Apr 26, 2015 6:34 PM

This... explains nothing. What are you trying to accomplish here with the bizarre speech and punctuation?

:/ I just don't get it....

Re: � what are you trying to accomplish here�

To demonstrate

The form, format, function and language of a code, the process of coding; It all started with an affidavit to establish facts of events.

To get an accurate account of events. For my own study, to see the big picture. And the transferable mechanics required for documentation be in order.

The process, lead to the affidavit, which is then converted to a detailed account for any liens We have a lien on a person and resulting duties and responsibilities. It was a study. Notice of mistake takes care of surety. However there is a duty to fulfill as to trespass and such. To be able to possibly, as per wishes to correct any mistakes, by administration and stay in good faith as legally required in trust.

The layout and structure of previous �bizarre� was a line by line accounting on a bill of exchange. That reads differently than regular sentences because of its function, it is different: It is like learning, python, html, or C++. As it was a study. It revealed interesting practical transferability, of skills to learn to write other code. A foundation to build upon.

However, there is a duty to fulfill as to trespass and such. To be able to possibly, as per wishes to correct any mistakes, by administration and stay in good faith as legally required in trust.

Exactly, Kent.

I AM learning Python as we speak. This point-form, poorly-punctuated gibberish bears no resemblance whatsoever to code, nor any extrapolation/application of Computer Science in general.

Also:

http://interactivepython.org/runestone/static/thinkcspy/index.html

PAY TO: RE: FULL SUM CERTAIN: DUE TO: FROM: AS PER WISHES OF: AUTHORIZED BY: ORDERED BY: RECEIVED: BY; SEE BACK FOR ENDORSEMENTS: NON- NEGATIABLE- NON- TRANSFERABLE; PAY TO: RE: FULL SUM CERTAIN: DUE TO: FROM: AS PER WISHES OF: AUTHORIZED BY: ORDERED BY: RECEIVED: BY; SEE BACK FOR ENDORSEMENTS: NON- NEGATIABLE- NON- TRANSFERABLE;

PAY TO the order of: RE: 8675309 FULL SUM CERTAIN: DUE TO: FROM: AS PER WISHES OF: AUTHORIZED BY: ORDERED BY: RECEIVED: BY; SEE BACK FOR ENDORSEMENTS: NON- NEGOTIABLE; NON- TRANSFERABLeupon

you were saying?

DATE: PAY TO the order of: RE: 8675309 FULL SUM CERTAIN: DUE TO: FROM: AS; PER WISHES OF: AS; AUTHORIZED BY: AS; ORDERED BY: AS; RECEIVED: BY; SEE BACK FOR ENDORSEMENTS: NON- NEGOTIABLE; NON- TRANSFERABLE PAST Due: Upon RECIEPT:

Did you take mushrooms today?

Let me

cheque

spot the differences, look for the pattern

and surety; who is surety

Not me.

not you either.

Like a legal alien.

DATE: PAY TO the order of: RE: 8675309 FULL SUM CERTAIN: DUE TO: FROM: AS; PER WISHES OF: AS; AUTHORIZED BY: AS; ORDERED BY: AS; RECEIVED: BY; SEE BACK FOR ENDORSEMENTS: NON- NEGOTIABLE; NON- TRANSFERABLE PAST Due: Upon RECIEPT: As:

"NON-NEGOTIABLE"? for what purposes do you not want this to be negotiated?

It applies to sum certain value

it a judge ment.

its

so...its an order thats non negotiable. You don't see whats wrong with that?

Next deliver it for administration.

its an example of coding it means they are subject to terms and conditions as per wihes.

wishes

It's an example of a bad program is what it is

yep,

banking

Try and quit thinking like a cop; If you read each of the above posts in order from top down there are slight differences in surety. This may be meant for others who perhaps will get the pint; The content is irrelevant only in that it is used to demonstrate code as it relates to accounting, if you have a bank in a this transition time, it might be good to know; however; these ass munchers believe in there little stage show; so we made it: TO BE, It is the mechanics of the structure and how slight keystrokes can make a huge difference in writing ones own code Or coming to comprehend the terminology as it is, in that private clubhouse; This may be meant for others who perhaps will get the

nevermind

Since I am clearly missing the point, would you kindly point it out?

How do you administrate things?

It depends on the task at hand

what is the source of the documents imagined?

source code

It depends on the task at hand...for arugments sake, lets say a Bill of Exchage

Hypothetical

Ok so:

Fucker slaps you: You don�t like fucker slapping you: You punch fucker in the throat; Fucker has a costume carries a gun. Taker� Objectively that is what happens;

Subjectively: fucker believes he king shit of turtle island.

Subjectively; the first slapee is in self Defence; I wanted comprehend.

But because fucker has guns; they slap surety on your ass; Not happy about that;

So as a duty to the trust covenant: We must answer fraud; Legally and lawfully;

So this is part of the answer derived from the affidavit; After a line by lien break down: Revealing a huge bill of exchange; Worth =1 slap 2500$ IT LIKES; 15000 � slaps based LINE ITEMS OF INVOICE; THAT BECOMES HISTORICAL BASED ON FACT; A judge ment. Our affidavit was quite long; It is one of the last things the will of the trust must address. If the facts are true and presented in good faith. As per wishes. A by

and the code was revealed.

Have you lost your ever loving mind?

its a bill of exchange'

You have lost your imagination.

who are you?

I am a MAN who happens to be the Sole Authorized Administrator and lawful holder in due course of a Legal Person that the government created.

Re: Non-Negotiable.

Not to get into it the whole buck o five method, turns out buck of five; Stamps and such are a valid accounting thing. Research for your self under judicial act; it is a process; they can buck o five a bill of exchange. I have sold many things for one dollar. Private bill of sale drawn up by hand for many years. Stamps and such are a valid accounting thing. Research for yourself under the judicial act; it is a process; they can buck

Interesting that you mention "buck o five", since your posts are resembling Adam's. Could you try speaking in complete sentences, and preferably in the first-person? Whatever it was that you were trying to demonstrate with these posts, it's lost. Do you ever see Scott explaining things in such a convoluted manner?

I don't see Scott explaining these things in a convoluted manner.

I do see that, he's growing more dashing and handsome with every passing day, though.

What the actual fuck IS this thread?

Tara, could you come here? I think we need to call in the cleaners. This may be the biggest shit-stain ever to hit the tender for law!

This one might be Peyote-induced... so be careful.

It's amazing!

The more I read it, the LESS SENSE it makes! I didn't even think that was possible!

I thought mushrooms

No, it's true! I just read the thread again! I ACTUALLY KNOW LESS than I did before! This is a BLACK HOLE OF SHIT! We stand on the event horizon of something colossal.

Time does seem to be slowing. I don't think we should get too close lest we be sucked in.

We still have to clean up said shit-stain. You see the problem!

I do. Perhaps he could take another stab (no offense Kent) at what mechanism he is attempting to employ. Otherwise, I'm going to take another run at string theory for something that's easier to understand.

*crickets chirping*

Tara, start here.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/7/1/b718644cb04ae1c404e4042cacada34e.png

What? Too far ahead?

OK... start here.

https://www.khanacademy.org/math/arithmetic/addition-subtraction/basic_addition/v/basic-addition

I have a string.

CLOSE ENOUGH! :D

I was going to say I had never seen anything as crazy, since the days of Bobis Youruncle.

I decide to look up August le Blanc. Then realized you ARE Bobis, August!

Ehh... nice come back! :D Plus I am learning "code."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ijsa4iYNxk

Holy fuck, I am out for a few hours and this happen !!!....

Bobis, you really need another radio show with Gail, seriously.... :-\

It is a means to do the accounting, to determine a value for a lien. By using a trust and agent in one agreement to write another; to secure surety via a third party: Is the point? It is old tech - A block chain off its own, umm-good peyote. Then being a bad guy and enforcing judgment, against cops as her majesty, crazy. As an act if parliament, even crazier, and probably a trap, just a wish; nuts. They don�t care. The similarities of the and fractal function intrigued me, fucking insane I know. Or Learning about the simplicity behind the language; the intent. By decrypting it; encryption decryption� decrypting. Hmmm crypto --- Crypto currency? De cryption Fucking bat shit nuts, which would ever buy that, What the fuck is a crypto currency? What if the power goes down? Pardon, the shit stain Pardon, the shit

Both block-unauthorized access to third parties. There that�s the fecking point Sir: perhaps collapsing the banks and starting a war As per wishes of Judge ment? Ludicrous

We think if you scroll up You may see a caveat: it was a study.

the rest is the shrooms.

I love Boobies :-) :-)

non negotiable; in trust

are our wishes clear?

No

For Deposit only;

You are just adding to the biggest stain shit ever. STOP

Ok, Think about this: A code if you will permit? A little equation adapted from versa algebra:

A currency (dollars, bill of exchange) is to a trust (deposit) As A trust = holder of deposits = bank [private] = agency (private)= [exchange] private) = PayPal= wtfcoin= Ethereum = Ethereum [trust the code] = private bank (Overlay network) = private exchange to Bitcoin is to dogecon is to Bobcoin= Ethereum= Bitcoin=doge poker room.

done no more shit out.

We think you should take some pill of some sort, we think if you keep this thinking process you will eventually get beaten by some thugs :-\

:/ WTF just happened here?

I think he was writing slam poetry.

:D

I can't see anything that looks like poetry in that shit :/

Bobis just might have received a bad hit on the side of the head, and this is the result of it......that happens sometimes, not his fault :/

He got a bad hit of something

Well, let's presume I take a round shovel, and I swing that thing on the left side of your head, this shit can cause some damages :/

And it's certainly not a very nice thing to do.....but shit happens, sometimes :(

hmmmm....let's presume I go to my nearest Peyote dealer, and he has some bad Peyote, but I don't know, so I take it, this shit can cause some damages.

And this guy is 6ft 3", if I remember good, another good reason to use a round shovel, statistically, he has high chances for that kind of shit :/

Amateur. GOLF CLUB DRIVER! Greater force to a smaller area.

Just sayin'.

Amateurs...

LOL :D

:D

What ever you want Scott, but a round shovel does the job too :P

If I'm going to hit someone in the head with a blunt object, I want it to take them down with the first blow. It gets tiring otherwise.

The Admiral has a point there. Sure a shovel might do the job...A driver will finish it. It's call blunt force trauma :D

In the absence of a driver a maglight or collapsable baton will do more damage than a shovel EVERY time.

Any peer reviews ?? :P

As a scientist, I would gladly test these things :D

Scott Duncan is right, again :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :D

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/video-girl-hit-head-shovel-3507200

Or maybe a mattock! :-D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc63IpZfe98

Anyways, nice thread Bobis, way to go man.... :D

:/ It seems like everyone but Bobbit Bob provided the value

Yes. Without this thread, you'd never have know about the efficiency of a golf club!

LMAO