You guys don't know when you are being played, and this is his SECOND sideshow.
Has everyone NOT noticed that his last "victory" did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING?
This is just an illusion prop. His job is to present the illusion that "Something Is Being Done". It isn't. It's a show.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER!
In case you missed the point: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER!
ALSO: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER!
As a point of interest: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER!
Every one of you think you can cherry-pick what I say (Except maybe Pete Daoust) as if I'm only "sort of right". Even you Joelle! I'm absolutely certain I've said things you foolishly don't agree with... until you are forced to,by reality.
All of you "old school" crowd know better than to say it out loud, because I always make you feel very silly for believing what you do.
The FACTS you learn here are contested a lot outside of my earshot, but none of that makes me LESS right.
Three years I've been here, and not even Pete Daoust noticed that a lawyer is playing all of you.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER!
You needn't waste time trying to see IF I'm right (though you should for a while), just figure out WHY I'm right. I already know, so you don't have to tell me when you find out :P
He told us up front at his seminar in Montreal.
He can not go where we can, he has to stay in a specific LEGAL frame in regards of this shit.....
But I never seen a LAWYER talk like he does, in terms of blasting the government.
Again, I know it's a LAWYER, and I do not qualify him as a "Good Lawyer", but more as a "Shit Disturber".
And I like "Shit Disturbers", I guess it's a Quebecois thing :/
Now, How long will he be a lawyer, I don't know.......he might get disbared at some point, like Michel Lebrun here in Quebec.....I don't know that part.....
I am not INSPIRED by this guy, I just like "Shit Disturber", and he seems to qualify for the TITLE :D
Rocco Galati is a pressure valve. He is placed there to not let the pressure burst the pot, and at the same time folks doing nothing believe something it's been done by someone. He is like a Canadian Ron Paul, but worse for he is a lawyer.
He is "fighting" big federal government, but surety and accounting are missing from his "shit disturber" speech? Is he forgetting the slavery part of the whole government thing?
So why doesn't he? Why does EVERY lawyer get evasive and uncomfortable with the questions I ask?
Why do EVERY ONE of them lie and deflect when you ask them if what I say is true?
How many times has Pete Daoust asked these questions?
Even Rocco The Dego won't give you a straight answer.
Why?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER!
WHY can't they answer your question? Is it a HARD question? You've stumped them or something? Don't just settle for that! Ask WHY they cannot answer? Are they implying you're "crazy"? ASK!
Why can you not answer my question? Is it a hard question? Did I phrase the question incorrectly?
I simply want to know if I, a man, who possesses this juridical person that an agent of yours certified and registered, has the right to the security of this person to discharge public debts?
Why is this question unanswerable by you?
Thanks, Chris
:-D
Remember: You are dealing with a PARASITE. Every cent they make, was taken BY FORCE, from all of you... AND THEY CAN'T ANSWER YOUR QUESTION?
...and you're OK with this?
FUCK THAT! KEEP AT THEM!
Or, you can write the return address right in the middle of the envelop, and on the top left corner, the place where you want to send the envelop, no stamps needed :D
"Pete Daoust Or, you can write the return address right in the middle of the envelop, and on the top left corner, the place where you want to send the envelop, no stamps needed"
:o :D (Y)
Fax them....I am Chris, the guy who possess the fucking juridical personality named CHRIS SCHULTE inscription number 0000000
I am going to the fucking protest tonight, and I will leave CHRIS SCHULTE home.
So fuck off and fuck you :D
That could have been interesting, Chris in the newspaper tagged as FREE-MAN-ON-THE-LAND, with a picture of you having your fist through a cop's fullface :D
MONEY that has LEGAL TENDER attached to it, is by its very nature, DEBT IN TRANSIT!
A 10 dollar bill is NOT NEGOTIABLE in itself. It's ALWAYS worth 10 dollars.
You can ACCEPT a 10 dollar bill IN a negotiation, but the bill itself is NOT NEGOTIABLE. It's ALWAYS worth 10 Dollars.
...just like the TRUE INVOICE that Pete described, is NOT NEGOTIABLE. It's ALWAYS the amount stated. No more. No less. It can ONLY be discharged or Voided. NO NEGOTIATION. The contract already exists.
Is THAT clear enough, Chris?
...or would you like to consult the 200+ "friends" you have?
Either ditch the losers, or fucking step up when one if the intellectual midgets you call "friends" decides to shit on anything I post.
You smack the worthless shits down publically, or you can join Gail Marie in the cast-out crowd because of the garbage company you keep. It's the value you give to these worthless people that kept you ignorant all these years. Don't let them rob you again.
This whole venture of truth has cost Tara, as well as me. It's taking its toll. You will find Tara has little patience with the "don't rock the boat" attitudes that allow these worthless sacks of shit to even have a voice. These people mean you harm. If you think "community cohesion" and the celebration of ignorance that follows by including these worthless people is more important than the WAR ON WRONG, then you need to re-read EVERYTHING I have posted these past 3 years again.
You don't get to pick-and-choose the parts you like. This isn't Piece-of-Shit Christian Fucking Bible Study!
It didn't say. The document wanted another address for the person than what they have. It was addressed to the postmaster, then stuff into the persons mailbox not in an envelope.
There was some conditions on that paper, when I was released from that jail, back in oct.2014.
1). The person needs to keep the peace.
2). The person can�t move from its actual address.
So I am really thinking of moving the person to that court house, because I have good reasons to believe that the person will definitely keep the peace in there.
:/
Even the concept of BUYING and PAYING stumps everyone...
Me: You know you need to make a firm decision to BUY something, before you ca PAY for that something, right ?
Fucktard: WHAT ?
Me: Ok, if you are going to PAY for something, it means that you took the decision to BUY that something, right ?
Fucktard: I don't follow you here...
Me: Ok, if you PAY for this PUBLIC debt, that has been sent to your person, it means that you want to buy it, right ?
Fucktard: *lost*
:(
Then ask what they are even doing, if they can't answer your simple legal question. CURRENCY (as LEGAL TENDER) is a FOUNDATION for the LEGAL MATRIX. THEY MAKE THE CURRENCY. Why would a LAWYER know more than the ISSUERS?
hmmmm.....so the IRS wants to talk to the person I happen to have. They want this person to call them. Should I (a) forward the correspondence to the surety or should I (b) simply send them a notarized copy....???
I will choose b! :-D
Look, I had to get out of this COMER facebook group, because it was too painfull reading all the bullshit in there...
I mean it's way easier to deal with fucktards that has no degrees...in that group, they all think that they are extremely intelligent, they BELIEVE being the future ELITES.... and on top of it, it was filled with lawyers.....the confusion was painfull....:D
How in the fuck can you have any results with these kinds ?
Interesting response from the Boston Federal Reserve:
Hello. Sorry for confusion. It�s a matter of not knowing the answer, and not a matter of us choosing not to answer. It seems to be a consumer legal matter.
If you are having trouble with a bank or other financial institution, this contact information might be of interest to you:
http://federalreserveconsumerhelp.gov/about/contact.cfm
Why do they think this is a consumer issue ?
*GASP* They're passing the buck?
WHAT A SHOCK! Fiat parasites NEVER do that! They're just "Doing their jobs".
...Oh, wait. Lying and passing the buck, IS what they do! :D
Dear Federal Reserve,
I am not having a consumer legal issue, it's more an issue involving this security that for some reason, I am the adminstrator of.
I asked this originally:
Good Afternoon,
I am Chris and I am the man who happens to possess the juridical person known as CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE, with Registration Number 492 14273.
Do I, a man who possesses this juridical person, have rights to the security/surety of this person to discharge debts that a drawn on the security?
If so, can you please tell me step by step, everything that is required so that I, a good administrator, can properly account for the juridical person which I happen to possess?
Thanks,
Chris