

Hey New Hampshire; do you understand that I HAVE a person? FUCK! Ok, let me find that NOTICE OF MISTAKE...

Finally! :D

Ok, since every one can read here, I do NOT care about your fucking mortgages......seriously, if you don't want to PAY for what you've asked for.....I DON'T CARE......leave me alone with these fucking mortgages .....I am not into "not paying my mortgage" :P Shane Pennell Pete, I have 4 rental properties(4mortgages). Do you you think liening the name would make trouble for me at the time of the mortgage renewal? I think I am "shit out of luck" at least until the Dogecoin gains some traction... Pete Daoust 19:58 Pete Daoust LOL.....why would you lien the name ? Shane Pennell 20:26 Shane Pennell Hmm ... so I can stop being robbed of these debts.. Maybe I'm too chicken shit to challenge the debts without the ability back it up $$.. Pete Daoust 21:02 Pete Daoust Idon't really understand where you are going with this.......sell these houses if they are not good for you :/

Julius Cruise joins us to tell of his Menard/Clifford adventures! Don't be shy, Julius! Tell Your Story! :D

DUELING DOUCHES! :D Quatlosers Vs. Clifford! Master Bates notices Dean C. Clifford issuing takedown notices all over youtube! These are, of course, part of his "crown rat" undertakings; It turns out that having people SWATed isn't enough to pleas his new masters, considering how it didn't really pan out. Now he's "Cleaning Up" the internet of his videos... Using LEGAL claims... Let that one sink in.

Fuck, guess what ?? .....we receive letters too :/ 2015-12-10 15:01 James Nicoll You don't have to add me as a friend, but would you be able to give me some advice on how to do things here in Quebec? I was in Ontario for 20 yrs and just recently moved back. Most of the information is for the rest of Canada. Quebec does things differently and any advice would be welcomed. I was following Eternally aware for a couple years, but from other research I felt he was missing certain things. Danny Perez was helpful, but he advocates getting the Act of Birth instead of the Birth Certificate or Record of Live Birth. I've read some of Scott's stuff, but he isn't the most pleasant man to talk to. If you can offer some help great, if not, can you recommend someone that can. I'm friends with Derek, but not sure how well he knows this stuff, since Scott looks down on him. Thanks for your time. :/

You want to look.

Scott Duncan I am curious what your "Top 10" book list would be for young folks to read before they are all fucked up by this current "society". You commented in the past about how our children "might" have a chance. Are there any authors you would recommend to those kids?

Well Scott...you are RIGHT once more. I had never heard of STINGRAYS before you mentioned them this past summer. I suppose most folks would dismiss it as PARANOIA :/ These are the majority who will never acknowledge that POLICE STATE is coming until it's already here.

I have sent Hydro-Quebec a few bills of exchange now and they've responded with this "nice" letter and a Consent or Proxy Authorization Form relating to the 'Act respecting access to documents held by public bodies and the protection of personal information (CQLR, chapter A-2.1)'. It appears this Act came into force the same year as the Charter (UK CANADA ACT 1982) I've skimmed through the Act and the word PERSON appears in various forms a whopping 474 times! As well as 7 instances of the words NATURAL PERSON. Here's a few other things in the Act I found interesting: 3. [...] The courts within the meaning of the Courts of Justice Act (chapter T-16) are not public bodies. 1982, c. 30, s. 3; 1982, c. 62, s. 143; 1992, c. 21, s. 375. 5. Municipal bodies include (3) a mixed enterprise company established under the Act respecting mixed enterprise companies in the municipal sector (chapter S-25.01) and a similar body established under a private Act, in particular the legal persons constituted under chapters 56, 61 and 69 of the statutes of 1994, chapter 84 of the statutes of 1995 and chapter 47 of the statutes of 2004. (See chapter 56) 54. In any document, information concerning a natural person which allows the person to be identified is personal information. 1982, c. 30, s. 54; 2006, c. 22, s. 110. 56. The name of a natural person is not personal information, except where it appears in conjunction with other information concerning him, or where the mere mention of his name would disclose personal information concerning him. 1982, c. 30, s. 56; 2006, c. 22, s. 110. 58. The sole fact that a signature is affixed at the bottom of a document does not make the information shown therein personal. 1982, c. 30, s. 58; 2006, c. 22, s. 110 I know they simply can't SEE the man, so to speak and that I don't want to claim NATURAL PERSONhood. I have re-read Persons for Idiots and Agency for Idiots yet I'm still not certain what they're games is here. Is this just another attempt at getting joinder or something else?... Pete?

From "The bailiff came today" dept :/ They could NOT entered the house, but they took the camper outside the house :/ I gave everything I have, EVERYTHING is on film.....will post this later on. And will give more details later on.... The bailiff told the cops that there were no such thing as Bill of Exchange sent to the city of Terrebonne, they don't know what I am talking about :D I have it on tape......

Apparently, we're not buying enough "PUBLIC" debt. PS Scott Duncan says HELLO! (HELLOS)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pfwCTsY08HMrwijOhDRlgraGewoS_g3nQsdnE4LjopQ/edit#

Hey, Kent Barrett, can you help ? :) This book needs a front cover, and a back cover� The front cover will show the title of the book, which is: "Sommes nous esclaves de la dette publique ?" Yes, the book�s title is a fucking question :D On the front bottom, in smaller character, I want: "Vous �tes TOUS pr�sum�s ESCLAVE de cette dette publique" The front cover will show a fucktard (man) with a few vampires in the background representing elected fucktards, ready to suck that fucktard�s blood. For the back cover, I need this to be written� "TOUT EST PRIVIL�GE CONC�D� PAR L��TAT -- VOTRE VOITURE, VOTRE MAISON, VOTRE PROFESSION, BREF VOTRE VIE; ET CE QUE L��TAT DONNE, IL PEUT LE REPRENDRE SI VOUS N��TES PAS UN CONTRIBUABLE DOCILE� d�claration faite et reconnue devant une commission de l�assembl�e Nationale du Qu�bec par M. Pierre-Andr� Par�, sous-ministre du Minist�re du Revenu du Qu�bec. (Le Devoir, 6 avril 1996, p.1)" And if you can draw on the background a few vampires with whips whipping fuctards�..that would be great. I hope you get the idea Kent, now let your ART speak. Please post results here, maybe other members can help too !! ... Thanks Pete.

I wonder how many of my detractors will call me a "Nazi sympathizer" for all of these? If you happen to be one of those, just assume you are too stupid to get the joke, and move on.

ALL belief is EVIL...where have we heard that before :P "Agnosticism is of the essence of science, whether ancient or modern. It simply means that a man shall not say he knows or believes that which he has no scientific grounds for professing to know or believe. Consequently Agnosticism puts aside not only the greater part of popular theology, but also the greater part of anti-theology. On the whole, the "bosh" of heterodoxy is more offensive to me than that of orthodoxy, because heterodoxy professes to be guided by reason and science, and orthodoxy does not.[13] � Thomas Henry Huxley" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism

I want everyone to remember this. THIS is why I don't give a shit what happens to any of you. Everyone who seeks me out, consumed my time and resources and shit on me for my trouble. You want my time/resources? Bring me a body part of someone who has wasted my time and fucked me around. THAT will buy an hour of my time. No more. Henceforth my time is payed in blood. It's the only currency I'll accept from an outsider. This is why. You are ALL the same.

Crown Rat Cliffords lies are growing exponentially. Recorded just a few days ago. The beautiful benefits of testifying !! WTF?? This is part one of three, I didn't get past part too, the bullshit was so overwhelming. :(

skype:aquilae.lab?call Last skype call EVER. Skype aquilae.lab