The Tender For Law

Volume 11

Jul 10, 2015 1:00 AM

Scott Duncan

WE! GET! LETTERS!

This week, our heroic Admiral gets invited by a fan's sister for an INTERVIEW (Not an interrogation, an INTERVIEW). She want's to be a LAWYER, and she's going for her "B.A. in International Law" (A Bimbo Degree), but the fact that she's THIS FAR means SHE ALREADY KNOWS.

Monty doesn't seem too anxious to answer my very compelling questions. :D

Photos from Scott Duncan's post

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

While we are waiting for Monty to get back to me, perhaps the Simu-Drones can give some insight into why I would be so open about wanting to inflict violence against a stranger I've never met?

Why am I SO SURE she deserves it?

Scott Duncan

Seriously, I ask for an answer. Silence.

All of you assholes LOVE to FUCKING GUSH about HOW MUCH you want to FUCKING THANK me for ALL YOU'VE LEARNED, and you BEG for things to compensate me for my time, and offer money, but the SECOND I make my wishes KNOWN, then ALL of you provide an excuse.

@Andrew FatOne [https://www.facebook.com/spyder666] thought the "free speech rights" of a piece-of-Shit Christian was more important than any debt owed to me. It's why Tara Duncan publicly trashes him, whenever he tries to leave the impression that he is "inner circle".

From then until now, you are ALL the same. I always ask a TINY thing, and it's always when your lying hypocrisy SHINES THROUGH.

Scott Duncan

I give HUGE VALUE, TRUTH, AND KNOWLEDGE! 1000 TIMES the value of what I ask, and EVERY ONE of you have stiffed me. EVERY ONE of you.

...and when you do, YOU'LL LIE!

The Fender actually says I "Wasted 2 years of his life", and all I asked of him was that he finish what he starts.

Why do all of you, who will happily take as much as you can from me never give ME the TINY THING I NEED, WHEN I need it?

SOMEONE explain that to me!

Alan Day

"...why I would be so open about wanting to inflict violence against a stranger I've never met?"

Because she is a (trainee) lawyer. There are NO good lawyers.

The fact she is a trainee means she is learning to harm to people.

She knows yet she continues studying to be a lawyer. Means she wants to harm people

Scott Duncan

Monty has raised my contempt for humanity by another point.

Sometimes one of you will message me to gush about how fucking grateful you are, and I just don't respond, because I just want to tell you to fuck off, because I hear that same old tired tale OVER and OVER again.

This cowardly little shit MESSAGED ME with something, I simply can't have ANY interest in, and he won't answer my fucking questions?

Piece-of-Shit Christian's "Free Speech" rights to spread lies and Nobility bullshit, is FAR more important than any debt owed to ME!

...and you are all OK with it. ALL of you.

Steven Sharp

"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "GOOD" LAWYER: There are NO EXCEPTIONS to this rule. The LAW SOCIETY LITERALLY claims OWNERSHIP of you (INDIVIDUALS), and there is NO scenario where anyone "good" could look at themselves in the mirror, if they claim to "own" you."

-Scott Duncan

Isaiah Whitney

Lawyers are some of the worst parasites. They make a living selling belief in fiction while producing no value themselves only stealing from those that do. They've stolen from the Admiral as well as countless others.

Scott Duncan

But I don't ask that of people. I ask for LITTLE things at the RIGHT TIME. I SEE MORE. You don't need to know WHY I'm asking, you just fucking DO it. Otherwise, Shut the fuck up with how fucking "grateful" you are. It's a lie, and I ALWAYS call you on it.

Scott Duncan

I have more respect for the Quatlosers. They actually believe the lies they make up. They really do.

What they DON'T do is claim I've "changed their life" and pretend to REALLY WANT TO COMPENSATE.

I ask that questions get answered.

I ask the lies be silenced.

I ask that promises be kept.

NEVER anything big. NEVER anything that costs you. Yet it's always "too much".

Fuck all of you.

Scott Duncan

Monty likely thinks my reaction is "crazy" and "over-the-top".

People think that about me calling Piece-of-Shit Christians, "Piece-of-Shit Christians", as well...

...until they see WHY I do it. Then I appear restrained.

Will Jefferson

I only ever knew one of the parasites personally and he oozed hypocrisy.

His grandfather's deathbed wish was that he not become a lawyer because this man knew there was no way to be a lawyer and a good man.

Herman Turkstra is now a semi retired constitutional lawyer currently residing in Hamilton Ontario.

?

Pete Daoust

The freeman movement....

I have better chances to find a toothpaste movement than a freeman movement...

I've been tagged last monday as I was IN the freeman movement, that QRA agent wanted it so bad....

He was all over it, the audio I have from this is hilarious, he FORCES me to be in that mysterious freeman movement. Poor guy, he gave me so many evidences that his goal was to associate me by FORCE to that mysterious thing :D

Pete Daoust

I said hey, I just want to know, and for three years now, if I can use the surety.....I am not one of these fucking freeman.....

He said that there was no such thing called surety :D

I said really ? so why is it said at article one that I have the right to it ?

He said I don't know I haven't read the charter :D

And he followed with, WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PUBLIC DEBT (I have no idea why he thrown that one),

I said OH.....thanks then :D

Pete Daoust

I just told him to send these bills of exchange back, and that I will PAY. he said they might have put them in the garbage :D

I started to laugh, and then he said that the other agent who took care of PIERRE DAOUST's case might have put them somewhere he don't know :D

Pete Daoust

One guy, who saw my video 0008, said to me:

Oh my best bet best friend she's a lawyer, I'll show her and will ask her what she thinks,,,,,

It's been two weeks now that she saw rhe video, and that guy told me today: It's weird, she don't want to talk about it !! :D

Scott Duncan

Clock's ticking, Dougie! Pay your bills, or face the people I am FORCING to buy it. THEY keep their word! Legally, and Lawfully, and they are going to want to recoup their losses.

These are VERY pissed off people who have been forced to buy that debt, but YOU provided the evidence.

Low, altered a public record, and WE PROVED it.

I didn't even kill the cops that boarded my vessel, because that would have broken my oath to HER MAJESTY. I KEEP MY OATHS, EVEN WHEN EVERYONE ELSE DOESN'T.

My debtors pay the price, and they KNOW who's responsible. Pray to your Joo God that they give you the chance I did.

Thing is, of all of HER MAJESTY'S Privateers...

...I'm the "nice" one. Except maybe Daniel J Wentz. Still, I'm surely in the top 5...

...of the "nice" pirates. :/

Hmmm... not really selling this, am I?

Well, in 2016 I have my sights on MUCH BIGGER things, and I need to build infrastructure for all of you, so you can see the war in real-time, and possibly evade detection when needed.

My aspirations are GLOBAL. I'm JUST GETTING STARTED. They could have left me alone, and kept their side of the bargain, and NONE of this would have happened.

Imagine what I will do when I TRULY AM a FREE MAN!

What will I do with the empire of "rust and hashes"? <---(Dr Who Reference mocking cops: End of Time ep1 29m:00s)

HASHES! Blockchains! Get it? :D

...the end draws near :D

Scott Duncan

Truth is terrorism these days. Poor Bin Laden. He's killed people, and shit, and I'm going to be in the same category. Everyone's OK with that, too.

...I'll be a "Terrorist" for telling the truth. That's it.

Let's make sure it's REALLY terrifying truth I tell then. The RIGHT people will have LOTS to be afraid of. They constructed me. I have SO MUCH to tell.

You see, when you try to make your cover stories about me "The truth", it means I am not breaking ANY agreement. I'm just a "crazy" guy who's served LOTS of "time"...

...except HUNDREDS of people interacted with me. For YEARS. What about all the places YOU deployed me to. THEY sure remember me! Are you going to threaten them into silence? :D Bad plan. I've prepared for it :D

Fix your errors, or I will tell you a story...

https://youtu.be/GoVLhUxhdSw

Scott Duncan

Wait until I start spilling "secrets". Everything I've shown you is hidden in plain sight! We haven't covered Canon Law! Brush up on your Latin, kiddies! You're going to need it!

As I said; ALL my oaths end in 2016. ALL of them. I timed it that way...almost 40 years ago! Yes. That long ago. The path wasn't clear back then, but I had a direction, and Computer Science to guide me.

MY ONLY regret is ALL THE MAGNIFICENT WORK I did, for the wrong people. It's time for those wrong people to have the regret. I have no use for it.

I'm giving everyone a means of storage and communication that can NEVER be silenced. It can never be turned off, and it can never be intimidated by a lawyer. :D

LAW, BANKING, COMMUNICATIONS, I'm targeting it all.

...as for GOVERNMENT... We'll govern ourselves, thank you.

YOU will starve, and if I have my way, your parasite children will be in the hold of a tanker, working in a fucking floating sweat shop, making things the people you exploit, want. It's to pay off their parasite debt. Every scrap of food they had, and every night they slept in a warm bed,and anything they spent money on, WAS TAKEN BY FORCE, BY SOMEONE ELSE! They can pay off their debt by serving their victims. Maybe they might learn what pieces of shit their parents are, along the way.

...ah, yes. IF I have my way. I have to disclose; I'm pretty used to getting my own way. It's an "Admiral" thing, and I freely admit, that that shit is thoroughly good. I admit, that it's great being the Admiral. I know it won't be forever, so I REALLY enjoy it while I can. :D

How's THAT for "crazy"? :D

Scott Duncan

I've waited half a lifetime for 2016, so I got LOTS of "crazy" to share! :D

I could go on all night, but instead, I shall say something that was "Crazy" 5 years ago, but is almost routine now: I'm off to build a bank. It will open with a net worth of $145 Million.

3 years ago, you would say "Bullshit Artist" or, of course, the old stand-by, "CRAZY"!

Now you would call yourself "crazy" for NOT accepting that as fact :D Let that sink in. Three short years, and you now know how to secure your future, in a way you could never conceive 5 years ago...

...but anyone and everyone who knows me, will testify that I SAW IT ALL COMING! I PREPARED for it.

It's time to "spread more crazy". :D

2016 is our year of "civil disobedience". I'm going to show you how to turn the NSA Snoop-net, into your own encrypted tunnel. "Illegal", you say? NOPE! The NSA will CONSENT. Your phone will ALWAYS broadcast to the government snoop-nets, the terms and conditions, connecting to the phone! :D

I heard John Affidavit Fernandes is looking to form trades networks for people wanting to sell their skill with Bitcoin! That is AWESOME! THAT is what ALL of you should be doing! Pushing your value ONTO THE BLOCKCHAIN!

Your wealth is PREDETERMINED and it rewards altruism. ALL European exchanges waived fees for Greece, and the price increase that resulted from mass adoption, allowed the exchanges to clean up! :D They made WAY more than any fucking "fees" would get them!

And ALL AUTOMATIC.

...and I will make MILLIONS OF COPIES OF IT!

See, as I LOVE saying; We've already won. You can't stop us now. You brought this on yourselves, and I'm YOUR MISTAKE. It's time to make YOU the MISTAKE, and leave it to better men than I, to correct.

I'm OPEN SOURCING, and LICENCING all my "secrets". I'm going to make Edward Snowden go all, like "Dude! WTF! You have had WAY more than me, for decades! WTF, dude! I had Hawaii, and a ballerina cum-bunny! WTF, DUDE! Why didn't you say something!", and I'll be like "Dude. Oaths. It's why I get to look down my nose at you. You could have quit. You didn't have to break your oaths.", and shit like that.

...but that's just "Crazy" talk :D

Scott Duncan

EVERYTHING government or the Law Society has constructed WILL BE USED AGAINST THEM. I WILL NOT STOP UNTIL MY DEBT IS PAID, AND UNTIL IT IS, I WILL KEEP TEACHING EVERYONE WHO IS INTERESTED. I AM MOTIVATED BY THAT DEBT, AND THAT DEBT BANKROLLS EVERYTHING I DO.

You couldn't handle ONE of me, what happens when there's HUNDREDS, who DO understand the issues.

If all the "Old School" folk at the ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE are all dead/retired, and it's all the Makris generation, then you guys got ROYALLY FUCKED by your predecessors! :D I haven't been there in 20 years. I don't know who the players are, and frankly I don't give a shit. You people brought this on yourselves.

I'm going to burn you with truth with the delight of a psychotic child burning ants with a magnifying glass. :D I'm not sure of my plans... questions...

Do I burn them with the truth ONE BY ONE, or do I do them all at once?

One at a time might cause panic, as calls for negotiation/surrender will go unanswered. This will instill panic, as the FIRST one couldn't be sure if I'm not some troll on the internet ("They should make that illegal". There is a piece of shit in EVERY government who wants to regulate speech), or if I'm a relic from days past.

The SECOND one will have an example to refer to, and will actively try to destroy evidence. They'll get caught.

The THIRD will just try to kill me.

...so, all at once, it is :D

Maximus Legis

Every time I hear the word Lawyer I want to vomit. Monty thye little Rat is probably the one who wants to be a fucking Lawyer and there's the first lie in his engaging with you Scott Duncan, he doesn't even have the balls to declare it.

Scott Duncan

What the hell! Here's a teaser. :D

Did you know: If a cop goes UNDERCOVER in a JAIL, they MUST USE THEIR LEGAL NAME, in ONTARIO? SURETY and ACCOUNTING with the MINISTRY OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES says (said?) they must.

It's true. I found out this very interesting fact, when I went inside to neutralize someone who took sexual liberties with someone close to someone favoured by HER MAJESTY. I spent 6 weeks maneuvering myself into the "range" where my assignment was.

And my WORST nightmare came true. An undercover cop, named THOMAS STYLES was also after my target.

I actually had to call my "handler" COLLECT, for instruction! I'd NEVER had to seek instruction. EVER. As if that wasn't bad enough, they said to WAIT HIM OUT! SIX MONTHS I had to share a cell with him. He would NOT BREAK. He was JUST as dedicated to his task, as I was. He was a convincing actor, for a LONG time, but his arrogance was his undoing. He unwittingly deployed the most advanced worm of the day, in his efforts to understand computers, quickly.

He was bullshitting about computers, and that's where I got him. Once, when they snuck him out for other police work, they let him play with a 486 DX2-66, the most advanced computer of the day!

He spewed bullshit, I spewed truth. I told him how to jackpot bank machines... STEP BY STEP. Suddenly I became HIS target.

But my target got moved. I had to follow, and the A.G. had everything arranged. I was FIXING THE SYSTEM FROM THE INSIDE! FUCK I WAS AN IDIOT! :D I was the ONLY choice of privateer. I could be trusted, and I WAS REALLY FUCKING GOOD at my job, and I was an OBSERVANT idiot who made records of EVERYTHING!

That's THOMAS Styles. There are many "Styles" in the York Regional Police. NOT that I'm implying "nepotism"! I'll explicitly say "nepotism" :D

It's THOMAS Styles.

(That should send a few people scurrying)

...and this is just a sample. I have NO problem NAMING NAMES! :D

Scott Duncan

People have learned to think VERY carefully before hitting that "send" button. They don't like being dragged out into the light.

People LOVE "backroom deals" and get very upset when I present the object lesson, that I DON'T.

I also just blocked some guy named Bruce McGraw, because he couldn't be bothered to read the ABOUT SECTION or the Pinned post. :D

Scott Duncan

Now it's the "he's nobody" game! (Search the site, and you will find people saying I should have my own thread)

Why is it these idiots think that "hearing of someone" makes something "more true", or "less true" in this case.

They DO know they have a "search" feature, right?

First I'm a "freeman".

Then I'm a "Guru".

Then I'm "nobody"

Pigeon-holing me seems to be a more difficult task than you'd think, huh, guys? :D

Scott Duncan

"Just did, still same. Being a technological idiot I had no idea how to do it so I used Google instructions. For IE 8 it told me to go to "safety" then to "delete browser history". Instructions told me to unclick the box "preserve favorite website data" but I decided to nuke everything. Still can't get on Tender for Law, half a second and blanked out. Other Facebook sites work fine." - OMG! IT'S THAT HACKER NAMED 4CHAN!

Scott Duncan

"I hate to disturb his obviously overblown and overinflated ego, but I don't think any of us even really know who he is, let alone have been talking about him." - It's all of these ilk. That's af far as their tiny brains can take them... It MUST be "ego". Oh yes.

Scott Duncan

And they LIE about me!

---------------------------------------------------------- Hmmm, personally I would just call him a rather nasty little man with an over-inflated sense of his own importance. Let me see, a Toronto boy, been around long enough that he can recognize the area down around the old Tip Top building and Front Street. Believes he is God's gift to computer science but from what I can tell has only audited a few CS 101 courses. Stirs up trouble on various FMOTL sites by claiming: a. they have stolen his ideas; b. they aren't radical enough; c. various people are agents of the government or CIBC bank. Basic strawman/natural person arguments with one novel self addition - the "affidavit of mistake". Self appointed admiral of his own fleet under mercantile law. Somehow he has obtained a small group of followers who enjoy being abused by him.

------------------------------------------------------------

REALLY? They REALLY think that this is how people's minds work?

...and what the fuck is this "Claim" I made?

a. they have stolen his ideas; An advocate of open source, and the creative commons is worried about his ideas being stolen?

b. they aren't radical enough; What?

c. various people are agents of the government or CIBC bank. <---additional bullshit you are supposed to believe? What IS that?

And they will just discuss it as if it's fact.

They even lie about NOTICE OF MISTAKE, by calling it "AFFIDAVIT of MISTAKE". <--this is a deliberate attempt to deceive.

Does everyone see the casual lie this whole thing is?

Scott Duncan

They CAN'T say "don't go there" you'll "waste your time", so they get YOU (the reader) to think that, by lying about the content itself!

You aren't supposed to notice. He'll claim "that's how I saw it" if called on it, and of course they still think magic parchments trump all rights, as reading their forum will show.

...and I have a NAVY! If you are going to paint someone as "crazy" and "egomaniac", WHY THE FUCK would you leave the ADMIRAL part out?

Scott Duncan

"conspiracy theory/theorist" is the latest "everybody knows" catch phrase. Naomi Wolf is getting the label as well.

If it's not too "egomaniacal", I see myself and Naomi Wolf, kindred spirits, in this realm. We both have "the label". Strangers have given us the label "conspiracy theorist". Each year passes, and I find myself in better and better company.

And we ALL get lied about. " Believes he is God's gift to computer science but from ***what I can tell*** has only audited a few CS 101 courses."

***Notice the "liability remover". This is how LAWYERS lie. When they are called on it, there is no denial; It's regarded as "a joke" and they "play along", ala "Since I'm a big-ass lawyer now, because the conspiracy theorists said so... ha ha...", etc.

Words like "rant" and "babbling" and "drivel" are there to STOP you (the reader) from reading.

Here's how WE as a GROUP, counter that sort of thing.

Chris Evan has established that there are in fact LIES on that forum.

That is an extraordinary claim. It requires extraordinary evidence...

...SO! Simu-Drones (They even lied about Simu-Drones! That's the entire province of Quebec, they're picking a fight with. I'm the ONLY English guy they LIKE!), here is what you do!

PROVE THEY ARE LYING!

I will only accept the MOST compelling evidence.

GO! STROKE muh EGOOOOOOO!

MURRRRIKUH!

Chris Evan

" And as to Duncan, I believe he's a popular mystery figure, even Mowe could only scratch the surface. I think Burnaby has a copy of his preliminary research on Duncan. Quite the enigma."

Oh my....a mystery (in their words) only to be solved by making up the answer. How scientific.

Chris Evan

Well, for starters, I've read every post and comment on the Tender for Law except perhaps ones I was blocked by the poster.

I've not seen one instance in which Scott ever accused anyone of being an agent of ANY bank or government. I do recall Scott stating that due to the shear numbers and content, they are most likely here. But never "various" (notice the plausible deniability left open here), nor specific people.

Scott Duncan

I make sure you are isolated from "natural news" and the "food babe", and I DEMAND a VERY SPECIFIC thought process! Some Illuminati conspiracy crap called "Critical Thought" <---cult leaders always use "secret codes".

Chris Evan

"From what I can understand of their ramblings, Dan Wilson was some guy they were arguing with on Dean Clifford's page. My brain can only handle so much so I'm not going to slog through that mess to figure out why they hate him so much. Here's the relevant part of the conversation: "Simu-Drones are inevitably BANNED from Dean Clifford's page, that's a FACT. 28 December 2014 at 15:20 � Like � 2"

I don't recall any of this.

Tara Duncan

Why indeed?

"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." - Oscar Wilde.

That said, my personal preference would be to be "talked about", good or ill, by someone who is not an illiterate, drooling moron.

Chris Evan

"I must mea culpa here.

I ran into Scott online and he started ranting saying the 1960 bill of rights states that only if there a victim does something become a crime. So I guess now he's pulled a quick one and now claims it's a maxim and not in the 1960 BOR as he originally claimed"

Well, here is a statement without any proof, but the most interesting pRt is that he starts by acknowledging doing something wrong. :/

Scott Duncan

The biggest threats are those who use the word "peace". People who use the word "peace" are always the first to lie, and inflict violence. History proves it time and again.

Mao killed everyone with a grade 6 education or higher... to secure "peace".

People who END what they say with "peace" should justly shot for doing so, to save any further violence.

The use of the word "peace" is much like "Big Beautiful Women" - It's a lie, because it was said.

If something is BEAUTIFUL, you don't need to try to convince people of it.

If your INTENT is PEACEFUL, you don't have to convince people of it.

GET IT?

Scott Duncan

They are trying to counter the Streisand Effect, and saying FOCUS ON YOUR HURT FEELINGS!

Here's the thing... You can't use my methods against me. It's why I use it. This sort of thing gets better with age. :D

Harry Wombat

They have to. They know the truth isn't on their side and they fear the truth being realized by more people.

They don't have the balls to admit the truth. They'd rather their fraud remain hidden so they can protect their shyster scam.

Age Thomson

"How do THEY benefit by LYING?"

On a side note, I think this question last came up in the thread where Dan-lien-your-name Wilson got his title bestowed upon him.

What are the chances that the "benefits" are the same for their lies?

I think that it is a rather feeble attempt to pull those who are sick and tired of dwelling in their own ignorance and trying to better themselves, back into the pool of lies and deceit by sowing doubt where there should be none.

One of the most important Scottism's - TRUST BUT VERIFY..... (For those just tuning in, go check that whole Scottism's thread) <----- See what I did there ?

How is it possible not to see comments like theirs for anything but the shit that it is if you've done ANY of the legwork that Scott asks of us?

The first conversation I ever had with Scott Duncan, I misused a word that I thought I knew. He called me on it and waited on me to actually look it up before resuming the conversation. Seriously! I have NEVER EVER EVER had another man take that kind of patience with me before.

Scott won't tolerate bullshit period, and any serious look at the Tender for Law group will demonstrate that he has taught US not to tolerate it anymore either. This is most certainly a bit of a "battle" for me as I have been born into a sea of it. The habit of actually looking stuff up for myself, checking the facts, and getting things straight before communicating it onto someone else is actually a life altering experience in and of itself.

Scott Duncan

Marc Stevens got the same Lie-Fest from Quatloos {http://marcstevens.net/} but he doesn't deal with them properly. He's be pretty effective if the courts followed their own rules anymore. Marc Stevens is pretty "entry level" when it comes to law, which is essential. We need the Marc Stevens and Christopher Cantwells, and the Hosey Josie The Outlaws, and yes, even the Larken Roses.

THOSE are the ones that get people asking the very basic questions. People like the HUMAN MACHINES INITIATIVE are for the people who answer those basic questions, and have MORE questions, like "what other choice is there".

That's where I come in.

I'm ALWAYS 5 years ahead of the rest of you. That's not "ego", that's just fact. The quicker you grasp that, the more you can exploit.

Think about it. This whole group is a PUBLIC RECORD of a 3 year period. People who follow it from the beginning will see a record of FUTURE KNOWLEDGE.

It's not "magic". It's just hard to learn :/

Don't try to copy me, take what I show you and EXPLOIT IT! Kent Barrett is the only one to get THAT message! (Still unsure as to why I'm a Skeleton though).

Scott Duncan

Here... Lemme try something...

*AHEM*

"On a side note, I think this question last came up in the thread where Dan-lien-your-name Wilson got his title bestowed upon him.

What are the chances that the "benefits" are the same for their lies?

I think that it is a rather feeble attempt to pull those who are sick and tired of dwelling in their own ignorance and trying to better themselves, back into the pool of lies and deceit by sowing doubt where there should be none.

One of the most important Scottism's - TRUST BUT VERIFY..... (For those just tuning in, go check that whole Scottism's thread) <----- See what I did there ?

How is it possible not to see comments like theirs for anything but the shit that it is if you've done ANY of the legwork that Scott asks of us?

The first conversation I ever had with Scott Duncan, I misused a word that I thought I knew. He called me on it and waited on me to actually look it up before resuming the conversation. Seriously! I have NEVER EVER EVER had another man take that kind of patience with me before.

Scott won't tolerate bullshit period, and any serious look at the Tender for Law group will demonstrate that he has taught US not to tolerate it anymore either. This is most certainly a bit of a "battle" for me as I have been born into a sea of it. The habit of actually looking stuff up for myself, checking the facts, and getting things straight before communicating it onto someone else is actually a life altering experience in and of itself."

...nope. :/ It only sounds good when other people say it. :/

Howard Posehn

"Postby bmxninja357 � Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:44 pm duncan is an idiot. most even in the freeman realm consider him a fool. he also promotes violence. in no uncertain terms.

for example: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... 5963379356

peace, ninj"

This post from Quatloos presented from one of the minds at the world freeman society. An attack on Scott with, "most even in the freeman realm" as bona fide evidence? And then with more bona fide evidence, "duncan is an idiot?" I don't want to tattle but, "he also promotes violence. in no uncertain terms." PSSSST: Now I don't want to cause alarm here for you Quatloos folks but I heard too, that along with promoting violence on those who would seek to harm him, well... he enjoys... eating babies too! (I have yet to see any evidence of this though.) And there is that fucking "peace" word.

Scott Duncan

Because of THEIR OWN LIES, you have formed a bias that prevents you from ACTUALLY LOOKING at WHO THEY ARE.

This also means you aren't qualified to answer ANY question about their motives. SEE THE PROBLEM?

YOU are being PLAYED and you don't even know it.

Scott Duncan

Who's "them"? Do you even know who they are? What's their history? Do they lie about everyone, or am I special?

DON'T BE THEM!

Saying idiotic things like "sick lawyers site" just gives them fuel for ridicule (which you deserve), because you have literally LIED about who and what they are!! YOU ARE THEM.

If I appear "abusive" then that's why. YOU ARE THEM!

Pete Daoust

Yes, it's like if you pull the word SURETY out of your mouth, they just don't want to talk to you, and will lie by associating you to these fucking freedumb....they will PUSH it so hard, I know, they have done it to me....

This fucking piece of shit just wanted to push that tag on me, that was the ONLY reason of his call.....

I can prove it, I have the audio....it's OBVIOUS....even after I told him that I was not one of these fucking freedumb, I am only interested in SURETY AND ACCOUNTING, he still pushed his bullshit....

:D

THEY HAVE TO LIE, that is WHY they LIE.....there's no other options for them after you've been EDUCATED by Scott Duncan.

Scott Duncan

If you tell a woman "well you're a disgusting,ugly, skank, but I'll fuck you anyway", you've kind of neutralized the insult yourself!

One does not VALIDATE fraud by tolerating it.

THEY claim YOU are the "fraud", but only YOU can show injury.

They don't apply their own standards to themselves. You do not negotiate with that. You eliminate it.

It's a lesson THEY TAUGHT ME.

LEARN MY LESSON. NEVER EVER GIVE ANY QUARTER TO A LAWYER! NOTHING!

I'll accept a proposal from the Law Society and/or Attorney General, when the head of Wailan Low is in a pike, outside Osgoode Hall, as a warning to all "Society" members, that committing fraud comes at too high a price.

Only on that day will I accept ANY proposal for communication.

Do that, and your debt is paid. I'll even offer 2 years less one day of tenure as JP, as your change.

I'LL EVEN CLEAR LOW'S CASELOAD FOR FREE!

A bargain at twice the price!

...and not very likely. Pity. The Newspapers would have a field day. The Law & Order type politicians could REALLY sell it, ala "Well it's the law, no matter how obscure, and if you look at his rulings, they are always in the INTEREST OF JUSTICE" ;)

...PEACE! :D

Scott Duncan

Drop my name EVERYWHERE :D

It will drive them NUTS :D

...oh and it will stroke my "ego" too! <---apparently that's a really important thing to people. I do this for my "ego".

Sorry, but people who think that is even a rational thought, aren't in any position to form opinions, muchless LIE about me.

Scott Duncan

Notice I have not changed AT ALL.

All of you at one time, thought EXACTLY like the Quatlosers. I was the "mean, bad egomaniac" who "hurts your feels"!

Until you realized everything I say is true, and i showed you far more respect than any Free-Dumber, or Piece-of-Shit Christian, by NOT LYING TO YOU. Fuck your feels.

The quatlosers NEVER want ANYONE reading their forum to make that transition all of you have made.

They lie about all of you.

They lie about your motives. They lie about how you see me, and they even lie about WHAT YOU ARE!

Why? Who would care that much that they would simply LIE?

Pete Daoust

Well, why not just send a fax ? :D

HAHAHA!!!

� 2002-2015 by Quatloosia Publishing LLC. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be reprinted in whole or in part without the express, written permission of Quatloosia Publishing LLC. This site is http://www.quatloos.com. Legal issues should be faxed to (877) 698-0678. Our attorneys are Grobaty & Pitet LLP (http://grobatypitet.com) and Riser Adkisson LLP (http://risad.com).

Scott Duncan

Chris Evan, I REALLY see you trying, but this is actually defamation in the way they are trying against me.

When it's used against THEM, it doesn't make it "valid".

1: Everything they say is TRUE, but sold as "crazy", and of course it's REPORTED. It's not even BELIEVED...just REPORTED.

2: Rape doesn't suddenly become "OK" when it happens to a woman you dislike.

3: Fraud, and Lawyer Lies don't suddenly become OK, if it's used against Quatloos.

Clear?

NO solution I provide will EVER work, if the standards are "fluid". They are EQUAL for EVERYONE, or it will FAIL.

Chris Evan

How about this....

My limited research into the subject matter regarding the creators of Quatloosia Publishing, LLC points me in a direction to further research the intent behind the creation as being for atonement of some serious allegations that I am currently looking for solid evidence of.

??

Scott Duncan

HOW MANY are rotting in jail because someone couldn't contain their biases? Don't be THEM!

You don't get to claim you are "better" than the average, unless you ARE. APPLY the same standard you'd want applied to YOU.

Age Thomson

Since you brought up Marc Stevens, and I had to look into him... Perhaps a quote straight from him on this very subject might be of interest.

"Quatloos are the guys who stand around insisting the �emperor� has clothes. While those who see the irrefutable truth � governments have no voluntary support � are denounced as liars, idiots and morons. Yeah, facts really are stubborn things. Despite all the name calling, governments still have no voluntary support. Spin that. Telling me to move will not change the facts either.

If I presented my services to the market the way governments do, quatloos would denounce me as a criminal, at least until I labeled myself a government."

Scott Duncan

The shit that works on those in commerce, doesn't work on me. "Crazy" is the best they have.

I'm just a Mentally Ill Computer Operator.

...OK :D

So why lie about me?

The Mentally Ill computer Operator thing; I PUT THAT THERE by using USEFUL IDIOTS.

If I am a "Mentally Ill Computer Operator" that the OH SO "INTELLIGENT" POLICE can "confirm"...wouldn't that be enough? WHY LIE about me?

Age Thomson

The Quatloos site is run by a lawyer under the guise of a non-profit do-gooder corporation, so he can shield himself from any backlash. They want to discredit you for the same reason that Dan-lien-your-name Wilson did. They are trying so very hard to prevent people from learning what you have to say. All of this appears to be in an effort to PREVENT anyone, by way of logical fallacies, spin, sophistry etc., from getting to the point of placing a lien on their name and removing themselves from the system. They ALL profit as parasites off of the host, and Scott Duncan is the only one showing the host how to remove the parasite(s).

Age Thomson

Another little quote from Marc

"If quatloos were truly interested in scams and had any credibility, then they would investigate how governments operate. If they did, they would see government is the biggest scam going. "

Age Thomson

I don't have a direct quote handy but I was just reading an old post earlier wherein Scott Duncan was commenting on Ayn Rand... He used the analogy of the dual barbed wire fence at a prison. The point was that there were people expected to wake up, and a second layer of programming was in place to capture those folks as well.

Folks like these at Quatloos certainly appear to fit with that. Of course the Tender For Law crowd is used to digging deeper aren't we? :D

Age Thomson

Since you gave it away Scott Duncan:

"The shit that works on those in commerce, doesn't work on me. "Crazy" is the best they have.

I'm just a Mentally Ill Computer Operator.

...OK grin emoticon

So why lie about me?

The Mentally Ill computer Operator thing; I PUT THAT THERE by using USEFUL IDIOTS.

If I am a "Mentally Ill Computer Operator" that the OH SO "INTELLIGENT" POLICE can "confirm"...wouldn't that be enough? WHY LIE about me?"

It's right there. The shit that works on those in commerce, (that's us, still in commerce) doesn't work on me.(You've put yourself beyond their reach).

"WHY LIE about me?" Because they are scared of you. And terrified of more of you... (us when our name is liened and removed from commerce)

(Insert that video clip here..... they won't just be like me, they will become me....)

Howard Posehn

Hello Quatloosers. I know you are following this so I have 2 questions that I would like you to answer. 1. Does LEGAL equate to Surety and Accounting? 2. Can I use the security of the Person to settle public debts of account?

Harry Wombat

Below is a quote from their post about trolling.

The more I read it the more I see how inverted everything is.

Their modus operandi is: someone who see's through their shit must be the ones who don't understand. The more you understand the crazier you are! It's a fabricated matrix of lies and deception that they are protecting. They fear that everything which presently sustains them will fall if what we are learning/learnt (WE ALREADY WON) becomes public knowledge.

They fear not only losing there way of life, they fear that we may think beyond their "solutions" and "truth" and that in the end, they might loose their heads. The benefit of their bullshit is that they keep their heads.

It seems to be a blatent textbook case of a Freudian slip; a confession of sorts!

Without further delay:

"They tend to have highly developed and irrational beliefs, mostly through their "education", and hold those beliefs strong. Any one who disagrees with those beliefs is an idiot or trying to hold them down. If you try to censor them then Godwin's Law comes into effect. They will resent any actual help trying to further their education by declaiming and trying to denigrate other's education or background."

Chris Evan

Oh man....the MO (modus opperendi) is the same. They attack (and prey) on emotion. BUT, the platform had to be established and the content had to be seeded....enter Quatloos (ie Quatloosia Publishing, LLC). They set up the forum and set the rules, AND took it one step further by censoring the content there and folks with the predisposition to carry out the MO were easily recruited. These folks' information was censored and they were programmed to be "SimuDrones" of these lawyers. They may be useful idiots, they may be semi informed agents, or they may have an entirely different agenda....point is, THEY ARE THERE and WITH A PURPOSE. The purpose is someone else's' agenda.

It's actually the same MO in here, except Scott offered full disclosure. (with the difference being that critical thought is encouraged rather than the content seeded based on emotion) Scott set up the Tender for Law knowing that a certain amount of folks would show up. He even said something to the effect of "I know how you will behave in groups, there will be one honor student and one class clown....but I never know who each will be". He knew what he was setting up and how it would be used. Just like a sports team....the team is different every year, but they are all working toward the same goal regardless WHO exactly plays each position....and that is making the company money (with the underlying public lie that they want to win the Championship).

Quatloos is the same platform as the Sovereign Citizen platform. As Scott pointed out some time ago, the Sovereign Citizen platform was organized by the government (FBI, if I remember correctly) to attract the hillbilly anti government crowd with a violent nature to fill the ranks...while never realizing that they are complete idiots! Quatloos is the same....the benefit goes to a faceless stranger named <insert LLC that Jay Adkisson or Chris Meyer holds here>. Quatloosers get bullshit in return.

With The Tender for Law, we get the truth. Scott told us from the beginning that he will get the benefit.

But I see it. I see the mechanism being employed here!

Scott Duncan

"LEGAL" is in jeopardy! None of them can see that. That is why we will win. Lawyers only think about the "next problem". That's all they CAN do.

...except I'm not like anything they've EVER seen.

Here is my "offer" to quatloos; Purge all reference to Scott Duncan and/or THE TENDER FOR LAW. Never speak of us again, and deny ever having done so...

...or I'll REALLY draw attention to you, by all the wrong people.

Want to lie about me? FINE. You just created a debt. That's how you can discharge it. If you choose not to avail yourself of this offer, I shall sell this debt to people who are REALLY grateful (An alien experience to you, I'm sure) to me.

That's the thing about grateful people. They will buy these debts, and it doesn't bother them... but I DO endorse them collecting their debt! I will do EVERYTHING to make sure they can! :D

I don't really care how much your feelings are hurt. This isn't a war you can win, and if you find yourself in a hole... Stop digging. I can wage a crippling, LEGAL, and LAWFUL war, for all to see. I will do it ALL publicly, which means it won't just be you that pays the price! Simu-Drones will be COPYING what they see!

QUATLOOS=LIVE TARGET DRONE

Want to play? I'll hit you in ways you cannot imagine...ALL LEGAL and LAWFUL, and all crippling to you, and "ego stroking" for me. (Seriously? You REALLY think that is a motivator to me?)

I have done it MANY times before, and I do not take prisoners. Ask Marin - Evans LLP.

If you accept the disengagement terms, I treat it as an oath. Ask Wendy Cole. Her terms were MUCH harsher then what I offer you. For me to go away, she had one of three choices to make me go away.

1: She quits practicing Law. 2: I litigate her into homelessness (I still tried cases Pro Se) 3: She dies.

I expressed that I really had no preference, and will accept any of them.

She chose 1.

She's never heard a peep from me since.

I'll still use her as a reference. ;)

BTW, I will delete NOTHING of what I've typed. ONLY YOU must purge all reference to myself and/or this group. That will pay your debt.

I SWEAR.

...NO "PEACE" INTENDED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Scott Duncan

I expect that they are going to teach ALL readers about AGENCY...

...and ASSETS. For no less than 20 corporations, I am an ASSET!

That's 20 LEGITIMATE copyright claims under DMCA laws in the US. Youtube taught us ALL that COPYRIGHT is the MOST IMPORTANT FUCKING THING IN THE WORLD, so courts are REALLY receptive to companies with LEGITIMATE claims!

I"LL LOVE watching you try to attach me to "FMOL" or "Sovereign Citizens" in the context of the ASSET HOLDER suing your ass. I'll be VERY reasonable with my fees to them, and I hope they pass the savings on to you, Quatlosers. :D

Scott Duncan

They do NOT want people reading my Meads article, so they BLATANTLY LIE about the content! "It's not worth your time" he doesn't say anything. It says it RIGHT IN THE TITLE! "Obiter dictum". JUST LOOKING THAT UP will give you a MILLION ways to destroy that crap!

They REALLY do not want people reading it!

That gave me an idea! :D

Obiter dictum

Scott Duncan

"The normal Scott Duncan Gibberish. I haven't yet bothered to read the Facebook posting all the way through so I don't know if he actually has anything relevant to say about Meads." - REALLY?

Did ANY of you have this hard of a time reading that article? Did ANY of you "stop halfway through"?

Can ANYONE except the liar who wrote this, relate to that "experience". Message me, if you gave up halfway through.

I want to know if ANYONE exists that can honestly use the following as a REALISTIC statement?

Was ANY LIVING MAN OR WOMAN EVER in the position where they couldn't make it through, and don't know if there's a point?!?

EVER?

I demand 3 people declaring this as their experience, before I'll even accept it as a POSSIBILITY! Do you see the fantasy puppets they try to make you into?

Why would you invent a story like that and act like "it's perfectly normal"? THAT is TRULY a psychopath. No REAL WORLD empathy, just bullshit you are supposed to accept as "normal" because he said so.

Am I the only one who sees a REAL diseased mind here?

Scott Duncan

"The normal Scott Duncan Gibberish" <---Nothing to see here. It's NORMAL that this "NOBODY" "LOON" THAT YOU "HAVEN'T HEARD OF" says "Gibberish". Nothing to see. Don't waste your time going to the link. It's only there to present the "air of objectivity". Just accept the lie. Don't look. The fact that I put a link is enough.

Scott Duncan

It's Gibberish, but you haven't read it all.

Seriously? THIS is what they have?

They actually TRIED with Leigh Collins, and THIS is the best they can do with ME?

ALSO: Does anyone think there is a market for Lawyer torture/snuff films? DON'T think this is about killing lawyers. That'd be wrong...unless it's in the interest of JUSTICE.:D

Chris Evan

Also, the entire thread was introduced by saying that they have been ignoring you for months.....as everyone else should be doing to. The only reason that they would even discuss you is because you brought it up.....well, lets look what he's done recently....oh, look at this Meads OPCA article, it's just regular Scott jibberish. Don't waste your time. Oh, by the way, does he have any court cases he's won? (That's my favorite rebuttal as dismissed isn't recorded....) That's like asking if the Red Sox are a good football team, then making the answerer prove by showing how many Superbowls they won. It's just stupid. There are enough examples of the root being surety and accounting just in here to support what Scott teaches.

Chris Evan

This is the entire comment of a poster named Eric: (this has been cut and pasted earlier and Scott dissected it...but there isn't even one single shred of truth to the entire post)

Hmmm, personally I would just call him a rather nasty little man with an over-inflated sense of his own importance. Let me see, a Toronto boy, been around long enough that he can recognize the area down around the old Tip Top building and Front Street. Believes he is God's gift to computer science but from what I can tell has only audited a few CS 101 courses. Stirs up trouble on various FMOTL sites by claiming: a. they have stolen his ideas; b. they aren't radical enough; c. various people are agents of the government or CIBC bank. Basic strawman/natural person arguments with one novel self addition - the "affidavit of mistake". Self appointed admiral of his own fleet under mercantile law. Somehow he has obtained a small group of followers who enjoy being abused by him.

Not one shred of truth here....not one!

But it set the platform for the rest of the idiots to use.....interesting mechanism.

David-Paul Sip

"Obiter dictum"...OBITER DICTUM This reminds me of what "Dan-Lien-Your-Name-Wilson" attempted to do. And just like then things only get worse for them and better for all us "SimuDrones" that gain a deeper understanding of what Scott is teaching.

Scott Duncan

Do i have any COURT CASES I've won?

I WON THEM ALL! THE ONLY TIME I DIDN'T WAS WHEN THEY LIED, CHEATED AND ALTERED THE COURT RECORD.

If the Quatlosers wish to "challenge" me on that, I will play the audio recording of the hearing, with Debrah Knight secured in the hold of one of my vessels. I will have a Golf Club with the word ""QUATLOOS" engraved in it, and a crewman (of another navy, of course) will club Deborah Knight with every word she edited or removed. She'll probably survive the first paragraph.

Would THAT be an adequate demonstration?

Scott Duncan

After the LAST case I won, the Deputy Attorney General sent his assistant with a message; "If you come back, you do so with the understanding that you will be compelled to service".

If I come in with my little "Poor Pro Se Defendant" act again, they'd force me to be a JP.

...I'd rather be dead.

I never appeared Pro Se after that.

They stopped pretending to follow the rules then.

It turns out they ALWAYS had a Dog-and-Pony show ready for me.

I look at The Fender's record, and the courts were lying sacks of shit since the 1980's. They were "playing straight" for the Reject from the Nobility. It was ALWAYS COMPLETELY corrupt, and they put on a SHOW for me.

Did I WIN?

FUCK YEAH! ALL THE FUCKING TIME! I used to pick fights because I WANTED people to sue me. I ALWAYS won.

...and it was always an act. It doesn't MATTER if I won. It was a lie.

David-Paul Sip

Obiter Dictum

[Latin, By the way.] Words of an opinion entirely unnecessary for the decision of the case. A remark made or opinion expressed by a judge in a decision upon a cause, "by the way", that is, incidentally or collaterally, and not directly upon the question before the court or upon a point not necessarily involved in the determination of the cause, or introduced by way of illustration, or analogy or argument. SUCH ARE NOT BINDING AS PRECEDENT. :P

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Obiter+Dictum

Scott Duncan

Declare Meads "Obiter Dictum", and you are done.

When you hear the word "Meads" in court, OBJECT!

"OBJECTION! Obiter Dictum"!

The follow up with, "THERE IS A QUESTION BEFORE THE COURT, TO WHICH I REQUIRE AN ANSWER", because they should ONLY raise Meads with the QUESTIONS you ask. Make a DECLARATION (like Meads did) and "Obiter Dictum" is irrelevant.

Howard Posehn

obiterdictum (ob-i-tar dik-tam). [Latin "something said in passing"] (18c) A judicial comment made while delivering a judicial opinion, but one that is unnecessary to the decision in the case and therefore not precedential (although it may be considered persuasive). Often shortened to dictum or, less commonly, obiter. PI. obiter dicta. See DICTUM. Cf. HOLDING (1); RATIO DECIDENDI. [Cases: Courts C=>92.] "Strictly speaking an 'obiter dictum' is a remark made or opinion expressed by a judge, in his decision upon a cause, 'by the way' that is, incidentally or collaterally, and not directly upon the question before the court; or it is any statement of law enunciated by the judge or court merely by way of illustration, argument, analogy, or sug� gestion. .. In the common speech of lawyers, all such extrajudicial expressions of legal opinion are referred to as 'dicta,' or 'obiter dicta,' these two terms being used interchangeably." William M. Ule et aI., Brief Making and the Use of Law Books 304 (3d ed. 1914). BLACKS NINETH

Steph Boucher

More then "a" qu�b�cois got it... or well on the way too.

You under estimate your ability at dumbing yourself down, Admiral. :)

Or maybe its just proportional to your ability at showing people how to think better.

Really simple, back to basic, like you say.

Stop Lying. (Stop talking shitstains, and hurting humanity with bullshit belief) Look up definitions. Don't look at the data, look at the structure.

I could go on on many more wise chunks. My Simu-Drone is updated ;)

Scott Duncan

Monty still has 2 outstanding questions...

...how rude that he did not answer!

To review:

Why didn't you remember that I want to kill lawyers? Did you think that was a joke?

And if not, why do you THINK I want to kill lawyers?

Why do I have such contempt for the vile cunt that is your sister, without even knowing her?

Scott Duncan

POLICE ARE BAFFLED AT THE NUMBER OF LAW SOCIETY MEMBERS TURNING UP DEAD WITH "QUATLOOS" WRITTEN ON THEIR FOREHEAD WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE A BRANDING IRON!

Citizens are advised to call 222-TIPS if you know what a Quatloo is.

...I can just see the headlines now. :D

Scott Duncan

It'd be just my luck to have some devoted psychotic awesome lurker decided to be inspired, and start branding/killing lawyers. This is just an awesome HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIO wherein we quite rightly laugh at the fear, suffering and murder of Law Society members...

...it's nothing harmful. :D

<3 PEACE! <3