Jun 19, 2015 2:25 PM

Keep refreshing this. Proofreaders are going over it now.

...sorry, again. ...about myself.

Six hours. Some likes... some SHARES... and NOBODY comments.

Fuck, you people suck.

Let me some time to read it first.....I need to print on some expensive paper, and then read, and then translate some stuff, and then think and then, I will be able to comment.... :(

What the actual fuck is everyone else's excuse?

Now I have to read things a few times before saying anything. :/

Fear ? :D

I have never read that Meads vs Meads stuff....

And this "OPCA" thing, I don't know why anyone would bring that up, I am just trying to identify the party with surety....

I do NOT, and did not PROTEST, and/or OPPOSE, and/or REFUSE anything.......I just want to know where is the party with surety....

I even tell them that if I have the OBLIGATION of being surety, I WILL PAY...and I will finally have, on the public record, that I am a SLAVE.....no big deal... :P

In other words, just tell me the truth, and I will live with it, that's all :/

Why would you "live" with that?

Well, I am not ready to die ! :/

That is ACCEPTING AN ODIOUS CONTRACT!

No, I will, of course, live with the facts, but won't ACCEPT it.

I will not be the best slave around, :D

Well people claiming ownership over ME are BY DEFAULT "ready to die", because that's one of the inherent risks involved in trying to "own" me.

Claiming "ownership" of me, is a LICENSE for me to kill you.

SLAVERY...

1). you bend over and get fucked in the ass. 2). You kill the master.

I'm opting for... 2.

Me two :D

*facepalm*

What....that is fucking funny :P

In my mind it is, anyway :P

Brilliant piece of writing - interesting, engaging, informative, hilarious! As I typed a goodly part of it I thought I'd give others a chance to comment. I especially liked the part about your relevant penis. Good job!

ALWAYS RELEVANT!

1) Thank you Scott Duncan. And Tara Duncan. Another invaluable contribution to the Creative Commons. I'll never be able to repay the debt I owe you both, but I intend to spend the rest of my life trying.

2) My excuse for not posting sooner is a bad one. I was reading the article on your page Scott, and I don't have permission to comment there. Only just realized that I can comment on this one in TTFL.

3) Either this was the simplest of your 'FOR IDIOTS' series, or some of this stuff is actually starting to sink in. (Very late, I know)

4) As has been mentioned many times, the comments on these posts are almost as valuable as the posts themselves.

"Claiming "ownership" of me, is a LICENSE for me to kill you."

I finally understand LICENSE.

You people suck.

Hmmm...forgive me admiral Scott. This article gave me some pause because I encountered this MEADS bullshit for declaring I am a man (which is true the last time I checked...see VERY relevant penis) and simple being here in regards to this matter. I require time to read this at least three times because it is an extremely important piece.

...you still suck.

Governers can ONLY take orders from an ORGANIZATION :/

Governer: Head of a Bank....

I have a fucking bank.....I really do, I literally exchanged some currencies today, I really did :/

ANd who cares about this Meads vs Meads stuff anyways ? :(

They will NEVER bring that up, I know they won't.......they would look stupid if they do :P

VERY STUPID :D

Fuck Scott...I was in court last week. I did not declare myself to be a man just administrator for this LEGAL PERSON I happen to have. I was asked for proof.

LOL :D

I informed them my intent here is to identify the party with SURETY (a la Captiane Pete) and that I am the lawful holder in due course of a "statement of birth" and "birth certificate". I gave them opportunity to inspect these documents which they refused claiming "anyone could have these documents" Nope... the bitch justice demanded WRITTEN authorization from the PERSON. :/

DECLARE is the wrong word :P

AFFIRM is the right word

I did not say DECLARE, only that "I am the sole authorized administrator for this PERSON"

WHY were you in that court ?

WHY were you in that court ?

MEADS made declarations.

Yes, he DECLARED he was an idiot, I see :D

"and that I am the lawful holder in due course of a "statement of birth" and "birth certificate"."

Why the fuck have you said this ? :/

David-Paul Sip, WHY were you in that court ?

Hellos !! :/

It was one of those pretrial meetings...If I did not attend they would have entered a conviction against the PERSON.

If I create an AFFIRMATION affirming WHO I AM, hook a Notice of Mistake and the birth certificate to it, and deliver this stuff to the court.

How in the fuck can I pull out of my mouth: I am the lawful holder in due course of a "statement of birth" and "birth certificate" ?

What is a fucking STATEMENT of BIRTH anyways ? :D

Well it was a meeting regarding a traffic matter, not a trial. They deemed the PERSON to have not appeared.

A traffic matter ? ....WHY going to court for a traffic matter ? :(

What is the alternative when they ignore your questions? They will deem you to not dispute the matter and enter a conviction. So yup. I am "stuck" Scott. I could appeal but I suspect this is not the route one should take. Am I correct?

Crown : Well Meads vs Meads blablabla�

ME: OBJECTION, what do I have to do in this ? �if the crown wants to divorce from his wife, what the heck does this have to do with establishing WHO is the party with SURETY in here today ?

:D

No mention of Meads v Meads this time lol! I OBJECTED throughout. I was told I did not have STANDING. I asked the Justice what standing she had? I asked who this woman next to me was (the Crown) and what standing she had? Was she present when the complaint occured, did she witness the complaint?

I recorded everything though despite leaving skid marks all over that court room.

Watch Pete Daoust. Notice he creates NO controversy. He ONLY ASKS QUESTIONS.

That is the skill to MASTER. Easier said than done though. Leaving out all emotion when you know that they are there to steal from you seems like a real challenge. Fortunately I have no fear and don't give a fuck. Now I need to turn their game around on them.

Dear Justice, do I have to FEAR anything in here today ?

I need a YES or a NO to that question :-P

Great work! I am re-reading this as I am prone to missing the point. (I'm sure there is a record of this) I have a quick question based on a real world example....

In the article, you wrote this: "You ACCEPTED a TENDER FOR LAW as soon as you used that NAME to BENEFIT in any way"

That is obvious and self evident, Scott has taught us how to work around this. However, last time I got a cell phone, along with a plan, for SGMI, Verizon Wireless would not give me a phone, nevermind a plan, without using a Social Slave Number. I questioned them on this, the associate called corporate, or legal or whoever....She came back and said there was no work around for the matter, BUT, as soon as the business account is opened, it doesn't go through the Slave anymore (or something like that).

That was a lie. I even said "What if General Electric came in here and wanted a plan, would you ask for a SSN?" They said it s a different department. I asked to be connected with them, but it was only for plans with 10 or more lines (or some other criteria).

So....my question is, I did everything I could have, outside of building my own communications network (this may be the answer, huh?) to use a different legal entity that I created (SGMI), how can I not have to use the legal entity (CHRIS) in a situation like this? :-/

Next time give 26137517 :-D

Or give your father's SSN, he loves you anyways :-D

Yes, he did publicly declare that, didn't he? JHAHA

Yeah unfortunately you can't just give them 9-digits stateside. These comanies are able to verify that shit almost instantly. I provided an EIN instead of an SSN and they would not accept it :o

Just get a SIP line and a disposable CELL phone. Forward the SIP to the cell when you go out.

Problem solved.

I have that :-D

I have two, actually. With Unlimitel

One always transfered to a cell phone, and one acting as a voicemail....we NEVER answer that one :-P

Sip gateways are LESS than 10 dollars a month. I don't know what your pay-as-you-go rates are.

"I did not declare myself to be a man..." Just as well. If you have to make that declaration in any situation, you have larger issues :D

:D

Thanks Joelle. Scott informs me that "trekkies" hate being called that - apparently this was not an error.

We're not always 100% with our editing (especially when Scott decides to write a book in several hours). Your attention to detail is much appreciated - please feel free to mention any errors you see in an article so we can ensure it is the best it can be.

Good eye - I'll inform the author.

...no there isn't. :P

Scott, thank you very much for this tip on SIP lines. This should keep me busy for a while.

Why does Verizon Wireless require an Social Slave Number though? Why won't they simply accept the tax ID Number? Is it because they are intent on stealing? :/

That is Facebook's crappy Javascript forms on Chrome. They constantly lie about it too and act like the Chrome problems are "new".

It's so they can comply with snoop orders from the government

That makes it worse.

You REALLY think I didn't try that? REALLY?

You're in the city; please drop by so that I may slap your face with my penis until it leaves bruises. :P

...ALWAYS RELEVANT!

Will Tender for Law members have a private viewing of this hate porn?

We have, after all, been watching the dialog for years now!

No. Those are my private collection. :D

It's the face that gets the bruises, but your inability to parse a sentence is only going to reinforce the notions that Newfies are dumb.

...just sayin'

I usually fast forward through the dialog of porn. This is the opposite. It's odd to watch. :/

...ALWAYS! ALWAYS RELEVANT!

Every time I post an article, Joelle wants to make babies with me. It's just how it works.

It's all part of the great CIRCLE OF STUFF!

Sounds like pillow talk to me!

:D

Yeah Joelle, Anibal picked up on this waaaaay before the rest of us. I still have a difficult time seeing it.

CREDIT UNIONS. it makes so much sense now, duh!!!

I wonder if Dan LIEN-YOUR NAME Wilson will have any input regarding this article? :D

Dan LIEN-YOUR-NAME Wilson has become very handy at solidifying this shit in people's heads.I even have ONE party who said they liened their name for NO OTHER REASON than Dan Wilson saying they shouldn't. :D

JEOPARDY!

THE Dean Clifford Theme Song!

https://youtu.be/BvUZijEuNDQ

"... but, he couldn't get the questions righ igh ight". :D

"I even have ONE party who said they liened their name for NO OTHER REASON than Dan Wilson saying they shouldn't."

This was already something I have intent to do but Dan LIEN-YOUR NAME Wilson saying I shouldn't made it imperative. It may have well have been a captain's order :D

If you are unsure, DON'T DO IT. I'll eventually get it all out here.