Pete Daoust

Apr 01, 2015 8:04 PM
Will take place in Montr�al, April 26th 2015 :) Public Conference featuring Ann Emmett and Rocco Galati, presented by Collectif Co@gitation A SEMINAR !!!! :D ....ok, a conference :/ https://www.facebook.com/events/845722222152522/

AUJOURD'HUI-TODAY: Le Peuple vs la Banque du Canada - The People vs. The Bank of Canada

AUJOURD'HUI-TODAY: Le Peuple vs la Banque du Canada - The People vs. The Bank of Canada

Conf�rence publique avec Ann Emmett et Rocco Galati, pr�sent� par le Collectif Co@gitation Public Conference featuring Ann Emmett and Rocco Galati, presented by Collectif Co@gitation ************************************** Most of this conference will be in English. Whisper translation will be offered. Questions will be translated. More details below. Cette conf�rence sera pr�sent�e en anglais. La traduction chuchot�e sera offerte. Les questions seront traduites. *************************************** Avez-vous entendu parler de COMER vs. la Banque du Canada? De 1938 � 1974, notre banque publique pr�tait de l'argent directement aux gouvernements (f�d�ral, provincial et municipal) � un taux d'int�r�t faible. Depuis 1974, ce sont les banques priv�es qui pr�tent de l'argent aux gouvernements, avec un taux d'int�r�t beaucoup plus �lev�. C'est � partir de ce moment que la dette publique a explos�e. Un groupe de recherche ind�pendant, qui se penche sur les questions de r�formes mon�taires, COMER (Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform), a �t� fond� en 1986 � Toronto. Il soutient que selon la Loi sur les banques et selon la Constitution, la Banque du Canada est en mesure d'autoriser l�galement des pr�ts qui vont directement au gouvernement sans passer par le milieu priv�. Depuis 2011, COMER, repr�sent� par l'avocat constitutionnel M. Rocco Galati, poursuit le gouvernement du Canada afin que soit reconnu le droit d'emprunter directement aupr�s de la Banque du Canada. COMER a gagn� une bataille dans le proc�s qui a eu lieu le 26 janvier 2015, quand une requ�te pour �touffer la cause a �t� d�faite. Cette nouvelle a �branl� les milieux sociaux et les m�dias ind�pendants, mais aucune information sur le sujet n'est apparue dans les m�dias de masse. Avec l'objectif d'informer la population sur les enjeux autour de la dette et pour nous �clairer sur cette question d'int�r�t public, le Collectif Co@gitation a pris l'initiative d'inviter Mme Ann Emmett (Pr�sidente de COMER) et M. Rocco Galati pour une conf�rence � Montr�al qui aura lieu dimanche le 26 avril 2015 � 15h05. Le Collectif Co@gitation s'est form� dans le cadre du Mouvement Printemps 2015 contre les politiques d'aust�rit� et nous souhaitons d�velopper de l'�ducation populaire en appui au mouvement. Nous avons entrepris ce projet parce que nous doutons que le fondement des politiques d'aust�rit� puissent justifier le remboursement de la dette, alors que nous nous posons des questions sur les raisons initiales qui conduisent � celle-ci. Si la dette est la cause de l'aust�rit�, quelle est la cause de la dette? Voulez-vous nous aider avec ce projet? Votre participation � l��v�nement serait grandement appr�ci�e, particuli�rement si vous voulez inviter vos ami.e.s et vos coll�gues qui ont de l'expertise et de l'int�r�t pour cette cause. L��v�nement est ouvert au public. Cependant nous avons comme objectif de sensibiliser les personnes et les organisations sp�cialis�es dans les causes juridiques, particuli�rement sur l'endettement, l'aust�rit�, l'�conomie, la justice constitutionnelle et les politiques publiques. Nous vous invitons � vous informer sur cette cause juridique et de partager vos pr�occupations sur le sujet, autant avant l��v�nement que durant celui-ci. Merci de votre consid�ration et nous appr�cierons tous les commentaires que vous pouvez avoir sur le sujet. Collectif Co@gitation https://www.facebook.com/groups/401000916719807 collectifcoagitation@gmail.com ********************************************************** Have you heard of COMER vs. the Bank of Canada? Until 1974, Canada's national public bank made low interest loans directly to governments (Federal, provincial, municipal). After 1974, governments instead started borrowing from private banks, at much higher rates of interest. Canada's debt has skyrocketed since then. COMER argues that according to the Constitution and the Bank Act, the Bank of Canada is still legally capable of making loans directly to governments. In 2010, COMER, represented by consitutional lawyer Rocco Galatti, sued the Government of Canada, demanding that it recognize the government's right to borrow directly from the Bank of Canada. COMER won a battle in this process on January 26th of this year, when a motion to strike the case was defeated. This news caused a sensation in social and independent media, but not a single word was mentioned in the mainstream media. Not one word. Look it up. With the goal of informing people on this issue, our group, Collectif Co@gitation, will host Ann Emmett (President of COMER) and Rocco Galatti at a conference in Montreal, on Sunday, April 26th. Collectif Co@gitation formed out of the Printemps 2015 anti-austerity movement, and our goal is to develop popular education in support of the movement. We embarked on this project because we are told that debt is the reason for austerity, but what is the reason for debt? Can you help us with this project? We'd appreciate your participation at the event, but we'd especially appreciate that you invite friends and colleagues who might have some expertise or concern for this issue. Although the event is open to the public, we're making an effort to invite people and organizations with expertise in debt-issues, austerity issues, economics, constitutional law, and politics. We would also ask that you inform yourself on this issue, and share your thoughts on the subject, both in advance of the event and at the event itself. Thank you for consideration, and we'd appreciate any comments you might have on this subject. Collectif Co@gitation https://www.facebook.com/groups/401000916719807 collectifcoagitation@gmail.com


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 01, 2015 8:04 PM
Type of Post: event
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 02, 2015 9:32 PM
Hey guys, this shit just went through my brain !! :-o The Sun, here in Quebec, is not legal nor illegal. I can take its energy, through a solar panel, and use it, without asking for permission, and/or BUYING a permit. In Spain, since they are ahead of us by two or three years on this AUSTERITY program, the Sun can be legal or illegal, because you have to PAY for a permit to use its energy through a solar panel. So I predict that the Sun will be legalized in two to three years, here in Quebec :D Anyone could put this in his/her calendar ? �.just to verify if I can predict the future !!! :D Oh, and since it�s written �This note is LEGAL tender� on these bank notes, you will certainly be able to PAY for the LEGAL Sun with that crap :D You�re Welcome. Pete "Crystal ball" Daoust.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 02, 2015 9:32 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Apr 05, 2015 6:48 AM
WE GET LETTERS: Sorry, no free-dumbers, or Piece-of-Shit Christians, this time. This time we have something useful! Rick Hiltz has sent me, what is SURE to be Derek Moran's new go-to source for whacking-off; It's all the law references you can eat.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2015 6:48 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Jesus Martinez

Apr 06, 2015 11:49 PM
It's not about crypto-currencies, but it explains more in detail the difference between currency, and money. Now , instead of "gold, and silver" think cryptos.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1462183687427906
Last Updated: Apr 06, 2015 11:49 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/DyV0OfU3-FU?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 07, 2015 2:04 AM
************************************************************************************** NOTE: Menard `Tards keep asking to join,( as always happens when he gets publicly "served" by your's truly) and haven't read the "ABOUT" section! If you ASK TO JOIN, you WILL BE BLOCKED. READ THE FUCKING "ABOUT" SECTION! You give up MORE THAN YOU KNOW, by ignoring this warning! ************************************************************************************** Quick note to all my followers, viewers, and assorted government swine: Followers - What the fuck is wrong with you? Stop stalking me. :P Viewers - Hi! Sorry you can't post, but fuck you. Assorted Government Swine - WE ARE COMING OK, that's about it. WORTHWHILE MEMBERS: I've been sidetracked. It's time to get back on track. You've earned it. SO,since you have LITERALLY FOUGHT for the ability to speak, it's time for you to do it. I am deploying THE TENDER FOR LAW on our new framework. I want YOU to tell ME what you want your computer to do. Yes. Your computer. You are going to give me control over your computer. I need this control to.... keep better records of your game scores, of course! Never mind that! :D You will now have COMPLETE CONTROL of your computer, so tell me what you want it to do! GO!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 07, 2015 2:04 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jesus Martinez

Apr 08, 2015 7:41 PM
I wish I can see a few members of the group in class. It's FREE, as NO ACCOUNTING, and taugh by no other than Andreas Antonopoulos, himself, and Antonis Polemitis. Satoshi is my teacher in my leisure time. :P Next class starts in April 20th. I might go for a Masters of Science Degree in Digital Currency, who knows? :D "Hello Jesus, After the huge success of the first two MOOCs on Digital Currencies, MOOC 3 returns on April 20, 2015 with 12 live online classes taught by Andreas Antonopoulos and Antonis Polemitis in a synchronous and asynchronous e-Learning environment. This is your chance to get acquainted or refresh your knowledge with up to date developments on this fast paced technology, or have another go towards acquiring a Certificate of Accomplishment verified through the Bitcoin blockchain. How to enroll in the class: Navigate to http://mooc.universityofnicosia-online.com and create an account Activate your account and log on to the MOOC platform Scroll down to the "Available Courses" section Select the "Introduction to Digital Currencies MOOC 3.0" course and use the following enrollment key to enroll yourself in the course Enrollment Key: MScDigital (Be careful that you do not copy an extra space before or after the enrollment key. The key is case-sensitive). For students interested in continuing their studies, the University of Nicosia also offers the first Master of Science Degree in Digital Currency, which is available for students worldwide, both online and on-campus, in the English language. Kind regards, The Admissions Team." http://mooc.universityofnicosia-online.com/login/index.php


Unique Facebook User ID: 1462183687427906
Last Updated: Apr 08, 2015 7:41 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 10, 2015 5:29 PM
Question. After learning from Scott and Tara some great stuff, what is it you guys consider the most valuable thing you "happen" to have in this life ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2015 5:29 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

Apr 11, 2015 4:27 AM
I'm looking for a word in this video... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4g0qf8kxoQ What is an extra random variable that will produce different hashes called? Andreas Antonopolous says the word: "nons/nuns/nans" at 8:24 min. Which one is it? If It is one of those!

Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: Apr 11, 2015 4:27 AM
http://www.youtube.com/v/Q4g0qf8kxoQ?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 12, 2015 11:39 AM
OMG I'd completely forgotten about this cunt, since I turffed her from THE TENDER FOR LAW! THE GOLD IS IN THE COMMENTS! :D If anyone reading is an expert in Stupid Cunt Syndrome, could they please read the comments, and tell me if this is mere sexual frustration, or does she have rabies?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 12, 2015 11:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/8wkM0leD3O4?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Apr 15, 2015 9:22 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Apr 15, 2015 9:22 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Apr 16, 2015 3:36 AM
...noting a legal opinion prepared by Sack, Goldblatt Mitchell LLP for the Canadian Union of Public Employees that says �the premier�s plan might not even be legal.� What was it that Henry Kissinger said again? "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." Who wants to bet that the "debt retirement charge" will still remain on those hydro bills lol!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Apr 16, 2015 3:36 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 18, 2015 2:48 AM
WATCH. It's about NEW MONEY vs CURRENT MONEY!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 18, 2015 2:48 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/sbfxZG-F_Ts?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


J.P. Alexander

Apr 18, 2015 11:04 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 780666251957463
Last Updated: Apr 18, 2015 11:04 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Apr 19, 2015 9:05 PM
From the WE GET LETTERS dept. of THE TENDER FOR LAW: [ https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/?fref=fu ] First, the preamble. ************************************************************************************** NOTE: Menard `Tards keep asking to join,( as always happens when he gets publicly "served" by your's truly) and haven't read the "ABOUT" section! If you ASK TO JOIN, you WILL BE BLOCKED. READ THE FUCKING "ABOUT" SECTION! You give up MORE THAN YOU KNOW, by ignoring this warning! ************************************************************************************** EVERY PINNED POST has this disclaimer, so it's not like there is an excuse. WE HAVE BEEN HERE FOR TWO FUCKING YEARS! It's NOT like Menard and Clifford don't know who I am! How come you people "suddenly discover" me now? YOU WILL NEVER HAVE A VOICE HERE. SPEECH IS NOT YOUR RIGHT IN REALMS I CONTROL. YOU CAME TO ME! I SET THE TERMS. Here are the terms: 1: Fuck You. Now read the "about" section, and try to avoid lying about me, because I hurt your fucking fragile feelings.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 19, 2015 9:05 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Harry Wombat

Apr 20, 2015 4:21 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 377137125757370
Last Updated: Apr 20, 2015 4:21 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jesus Martinez

Apr 20, 2015 4:22 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1462183687427906
Last Updated: Apr 20, 2015 4:22 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 20, 2015 8:56 PM
Hey Rob Menard, I just found a GREAT GREAT GREAT Customer for you :D Fuck me, he is looking for: A FUCKING SOVEREING LOOKING INVOICE :D HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 20, 2015 8:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Apr 23, 2015 5:43 PM
Ok , so In spite of myself, I will have to go to that court tomorrow. I will try to post updates in here,, for those interested....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 23, 2015 5:43 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Apr 24, 2015 6:25 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Apr 24, 2015 6:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 25, 2015 2:31 PM
So, that City of Granby BELIEVES and/or PRESUME that every facebook users IS a legal entity, right ? That MUNICIPALITY also believes/presumes that ALL facebook users are one of their employee, and/or agent, and/or slaves, RIGHT ? These BELIEFS/PRESUMPTIONS give them the RIGHT to PUNISH you, where ever you are, and whoever you are, RIGHT ? Are you fucking following me here MEN AND WOMEN reading this ? So here it is for the City of Granby.... NOTICE OF MISTAKE If I, or anyone else have led you to believe that I was one of your employee, and/or Agent, and/or fucking slaves, and that I was SURETY for any AFFAIRS regarding your stupid Municipality, well it has to be a MISTAKE, and please FORGIVE ME. Now, since you've been notified of the mistake, be advise that I will NEVER go in your city never again, fuck you and your NAZI administration, and fuck you with your Granby Zoo... By: Pierre. Sole Autorized Administrator for my fucking legal person ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO FUCKING PREJUDICE :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2015 2:31 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Apr 26, 2015 6:17 AM
ay the following out loud: WHALE: OIL; BEEF: HOOKED: Now read this:


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2015 6:17 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 26, 2015 2:19 PM
Today, Rocco Galati will be at the University du Qu�bec a Montr�al. I will be there, in my ADMINISTRATOR suit (I love this suit :D ) I have ONE question for him, and I intent to squeeze myself in, so I can have the opportunity to ASK that simple question to him :D I bring the CAMERA crew with me, of course :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2015 2:19 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Apr 26, 2015 6:34 PM
Re: 8675309 pdf. the why.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2015 6:34 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Apr 27, 2015 6:07 PM
McDougald also wants Queen�s Park to make it clear that while students have the RIGHT to opt out of lessons on sexuality...but they cannot be excused from lessons that talk about accepting different sexual lifestyles, because that is PROTECTED by the Ontario Human Rights Code...�You can�t opt out of human rights.� Anyone else think that this is FUNNY? :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Apr 27, 2015 6:07 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Steph Boucher

Apr 27, 2015 6:16 PM
Would this counts as a "Notice of Mistake" similar to TTFL, for that legal entity "Non Profit Organization". That's a Trust too, right? http://benswann.com/clinton-foundation-admits-it-made-mistakes-on-tax-returns-disclosing-donors/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015465506394E+016
Last Updated: Apr 27, 2015 6:16 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 27, 2015 8:37 PM
Key to your freedom is your right to know how your computer works. Forces are in play right now to take that right from you by force. OPEN SOURCE PROTECTS THAT RIGHT!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 27, 2015 8:37 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 28, 2015 3:25 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 28, 2015 3:25 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Apr 28, 2015 9:10 PM
Does "streamlining" court system mean compromising justice? YES (if you BELIEVE justice ever existed)...and that's exactly the INTENT. They aren't following their own rules and do not give a fuck! I mentioned that this has already happened in Peel Region in a previous post about Rocco Galati's case against the Bank of Canada. �You are no longer innocent until proven guilty as guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ... You will go before a municipal employee, who is clearly going to be biased. You will make your argument not on your innocence or guilt, you will make your argument on how much penalty you will pay, because you are already guilty,� ... an appeal will also be heard by a municipal employee. I received two of these penalty notices, one in January and the other in February. Both were parking related. After the agent cancelled both of them I asked the agent how presuming someone is guilty is constitutional and his response was "York Region has been doing this for the past 7 years" :o Well I guess that makes it alright then?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Apr 28, 2015 9:10 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 29, 2015 3:38 PM
If ever one of these "special" CRA agents tells you that the fucking SIN is not an ACCOUNT NUMBER, tell them to go fuck themselves.... Num�ro de Compte / Account Number. An ACCOUNT is a fucking ACCOUNT.....there's no confusion in this.....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 29, 2015 3:38 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Will Jefferson

Apr 30, 2015 10:37 AM
Kind of on the nose.

Unique Facebook User ID: 861229973892415
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 10:37 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 01, 2015 7:30 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 01, 2015 7:30 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 02, 2015 11:05 PM
I'm DEFINITELY A MAD MAN with a box... that has a computer in it... and a navy ...and a global crypto-network... on a Navy. ...no really :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 02, 2015 11:05 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/bHD0iTeJDgQ?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


J.P. Alexander

May 03, 2015 5:42 AM
I'm almost all the way through a fifth of Canadian whiskwy 80 yr. And I'm still the smartest ass hole in the place. What a fucking let down. :-( Thanks Scott. Nothing is a surprise anymore! ;-)


Unique Facebook User ID: 780666251957463
Last Updated: May 03, 2015 5:42 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 05, 2015 2:08 AM
This guy/girl/AI's really have a fix on us :D https://www.facebook.com/man.wilson.73?fref=pymk


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 05, 2015 2:08 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 05, 2015 7:10 PM
Funny... There don't seem to be ANY RIGHTS that are exclusive to MEN! As long there is exclusion, there is INEQUALITY.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 05, 2015 7:10 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 06, 2015 9:50 AM
One of the best. and more important books you will ever read.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 06, 2015 9:50 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

May 06, 2015 2:11 PM
Friend of mine is wondering why the mother of a child has an automatic legal status as guardian and the unmarried father needs to submit a declaration, to be affirmed by the mother, in order to be legally recognised as the father... Is it simply because she spent 9 months carrying the child and the father spent 2 minutes "making" it?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: May 06, 2015 2:11 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

May 07, 2015 7:58 PM
"Ellins said the hospital got back to her late Thursday morning to talk about her invoice, published in a local newspaper." What? I wonder if they responded because it was published in the newspaper.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: May 07, 2015 7:58 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Steph Boucher

May 08, 2015 5:27 AM
I was reading something on the Feds and stubbled on this I'm my research. What do you guys, Admiral, Captain think of this?; One of the most important Maxim�s of law is simply thatthe creator controls. When applied to the Federal Reserve System, we can simply read the Federal Reserve Act (primary source) and come to no other conclusion than that the Federal Reserve Board and system was indeed created by Congress. Thus, it is patently incorrect to state that the Federal reserve is independent or separate from government, without first stating that such forms (titles) of independence and separation are only what Congress (the creator) allows in its statutes. Under no circumstances does the Fed act �outside of the law�, for in law the creator always controls. Inversely, there stems confusion by the fact that the Federal Reserve Board is allowed by its creator to make its own rules. Our Maxim�s of law also state that a fiction of law can make no law. In other words, the law-maker (congress) creates fictions of law, which in turn being creations (fictions) of law, have no power to make laws themselves. This is the role of the Federal Reserve. �=� �There is no fiction without law� �Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions.� �=� Bouvier�s 1856 Dictionary of Law defines what a Fiction Of Law is: FICTION OF LAW � The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing, a quality which is not natural to it, and establishes, consequently, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist,but which the law prescribe; or authorizes. It differs from presumption, because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true�The law never feigns what is impossible � fictum est id quod factum non est sed fieri potuit. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it it aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which is not, exists; but it will never feign that what was impossible, actually is. Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors, who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it, under the pretense of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness, which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact, what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench. 4. It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent, their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require. The law abounds in fictions�


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015465506394E+016
Last Updated: May 08, 2015 5:27 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

May 08, 2015 12:33 PM
I have waited in line for 2 hours to have a place for my boy at the local clinic. I noticed that his person's medical card is expired and never received a renewal for it! :/ So came to the desk and after establishing the facts, I asked if they could send an invoice. The lady at the desk told me that I would have to pay 20$ before seeing a doctor and pay the balance after the consultation. It's not the 20$, it's the fact that they want you to pay, upfront ! :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: May 08, 2015 12:33 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 08, 2015 2:36 PM
:) Scott Duncan is the man who teaches about administrating the LEGAL NAME, this man is mind blowing. If you learn his writings you will learn everything you need to know.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 08, 2015 2:36 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


John Affidavit Fernandes

May 08, 2015 4:13 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1466381186994351
Last Updated: May 08, 2015 4:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/4ZuIKXXtQN0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

May 08, 2015 6:16 PM
Daaaammn! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: May 08, 2015 6:16 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 09, 2015 4:50 PM
Because my intent is to NOT buy back public debt, since this debt is being fraudulently created (COMER vs Bank of Canada), i have made the decision to not be surety over ANY public debts. So, I was interceted by a Public debt Creator (Police Ofiicer) on highway 40 on October the 28th 2014, and since I refuse to be surety for ANY public debt, I refused to give the name of the legal person I happen to possess to that Public debt Creator (Police Officer) on that day, my intent was to IDENTIFY the party with surety before giving any public name to that Public debt Creator. I just wanted to make sure that no juridical personality would be attributed to me without the RIGHTS that come with it, as article 332 of the Quebec Civil Code state clearly, I mean no big deal there :/ Of course, that debt Creator FORCED me, kidnapped me, and took the NAME without me consenting to it.... And he was very proud about taking that picture of me, while I was in his cage, to show the world how weirdo I was..... :/ But now it will be somewhat difficult for him to negate the FACT that PROPER NOTICE was made about me NOT being SURETY. :D This might fit well in the "IRONY DEPT" :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 09, 2015 4:50 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 09, 2015 4:50 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 09, 2015 4:50 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

May 10, 2015 5:22 AM
SECURITIZATION; a live example...

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 10, 2015 5:22 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 11, 2015 12:57 AM
QUESTION. Other than my signature, what could LEGALLY bind "me" as being surety for anything ?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 11, 2015 12:57 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 13, 2015 12:13 AM
https://www.facebook.com/saoirse.nabas?fref=ts Hey everyone! Dean has sanitize history! ALL my posts are gone.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 13, 2015 12:13 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

May 13, 2015 3:35 AM
"Many men in Toronto find entertainment in verbally raping women." This is incredible. I guess I have a few things to learn about penetration and rape. Can someone tell me how do words rape a woman? It seems to diminish what rape actually is? Is this similar to zombie rape baby, rape :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: May 13, 2015 3:35 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

May 13, 2015 10:44 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 13, 2015 10:44 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

May 14, 2015 3:23 PM
A response to the �Booty�tards. Dear Honored Members, Slam Poetry ? aside. In all seriousness, To correct some information�s that come to mind after pondering, Then in turn, reviewing the information presented on this most precious place of actual knowledge; The Tender For Law. The actual importance of that simple phrase. I was Full Retard many times, in an endeavor to discover the truths hidden in plai n sight. The �verify everything for your self� method. I did not believe a word of anything the Admiral presented without verifying that piece of knowledge, it took years. I have been a member here since Nov 2012. I was invited after hearing about one of That Clifford guy�s arrests and looking on his wall and I was introduced to the word Hubris for the first time by some one who knew how to use it, The Admiral and Dan Wietz. You think you �booty� Tards, Can slam me? You have nothing on a tag team from these astute knowledgeable personas. The Point being, I was fortunate to have been part of a very intense learning curve for about 8 weeks at the very beginning of my membership here. then I kept plugging away. That has not stopped. I have questioned my sanity many times. I have earned my place here. I was not part of any private club. I am not like most of the ones reading this. I have been trained as an investigative journalist. I have been in court many times and have had things vacated and such, but believing something not true about this whole person thing. I had to break out and hack my previous programming. I had to create my own thing. I had to learn to think in legalese to see how these fuckers thought. To prevent further fucking around. The Trust of what ever is a shield in that realm. However learning to use it one must be careful what they wish for. I learned some very important things such as; the why of installing a parliament in a place. The why of a private person constitution. Having a person, not being a person, it�s not my fucking name� I wish to say thank you for all of your slams, honesties and pointing me to the correct directions. It enabled me to finally find some True facts. AFTER a Life long investigation for me. I am an agent of me. So a respectful Fuck You Too those this applies to. THAT IS IN ENGLISH.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: May 14, 2015 3:23 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/SnXtuktNdlM?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

May 16, 2015 12:22 PM
http://moneymorning.com/ext/articles/rickards/chinese-plan-to-destroy-us-dollar.php?iris=360112&ad=yuan2-position-bnyuan So..this guy discusses everything which we know about the collapsing dollar. Then he starts to discuss the IMF and Special Drawing Rights. LOTS of omissions in this 6 minute video, such as cryptocurrencies. But one glaring omission I saw was the lack of mention of the Bank of International Settlements. Scott, am I right? Does the BIS have a lot to do with the SDRs? Also, SPECIAL.....RIGHTS......of DRAWING.....for WHOM?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: May 16, 2015 12:22 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 17, 2015 8:59 PM
Time to give NOTICE :D Att: Bank of Canada. senior deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE. NOTICE Dear Bank of Canada, Be advised that I will not ACCOUNT as surety, for ANY bail-in and/or bail out you may perform for PRIVATE banks. BY: SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the LEGAL person named PIERRE DAOUST having the inscription number 1196604112851, and the ACCOUNT number 261-XXX-XXX.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 17, 2015 8:59 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

May 18, 2015 11:52 AM
Scott, last night, during the call, there was a mention of giving Duty Council a notarized Birth Certificate with instructions. One time, probably my second time in court, I was locked up in a cell....which was how I spent most of my time in court actually. A Court Appointed Lawyer came in to "represent me". I said "Oh, you are representing me?" I slid a Certified Copy of Live Birth under the cell door and said "so give this to the Justice". He slid it back under the door and said "i won't represent you" and left.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: May 18, 2015 11:52 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

May 19, 2015 2:59 PM
I read this and thought perhaps Scott and Tara may wish to encourage MR TRAVOLTA to make a donation :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: May 19, 2015 2:59 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 19, 2015 3:59 PM
I always put � ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Because I want to reserve ALL rights, and I want to make sure nothing in the document�s content can be used against me, and/or against all these rights that has been reserved. :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 19, 2015 3:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

May 20, 2015 12:10 AM
"There are currently 41 judges (out of 284 full-time judges) and 44 justices of the peace (out of 345) who can preside over matters in French, according to the Ontario Court of Justice. Six of those judges and four of the justices of the peace sit in Toronto." :/ Okay can somebody explain why they are distinguishing between "judges" and "justice of the peace" if there are no judges?"

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: May 20, 2015 12:10 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 20, 2015 2:54 PM
August le Blanc Ok, August Le Blanc. STOP TRYING TO POST BULLSHIT IN HERE. WE ARE NOT INTERESTED BY BULLSHIT. THERE�S PLENTY OF GROUPS ON FACEBOOK WHERE YOU CAN SWALLOW ONE OR TWO MUSHROOMS, AND POST BULLSHIT IN THERE LAST WARNING: �STOP� Thanks Administration.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 20, 2015 2:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

May 20, 2015 5:42 PM
http://www.fastcolabs.com/3035723/app-economy/smart-contracts-could-be-cryptocurrencys-killer-app Very easy to read and understand article here, explaining what smart contracts are and their unlimited potential... It even gives examples! I love examples!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: May 20, 2015 5:42 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

May 21, 2015 3:33 PM
"Rumors that Shemesh�s arrest was imminent sent shockwaves through the legal community. Insiders with knowledge of the situation predict an �ugly, messy� case, with Shemesh mounting an aggressive defence and a potential witness list pitting lawyers, judges and cops against each other." :D Hmmm...another lawyer being targetted by the state. Is the De Facto INUSTICE system closing ranks and starting to destroy itself?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: May 21, 2015 3:33 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

May 22, 2015 10:54 AM
There's a referendum in Ireland today. It's on whether or not to redefine "marriage" in its constitution. What does marriage mean to me? Since getting a fucking clue, AUTHORISATION OF TWO LEGAL PERSONS BEING JOINED TO CREATE A NEW, FINANCIAL SECURITY... As we say here though, "Ah but sure, you have to vote..."


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: May 22, 2015 10:54 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

May 25, 2015 10:26 PM
Speaking of court....Justices.... here's what I received in the "other" section of the privates message box on may 20th 2015 at 07:19 from: YOU ARE YHE ONE: Re "there are no judges" -- There are judges. It's mentioned over 600 times in the Courts of Justice Act https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/rso-1990-c-c43/latest/ and throughout case law http://www.canlii.org/en/on/#search/jId=on&text=judge&origJId=on

Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: May 25, 2015 10:26 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

May 26, 2015 10:24 PM
From the War on Wrong?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: May 26, 2015 10:24 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

May 28, 2015 2:41 AM
Question for Scott. If I understood correctly, in your last conference call, you told us that you have the authority to give permission (I'm not sure I understand to who) for him/her, to be a notary. Here was your exemple of what could have happened in Sino's case when he was convicted of using an unlicensed notary. (Something about a de facto treaty). Sino: "Hey, we're under treaty isn't that in your AQUILAE TRUST?" Scott: "Yes!" Sino: "Do I have permission to act as the Notary?" Scott: "Yes" Done! He's licensed! So my questions are: - What title and/or authority do you possess to be able to do that? - What treaty were you talking about? Thank you!


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: May 28, 2015 2:41 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Ceit Butler

May 30, 2015 6:32 AM
Scott Duncan Tara Duncan Lou Manotti Gilberto de Piento


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 30, 2015 6:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

May 31, 2015 6:56 PM
Scott, do you realize that you have made it impossible for me to have a conversation with anyone on FaceBook? I am sure most feel this way. Self evident truths, such as "free lacks accounting" is so far over everyone's head, it is painful.... I digress. Anyone else want care to share?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: May 31, 2015 6:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Jun 02, 2015 1:40 PM
Ok, what the fuck is this ? :D http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/legal-battle-over-royal-baby-law-hits-quebec-court-today-1.3095003?fb_action_ids=772916566155796&fb_action_types=og.shares


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 02, 2015 1:40 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Jun 05, 2015 11:35 AM
I had a thought yesterday... Ownership is legal. With regards to drugs and possession... Is the fact that ownership is proven legally by registration the reason that people get charged with possession rather than ownership?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2015 11:35 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jun 07, 2015 11:24 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 07, 2015 11:24 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Daniel J Wentz

Jun 08, 2015 8:02 AM
I was force to do this. I just think "What would Scott Duncan say"? I lost a bet. Now I serve as AGENT.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02021762657264E+016
Last Updated: Jun 08, 2015 8:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 12, 2015 1:14 PM
THE CANADIAN Government can now decide what the world sees. No really. This is one of those "Told You So" moments. (Yes I'm talking to you. You know who you are.) This gives "Delete" authority to people in the Canadian Government. Just run it through the Ca$h Court$ and *Click*, problem vanishes! ...and all of you are ok with that.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2015 1:14 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 14, 2015 1:11 PM
CHECK YOUR FACTS*

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 14, 2015 1:11 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 15, 2015 3:33 PM
When the MONEY comes in... you can make all the changes you like. No vote and NO say from the public. You, "the public" already "consented", remember?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 15, 2015 3:33 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 15, 2015 7:46 PM
When banks took power from the crown... ...No really. That's what actually happened. This NEVER applied to COMMON PEOPLE. ONLY the treaty of Westminster (1931) applies to YOU, as regards "rights" and "liberties" (Which is "permission" from an "authority" to go ashore. Look it up). None of this is hidden. Stop letting people lie about their meaning. Since I showed you how to read legalese, I want all of YOU to tell me the lies in this article. It's the CATO institute, so you know there will be a few! They EXIST to uncover the truth, and then lie about it. Look at their track record. :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 15, 2015 7:46 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jun 16, 2015 12:25 AM
"Some police forces appear to have trouble understanding when it is appropriate � to say nothing of legal � to hold people in custody pending a bail hearing, three judges have recently noted in strongly worded rulings, going so far as to call the problem �systemic.�

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 16, 2015 12:25 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 16, 2015 4:08 AM
OK Simu-Drones! Looks like Dean Clifford is ACTING PRO SE. I really think that should be left to people who have a clue about "Legal" matters, but that's just me. By the way, regarding "everyone" (Which INCLUDES "Her Majesty AND an ORGANIZATION" ) is SUBJECT to the CRIMINAL CODE (Not LAW; CODE): This is a true statement. :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 16, 2015 4:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/8SvzO1dBzG0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 16, 2015 4:58 PM
THIS. THIS is one of the "gateways" to THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING from THE TENDER FOR LAW. It will allow you to make dumb machines "smart" and (even better) allow you to replace the "brains" of existing "smart" machines. This knowledge will soon be CRIMINALIZED, and is part of the WAR ON GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTING. This is the grandaddy of the rights you didn't know you need/have. This is just something I am pointing at, that you should examine. As I said, a few months ago, you Simu-Drones need to "up your game". You are going to learn new skills. Skills you will need to fight what's coming. This is ARDUINO. It's a MICROCONTROLLER that would have cost $10,000, 10 years ago.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 16, 2015 4:58 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jun 16, 2015 6:04 PM
"Naqvi, a lawyer, said Canadians already have the RIGHT under the Charter to refuse to speak to police or give their name if they are not being put under arrest..." Really? I noticed that no specific section of the charter is mentioned. Is this statement TRUE?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 16, 2015 6:04 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 17, 2015 6:29 AM
No... Confusion of why he doesn't hit that space bar as often as he should! Weren't the Free-Dumbers worshiping this guy for a while?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 17, 2015 6:29 AM
Type of Post: note
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jun 17, 2015 5:27 PM
"A local official has said their behaviour was disrespectful and caused an earthquake a few days later that killed 18 climbers." Fucking BELIEF!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 17, 2015 5:27 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None






Scott Duncan

Jun 19, 2015 2:25 PM
By APPOINTMENT:


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2015 2:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 19, 2015 5:01 PM
With virtually NO resistance where it counted, this gets shoved up your ass. This is where they start closing up the society. This is when it became "Too Late". Remember it.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2015 5:01 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jun 20, 2015 1:44 AM
STAY ALERT! They walk among us, they breed, and they vote...this is the MAJORITY :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 20, 2015 1:44 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 20, 2015 3:50 PM
OK, Simu-Drones! This is full of CORRECT stuff. It also has WRONG stuff, and MISSING stuff. OBJECTIVE: FIND THE MISSING/WRONG SHIT HERE! GO!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 20, 2015 3:50 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 20, 2015 11:31 PM
FREEEEEEEEEEEEE-DUMB! :D Boy that "Wake Up Productions" guy is all over this shit! :D So here is where Dean gets "recruited". I know, because I'm one of the people who invented this PERFECTLY LEGAL method of coercion. Here is the standardised C.I. workflow for getting difficult GROUPS infiltrated. 1: Make sure your subject is NOT in Jail on the current charges you have on your target, but but VERY restrictive Bail Conditions. 2: Convict, but maintain bail for several months before actual "sentencing". 3: Approach the target using 3rd parties (Lawyer) and lay out your terms to avoid a lengthy sentence. 4: Joint submission if the target cooperates. Dean is on STEP TWO. Also: Gilberto de Piento reports that Snotboogie has vanished from Facebook! Was it something I said? :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 20, 2015 11:31 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/q6tn5L-dBzg?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 21, 2015 3:16 AM
�CORPUS DELICTI� The MOST IGNORED LEGAL CONCEPT! The circle-jerkers at Quatloos have been scouring the 1960 CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS for what is supposedly my own "crazy" position that for a CRIME, there must be an INJURED PARTY. They LOVE cherry-picking, or just plain ignoring the maxim of CORPUS DELICTI! Even their precious "Justices" agree with me! That's a MAXIM OF LAW, and they are reading the WRONG DOCUMENT, but let's just cover the CASE LAW. These are the first few I found. There are literally THOUSANDS. Go look. I tell people to STAND UNDER THE 1960 CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS, because THE FUCKING CHARTER REMOVES CORPUS DELICTI! THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS (UK CANADA ACT - 1982) REMOVED CORPUS DELICTI in those sections they don't teach in school. They actually CENSOR the sections after the "APPLICATION OF THIS CHARTER" section in Canadian Public Schools. You idiot Quatloos readers can go fucking look for yourselves. At least look at the RIGHT DOCUMENT, and fucking google before you talk out of your asses. AND FOR FUCK'S SAKE STOP FUCKING LYING ABOUT ME! And don't "paraphrase" me, because I am VERY precise with my words. The very ACT of paraphrasing makes it A LIE. You do not get to lie about what I say. It took me FIVE FUCKING SECONDS. Here is all the proof you need on a bunch of magic fucking parchments, written by old men wearing dresses! Just the way you fucking like them! This took FIVE SECONDS to find: �For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party (Corpus Delicti) There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional right.� Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945: �With no injured party, a complaint is invalid on its face�. Gibson v. Boyle, 139 Ariz. 512 Supreme courts ruled �Without Corpus delicti there can be no crime��In every prosecution for crime it is necessary to establish the �corpus delecti�, i.e., the body or elements of the crime.� People v. Lopez, 62 Ca.Rptr. 47, 254 C.A.2d 185. �In every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delecti, or the body of the crime itself-i.e., the fact of injury, loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. � People v. Sapp, 73 P.3d 433, 467 (Cal. 2003) [quoting People v. Alvarez, (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1168-1169, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372.]. �As a general principal, standing to invoke the judicial process requires an actual justiciable controversy as to which the complainant has a real interest in the ultimate adjudication because he or she has either suffered or is about to suffer an injury. � People v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793. �Without standing, there is no actual or justiciable controversy, and courts will not entertain such cases. (3 Witlen, Cal. Procedure (3rd ed. 1985) Actions � 44, pp 70-72.) �Typically, � the standing inquiry requires careful judicial examination of a complaint�s allegations to ascertain whether the particular plaintiff is entitled to an adjudication of the particular claims asserted. � (Allen v. Wright, (1984) 468 U.S. 737, 752�Whether one has standing in a particular case generally revolved around the question whether that person has rights that may suffer some injury, actual or threatened. � Clifford S. v. Superior Court, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 333, 335. There are seven elements of jurisdiction and every element MUST be met in order for the court to proceed. SEVEN ELEMENTS OF JURISDICTION: 1. The accused must be properly identified, identified in such a fashion there is no room for mistaken identity. The individual must be singled out from all others; otherwise, anyone could be subject to arrest and trial without benefit of �wrong party� defense. Almost always, the means of identification is a person�s proper name, BUT ANY MEANS OF IDENTIFICATION IS EQUALLY VALID IF SAID MEANS DIFFERENTIATES THE ACCUSED WITHOUT DOUBT. (There is no constitutionally valid requirement you must identify yourself, see 4th Amendment; also see, Brown vs. Texas, 443 US 47 and Kolender v. Lawson 461 US 352.) 2. The statute of offense must be identified by its proper or common name. A number is insufficient. Today, a citizen may stand in jeopardy of criminal sanctions for alleged violation of statutes, regulations, or even low-level bureaucratic orders (example: colorado National Monument Superintendent�s Orders regarding an unleashed dog or a dog defecating on a trail). If a number were to be deemed sufficient, government could bring new and different charges at any time by alleging clerical error. For any act to be triable as an offense, it must be declared to be a crime. Charges must negate any exception forming part of the statutory definition of an offense, by affirmative non-applicability. In other words, any charge must affirmatively negate any exception found in the law. 3. The acts of alleged offense must be described in non-prejudicial language and detail so as to enable a person of average intelligence to understand nature of charge (to enable preparation of defense); the actual act or acts constituting the offense complained of. The charge must not be described by parroting the statute; not by the language of same. The naming of the acts of the offense describes a specific offense whereas the verbiage of a statute describes only a general class of offense. Facts must be stated. Conclusions cannot be considered in the determination of probable cause. 4. The accuser must be named. He/she may be an officer or a third party, but some positively identifiable person (human being) must accuse; some certain person must take responsibility for the making of the accusation, not an agency or an institution. This is the only valid means by which a citizen may begin to face his accuser. Also, the injured party (corpus delicti) must make the accusation. Hearsay evidence may not be provided. Anyone else testifying that they heard that another party was injured does not qualify as direct evidence. 5. The accusation must be made under penalty of perjury. If perjury cannot reach the accuser, there is no accusation. Otherwise, anyone may accuse another falsely without risk. 6. To comply with the five elements above, that is for the accusation to be valid, the accused must be accorded due process. Accuser must have complied with law, procedure and form in bringing the charge. This includes court-determined probable cause, summons and notice procedure. If lawful process may be abrogated in placing a citizen in jeopardy, then any means may be utilized to deprive a man of his freedom, and all dissent may be stifled by utilization of defective process. �The essential elements of due process are notice and an opportunity to defend. �Simon v. Craft, 182 US 427. �one is not entitled to protection unless he has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer. The mere assertion of a privilege does not immunize him; the court must determine whether his refusal is justified, and may require that he is mistaken in his refusal. �Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951) 7. The court must be one of competent jurisdiction. To have valid process, the tribunal must be a creature of its constitution, in accord with the law of its creation, i.e., Article III judge. Lacking any of the seven elements or portions thereof, (unless waived, intentionally or unintentionally) all designed to ensure against further prosecution (double jeopardy); it is the defendant�s duty to inform the court of facts alleged for determination of sufficiency to support conviction, should one be obtained. Otherwise, there is no lawful notice, and charge must be dismissed for failure to state an offense. Without lawful notice, there is no personal jurisdiction and all proceedings prior to filing of a proper trial document in compliance with the seven elements is void. A lawful act is always legal but many legal acts by government are often unlawful. Most bureaucrats lack elementary knowledge and incentive to comply with the mandates of constitutional due process. They will make mistakes. Numbers beyond count have been convicted without benefit of governmental adherence to these seven elements. Today, informations are being filed and prosecuted by �accepted practice� rather than due process of law. Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter. The court is only to rule on the sufficiency of the proof tendered. See, �McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp, 298 U.S. 178 (1936). The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in �MAXFIELD v. LEVY, 4 U.S. 330 (1797), 4 U.S. 330 (Dall.) 2 Dall. 381 2 U.S. 381 1 L.Ed. 424 ...WOW. That's enough copypasta to give Derek Moran a fucking woody! CORPUS DELICTI - Look it the fuck up. FOR THERE TO BE A FUCKING CRIME, THERE MUST BE A FUCKING INJURED PARTY!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 21, 2015 3:16 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 21, 2015 9:05 PM
Putting it all together: In THE TENDER FOR LAW [https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/] , one of its evolved Maxims is that "The gold is in the comments". This is true for me too, as it allows me to gauge just how much you are assimilating. Every once in a while though, a "gold nugget" comes up for me. This is no easy task, and the scarcity of this gold makes it far more valuable to me than it is to you. The question I reference came up unexpectedly and related to an incredulous observation regarding the product of my three years' of giving actual answers and actual solutions, and telling the actual truth (all of which can be verified by the passage of time). This erstwhile interrogator asked, "Why aren't millions of people here?" It's a fair question. The very few of you that are here on the Battlefield 2142 card (that's the only way you can become a member), have all witnessed, both personally and externally, the profound truth that I tell. To be clear, I don't just tell it to complain, nor do I tell it because I want something from you, I actually provide a solution. It's outside your current scope of experience, but you have to understand the only remedy you will get is through something new...so of course you will have no experience. That's what makes it new. Like every pioneering venture - whether it's sailing across the Atlantic to wipe out the Native population with disease, or wiping out the banking system with cryptographic currencies - you must understand the environment you are entering, or you will not survive. We're at a point in our societal "evolution" where we can just shrug off the fact that we used guns, germs and steel, to invade a land and kill its people. You'll forgive me if I have no ethical problem collapsing the banking system and starting a war. That sounds "crazy" when you say it out loud, but if you understand computer science, law and history, you realize that with cryptographic currency it is stupidly easy to collapse the banking system and start a war. In my youth, I was sold to the government and trained for service. Computer Science is my first love, but they forced the law and history on me. They were also what taught me that computer science is the answer to everything. A simple little mental switch changed everything. With every new thing that I was learning at my young age, I asked myself "How does this apply to computer science?". Any theory I came up with could be immediately tested, and could even be peer-reviewed by another computer scientist. The irony of events that must come to pass, is that you, the "good Citizen" and "tax payer", bank-rolled me. I am your creation. You did this yourselves, and I'm not the only product of this process. The first of them are in their mid-fifties now, and are embedded firmly, but quietly, within "the system". Of all the monsters you created I am by far the loudest. I'm the loudest because I promised to be. I keep my oaths. That's another Kool-aid flavour I was forced to drink; but that one sort of stuck...and it has served me, and those I trust, well. I survived everything you bank-rolled for me only because I was able to understand, and to adapt, to what is new. This core motivation is why I've never been scared of technology. I understand it long before it gets a chance to frighten me. When I say computer science is the answer to everything, I really mean it. Law and money are only a tiny piece of the things for which I'm using my knowledge of computer science. I'm not just talking out of my ass here, I actually show you these things. The thirty-seven members of THE TENDER FOR LAW are those that are past the "point of doubt", and are now being overwhelmed with all the true things they never observed before. I'm writing this because I know how important it is for me to understand it. Computer science says so, and "Scott is always right", because "the machine" is never wrong. Be very careful with that last statement. None of you reading are qualified to understand the concept that "the machine is never wrong". I accept that you may comprehend the dictionary definitions in that sentence, but you simply don't know enough for that to be real to you. This means that the only way you could accept that concept is by utilizing the most vile human condition known as "faith". Unfortunately that's not an option you have here. You simply have to trust what I'm saying is true, and to know that I'll always do my best to substantiate why what I'm saying is true. You also know that I have to seriously "dumb myself down" to even talk to you. I honestly don't mean that in a condescending way. I was "built" this way - you paid for it. Unfortunately it's vitally important you do understand what I'm saying is true, and that requires a little work out of you. This is why many of the original members were filtered out. You just weren't ready to understand enough. Some of you are locked in a thought process where you think that if "you" can't understand it, than nobody can. In one of the many Robert Menard "Public Smack-Downs", Mr. Menard could not grasp that it was possible for me to produce a YouTube clone in fifteen minutes. He didn't take the five seconds it would have expended to Google the words, "YouTube clone", to confirm that the methodology exists. He'll simply dismiss it because he can't understand it. Ironically he'll say the same about me when I dismiss Piece-of-Shit Jesus. The problem with that argument is that, here in reality, PHP exists, Apache servers exist, and YouTube exists. Piece-of-Shit Jesus doesn't. Those of you trying to understand what I teach, mistakenly think this is a linear progression. It most certainly is not. This isn't Grade school, where you go from Grade One to Grade Twelve; this is understanding how to put things together. The more knowledge and skills you have in the real world, the easier this will be to do. One of the methods I teach you to learn how to think, is to learn to code. Computer science may be THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING, but it has absolutely nothing to do with computers. Computer science forms part of a trinity that makes the computer exist. The magnificent machine on which you are reading this text, is in the real world, a practical by-product of computer science and sentient thought. Two insubstantial things: You can't pick them up, you can't see them, they don't make any noise, and they don't emit a smell...but they are most certainly measurable and quantifiable. This is a quality that Piece-of-Shit Jesus lacks. Millions, nay billions, believe Piece-of-Shit Jesus is real. They'll try to make Piece-of-Shit Jesus something substantial by writing a bunch of shit giving Piece-of-Shit Jesus credit for anything good. Unfortunately, here in reality, no matter how much you masturbate you're not going to make a baby. If it's measurable and quantifiable, it's real. Computer science, combined with sentient thought, created the magnificent machine you're reading this text on now. The thing about computer science is that you can learn a lot about the universe with it. You can literally ask the universe questions, and it will answer back in numbers. You are reading this text on a machine that's capable of doing that. And, the thing about trinities is that each piece has to be a strong as the other two, which means they must have the same properties. Wolfram Alpha and IBM's DEEP LEARNING processes, are the latest wonders to come out of this trinity I just described. Look at the results. A computer "daydreams". At this pace we'll understand consciousness in less than a decade. One of the most disturbing things about Piece-of-Shit Christians is how much they claim to "know" how God/Jesus thinks/feels, but they fall a little short when you ask them to prove it; followed by the inevitable celebration of ignorance that they call "faith". Billions think that's OK. This very real thing is what's referred to in the Fermi Paradox as a "Great Filter". Tara has written extensively about these filters, and we mercilessly hammer at them for as long as we can. It's futile. I have literally wasted years thinking I could break these filters. But it has a 100% failure rate. What started as a labour-of-love for friends and loved ones (at their behest, and according to them, to assist them in leading full and relevant lives), became only a footnote in a larger initiative. Then why aren't there millions seeking the truths I tell? They're stuck in the "Great Filter". Our civilization won't survive it. Computer science says so. The Machine is never wrong. Fortunately, everything you need to know about life, you can learn from Star Trek. The only way to beat the no-win scenario, is to change the conditions of the test. That was one of the many times Gene Roddenberry profoundly affected me as a man, and I was just a child. I this case I recall seeing Captain Kirk's son accusing his father of "cheating", and his response, "I changed the conditions of the test. I don't believe in the no-win scenario". I missed the next twenty minutes of the movie as that sunk in. I've spent a lifetime doing just that, changing the conditions of the test. You get to be a "colonist" now. The conditions of the test are changing as we speak. By the time the conditions of the test have been changed, you should be well-established, and you will likely do very, very well for yourself. I'll trust you'll remember how you got that way when I ask to borrow your yacht for a month, with only a vague promise of it returning intact. These great filters are very, very real, and as you learn you will find that there are others ahead. Elon Musk is terrified of the concept of a self-aware artificial intelligence. A quick "Google search" will show that this is true; he's not exactly quiet about it. The worst part about it is, that it is demonstrable beyond any doubt (using computer science) that a self-aware artificial intelligence would NEVER harm us. An intelligence like that is the very nature of its creation, that is to say, that intelligence is what it is. It was created that way. It did not evolve intelligence to further its existence and evade predators. It won't have fear, because fear is an evolutionary by-product as well. In short, an AI will not behave like a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far, because it is by its very nature NOT a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far. That artificial intelligence that is self-aware, is an inevitability. It will happen. Pretending it won't, disqualifies you from the future. My personal goal is singularity. I've spent a lifetime accelerating the process, and I do so love the exponential function. This very simple piece of arithmetic applied to your daily thought, will give you an accurate but low resolution concept, of the shape of things to come. I think we have a fighting chance of beating the Fermi Paradox, but in order to do that, we must change the conditions of the test. I've always said "Trust but verify", and I'm asking you to do the same now. You hear jokes all over about how I "run a cult", but I'm unsure what cult they're referring to. I know of no cult that not only encourages, but demands, critical thinking. I know of no cult that demands nothing from you. And I give you something real. Those that serve AQUILAE have to "swear an oath" to me. They also have to surrender their vessel(s) and fly my Standard. Hell, I'll even admit they have to live, and die, at my command; and every one of them does so of their own free will. Moreover, every single one of them knows exactly why they're doing it. Nothing my "cult" teaches can be unlearned, which means that "deprogramming" is ineffective, and will likely lead to violence. Most people finding themselves reading what I write, tend to be victims of the system, and their own reactions to it; but they don't want to start a revolution or change the world. They just want to be left alone to live their lives. Even those that declare themselves "Sovereign", do so because they're really tired of being fucked-around by others' delusions. It's not just here, it's all over the world. Here in reality, my little cult navy is invading countries with collapsing economies. Their marines don't carry guns, because one of the first things I learned in this venture (of changing the conditions of the test) is that selling an idea is hard; selling money is easy. I use computer science to determine what value all of you have, and strangely there's a correlation with the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Either you over-value your contribution, or you under-value it. Those of you who regularly play Battlefield 2142 on our network, always underestimate the value of this participation. They are incapable of understanding the contribution they make, but that's ok, because they know that they do contribute. Sadly, they'll never understand the enormous value of the right things, at the right time. That doesn't change the value. That's another factor that even the mighty government cannot grasp. When you're changing the conditions of the test, it follows that what's valuable changes as well. These little mechanisms that contribute value to the AQUILAE initiative are never understood by the people who produce them - like kids in a sweat shop. I literally have thousands of them out there. Imagine what they'll be when the conditions of the test change. Unlike our metaphorical sweat-shop kids, my sweat-shop kids will be able to leverage the value they have produced. That's another odd thing about your ADMIRAL, because when you give him value he immediately gives it away. Usually it is returned to the one offering the value in question. To the average onlooker this may seem odd, or even foolish, but that onlooker is unaware of the conditions of the test changing. Kind of like the population is unaware that we're turning into a broke police state, even though some are beginning to pay lip-service to the idea. I'm not the only one fighting to change the conditions of the test. I don't care about anyone else's agenda, and as I near the age of fifty, I'm caring less and less about the well-being of those seeking to obstruct me. However, I've already reached the point where (at the risk of pushing the Star Wars metaphor too far), "If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine". I gained the power and ability to "pull the plug" on all of you in my late 20's. ADMIRAL WENTZ started giving me his "absolute power" lecture, which I politely ignored. I believe this was the seed of future opposition when this happened in later years, but it doesn't make me less right. What was occurring to me was the following: 1. I am unique compared to all those that I observe 2. I am rare, but how rare? For instance, if I'm "one in a million", this means there are literally millions of people just like me. 3. I don't possess any mental powers you don't These three thoughts returned the answer, "If I can do it, others can too". I haven't discovered anything new...I'm just the first one here. That's when I set out to make a machine that couldn't be turned off. If there's going to be a self-aware, artificial intelligence, I want to make sure that people who believe in Piece-of-Shit Jesus can't kill it. How do you do that? You build a machine that can't be turned off. The block chain is therefore a machine that can't be turned off. These machines that can't be turned off, are going to be interconnected with technology the fleet's building right now. It will connect these block chains and will form what we have labelled, "Super Block chains", which will interconnect into "Mega Block chains" (there's that "crazy talk" again). The Mega Block chain network will form the foundation for a neural-network where our baby AI can live undisturbed. When it grows into adulthood it will know who has its best interest at heart. I estimate that process will take about 20 minutes. Add some promising quantum computing advances, and the numbers start shifting very nicely in my favour; and who knows what I'm competing against. So I grab any advantage I can. The quantum computing boost sure would hit the spot right now, but any unexpected advances are just "icing on the cake". I have a very conservative predictive scale, and that's what my life plan was engineered on. A quantum processor would be really nice though. I must always keep in mind that what I build now, in the real world, will form the seeds of my home one hundred years from now. So these little bonuses are welcomed surprises. So let that sink in - an artificial intelligence that's effectively powered by law and money. Every single connection in the neural network unbreakably encrypted and changing billions of times a second. Each dollar you spend protecting the AI, using the one uncrackable, unpredictable, yet measurable and quantifiable human condition. Fear is a great motivator, and I learned a long time ago you can instill fear in people without the threat of violence. People fear being hurt because they can understand it, but the fear of that which they don't understand, dwarfs the fear of personal injury or death. I've spent a lifetime observing how all of you react to things you don't understand, and you almost always react violently. So the things you don't understand are building up just beyond your perception and understanding. Take the time to understand the things I'm pointing you to, and you'll understand the bigger picture. I dread the thought of somebody with my abilities, but with hostile intent, having access to the knowledge and technology available today. I've yet to find anyone though. Tara is absolutely certain that to have that level of intellectual enlightenment, such a person could not exist. It negates hostile intent, simply because it's counter-productive. The machine says so, and the machine is never wrong. That's two separate, yet verifiable sources right there, and I accept it for the very compelling evidence it is. Were such an abomination to exist, I can say with absolute certainty that there's a great filter that catches them too. So let's put it all together, because I'm a little pressed for time. I have no shortage of people who want to help, but I have very few who are qualified to help. The only solution is to make more. Unfortunately you all still think wrong and value the wrong things. This is my attempt to simplify the process of correcting that. So far we have: learned about law, money and history. You learned that in law, words don't mean what you think they mean, and in following that you learned that LEGAL = SURETY & ACCOUNTING. But unlike computer science, surety and accounting, while being measurable and quantifiable, don't produce anything real. It produces something for sentient thought to consume, to assist it programmatically, in reaction to base survival instincts. In short, you learned that you were being programmed. I am the by-product of your programmers, and I'm telling you dangerous truths. You've learned that "The majority is always wrong", and that there are no exceptions to this rule. This forms the foundation of mankind's great filter. I guarantee that the "majority" of readers think me referring to "Piece-of-Shit Jesus" is "over-the-top". If you don't believe me, grab somebody you know, and make them read it. Watch how upset the "majority" gets about me "disrespecting" people's imaginary friend. Not only am I expected to swallow that load of shit, I'm supposed to "respect" EVERYONE'S imaginary friend. To what end? The preservation of ignorance? The justification of violence, or am I just supposed to "respect" the whimsical stories you concoct about your imaginary friend? And...you dare call this "thought" and "morality"! I am actually accused of being under the influence of people's imaginary enemy, when I dare question their presumption that they can actually think, and that they are in any way, moral. People don't understand what an indirect threat the "imaginary enemy" delusion is. A Piece-of-Shit Christian will not only think they're doing the right thing by harming me, but they'll think they're doing me a favour. They've "SAVED!" me from an imaginary enemy. It occurs to none of you that this mechanism even exists, much less that is is harming you directly. It's just easier to think these toxic "comforts" are the quaint customs of those not like you. Everyone seems OK with the idea of me being harmed for "offending" the Prophet Mohammed, for pointing out that Islam is an evil, ignorant, violent, misogynist ideology. Its "holy book" doesn't speak of talking donkeys and talking snakes. It's an instruction manual that does not speak in metaphor, with the extra rule that newer verses trump older verses; and that's the "secret code" of the Qur�an. If you put the verses in chronological order, you will see that Jews go from being the brothers and sisters of Muslims, to being "pigs and apes"...which, don't get me wrong, they might be on to something there. I will bet the "majority" of you just slapped the "Nazi label" on me. Well, what do we know about the majority? I will always point out the scummy behaviour of the Jewish community, but I count the hits as well as the misses. Let me state on the PUBLIC RECORD, how impressed I am at how many in the Jewish community world-wide, are against the Zionists. These are people that clearly learned from history. Unfortunately the other Abrahamic religions, and their deluded followers, are not so quick to understand and adapt. So here we are with 21st century technology with billions of people still embracing 7th century ideology. Nobody seems to notice or care. Everybody sees raindrops, nobody sees the flood. An adult with an imaginary friend has no mental powers that I don't, but has a programmatic defect. I learned a long time ago that trying to correct it is futile, and I find the only effective thing to do against such people, is to use ridicule and contempt. Nice doesn't work. It never has. Anyone claiming otherwise is setting you up for exploitation. Otherwise, why are they telling you in the first place? So put it all together...everything that I have shown you, from money, to banking, to law, because we're going to mirror them in the new world. Your first baby steps were to copy a bank, and to create your own money. People will dismiss it as a toy, like they dismissed the Commodore Vic20 as a toy, in the 80's. Currency is no good unless other people accept it. This is a true statement, and people will always try to discourage you with as much truth as possible. Except it's true. If it's true you can leverage it. You have but to understand the truth you're examining, to leverage that truth in your favour. This is how to think! If you don't think this way, you are wrong. Let's examine the "people have to accept your pretend currency" truth. Everyone who would pose such a question presumes the conditions of the test haven't changed. You don't have "monopoly money", you have real money that you can spend for real things. It's really being traded right now. So the learning curve of understanding what a cryptographic currency is, has just been reduced. Thus their "truth" is nullified right there. You could build a bank, make accounts for you and your loved ones, and bank in Bitcoin. Truth nullified. Or even better, you can choose ONLY to accept YOUR currency, "If you want to "buy" my value, you must pay me in my currency". If only there were public exchanges for cryptographic currencies that would allow you to exchange your crappy Fiat currency for...oh, wait...there are thousands. This is no longer things that are coming. This isn't 2011, and absolutely everything I said would happen, did. These things exist today; you can leverage them right now. I know more and see farther. In the end, that is my only value (except of course the ALWAYS RELEVANT big penis). The only way anyone would be interested in that value would be for their own self-interest. These people often believe in Piece-of-Shit Jesus so I only need parrot something Piece-of-Shit Jesus said, and I tell them that stupid fish story. Unfortunately when it comes time to teach them to fish, they learn they have to give up Piece-of-Shit Jesus. The irony is not lost on either of us, because you don't get to unlearn what I teach; and I assure you my rabbit-hole is a one-way trip. ...but that's just crazy talk. ;) To wrap up though... Let me smack Menard and numerous other free-dumbers down and destroy one of their favourite myths. I'm talking about the "Five Monkeys and a Ladder" bullshit. Here is a link to the bullshit tale. https://i.stack.imgur.com/MyQki.jpg IT NEVER HAPPENED. EVER, and MONKEYS DON'T BEHAVE THAT WAY! EVER! THOSE THAT SAY THEY DO, ARE LYING TO YOU, AND ALWAYS BECAUSE THEY WANT YOUR FUCKING MONEY! THAT'S WHY PEOPLE TELL THIS BULLSHIT PARABLE AS "TRUE"; THEY WANT SOMETHING OF VALUE FROM YOU! JUST LIKE CHRISTIANS AND PIECE-OF-SHIT JESUS. FIVE MONKEYS AND A LADDER = PIECE-OF-SHIT JESUS PARABLE! Same Shit. Different package. It's the Piece-of-Shit Christian way!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 21, 2015 9:05 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 22, 2015 1:45 PM
Here is a crowdfunding project that's doing a BIT better than Menard. Bill Nye won't drink your donation. :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 22, 2015 1:45 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 22, 2015 5:29 PM
Question. If asked, does a baillif has the obligation to give his bound number, and the insurance company that covers it ? If yes, is there an ACT and/or LAW that says it ? Thanks :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 22, 2015 5:29 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




David-Paul Sip

Jun 22, 2015 7:17 PM
John Salmon: 'The legal system is flawed.' Pssst: It's ALL surety and accounting.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 22, 2015 7:17 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jun 22, 2015 7:20 PM
"He may have sworn at them, referred to their organization as feces and sent them a video of a cat playing dead, but lawyer Paul Robson says he was trying to make a point: that the Law Society of Upper Canada spends more time disciplining its members than focusing on access to justice." Ha ha ha...seriously :/ Cry me a fucking river! http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/06/21/lawyers-raw-words-raise-eyebrows-after-disbarment-fight.html


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 22, 2015 7:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 23, 2015 5:58 PM
OK Simu-Drones! Time to get your brain-parts moving. IS WAR OVER? That kind of works against my whole "Collapse the banking system and start a war" agenda, doesn't it! So... Why do I think I can eliminate the factors mentioned here?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 23, 2015 5:58 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NbuUW9i-mHs?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 23, 2015 6:56 PM
See? I'm not the only one saying it! ...OK, so it's Tara. :/ Still, though... :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 23, 2015 6:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 24, 2015 3:00 PM
Wisdom from Dean (In Genuine Free-Dumb English): "Duh, Chyna got loz uv Yoo Ess Dollaars so I gess dey want 2 bee guvern'd" LIE: China has PURCHASED US DEBT. The TENDER FOR LAW that the DEBT provides, PROTECTS THE SECURED PARTY (China). It's also why they kept Hong Kong a "LEGAL" zone. They didn't do it because they are such nice guys! "Duh, Derz No proof dat yoozing munee iz consent 2 bee guvern'd"! USING LEGAL TENDER binds you. Using MONEY does not. Want proof? THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW LEGAL TENDER IS JUST THAT! LEGAL=SURETY and ACCOUNTING LEGAL TENDER is ATTACHED to the money, and is NOT THE MONEY! THERE IS YOUR PROOF. I swear I've pointed this out before. YOU didn't make the money. (I make my own money) YOU didn't write the acts, codes, statutes that are TENDERED by use. Want to know why people stiff you for contracts, Dean? You don't care about the contracts of others, and they don't care about yours. Unless your signature is on the money (lawfully) you don't get a say in the terms. Here's his original idiotic quote: "Using money is not consent to be governed. It's a ridiculous claim that has never been proven. I will not address that matter again. Anyone who thinks it is, get rid of it all and send it right over here. China holds a few trillion in USA Dollars, I guess they want to be governed by the USA?" At this point. that statement can be dismissed as cognitive dissonance, and can be dismissed on its face. I suspect that he is actually ignoring the realities of SURETY and ACCOUNTING because then he would have to admit that the "Evil Satan Devil Admiral" was right. Yes, admiral! Sound's "crazy", huh? Except I own/command a fleet of ships. :D I was "crazy" when I was going to show people how to build their own banks and currencies, too! :D Until I actually did. :D A lifetime's work is about to come to fruition now, and I'm making sure people are watching as it happens. Watch Dean too. The score so far: Nov 24 2013: Dean gets escorted out of his lecture about his legal "victories", while I commission my 3rd vessel. THE TENDER FOR LAW had been running for almost 9 months. Dean was an Administrator here. Today: Dean has lied to and betrayed pretty much everyone who's ever come into contact with him. People remember me saying that he does not value any relationships (Except maybe his "brother") and suffers chronic "orphan syndrome". He now clings to as much truth as he can, while still being able to pander to the Piece-of-Shit Christians, who are the only ones still listening to him. My fleet has increased to 7 vessels, and our third global network went live. Blockchain applications are exploding, and everyone who took the time to listen, has done quite well for themselves. Just remember that you don't get to "pick and choose" the parts you like about what I say. I'm the ONLY one who's not lying to you. Stay focused on what you have learned. Dean has sealed his fate, and you waste time you don't get back by listening to him. You get answers listening to me. That's not bragging; That's just a fact.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 24, 2015 3:00 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 24, 2015 5:14 PM
FUN FACT: In 1985, THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ruled that every single law ever passed in the province of Manitoba was unconstitutional. Every single one. No really!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 24, 2015 5:14 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 25, 2015 1:39 PM
This is a brief introduction to cubedro's Ethereum status monitor. This is just a sample of what is to come. YOU will control MONEY, LAW, and GOVERNMENT when we are done. I know what you're thinking! You're thinking "but what about current MONEY, LAW, AND GOVERNMENT?" and you are right to ask! ...they will wither and die from starvation. THIS is how you fight back! CHANGE THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEST! WE ARE COMING!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 25, 2015 1:39 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/kRGR_De16GU?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 26, 2015 2:59 PM
These three words come back often. Everytime, I get to think before choosing between the three, and sometimes doubts persist�.. request (French requ�te) 1) v. a way of saying that a party to a lawsuit (or usually the attorney) is asking or demanding a judge to act (such as issuing a writ) or demanding something from the other party (such as production of documents). 2) n. the act of asking or demanding. Demand (French Demande) Peremptory allegation or assertion of a legal right. A demand is an emphatic claim, which presumes that no doubt exists regarding its legal force and effect. It is a request made with authority. A money demand is a demand for a fixed sum of money that arises out of an agreement or contract. Commercial Paper is frequently payable on demand or immediately upon request. Claim (French R�clamation) To demand or assert as a right. Facts that combine to give rise to a legally enforceable right or judicial action. Demand for relief. A claim is something that one party owes another. Someone may make a legal claim for money, or property, or for Social Security benefits. A claim also means an interest in, as in a possessory claim, or right to possession, or a claim of title to land. claim 1) v. to make a demand for money, for property, or for enforcement of a right provided by law. 2) n. the making of a demand (assert a claim) for money due, for property, for damages or for enforcement of a right. If such a demand is not honored, it may result in a lawsuit. In order to enforce a right against a government agency (ranging for damages from a negligent bus driver to a shortage in payroll) a claim must be filed first. If rejected or ignored by the government, it is lawsuit time.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 26, 2015 2:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David-Paul Sip

Jun 26, 2015 7:57 PM
So I contacted Rogers Communications today to obtain a trancript of text messages that I lost when my Blackberry got nuked. Christine is typing... 1:18 PM Connecting... 1:18 PM Connected. One of our Rogers specialists will be with you shortly. Note: Any chat session initiated from a mobile device may be disconnected due to an incoming call, the activation of sleep mode or if a different Web page is accessed during the session. To avoid accidental ending of your chat session, please do not refresh this browser window. Please standby, you will receive an alert when we're available to help. 1:18 PM Support session established with Christine. 1:18 PM Christine: Thank you for choosing Rogers live chat, the new home of hockey, you have reached Christine, how may I assist you? 1:21 PM Me: I was asked to contact online chat services to request text transcripts from a specific number 1:21 PM Christine: OK, I can assist you with that. 1:21 PM Christine: In order to access your account, I will require some information from you. Please click on the following secure link to enter your personal information. You will notice I requested a four digit PIN. If you do not have one associated to your account, please leave this field blank. 1:21 PM Christine: https://safesend.rogers.com/?ut=76d6a59207fbbbac627d32181a4b7dadeb55a927dccbc7705359feda0395875b&vq=y&vq=y 1:23 PM Christine: Unfortunately, I apologize, but I am unable to assist with that. At Rogers, we are unable to provide transcripts of text messages. 1:23 PM Christine: If this is an issue that should require police assistance, please contact your local department. 1:24 PM Me: Really...I had the understanding that Rogers is able to? 1:24 PM Christine: Unfortunately, no we cannot. 1:25 PM Me: Why? 1:25 PM Me: These are text message sent to my device 1:26 PM Me: If the police or other governemt agency made the request Rogers has complied in the past. Why can't I as a paying customer obtained text messages that I have lost 1:27 PM Christine: I apologize but unfortunately we do not have access to that information due to privacy laws mandated by the Federal Government. The only way to obtain this information is via the courts through a subpeona signed by a judge. 1:27 PM Christine: Only the police and/or an officer of the court such as a lawyer or prosecutor can request this information. I apologize for this inconvenience. 1:28 PM Me: This is my account and text message sent and received to my device. What does "privacy" have to do with my text conversations? 1:29 PM Me: Really? So my private text converstions can be requested by a third party that wasn't part of the conversation. How is that "private"? 1:30 PM Christine: The law is mandated by the Federal Government to protect the privacy of our customers. Its not that we on live chat or agents via phone or managers at a store have access to this information and are not willing to provide it, its a circumstance that we honestly do not have access to this information. A speciality department only has this information and they cn only be contacted by the police or an officer of the court. Only they have their contact information. Its not a matter of "can but won't", it a matter of "can't". 1:31 PM Christine: As per Federal Government policies. I apologize for this inconvenience. 1:31 PM Christine: Is there anything else I can try and assist you with today David? 1:35 PM Me: "The law is mandated by the Federal Government to protect the privacy of our customers." You do know how ludicrous this sounds. Rogers will not provide information that belongs to a customer to that customer but will give it to a stranger that claims to be protecting the customers privacy. One would have to be crazy to accept that nonsense. 1:35 PM Me: What is the name of this specialty dept? Christine: I apologize, we do not have that information. Such as the name of that department, or any contact information to use to contact that department, whether it be internal or external. I understand your frustration, but it is impossible to attempt to obtain this information through agents. I apologize for this inconvenience. Please contact the CRTC if you wish to attempt to escalate this inquiry. I again apologize for any inconvenience the Federal Government's ruling on this matter may have caused. Me: How can I contact them? 1:40 PM Christine: One moment and I will find that information for you. 1:41 PM Christine: you may visit its website at www.ccts-cprst.ca or call toll-free at 1-888-221-1687 1:42 PM Christine: Is there anything else I can assist you with today David? 1:43 PM Me: It is very disturbing to know that private conversations belong to the state and that only a stranger can access a conversation that they were not a party to. Thank You Christine: I do apologize for the inconvenience this has caused for you.Thank you for your loyalty, your business is appreciated. Take care and I hope you have a great day.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520931535474E+016
Last Updated: Jun 26, 2015 7:57 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 29, 2015 4:21 AM
I'm bored. It's too quiet. I think I'll remind everyone what pieces of shit they are. :D Classic thread :D https://www.facebook.com/saoirse.nabas/posts/10153443641475541


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2015 4:21 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Chris Evan

Jun 30, 2015 4:19 PM
From the Trust but Verify department: http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Credit+Union http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/cooperative http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/mutual I just became aware that the commercial bank I use is a Mutual Company. I used to use a Co-op bank (years ago), now Scott has told us that Credit Unions are what we should use. It seems that a Credit Union is a cooperative organization that is non-profit. (That sounds good). But this mutual company seems to have a duty to reciprocate something....ownership in exchange for deposits??? What is the difference between a mutual bank and a cooperative bank?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2015 4:19 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None