May 05, 2015 2:08 AM

Why does he/she/it babble about shit that has nothing to do with GoodFraudy's babbling?

I know Scott Duncan hates it when people apply the "mental illness" cop-out, but we really think it applies here.

"If the name is not you why would you care at all what happens to it?"

If the kitchen table is not you why would you care at all what happens to it? :D

See how brilliant you sound, Danny boy ??? :D

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!.....this shit is getting more and more fucked up every day......

You HAPPEN TO HAVE that name. It's not your fault, but while you DO have it, you ARE obligated to ADMINISTER it. ;)

Yep, in spite of myself, I do that.....

What prevents them from seing me as Private Person Agent Administrator Pierre with no surety anyway ? :D

Magic Parchments.

"Who created the laws of surety, consent, agency, contracts, trusts and why do you voluntarily submit to them by using their creation?

WE DID !!!......idiot :P

There's nothing wrong with the LAW, the wrongs are the ones who are suppose to DELIVER that law to us, the trust is breached, the whole fucking law has been stolen from us, they CAPTURED that law and are keeping it for them...

Yes, I am talking about you, LAWYERS ...

Even though WE paid and still paying for that LAW, they captured it and keep it for them, that's what has been stolen from us......

That ONE POINT is what everyone misses. Now we have a generation of illiterate morons who are too ignorant to even question the issues knowledgeably.

...and since it's that stupid agent again, I would like to reiterate: LIEN YOUR NAME!

This is the one thing he REALLY wants you to NOT DO! If a CONFIRMED agent tells you NOT to do something, you should probably do it. ESPECIALLY if said agent tries to sell "for your own good".

NOBODY DOES ANYTHING "for your own good". There is ALWAYS AN AGENDA. Even HERE, I have made it VERY CLEAR that I have an agenda. Those who claim to be doing out of "altruism", MEAN YOU HARM!

Joke all you like about this piece of shit, but remember, AGENTS MEAN YOU HARM. ALL AGENTS! Anywhere! For ANYTHING!

You only USE agents when fraud/crime is a factor. That is the ONLY REASON to even HAVE agents.

Think about ANY time you used an AGENT of ANY sort. It's to remove liability and to act against another.

Clarification Request:

I thought I "got it" when Lou previously pointed out that we don't want to reserve "ALL RIGHTS" anymore because they can only offer their "LAWS" and "RIGHTS", that THEY tender within THEIR jurisdiction?

My chimp brain is NOW suggesting that I missed a post that more or less said "keep those words 'cause THEY are the JURIDICAL trustees".

:/

If you do not want the laws you bought, then that is your choice!

SECURITY of the SURETY is our INSURANCE, and. LEGALLY, that's better than JESUS <---According to THE new Piece of Shit Christian CLUBHOUSE.

FUCK! I hope this isn't shitstaining.

^^ And Scott is WAY better than jeebus

That much is certain.

Harry Wombat...

"SECURITY of the SURETY is our INSURANCE"

I can't get this one into my protoplasm :D

What the fuck does that mean ?

Harry Wombat ???.... :/

Pete...

As I said, I was hoping that comment wasn't a shitstain. I thought I might of had an "aha" moment and would post it to see if Scott liked it to determine if I was on to something. As you can see, he didn't. :(

____________

Anyways...I'll now elaborate on what I feared may have been a shitstain.

I'm in the process of trying to discover what Scott meant in an earlier post (Dan Wilson PM conversation) regarding a SECURITY AGREEMENT (a written agreement between parties which identifies the collateral/property and is signed by the debtor to confirm they agree to have their property liened or seized if they do not pay their debt) NOT being NECESSARY for us to acquire prior to initiating a lien because it (the security agreement) "....is INCLUDED in THE TENDER FOR LAW that MONEY provides."

I thought I was on to why that is true, when I read..."If you do not want the laws you bought, then that is your choice!"

-----------------------

I was thinking (you should have seen the smoke come out my ears)...

I think I sort of get it now; my person doesn't have to provide/obtain a written and signed (by the surety) security AGREEMENT (even if their clubhouse rules say the person has provide one when requested to within x days or every couple of years) because:

commercial transactions/contracts/obligations are in themselves a SECURITY AGREEMENT when fiat money is involved. Acts and Statutes and Codes PLUS money PLUS a SURETY= SECURITY and SECURITY AGREEMENTS. The NOTE itself is a securitized promise/agreement to pay at some point in the future.

The SURETY acknowledges this SECURITY. It's our INSURANCE.

There's an AGREEMENT that they and "their" stuff is part of the SECURITY by their AGREEMENT to use fiat money which has already included a SECURITY AGREEMENT - which in turn allows me to lien property (securitize and secure their obligation). My ability to hold persons and their stuff accountable and lien them if they don't act honourably is my "insurance policy". If they don't want to be SURETY for our SECURITY AGREEMENT, they didn't have to buy/sell the Acts and Statutes or accept the THE TENDER FOR LAW and the SECURITY AGREEMENT that money includes.

And so I typed..."SECURITY of the SURETY is our INSURANCE" _______________

I'm still trying to figure it out myself. I know I don't quite have it yet. If I don't figure it out soon I'll just ask Scott:

How does THE TENDER FOR LAW that money provides include a SECURITY AGREEMENT - as defined/described by their Acts and Statutes?

Received this in private from NotDan Wilson :D

03:17

Notdan Wilson

Scott promotes using instruments and claiming rights in the Crown system which only enslaves you to Crown law. WHY BEG FOR FAVOR FROM A MASTER? Wake up. The legal person is not you or yours. The PPSA system is not yours. Leave these Crown properties and services alone, or suffer.

.

...

Notdan Wilson

03:29

Notdan Wilson

KEEP HIDING BEHIND YOUR BLOCKS SCOtt

.

dONT LET YOUR greed BLIND YOU

.

IT'S NOT YOUR LEGAL PERSON TO CONTROL. WAKE UP

.

GET OUT

.

TOTALLY

.

STOP PLAYING PAPER BULLSHIT GAMES

.

FUCK THAT WHOLE LAW SHIT

.

:d

.

:d

.

:d

.

.

NO KNOWLEDGE REQUIRED JUST OPT THE FUCK OUT

.

LOL

.

NOOBS MAN

.

:d

.

dude

.

as soon as you write on paper they win

.

they own paper

.

and as soon as you claim legal shit

.

they own the law

.

why is it so hard for people to understand

.

you can escape, not control

.

don't die, have fun. bye.

.

.

...

Notdan Wilson

03:44

Notdan Wilson

and post your battlefield server so i can fucking shoot you in the face

.

pussies

.

.

jk, i cant play right now

.

well maybe......

.

...

Notdan Wilson

04:06

Notdan Wilson

The gov didn't steal anything from you. You volunteered to play their game.

.

Big difference

.

now youre all butthurt that you voluntarily gave your energy

.

.

it's not THEIR fault.

Maybe he was drunk :D

BUT LOOK HOW HARD HE TRIES! Why am I that important?

Have YOU created a bunch of accounts to talk to anyone? These accounts he creates are created for ME ONLY.

LIEN YOUR NAME.

I'll say it again: LIEN YOUR NAME.

The fact that this idiot is so desperate to stop you, should be a sign. :D

Remember the basics:

1: ALL LAW IS PROHIBITIVE 2: A LICENCE IS PERMISSION TO PERFORM AN ILLEGAL/UNLAWFUL ACT 3: A SECURITY IN WHICH YOU ARE THE BENEFICIARY PRESUMES JOINDER

Liening removes JOINDER and any presumption of such joinder.

MMMMhhhhhhh!!!!!

What?

Seriously... what the fuck are you saying Pete Daoust?

This may be the best thread on TTFL.

I was thinking, Lou Manotti...

In French, sorry :/

What exactly is there to think about, that you haven't already thought of?

Livery of Seisin

"Livery of Seisin" But Pete Daoust is under "civil law", so I do not know how that plays out there, Chris Evan.

Right....good point

You are making this too complex...

IF IT'S HARD, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!

:D

https://youtu.be/0V7zdcSBRjQ

According to private messages, this psycho is even trying to send "me" messages on this account specifically created for me (which I immediately blocked) on public posts.

I want everyone to examine this idiot's behavior, especially the creation of Facebook accounts that only exist because I exist. You will hear the same arguments from this piece-of-shit, over and over and over. It's always the same crap.

"You'll ruin your personal credit." This is a lie. This, in fact, detatches you from liability, and thus increases credit risk. It becomes "not a rating", but a "buyer beware" warning. However, if you understand commerce, and especially Private Banking, none of these things play a role. If you're worried about your "credit rating", you're worrying about preserving the Tender for Law that money provides. You're also worried about preserving your role as TRUSTEE for any LEGAL matters.

But notice how important he thinks this is. This is now the fourth account he has created. These are the actions of a psycho, or a government contractor.

Pete, I suggest you block him so your post does not appear TO him or to any of his "friends". As you can see, liening your name scares him, and/or his puppet masters. It doesn't matter which, but I strongly suspect a LAW SOCIETY connection. Only the LAW SOCIETY would be worried about the name being liened, as damaging the security prohibits ATTORNMENT. The LAW SOCIETY simply cannot ATTORN an INDIVIDUAL to a JURISDICTION where the government can ACT as a PERSON.

In all that is LEGAL, the only actual FRAUD is the STATEMENT OF LIVE BIRTH, in as much as the STATEMENT OF LIVE BIRTH, does not adequately disclose that it is, in fact, the SIGNATORY'S REPORTING of INFORMATION; specifically that a CHILD OF UNKNOWN PARENTAGE, was found alive on that DATE. If you read a STATEMENT OF LIVE BIRTH you will see that it is littered with LEGALESE. You are NOT a parent, you are an INFORMANT, or in some regions a WITNESS, in which case the doctor and/or midwife becomes the INFORMANT. Again, this is the only FRAUD. The rest is not hidden. As I've always said, I purchased this law of my own free will, and I did not get what I paid for. In every JURISDICTION where there is LEGAL TENDER, if you do not get what you paid for, and there is no REMEDY, you are the victim of FRAUD.

So if anyone wants to accuse the government, and/or the church, and/or the LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA of FRAUD, make sure you stick to those very specific points. I'm not one of these fucking FREEMEN. In fact I dare say, I'm a Loyalist when it comes to the law. You've just had its benefits stolen from you, because the government can no longer pay the tab for your RIGHTS. Well if they're not going to pay, they're not going to benefit.

TL;DR: LIEN YOUR NAME

<<In every JURISDICTION where there is LEGAL TENDER, if you do not get what you paid for, and there is no REMEDY, you are the victim of FRAUD.>>

It's so fucking clear.

The fact that "Dan Wilson" says you shouldn't should be compelling enough to do it :D

When I read Pete's pasted messages from "Dan Wilson", I saw he was trying to desperately to put shade in the only method that would hurt does fuckers... placing a lien on the name using ppsa. And the fact that he is SO insistent about it makes his intent clear.

Maybe the Law Socie.... I mean, "Dan Wilson" has given a few of us the last push to lien the name. The Tender for Law that money provides is FRAUD, so I might as well keep creating my own money and take a big dump on their "joinder."

So lets lien the NAME :-D

We should write a guide, and call it the "Dan Wilson" Method :D

Hehe... :D

Lien the Name: Check � the Admiral said at the beginning. Creative commons :check Agent only used to

not for fraud to address fraud or crime

Mushroom ? :-\

This guy has a rebuttal for Scott's comment. He gives power to the courts

It's interesting that his position is "don't play". He would rather not have slaves than have slaves that know.

Actually, this account MAN WILSON is all about Scott

These are accounts created just because the Admiral exists. There is NO other purpose.

And WHY is he doing it?

...well, because he LOVES you of course! In EXACTLY the same way Piece-of-Shit Christians "love" you.

:D

Yeah, "Dan" is worried about us. He is on a mission to save "Canadians" from harm. In a "Jesus as Lawyer" kind -of-way.

I swear Pete Daoust had posted a response earlier. It seems to be gone now. From what I remember, Mr. Daoust's answer was accurate.

The only way to deal with these types is to block them.

"Mr. Daoust." Dang.

:D

Yeah, for furthur information please contact:

Mr. Daoust. 9111-1111 Quebec Inc FTP TRUST ftptrust@ftptrust.com

Hopefully Dan Wilson will send lots of emails to ftptrust@ftptrust.com :D

Maybe he will "save" you. Hahaha!

A friend ? :/

I never accepted friendship with this tard....

Anyone can duplicate a profile. You download the profile pictures, some copy and paste, and bam. You can be "Pete Daoust."

And "Dan" it's an expert opening facebook accounts, so you can never be to sure if maybe "Dan" has created duplicate profile accounts for some members.

But this is a HUGE waste of time on his part, no ? :/

Not if he's been paid to, or it's his JOB. Then it's just an undertaking of employment.

...label that what you will.

THE TENDER FOR KINTTING was not the huge success we thought it would be. :/

I thought of a group too, but it was not the huge success I thought it would be. It was called The Tender for Cock. It's lonely world. :/

You think YOU have problems! I put the Battlefield 2142 condition for entry into the group. You'd think that'd stop all the closet-case-greasy-ass spics from getting in... BUT NO! They still get in.

:P

No shit! It's they're like EVERYWHERE. Puerto Rico is just lousy with them.