Jun 16, 2015 4:08 AM

Notice Mainstream media NEVER says "Freeman-on-the-land"? They always OF the land. Let that sink in.

LEGALLY what does ON mean, and what does OF mean?

http://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/freeman-of-the-land-makes-winnipeg-court-appearance-1.2423433

These guys use the LEGAL term "FREEMAN", giving the Court/Attorney General SURETY, but never acknowledging that to label him "Freeman" means the court is in LEGAL violation of his "rights" by simply imposing the jurisdiction.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/Freeman-acting-as-own-lawyer-while-defending-drug-weapon-charges-307441301.html

Re:"Queen�s Bench Justice Chris Martin instructed the court clerk to record that as a "not guilty" position. That drew the ire of Clifford, who repeatedly insisted the federal government has no standing to prosecute him." - IDIOCY! You QUESTION! QUESTIONING NEGATES UNDERSTANDING! Ask BY WHAT AUTHORITY do YOU enter a plea on ANYONE'S behalf?

Most don't realize that BENEFIT of the doubt, means something LEGALLY (Surety and accounting) and that is the defense every "justice" uses when they are called on their unlawful acts. If the ACCUSED (not a "defendant") is absent at proceedings, a justice MAY preserve the BENEFIT of the doubt FOR the accused, and enter a NOT GUILTY PLEA, on behalf (as agent) of the accused.

NOTICE OF MISTAKE, clears that up! The Justice MISTAKENLY thought he/she had permission/licence to ACT as AGENT.

Then demand the JUSTICE pony up security for costs, because you intend to get a VERY expensive lawyer. :D

Why the fuck can he not just accept that its all accounting and surety and merely point out the mistake and ask forgiveness continuously into fucking infinity if necessary ? !

Make like a fucking Parrot FFS !

I know Maximus. Is it ego?

If it's ego it's a fucking dumb arena to let it loose in Bart Foley!

Foley :P

Haha phone finger trouble, apologies ?

Oh I smell GOLD nuggets waiting to be harvested :D

The simplicity of Deflecting Surety is not flashy enough for them. These guys need to make everything look complicated in order to appear smart in the eyes of their groupies. Well guess what "If it's not easy you're doing it wrong" :-)

Stubborn Jackasses are going to get burned. Because of Ego as Bart Foley suggested.

Slow down Maximus and let's allow the Admiral time to respond. There are nuggets to be mined here :D

"These guys use the LEGAL term "FREEMAN", giving the Court/Attorney General SURETY, but never acknowledging that to label him "Freeman" means the court is in LEGAL violation of his "rights" by simply imposing the jurisdiction." << Scott Duncan

:o So let me see if I understand...if the state and/or it's agents attach the label/title Freeman then they have no jurisdiction because they have admitted that the man is free?

They admit nothing EVER. It's what they do not what they say .

It's a BIT more than "Ego", because to do that would be to acknowledge that I have been telling the truth all along.

...and people spent FIAT on Dean. People will take that shit PERSONALLY. Imagine, if you will, that YOU are one of the Piece-of-Shit Christians following him. Three years you've watched the "Devil" and his "blasphemous truth" torment your hero Dean Clifford...only to find he admits that I'm right, have no "victims" and NEVER CHARGE MONEY. It would be as if Dean were saying "Scott is ALWAY RIGHT"! THAT is unacceptable.

Imagine having 3 years of your life wasted on listening to non-truth, only to find that "The Devil" is the only one who's been telling the truth, and "Freeman Jesus" publically declares SCOTT IS ALWAYS RIGHT! Just imagine that scenario.

Now imagine that you are Dean with 200+ angry Piece-of-Shit Christians looking to get some answers as to why "the Devil" keeps telling the truth, and giving ACTUAL answers, and Dean charges money for "seminars".

...HEY, do you suppose Clifford The Free-Dumb Teddy-Bear will appear in court as an exhibit? :D

Thank fuck you invited me to The Tender For Law when you did , phew ! :-)

EVERYONE can read the whole group now.

...they just don't get to speak. :D

"They admit nothing EVER. It's what they do not what they say ." << Maximus Legis

OR "Judge a man by his actions, not by his words" and yet if labelling someone a FREEMAN is not an admission then it seems like a "Freudian slip". I'm giving these tards a lot of credit by presuming they know what the word "freeman" means.

This just triggered something in my mind...is FREEMAN different than FREE MAN (as written in the Canadian BILL OF RIGHTS)?

Yes.

FREEMAN is a LEGAL TITLE.

FREE MAN is two words, where the first describes the second.

"FREEMAN is a LEGAL TITLE." Seriously, where else are you going to learn about this shit? WHERE?

Okay...this is fucking interesting. So if I understand this so far, since "FREEMAN" is a LEGAL title that the state and/or it's agents do not have JURISdiction over, it seems that this is a SUPERIOR title. :/ If so then why won't these gubment agents recognize it?

Is it because these gubment agents know it is SUPERIOR and have good reason to be fearful of any man who claims this title?

If I remember correctly, Scott EARNED the title of FREEMAN and it was acknowledged.

FREE of prohibitions. All ACTS/CODES/STATUTES are PROHIBITIVE.

"FREE of prohibitions. All ACTS/CODES/STATUTES are PROHIBITIVE." Well that explains why they refuse to recognize the title and are fearful of it lol!

:/ Are you saying the title FREEMAN can only be earned and NOT CLAIMED Chris?

Yup

I can claim that I have 2000 BTC from the genesis block, but in reality, if I can't or won't prove that, have I earned the right to say that?

Okay so how does one EARN this title and have the state recognize it? My first thought is to "Lien-the-Name" :D Or is there more to EARNing this TITLE?

Hmmmm. It's seems one would have to learn the different tenders for law attached to each act, code, or statute and not accept them. Or bring them all to s zero balance

For instance, property tax is only assessed due to a mortgage. Etc...

Maybe there is more to it....I'm not sure. But no debts is definitely part of it

I don't know if Chris Evan is saying it, but i sure am.

IT'S A LEGAL TERM. A CLUBHOUSE RULE.

Here, I am "Un Homme Libre" :D

I PAID FOR THAT "LEGAL" FRAMEWORK AND DID NOT GET WHAT I PAID FOR.

In 2016, I intend to collect.

I will command that the eyes and thumbs of those who participated in WAR against my PERSON, attend hearings for sentencing. I don't care if the rest of the body attends. Unlike GOVERNMENT, I do not claim the entire body...

...just their eyes and thumbs. They may choose to have the rest of their body attend as well, but the eyes and thumbs WILL attend.

Freeman also refers to "Citoyen D'Honneur" in French.

Honored CITIZEN :/

Or CITIZEN of Honor ...

Will attend. Will, not shall but WILL. Interesting

"Un Homme Libre" = Man with permission to go ashore?

Libere = LIBERTY = Permission to go ashore (Shore Leave)

Maybe a �CITOYEN D�HONNEUR�, wearing his special SUIT, can go ashore without being shot, because he has the permission to do so�

An �Homme Libre�, naked, doesn�t need any persmission whatsoever, but will/can get shot at any given time, without a blink of an eye from anyone :D

HAHAHA!!! :D

Maybe a �FREEMAN�, wearing his special SUIT, can go ashore without being shot, because he has the permission to do so�

A �free man�, naked, doesn�t need any persmission whatsoever, but will/can get shot at any given time, without a blink of an eye from anyone :/

Hmmmm...my "spidey Senses" are tingling and I think words like LIBRE and CITIZEN are words I wish to avoid.

Regarding the word Freeman, "IT'S A LEGAL TERM. A CLUBHOUSE RULE." Translation....also to be avoided :D

Not if you've EARNED it and DIDN'T GET WHAT YOU PAID FOR.

Well then...How would someone EARN (acquire by service) the title FREEMAN? And because I had never fathomed the possibility that this would be for sale, how would someone PAY for such a LEGAL framework? :/

You PAY for the BENEFIT AFTER you are FREE.

You EARN the TITLE in CHILDHOOD. It's why CHILDREN are referred to as MASTER. If you SERVE government as a youth, you have the RIGHT to claim the title, and the government sets the terms for interaction going forward.

...which it does for CORPORATIONS all the time.

Unless you were sold to the government as a youth in the 70's, you've no hope of EVER claiming the title. The De Facto courts now, all act under the CHARTER as the "higher authority".

Private TRUST is "higher authority". ;)

"Unless you were sold to the government as a youth in the 70's, you've no hope of EVER claiming the title."

I don't think I want this title but this is still interesting. Okay if this means what I think it does this is surprising. Let's see if my understanding is correct. I was "sold" to the government in 1973 (The year I was REGISTERED). When you write SOLD I wish to confirm that this is refering to and/or includes the birth registration?

No, nothing like that. Your PARENTS have to SIGN PAPERS.

Notice that this is NOT "Children's Aid"; This was SCHOOLING for SERVICE. Few noticed that despite the fact that all of those in the program I was sold to, were of "gifted" intelligence, they all just did REALLY bad in school...and then they disappeared at 13. My Grandparents intervened before that was allowed to happen, but Daniel J Wentz wasn't so lucky.

When I said "Great Minds don't work for the Government", because in order to HAVE a "great mind", Government is, by its very nature, ethically repugnant. Tendering the PURCHASE of "problem children" who passed certain tests, was the Government's solution to this problem.

There's LOTS of kids the government can secund from church ORGANIZATIONS like the CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY (SOCIETY!) which you will find is a CATHOLIC CHURCH ORGANIZATION. These don't tend to produce the brightest children, as Catholic doctrine is to dumb down by force.

...but kids that are SOLD to them, well not only will the parents not notice them MISSING, they won't CARE.

Most end up dead in their mid-20s or serving "life" for a crime they had nothing to do with.

...all in "service" to the Government.

Noble title is the only thing that gave my Grandparents any standing, and they leveraged it... at the expense of the "secret" getting out.

:O Holy fuck....I NEVER noticed this! That is some scary shit!

Which part? I cover a lot there. :D

...and you do not know what scary shit is.

Let me bring down the banks and trigger a war, first. That will give me the necessary "credit" to present the REALLY scary shit...

...because it sounds fucking insane without the proper context. You know... like when I said I would teach you how to make your own currency/bank! :D It sounds ridiculous at first. That is, until it doesn't.

I am teaching you how to think and observe, using THEIR tools. I was trained to HUNT government workers. In my 20's I really BELIEVED that I was "fighting the bad guys", and in the end, I'd get my reward. In REALITY, I was hunting those developing a conscience, and those who were "whistleblowers" but didn't know it yet. For a decade I hunted these people and instructed who needed to be "relieved" of their duties, or "silenced".

It was all perfectly "LEGAL". It was "AUTHORISED". I was "Just doing my job".

They really got their money's worth, when they bought me. Fun Fact: My Family thinks I spent those years "In Jail". True story! Go ask them! :D Then ask why I lasted 10 DAYS in jail, muchless TEN YEARS! I should have AT LEAST ONE "Prison Tattoo" if I've done that kind of time! ...but people will believe anything the Government tells them.

No matter. I had a LIFE PLAN. Something you idiots will NEVER have. You are just along for the ride. Like it or not.

The NEXT ten years were PARADISE.

I wanted to retire and play with my toys. Let the rest of you idiots slave and labour to destroy yourselves; I wanted to preserve and advance the BEST of what we are as a species. Computer Science was ALWAYS the answer. I wanted to do that.

I moved to a place in an area nobody wanted to be, and built a communications conduit to the Bell Switching office about 500 yards away. With my future SECURED and technology 5 years ahead of everyone else, I figured I'd just coast into retirement. Y2K was supposed to be my Swan Song...

...well the people who signed those agreements, are all replaced and/or dead. The current generation thinks it's OK to ignore my (AND YOURS, YOU IDIOTS!) rights simply because I don't have surety.

They will do the same to you. NEXT YEAR. IT'S COMING!

The dead in their 20s or serving a life sentence part.

It's a dangerous job.

Ok. You spent 10 days (or 10 years as they claim) in jail, yet there is NO record of it. How is this possible? :/

Oh such VALUE in the nuggets being mined here :D Oh! And am I ever beginning to see why just the mention of Scott Duncan's name causes the government agents to panic lol!

Yes there is. You can go look. According to government records, I have served most of my life in jail.

...except there are a bunch of Banks and Crown Organizations that have me working for THEM as well!

That's just using my "Legal" name. I won't even touch on my aliases. Suffice it to say, I have but to point to pictures of shit that's CLEARLY me, but with a different name. (Newspapers, etc.)

Government only controls the records IT keeps. It can't control everyone ELSE'S records. I made sure there was a lot of them.

This question was not answered ...."LEGALLY what does ON mean, and what does OF mean?" << Scott Duncan

This seems similar to the difference in the meaning of the word AT versus the word IN (court). Are all of these jurisdictional terms?

My mind is currently processing all this. I'll be back in a year once I figure it out.

Why is this hard? I'm not speaking Yiddish here! I try not to use words with too many syllables, so you can keep up, but you have to meet me half-way here.

Here's the thing about "criminal Records"; They can't be erased. They are written to READ ONLY medium (Optical). When I am "arrested", the arresting officer can ADD NOTATIONS to the "record", and it's there for good! A record can only be "sealed". This stupid mechanism is why any Police dept will look me up and see "Occupation: Computer Operator" ***CONDITION: MENTALLY ILL*** AKA "Doctor Who". They made the shit up as they went along, depending on what they needed.

I'm not making that up! Call Defective Poutine at 32 Division, and and ask him! :D

http://www.thesunshinelist.com/salary-disclosure/martin-fabian-poulin/city-of-toronto--police-service

They spelled "Defective Poutine" wrong.

...Yet I can ALSO show you HUNDREDS of people who know me in my chosen field. Many in places we worked together. Including, but not limited to: NCR, Deloitte & Touche, CIBC, The Toronto Hospital. They will ALL remember me... How do you forget a "Mentally Ill Computer Operator called Doctor Who"? :D

Bwah ha ha ha! :D It's hard to forget somone that has apparently perfected the art of being in two places at the same time all while sitting in jail.

Defective Poutine seems to have forgotten about me.

Perhaps he's buried in other cases...

...or maybe he lost his badge again! :D

Shit, I almost want to call defective poutine :/

I called him twice in the past, and reached his voicemail.

Didn't want to leave a message......

I just wanted to know if Scott was a real man, or an hologram or something :D

Call 32 division and ask for his FAX number! 416-808-3200

:D

Ok, so at one point JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN was convicted of something and sentenced, yet no man ever sat in s cage? 2 things are going through my head, one is that the person named on the Drivers License is not the same person on the court file and secondly "where is the surety".

But I can't comprehend how they accounted for this. Don't they have armed goons that count the sureties 6 times s day?

And why wasn't the charges discharged or dismissed without a surety? And , oh man.....I just don't get it.

In Canada you can get around the accounting by getting a JUSTICE to endorse "IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE" as a means of discharging the account. I got PAID for providing the "service" to the government... in the EXACT same way a "justice" does.

I really wish I was making that up, but there it is. "In the INTEREST of JUSTICE". Let that sink in.

Oh :-o

How courteous !!! :D

Whoah! I don't think I know how a "justice" gets paid for providing the "service" to the government but why does this sound like something other than a cheque or direct deposit? :/ Fuck I'm missing something. How does a "justice" get paid?

Cash.

They don't pay taxes either. They file returns, but they never owe anything.

I hope I didn't cause Defective Poutine to take a salary cut! His pay appears to be going DOWN.

When I TRULY believed I was "hunting the bad guys", I knew I couldn't be stopped. I was VERY good at tracking them down and eliminating them from government service.

I was in a contracted supernumerary position, so I was "untouchable".

I remember that feeling of being paid to "do the right thing". I was in my 20's and really thought I was "fixing the system from within". It turns out I very efficiently eliminated everyone who could have helped us today. That is just ONE of the terrible things I've done to you, that you don't even know you are a victim of.

If I wasn't so good in my 20's you'd have a fractured and polarized government right now, not a police state.

In ONTARIO, it's MY FAULT. I'm the reason why there are no "good" government workers. I hunted them to extinction.

If you EVER wonder why I give you all so much, this is why. Yes, I am keeping a promise, but I don't need to do that much to fulfil my obligations there. The rest is from ME. It's the least I can do. Call it "atonement". It's also why I'll NEVER, EVER charge money. EVER.

Sounds like a recipe for a vacation at the Fortress of Remand.

***Relevant Cross-Post***

"LEGAL=SURETY and ACCOUNTING" are "devil words" to the Piece-of-Shit Christians following Dean! Think about it! They CAN'T TELL THE TRUTH without revealing that "SATAN'S ADMIRAL" is the only one who ever told them the truth.

THAT is POWER. Piece-of-Shit Christians who follow Menard and/or Clifford, CAN'T TELL THE TRUTH! :D

I really AM the "Prince of Lies", and Menard, and Clifford's Piece-of-Shit Christians are my LOYAL subjects! SUCK IT UP! PRAY REAL HARD, you STILL can't tell the truth without admitting I AM THE ONLY ONE WHO EVER DID TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT "LAW".

Your LORD and MASTER stands on high, condemning you to a life of lies. Forbidden from speaking the truth, by a muzzle of your own making. All you can do is lie, and each time you do, you become more my slave. I am the "prince of lies" and I rule over the liars, WITH THE FUCKING TRUTH.

THAT'S why I've already won!

https://youtu.be/Bbb56jZo0rE

:D I'm like a Pissed-off Jesus Christ :D

I'm BETTER THAN JESUS! :D

"No more talk"? Yet here he is. TALKING!

Did Satoshi Nakamoto "talk"? NO!

It was "Here! Banking! GO!", and that was when the "talk" part ended.

The idiots who listen to this shit offend me, by existing.

This thread is filled with gold.

For instance this...which passed with seemingly no questions:

Scott Duncan Re:"Queen�s Bench Justice Chris Martin instructed the court clerk to record that as a "not guilty" position. That drew the ire of Clifford, who repeatedly insisted the federal government has no standing to prosecute him." - IDIOCY! You QUESTION! QUESTIONING NEGATES UNDERSTANDING! Ask BY WHAT AUTHORITY do YOU enter a plea on ANYONE'S behalf?

Most don't realize that BENEFIT of the doubt, means something LEGALLY (Surety and accounting) and that is the defense every "justice" uses when they are called on their unlawful acts. If the ACCUSED (not a "defendant") is absent at proceedings, a justice MAY preserve the BENEFIT of the doubt FOR the accused, and enter a NOT GUILTY PLEA, on behalf (as agent) of the accused.

NOTICE OF MISTAKE, clears that up! The Justice MISTAKENLY thought he/she had permission/licence to ACT as AGENT.

Then demand the JUSTICE pony up security for costs, because you intend to get a VERY expensive lawyer. grin emoticon

Basically, one can demand security for costs for anyone affecting the public without insurance then, correct? In this instance, you said "demand the JUSTICE pony up security for costs", but earlier you said something to the effect of: demand security for costs for the arbitrary granting of personhood to the government.

Then this: "In Canada you can get around the accounting by getting a JUSTICE to endorse "IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE" as a means of discharging the account. I got PAID for providing the "service" to the government... in the EXACT same way a "justice" does."

This is sinking in...but the mechanics are vague. If one gets called to account and is deemed to have surety, hence convicted, it seems, hmm, how do I say this, WRONG for a Justice to discharge the matter in its (his?) own interests.

If I have this correct, once you were deemed to have surety, hence convicted, you passed that on to a Justice (somehow), so, in its (his?) own interest, discharged the matter. :/

IN THE INTEREST OF "JUSTICE" is ALWAYS valid, legally. You people just don't know what the word "JUST" and "JUSTICE" mean :D

...sorry chris, the wrong shit I just delete, now. Stop inventing shit.

It's a bad code I'm working the bugs out of. Sorry.

"The constant and perpetual disposition to render every man his due"

Yup. I have no clue what these words, justice and just, mean. YET

"All men are equal as far as the natural law is concerned".

There is also another term used frequently in the definition of Justice.....EQUITY

EQUITY is part of the "accounting" in "It's all SURETY and ACCOUNTING".

...but way to go Captain Obvious! Your secret identity has been unmasked! :D