We have private mail from Man Wilson.
https://www.facebook.com/man.wilson.73
Man Wilson: Re "there are no judges" -- There are judges. It's mentioned over 600 times in the Courts of Justice Act https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/rso-1990-c-c43/latest/ and throughout case law http://www.canlii.org/en/on/#search/jId=on&text=judge&origJId=on
Me: Fuck off, Dan. ;)
So pay attention to what this dipshit says! He says it's mentioned in the "Courts of Justice" act...
...but cannot name even ONE JUDGE.
...he'll say "Justice" and "judge" are the same (Lies: Judges are nominated/elected by the community. Justices are APPOINTED) but only to distract you from the fact that THERE ARE NO JUDGES. A Justice doesn't have to follow the "Courts of Justice Act" because a JUSTICE IS NOT A JUDGE!
A JUSTICE IS NOT A JUDGE, SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES.
If you are compelled to a courtroom, demand to be heard in front of a JUDGE AS DESCRIBED IN THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT.
If they say that a "Justice" is the same... DEMAND PROOF! :D
Because he can't. He can only point to Acts and Statutes that misuse the word "judge" in the very manner that The Star does. Man Wilson knows that "JUDGES are ELECTED" and that APPOINTED is NOT EQUAL to elected. He wants folks to believe that if something is written on paper then it must be true.
OMG! And there you have it. Thanks for this Scott and Fuck You "coWARD WILSON". It should be clear why the courts and the state are NOT following their own rules anymore.
All he does is show all of you the scam hidden in plain sight.
Now you can't UN-see it.
A JUSTICE acting as a JUDGE is the same as a SECURITY GUARD claiming they are a POLICE OFFICER.
A Security Guard ENFORCES POLICY just like a POLICE OFFICER, but you would NEVER accept a claim that a SECURITY GUARD is the SAME as a POLICE OFFICER.
If they force you into a courtroom, demand to be heard before a JUDGE (As described in the Courts of Justice Act), not a Mall Cop :D
Fuck now I finally get why there are no "De Jure" courts. Call it a "slight of hand" but the JUSTICES are not required to comply with the COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT because they are NOT "judges". There are only DE FACTO courts of INJUSTICE.
What has Dan Wilson taught you today?
1: THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN ONTARIO
2: THERE ARE NO DE JURE COURTS IN ONTARIO
3: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT COVERS JUDGES AND DE JURE COURTS
4: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO EITHER THE COURT, OR A "JUSTICE".
I think Man Wilson should continue trying to prove you wrong Scott Duncan. The more he tries the more folks learn and come to know that the Admiral is ALWAYS RIGHT. I'll have to post more Toronto Star articles :D
To the casual reader: *insert name here* Wilson, creates profiles JUST FOR ME. As reticent as I am to play the "mental illness" card, that sort of thing kind of fits. If I find myself creating Facebook pages JUST for a specific stranger on the Internet, I think I am going to just kill myself, because my brain would be too broken to repair, if I did that....
...So he's Psychotic, and/or he works for the Government (The two CAN'T be mutually exclusive by their very nature).
"Scott Duncan Adrian Thomson; He can't mention one JUDGE in ONTARIO, for the same reason YOU can't. BECAUSE THERE AREN'T ANY."
That was exactly what I was thinking when I posted my comment.
Dan clearly knew what the challenge was before he made his post to Leigh Collins, but instead of actually naming ONE "Judge", he attempted to obfuscate and misdirect, thus proving Scott is right. :)
I don't hide.
I don't LIE.
I make it VERY clear that I DO have an agenda, and that Government is the target.
None of these things are new. You ALL know this, so I'm free to say/do what I wish.
"Dan Wilson" is only here to lie. He's deployed because of the damage I (and some of YOU) do to the system at large; We erode a specific part.
I have initiatives elsewhere that NONE of you know about. They all do the same thing to different parts of the System. they erode these key parts. The system will just seize up one day.
The thing that "Dan Wilson" and his puppet masters are incapable of grasping, is that I'VE ALREADY WON. I had already won in 2009. It's 2015 now.
WE.
ARE.
COMING.
**cue ironic parallel**
https://youtu.be/nVUFGSgtaDg
"...I finally get why there are no "De Jure" courts." In case anybody missed it...NUGGET ALERT! Scott Duncan insists that folks understand the MECHANISM. Well I FINALLY see the mechanism and understand HOW the law has been STOLEN from ALL OF US.
Hey just to help me put all the pieces in a way the my brain process nicely.
The reason it's de facto an injustice court and that there are only Justices and no elected Judges is a because we have an old system of Trust Law that is being cleverly replaced by a Legal Justice Court, is that correct?
if that is correct it will make sense as in why when you say "clubhouse" rules and we're not part of the club that would mean that the trust law system that was established before was FOR Nobility and we are not.... we are not "you".
We are part of Maritime Admiralty jurisdiction and therefore, not oversought by Trust Law Jurisdiction... but by Legal Courts, like good little piece of assets the our person provides our rulers.
( ahah moment of a sudden understanding of the underlying structure)
Stay on topic! :D
DAN WILSON HAS TAUGHT US ALL THAT THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN ONTARIO, EVEN THOUGH THE "COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT" TALKS ABOUT THEM.
YOU CANNOT SHOW ME EVEN ONE JUDGE IN ONTARIO!
ALL SWAPPED OUT! ONLY "JUSTICES", WHICH AREN'T COVERED IN THAT ACT! :D
What has Dan Wilson taught you today?
1: THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN ONTARIO
2: THERE ARE NO DE JURE COURTS IN ONTARIO
3: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT COVERS JUDGES AND DE JURE COURTS
4: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO EITHER THE COURT, OR A "JUSTICE".
Dude... stick to what Dan Wilson taught you. :D
What has Dan Wilson taught you today?
1: THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN ONTARIO
2: THERE ARE NO DE JURE COURTS IN ONTARIO
3: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT COVERS JUDGES AND DE JURE COURTS
4: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO EITHER THE COURT, OR A "JUSTICE".
In case you missed yesterday's late breaking news, agent "Dan Wilson" taught us that
1: THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN ONTARIO
2: THERE ARE NO DE JURE COURTS IN ONTARIO
3: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT COVERS JUDGES AND DE JURE COURTS
4: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO EITHER THE COURT, OR A "JUSTICE".
And we can't UN-know this :D
I would have accepted Admiral Scott Duncan as an example. I sit as Judge Advocate General for AQUILAE at least twice a year. Dean Clifford actually attended one of those courts. There were cookies!
Here, I have just awoken. I can't pick the bones out of it , yet...
( I am not editing Dan's spelling)
ttp://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/general-public/what-do-judges-and-justices-of-the-peace-do/
learn 2 google
they dont care about your beliefs. canada dictates how canada works. you dont go into their court and tell them what a judge is, they tell you. you have no superior lawful position. it's their court their law. the courts were created for enforcing canada's constitution and laws. they cant rule about anything outside of that. they're not paid to.
scott is lost in freeman land, thinking he can outsmart the system that completely belongs to them.
who the fuck cares about how they define their judges
get your own life/society
you empower canada by even talking about it
"Generally, it is only appropriate to use the term "judge" when speaking of an anonymous or general position, such as "the trial judge," or when referring to a member of an inferior or provincial court such as the Ontario Court of Justice." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge#Canada
again, you don't decide what things mean for canada, they do.
so ask them don't try to define it yourself
The Canada section just PRESUMES the title of "judge" on a Justice.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!
A JUDGE IS NOMINATED AND ELECTED BY COMMUNITY CONSENSUS TO HOLD THE PUBLIC TRUST.
A JUSTICE IS APPOINTED.
Wikipedia's pseudo-definition notwithstanding.
"they dont care about your beliefs" .....That is NOT true, :D
They PRAY for you to be INFECTED with lots of them :D
I have seen it, with my own eyes....
HAHAHAHAHAH!!!! :D
So "Dan Wilson" is a frontman for SLAVERY, and he does not give a shit about it. Thank "god" he is so worried about "us." He really cares for us, as a master cares for his dogs.
The best part is that everytime "Dan Wilson" types anything, he opens a "can of whoop-ass" from the Admiral.
Keep them coming, "Dan"! :D
The ONLY productive interaction, with someone serving the Law Society, is with a bullet, or sharp stabbing instruments.
...followed by fire and magnets. :D
I was wondering why "Dan Wilson" would refer to Wikipedia for a definition of judge and then write about how CANADA defines judge but not actually refer to the ACTS and STATUTES he seem to like circle jerking to for said definition.
I could find no definition of "justice" or "judge" in the COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT but there is this from the Provincial Offences Act...
Interpretation
1. (1) In this Act,
...
�court� means the Ontario Court of Justice; (�tribunal�)
�judge� means a provincial judge; (�juge provincial�)
�justice� means a provincial judge OR a justice of the peace; (�juge�)
http://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90p33#BK1
�justice� means a provincial judge OR a justice of the peace; (�juge�)
Remembering that there are no homonyms or synonyms in law the key word here seems to be "OR" is it not? It does not say "and" or "and/or". This seems to mean it is either one OR the other.
Lol! I see a LICENCE to perform an ILLEGAL ACT. I thought it meant a justice does not need to be a "provincial judge" and since there are no judges in Ontario, by process of elimination then that leaves "Justice of the Peace"
Justice of the Peace is NOT the same as JUSTICE.
A Justice of the Peace is there to ENDORSE ATTORNMENT, and NOTHING ELSE. It's why they need NO LEGAL TRAINING.
Ohhhh...I see! So by "It's essentially a LICENCE for a JUSTICE to ACT as JUDGE" would this also mean that it's essentially a licence for a Justice to ACT as a Justice of the Peace also?
Endorse
To sign a paper or document, thereby making it possible for the rights represented therein to pass to another individual.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/endorse
That's why...
Are you addressing ME ?
I am not a YOU, I am a ME, if by answering to YOU I have led YOU to believe that I am the party with surety in this matter, that would be a mistake and please forgive ME.
"Since 1780, Massachusetts judges have been appointed for life by the governor with the consent of the governor's council. "
http://www.judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/index.cfm?state=MA
It's the same in our "civil law" jurisdiction here. Everyone is appointed.
The other day I was having a conversation in a car. We were 6 folks in the car, 2 of them lawyers. The lawyers were having a conversation about "judges" in PR.
So there was a moment that I just could not resist and interfered, and I said "Well, last time I checked, I could not find any "judges." A real jugde holds public trust, after the celebration of an election. What we have are unauthorized ADMINISTRATORS appointed by the governor."
After my comment, it was the most unconfortable silence I have ever witnessed.
Poor, I don't care, nor for rich. But what I do know is that you have negative accounting with me. :-D I let you borrow a winter hat 2 years, never saw it again....interest on the debt is still accruing. :-P
I left the hat back in November of 2012 at the Tycho Brahe, and I believe Derek Moran took it. I also left a winter coat/jacket in there. If you see the Bitcoin Expo pics we took back on April of last year, you will see the Admiral wearing it. Oh, I also left a pair of gloves in there. Blame the PRIVATEER! :P
Not even the Ontario Legislation Act (which seems to be the provincial equivalent of the federal Interpretation Act) defines "Justice" or "Judge". This Act does define "Peace Officer" which includes a "justice of the peace", "individual", and "person" though ;)
http://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06l21#BK104
I was referring to the Martial Law in Watertown over the bombing and the Nazis, ahem, I mean cops, marching down the street making up a bunch of bullshit stories.
ALL of you are horrible. Your ignorance and collective apathy are why I even have anything you want to listen to... and even THEN it's ALWAYS AFTER you have been victimized.
No Michael, there are LOTS of horrible things in this group.
A friend of mine just got off the phone with the Quebec Health Care Manager.
This guy told my friend that he CAN'T put the word MAN, and the word PERSON in the same phrase on these document they are sending to us, because it won't pass their LEGAL department.
EVERY document these guys are sending has to be approve by their LEGAL department. And MAN and PERSON can not be used in the same phrase :P
Wow...just wow! "Dan Wilson" LIKED my earlier post which follows...
"I was wondering why "Dan Wilson" would refer to Wikipedia for a definition of judge and then write about how CANADA defines judge but not actually refer to the ACTS and STATUTES he seem to like circle jerking to for said definition.
I could find no definition of "justice" or "judge" in the COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT but there is this from the Provincial Offences Act...
Interpretation
1. (1) In this Act,
...
�court� means the Ontario Court of Justice; (�tribunal�)
�judge� means a provincial judge; (�juge provincial�)
�justice� means a provincial judge OR a justice of the peace; (�juge�)"
Fuck does everyone see what he's done lol!. By liking this "Dan Wilson" you are affirming that Scott Duncan is right when he writes THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN CANADA :D
Pay attention! �justice� means a provincial judge OR a justice of the peace; (�juge�). NOTICE the word "OR". It is very important.
This is AWESOME! You liked this too "Dan Wilson"...further affirmation that Scott Duncan is always right :D
"I think Man Wilson should continue trying to prove you wrong Scott Duncan. The more he tries the more folks learn and come to know that the Admiral is ALWAYS RIGHT. I'll have to post more Toronto Star articles :D "
Ya, Ya David-Paul Sip. He liked my comment, too. Big deal. That is his way to catch your attention because Dan made a new post @ Scott Duncan on Man Wilson's wall. :P
I don't care that he liked my comment Leigh Collins :/ What is wrong with you? Do you really think a "like" from "Dan Wislon" means something beyond his being sweet on you? Lol!
What is wrong with YOU, Sip? How can you assume his 'likes' are evidence that he agrees with the Admiral. Dan ain't sweet on me. He likes Scott. But Scott won't let him play in the playground.
"How can you assume his 'likes' are evidence that he agrees with the Admiral..." Because "the Admiral is ALWAYS RIGHT" can only mean one thing...that the Admiral is ALWAYS RIGHT. Oh and because I said so. :)
A "like" is a "like". Who has time to figure out some fucktard's motive? So I avoid any ASSUMPTION and take it for what it is not what I believe it to mean. :D
Right... Well, be noticed that when I like something, I could like it, hate it, or just acknowledge that I have read the comment, or being liked to mark my spot.
Carry on, Soldier Sip.
Dan has brought this to my attention and it is apparently his response to/for Scott, the Coward-miral, who blocks everything from everyone.
( :O (and I made paragraphs) )
So, Admiral, this is for you...
Re: Scott @ https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/831091613593439/
"A JUDGE IS NOMINATED AND ELECTED BY COMMUNITY CONSENSUS TO HOLD THE PUBLIC TRUST." - Claims require proof. Where do you get this from? With a simple search, I see the term "Justice of Peace" used at least as far back as the 1600's in England (see http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp�).
To my knowledge, judges (or justices) were not historically elected in the English system. Canada is an internationally-recognized Sovereign state. A sovereign state can set up whatever courts and terminology it wants. It can require or not require election of judicial officers as it chooses.
Your personal/foreign law means nothing to them. Thinking otherwise is sovereign citizen/freeman wishful thinking and a mistaken understanding of Public International Law.
Well surprise surprise...looks like we GOT MAIL :D
Thanks for sharing Leigh Collins. So let's see if I'm following this correctly. I call "Dan Wilson" a coWARD and he replies with "Coward-miral" :/
So basically "Dan Wilson" it's ok with slavery, because historically it's ok. Fuck these religious prechers of law society scripture! We KNOW it's SLAVERY! Your fucking rituals are non-withstanding in reality, "Dan."
We just sum up this phenomenon with the term "Magic Parchment Syndrome".
Notice I know the bible BETTER than ANY Piece-of Shit Christian. I'VE ACTUALLY READ THE BIBLE. (ALL of the Piece-of-Shit religions are filled with people who've never actually read the bible)
I know the LEGAL tomes better than ANY lawyer or professor of law, because I'VE ACTUALLY READ THEM.
"Dan Wilson" endorses magic parchments. He thinks harm should come to those who don't obey the magic parchments, and sells the bulshit that he's doing you a favour by telling you this.
I endorse kicking "Dan Wilson" in the face.
"Dan" does not need to say the truth, he does not have to prove the Admiral is wrong. All he needs to do it's plant a seed of DOUBT to get the old programming to take over. His "job" is to plant doubt in anything the Admiral says. That's enough.
I think Scott can tell the truth without allowing "Dan Wilson" to leave skid marks everywhere. Watch...
"To my knowledge, judges (or justices) were not historically elected in the English system. Canada is an internationally-recognized Sovereign state. A sovereign state can set up whatever courts and terminology it wants. It can require or not require election of judicial officers as it chooses." << Man Wilson
This seems like a diversion tactic. I've seen this from "Dan Wilson" before. He focuses on the word ELECTED hoping folks will forget that the topic is JUDGE vs JUSTICE.
The admiral has pointed out that CANADA did have actual JUDGES. I do not recall when then ended, but Scott has mentioned this too.
I was too young to know or remember JUDGES. No doubt this is partly to blame for why the term JUDGE is carelessly interchanged with JUSTICE. Nobody NOTICEd the change, just like they didn't NOTICE what the "repatriation" of the constitution really was.
Were these judges actually ELECTED in Canada before 1982?
FUN FACT: Canada USED to have GRAND JURIES. That gave people too much power over police and Crown Attorneys. Now it's not even a faded memory, and the border-line retards in the US wouldn't know their power if it slapped them in the face. US Grand Juries are a fucking joke that can just be used as a rubber stamp.
The Crown Attorney was not even allowed to CHARGE you without the permission of AT LEAST 25 People from the community. Now people are too ignorant to even grasp what they have lost.
Notice how this "Dan Wilson" piece of shit ENDORSES your slavery.
THESE magic parchments are the REAL magic parchments! It says so on the Magic Parchments! Seeing Magic Parchments for the bullshit they are, is just "wishful thinking".
Well Dan, I actually PAID for that "law" and I didn't get what I paid for.
It's all attached to the fraud of the Birth Certificate, and I am telling people that they can functionally neutralize your beloved Magic Parchments by LIENING YOUR NAME!
TL;DR: LIEN YOUR NAME.
I've waited a "reasonable" amount of time, and there is no refutation from him, so it stands!
LIEN YOUR NAME! DAN WILSON SAYS SO! :D
(I'm just following the rules of his Magic Parchments! Don't look at me!)
But if it hasn't been a historical tradition among slave handlers, I mean how can it be possible, right "Dan"? :D
Slave Masters can set up whatever "courts", and terminology they want. They do not need a judicial election, fuck that! They are slave masters, and you must be ok with it! "Canada" it's an internationally recognized slave camp, so magic scriptures, rituals, and parchments are the order of the day. Don't believe me? Look, it's in the "Law society" scriptures, so it MUST be true! Of course, that is all "to my knowledge" which could be very selective if my check gets affected.
Dan Wilson is a contradiction, it seems. He CLEARLY endorses your slavery, but he just recently said LIEN YOUR NAME. As reticent as I am to side with him on this issue, I fear I MUST concur; LIEN YOUR NAME.
Remember what this little weasel is trying to distract you from! He starts talking about Magic Parchments to stop you from LIENING YOUR NAME. He says he wants to "help" you by keeping you enslaved.
Fix that by referring to him as Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson. In fact I'd like that to be the rule henceforth. Don NOT mention Dan Wilson again. You are to ONLY refer to him as Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson.
That's Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson. Please use all the words :D
Like A Pimp Named Slickback. :D
https://youtu.be/A6_zN5Lh2yQ
RECAP...
What has Dan "Lien-Your-Name" Wilson and his trusted sidekick Croaky taught you today?
1: THERE ARE NO JUDGES IN ONTARIO
2: THERE ARE NO DE JURE COURTS IN ONTARIO
3: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT COVERS JUDGES AND DE JURE COURTS
4: THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT DOES NOT APPLY TO EITHER THE COURT, OR A "JUSTICE".
It seems Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson ( (y) ) is now "obligating" Scott to "prove your claim that elected judges have ever existed in historical English law", and we accept.
There never were. Before 1982, JUDGES were appointed by regional authorities, and often ran for elections on platforms based on who they would appoint as regional Judge. The FEDERAL government was not involved, beyond oversight.
Distraction over.
LIEN YOUR NAME.
PS - This is not an invitation for discussion. That takes time you aren't paying for, and the Admiral does a fine job exposing your lies.
I can only remember there being Justices but I appreciate the lengths Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson goes to in his effort to prove the admiral wrong. He has inadvertantly taught us more than we may have known otherwise.
And the bonus is it comes at the expense of his own credibility. But do not be deterred Dan Lien-Your-Name Wilson as your are helping folks immensely.
NOTICE that the OFFICIAL title attached to any man wearing a black robe is JUSTICE and NOT Judge. REMEMBER, there are no SYNONYMS in law. There are no HOMONYMS in law. I learned this from a wise Admiral :D
"That was someone from Ptolemy, on Lou Manotti's post last night....spilling the beans before I have a chance to :P"
They can't let you have ALL the fun Scott now, can they? :D
Scott, did you ever read this guy George Mercier?
He seems to identify a jurisdiction person, banking contracts, and jurisdiction. I don't sense any freedumb after 12 pages of Invisible Contracts.
This brings up the very important, and still unanswered, question of why is Scott the only one who tells the truth.
Through the first 10 pages of this thing I read was nothing but pure genius. Then a fucking lie. He argued that I would be judged similar to a tort by a Heavenly Father.
How is it that he could be right about banks, banking, law, jurisdictions but still succumb to religion? How does this guy know about the juristic person, contracts, etc and can't see the bullshit religion offers?
Why is Scott the only man who seemingly can? The only one who doesn't lie? Why?
Fuck I can't figure that out. Anything I say is at best an ignorant guess. I say cause he knew about social engineering at a young age. So it is in his base programming thus is easier to identity
If he is one in a million, there are millions of him. I think that they need our ignorance. Scott doesn't pander to it for reasons that support his agenda.
Chris Evan This brings up the very important, and still unanswered, question of why is Scott the only one who tells the truth.
It got answered the other day Chris Evan.
Scott Duncan is the only one because there can be only one.
I had to go and watch the Highlander movie again to get it. Scott cuts off the head of all the others I think :) hahahaha
Chris, I have not liened the name yet. I am currently reading a post in which Scott has stated that "ALL CLAIMS MUST BE SETTLED before you lien the name". The legal Name / person / legal entity I happen to have has an outstanding claim currently and should be concluded later this year. Once it is resolved I am planning to lien the name as soon as possible.
I would love to shot Ozzy in the head in Battlefield. With whatever is left of his brain, it must be fucking easy to continuously kill him. Run him over with the jeep while he screams "Sharon!"
Hi Leigh, it was in a post that michael a Rivera listed last week on 7 or 8 pdfs of information from the The Tender for Law on an app called the box. It's in the first pdf on about page 80. I'm using my mobile at the moment, apologies if that is unclear. You could also search The Tender For Law under All Claims must be settled before you lien the name. B
ALL CLAIMS MUST BE SETTLED.
Interesting. So, if someone just acquires a mortgage, are they fucked? or is the instrument settled in say.....30 days?
This is on the presumption that a mortgage is a claim.
hmmmm....is it? What about a car loan? etc....or is a claim a court case?
Like Scott said, something to the effect of follow what the United States did. Well, they never paid off the King and he maintained a claim after they settled.
The person i have has many things to account for...... I am also still dealing with my wife...... i have 2 kids to consider and because my wifes actions they have persons too.
I still have not figured this out enough. The pieces are swirling in my sad brain. I have minimal value to offer at this point outside of the contracts i must complete before i can resign
Michael Atkins, please listen carefully to this guy, in this 60 seconds video you'll get EVERYTHING you need to know.....FOCUS !!!!!
http://www.clickhole.com/video/dont-understand-bitcoin-man-will-mumble-explanatio-2537?utm_campaign=default&utm_medium=ShareTools&utm_source=facebook