The Tender For Law

Volume 11

Aug 01, 2015 11:32 AM

Harry Wombat

O.K. For what seems like obvious reasons, now you guys have me thinking about UNDERWRITERS and UNDERTAKERS of ESTATES who SEIZE SURETY for their BENEFIT, rather than deflect it, and use it to their advantage to INSURE themselves (not to mention all of that in a blockchain) and UNDERWRITE their endeavors.

Fast frward to...

"I accept your OATH" (here i see SURETY and ACCOUNTING and UNDERWRITERS): is something I want to know more about. Is this notion merely FREEDUMB postulations?

^^ Article request about seizing and accepting all surety in all matters. I know this may seem UBER odd, but, I think my EDUCATED inkling about the advantages of seizing/claiming ownership of SURETY might bear fruit :)

Please and thank Scott. <--- Notice how I didn't sat YOU?

Read Comments

Harry Wombat

I know we have been taught to deflect surety at all times. I hesitated asking, but, curiosity got the best of me. :/

******

My question arose from re-listening to Sino General and his interviews with Winston Shrout.

As you likely know, Winston teaches to always deflect surety as well. However, as you may also know, he occasionally mentions, that he has learned enough about law that quite often he is eager to accept and be surety, explaining only that there is a very good reason why people start insurance companies which go out of their way to be surety - it's the most powerful legal position to have.

******

Hearing that Winston himself likes to be surety caused cognitive dissonance as it goes against everything I/we have learned (and what Winston teaches as well).

My hope was that Scott might shed some light on why Winston (and insurance companies) see a tremendous advantage to accepting surety for as much as they can, rather than deflecting it.

My thought was that whatever Winston was referring to might fit in well with the topic of underwriting that has surfaced here recently. :(

Scott Duncan

Not really. The fact that you are compelled to feel that about strangers, means there is a much deeper problem afoot.

These are just parasites. They are largely irrelevant.

They live off your credulity, not by TAKING anything from you.