The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Dec 15, 2014 4:59 PM

Scott Duncan

So...

How many of you cowardly twits are here from QUATLOOS?

I've been letting that elephant lounge in this room for a while. It's time to have a chat, and to issue a few warnings to those who publish the name "Scott Duncan". You assholes like to associate me with all the "Freeman gurus", because you frankly don't know any better. You also look at Africa as a Country too, I imagine.

This is why you have been welcomed here in a VERY public manner, many months back. You mock me on your forum by quoting "scott is always right", and never once pondering why I make this VERY grandiose claim. If I tell you I'm right because of computer science, then you'd brand me a "kook", and never once apply the scientific method to it.

If you've been reading, you should have changed your position by now. By this point there should be NO MISTAKE. By this point, you should know as well as every piece-of-shit christian, that I am NOT a "Freeman-on-the land" or any other version of that bullshit.

I'm the ULTIMATE in LEGAL ENTITIES, and I OBEY THE LAW. I got shit on for my trouble. Now I'm going to collapse the banking system and start war. I am Satoshi Nakamoto!

...what the fuck have YOU done lately?

So... Let me lay out for you something you CAN quote without defaming me through your self-imposed ignorance:

I am not charging money for ANYTHING YOU ARE READING AND NEVER WILL. In fact, if you did ANY reading here, you would see just how much contempt I have for those who do. We're kindred spirits on this issue, except I'm a bit more zealous with my convictions. You think they should be "exposed". I think they should be harmed. You are under no obligation to feel as I do, and I do not fault you for not feeling the same as I do, but that doesn't mean you get to lump me in with them.

QUATLOOS' intent is to expose fraud. You do that best by GETTING YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.

If you DON'T get your facts straight, you will become someone else's mechanism for disinformation. I've BEEN that "someone else", so I know what I'm talking about here. I ONLY tell the truth. I'm ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO DID ALL THIS TO YOU.

You've been robbed and all of you are too ignorant to see what was stolen from you. Associating ME with delusional Piece-of-Shit Christians, and fraud artists helps the wrong people. Stop it. The ONLY thing you accomplish is delaying those seeking answers. Your existing credibility makes it REASONABLE to take what you say as truth... except it isn't, and those seeking answers will notice. They will NOW remember THIS message, and you won't get to claim the "innocence of ignorance" in your defence when they call you to account for the time you stole from them.

I'm here to tell the truth. I promised to. I swore an oath and unlike ALL of you, I actually take that seriously. You, of course will suddenly have "expertise" to clinically diagnose me with a "mental illness" invented by a professional name-caller tho explain that... What? You get to make presumptions about me! I'm simply returning the favour!

If you MUST apply a "mental illness" to me, I confess I have C.D.O.

CDO is like OCD... only the letters are IN THE RIGHT ORDER! AS THEY SHOULD BE!

...I digress.

If you MUST "focus on my crazy", quote me when I say I am COLLAPSING THE BANKING SYSTEM AND STARTING A WAR. I mean COME ON! That shit's simply BEGGING for the "crazy" label! You should be quoting that shit into the next decade!

...which should give you pause. I REALLY want you to do that. WHY?

No matter.

Just get your facts straight. In the end, we're both about what's true. Feel free to shit on yourselves. Don't stain me while you do it.

Read Comments

Will Jefferson

I was wondering about this, I figured for sure they'd have something to say about Pete and/or Dennis' recent "adventures" but no. They haven't spoke of Scott since August I think, almost like they're avoiding the topic. :D

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=9968&p=170064&hilit=notice+of+mistake#p170064

They were definitely watching but is it possible none became members before the group went secret? Maybe they need to be invited. :D

Maximus Legis

Apologies Tara Duncan. Just bringing a bit light heartenedness in. I'm not really SPARTACUS. I don't know what Scott Duncan is doing in the background regarding his agenda. I get what he's saying when he says he's Satoshi. Satoshi's impact on the system will be evident one day soon whoever he/she is. But Scott's will be ultimate. Am I wrong?

Scott Duncan

We need to get the stupid out of the gene pool. Killing yourselves will help humanity. If you've congealed a parasitic offspring and you don't wish to kill it, please consider having it spayed or neutered before you do this great service for my sanity, and humanity.

Scott Duncan

RED FLAG: Posting undefined acronyms are trained behaviour of cults and government workers. They use them as "codes" to make them seem "scientific" or "elite" because of their "elite" government policy language.

People who post acronyms that aren't defined, are reacting to TRAINING.

Most of you are too stupid to be an agent of ANYTHING so i get a lot of "false positives" using this method. It's about 85% accurate.

ALWAYS make a note of people who do this.

/RED FLAG.

David-Paul Sip

"I get what he's saying when he says he's Satoshi. Satoshi's impact on the system will be evident one day soon whoever he/she is. But Scott's will be ultimate. Am I wrong?" Uh you're wrong Maximus Legis...Do you get what he is saying? The Admiral meant precisely what he said. This was not some metaphor. The admiral revealed this in one of the Friday calls. He used the words "I am" Think about that.

Scott Duncan

This is your ONLY warning. If you get swept up in the purge, IT'S YOUR FAULT. If you suspect that another member might be, or may support Piece-of-Shit Christians, and their evil, ignorant, violent, misogynist ideology, please report the Piece-of Shit in question to the nearest administrator.

I understand Pete Daoust is anxiously standing by to receive your reports.

Pete Daoust

:D

Well, indeed, it looks fucking confused !! :D

Shalom I understand where you are coming from, but I believe these brothers have dug their own whole and it truly get under my skin that we have those who are coming from a place of error making the job of those who are attempting to seek Yah and to say what Yah says and not what wee think. One of the other mistakes is that they are attempting to state that it is 50 literal days. The Scripture states that you shall complete 7 Shabbats and then on the omorrow after you complete 7 Shabbats it will be the 50th day. It is a big difference between counting 1 to 50 and having 50 days period and after 7 shabbats it will be the 50 day. Meaning that you have a new moon day in there or two that would not be counted so it would be the 7 shabbats being 49 plus 1 being the 50th day. The key being you shall count 7 complete shabbats not 49 days.

-Jay Penn

Scott Duncan

FUN FACT: Piece-of-Shit Joos padded the holocaust numbers so they could claim "Israel" from Yahweh the holy Real Estate agent, who supposedly said "8,000,000 Piece-of-Shit Jooz will die before you get to kick people out of their homes on a worthless promised land"...

...I paraphrase.

James Baal

Considering the amount of FB accounts used and the amount of "I will Collapse The Banking System and Start a War" accessesible to them we are save to assume that we are talking about a dependent entity in a complex relational entity System so is it save to say I can HAVE the opportunity "Collapse the Banking System AND Start a War" I don't like war ...sadly this entity is not mutual exclusive time to look at the agenda I guess....

Bruno Hiller

The banking system collapsing is inevitable, and already self evident. The war that will follow is what we all have to prepare for (providing of course you have taken steps to survive the financial woes) and I'm pretty sure most of us are fucking fucked. :) (edit) Congratulations Scott Duncan! What's next for you after the whole banking failure / starting a war thingy succeeds completely? Like, where do you go from there?

Will Jefferson

I don't know what to say about the quatloos people and I suspect it wouldn't matter. They are "all knowing" and dismiss anyone who questions the legitimacy of the status quo no matter how demonstrably evil it is, ethics never seems to enter into the equation. They're fucking weird.