Weapon's free! Spread this man's "wisdom". :D

These Kids are worthless. I'd better see this group SCREAMING about this by this evening, or we will be having a spontaneous PURGE PARTY

Weapon's free WTF, WEAPONS HOT :p

I wish I could have seen who was arguing against the admiral. All I could see was Dan and Stuart giving them shit. Way to go guys fuck those pukes

Well, I am blocked, so I am missing all of it :( Do you think we have the right to have more than one facebook account ? :D

I mean is it legal or something ? :D

I'm blocked by whoever they're arguing with. I'm assuming it was Dan Wilson? Weird because I don't recall having words with him yet.

I only see one side of the conversation as well :(

Guess he took preemptive measures to keep a bunch of us out of the fight.

He deactivated his account. You are most likely NOT blocked. Read the ENTIRE thread. There is still VALUE in Daniel's and Stuart's words. You can infer what is being spewed on the other end. READ THE ENTIRE THREAD.

Could Dan be Derek M?

Derek M? Spell the whole thing. NO UNDEFINED ACRONYMS! This isn't a fucking government office. Stop speaking in fucking code. If you are going to use a LETTER instead of the WORD, you FUCKING WRITE THE WORD AT LEAST ONCE. Other people are reading this, and they aren't in your empty little head to see what you mean

Derek Moran. Forgive my shitstain Admiral.

Dean ( both) = FUCkTRDS NON- ANONYMOUS

Daniel J Wentz He wrote it. It's his. I just said Roguesupport is the Copyholder. Keep your lies straight. Daniel J Wentz No you don't liar. In fact if there is an account left on the group that hasn't come here to declare what a sack of shit you are, they are purged from the group. Stuart Stone Scott has never come across to me as weak...again, your bias/beliefs may be clouding your own perceptions. Do I 'need' to defend him? ...See More Dan Wilson Okay well I made my point a while back. Have a good night, guys. Daniel J Wentz Wow... what kind of psycho claims something is "worthless freeman stuff" and makes multiple accounts? You do know that is the act of a psychopath, right? Liar or Psychopath. Those are the only things people will see at this point. You should have listened to your handler and signed off Daniel J Wentz You LIED a while back. Is that what you are referring to? Daniel J Wentz OOPS, the handler is mad! Stuart Stone I think you're reading too much into it all Daniel J Wentz, 'wannabe' was the term that sprung to my mind. Dan Wilson has repeatedly sidestepped making any point in this entire thread...that takes a degree of skill....See More Daniel J Wentz I think what little exposure to Scott Duncan you have is more than enough to convince you that he know how to handle hot psycho girls. This is a government worker. I've dealt with far too many of their ilk in my day. I recognize their stench the second they speak up. Daniel J Wentz This is a common Police tactic. Christian cults do it too. Notice he claims to have "given his position" (Which appears to consist of doing nothing but lie about Scott Duncan), and you are to "stupid" and "ignorant" to see it. But he "cares" and "feels sorry" for us....See More Daniel J Wentz I'm not "reading too much" into it. This psycho has been obsessed with Scott Duncan, and he does nothing but lie about Scott Duncan. That's not "wannabe" behavior. That's psychopathic behavior or government behavior. Nothing else. Stuart Stone Noted, thanks Mackximus Minimus Fuck off, "Dan Wilson". I knew you were a lying scum bag agent from "god's little helpers" from day one, and I called you out. That is why you blocked me, you piece-of-shit. It seems you are pissing off the wrong crowd. You clearly come out as a liar, ...See More Adrian Thomson "Best practices for attribution You can use CC-licensed materials as long as you follow the license conditions. One condition of all CC licenses is attribution."...See More Best practices for attribution - CC Wiki You can use CC-licensed materials as long as you follow the license conditions. One condition of all CC licenses... wiki.creativecommons.org .. Steven P. Nuxoll THE TENDER FOR LAW � SURETY FOR IDIOTS (c) 2013 ROGUESUPPORT INC. This is visible in the original post up top is it not? I fail to see how I plagiarized anything when the source of the info is clearly visible as it should be. Dan Wilson UCC is not applicable in Canadian courts. UCC is US law, however it has had some influence internationally: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Commercial_Code. Canada has something similar to Article 9, but not the same: ...See More Bobis Youruncle Hey Stu.. Credit Where credit is due.. Fucktards ANONYMOUS...See More Adrian Thomson "Steven P. Nuxoll THE TENDER FOR LAW � SURETY FOR IDIOTS (c) 2013 ROGUESUPPORT INC. This is visible in the original post up top is it not? I fail to see how I plagiarized anything when the source of the info is clearly visible as it should be." Nope, it was/is not....See More Dan Wilson Hey Adrian, tell Scott to bring a lawsuit for infringement under the Crown law of incorporation and copyright he hides behind or STFU. PS way to support the system, Scott! Tell us more about the Crown laws of notice, trusts, contracts, liens, surety and everything else you didn't create but think you have a right to use and control! Will Jefferson The "Law of Paper", really. Its seems Dan also wants you to believe the crown invented the concept of giving notice. You're transparent as fuck Dan, are you even trying? Steven P. Nuxoll Point taken Adrian Thomson, Had I realized how sensitive people were and their inability to see that I merely copied and pasted a portion to highlight the main point of the content shared I would have made it abundantly clear to those who cannot discern what I thought most could figure out. I'll make the necessary edit to clarify for those who had any confusion. Adrian Thomson It looked to me Steven that it all stemmed from that, so I linked to the Creative Commons site as reference. It was not so much about making a point, but to clarify the error. Cheers Adrian Thomson Dan Wilson, where do you get the idea that I am here to do your bidding? If you have something to say to Scott, send him a message yourself. Steven P. Nuxoll Cheers David T Godby Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. however, never underestimate the power of one small group of hackers to turn off all their technology and leave them begging for it back. James Baal This isn't about who wrote what this is about responsibility YOU are not able to apply necessary guidance YOU are doing damage. IF YOU understand the content of your post YOU would have recognized that the content posted is so advanced in its nature AB...See More David T Godby Thanks for this post. It was quite poignant. idgaf, it's useful. Fearful assholes will always try to argue with semantics, never understanding the base point is that we are ALL citizens caste into the slave system, unless the person reading this is ...See More David T Godby Realize also, US law is still under the BAR (British) system. You can easily walk into open court, demand to see the victim in your case, if the 'victim' is the state then there is no victim as the state is not a person and then move to dismiss the magistrate. There is no victim, there is no crime, at that point you can move to dismiss your own case and that's that. Dan Wilson Will, Yes, exactly. According to every court in the land, Crown law is all that matters. The Crown BROUGHT the laws of notice, contract, trust, etc. to the land. Using them means you submit to the Crown. You cannot USURP the Crown using law because THEY CREATED IT and therefore THEY CONTROL IT. Why is that so hard? Dan Wilson Adrian, Since you didn't seem to pick up on it, my request was more rhetorical and sarcastic than anything. I know better than to have expectations of you as a competent messenger for your "Admiral". My point still stands. WHAT gives SCOTT or anyone the RIGHT to USE and gain ADVANTAGE via LAW THEY DID NOT CREATE free of control of the creators of said law? It's easy for anyone with any sense to comprehend the mistake. IT'S NOT YOUR LAW. Where is Scott on this issue? Hiding. Ignorant. Adrian Thomson Dan, Your request was neither rhetorical nor sarcastic. It was an ORDER, and sice you insist on bringing it back up my response to ORDERS from strangers is FUCK OFF! You then made an attack on Scott with one sentence and a request of him in the next sentence. Adrian Thomson From comments like that, it is hard for other readers to know if you are coming or going. How can they take your words seriously?

Dan Wilson doesn't go away does he?

No. He's trying to get you to do NOTHING and "walk away". This allows them to rule summarily against you. The Liening of the name gives you complete control, and the banks/government gets NOTHING. ...as it should be. YOU are the only one who paid for that name. Every transaction you've done in that name is something YOU did. NOBODY ELSE CONTRIBUTED A CENT TO THAT NAME. NOBODY. Demand your money back, plus interest, plus punitive damages for non-disclosure. They can have the name back when they pay what they owe. THIS is why Dan Wilson is trying to convince you that i'm wrong. He's Government and means you harm. You learn too much here.

I posted as much in that thread.

And my attack skills are clearly lacking

If Dan Wilson is Derek Moran then I have vastly underestimated him. ...and I haven't, so it's not.

Just remember to quote him. He closes his account when he logs off so all his posts vanish.