The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Dec 15, 2014 3:26 PM

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

Dean Kory, if you are going to allow piece-of-shit christians to shit-stain MY CREATION, you might want to give credit where its due.

You have too many piece-of-shit christians reading your posts, so you may want to correct that. Piece-of-Shit Christians MUST have my name rubbed in their face. That is the condition of you staying here. Otherwise, I simply block you COMPLETELY and you will have to WAIT to pretend to be smart.

Scott Duncan

It occurs to me that Dean Kory honestly has no clue why I think he's such a worm. You can see him, on his page "playing both sides" thinking he can do some bullshit "best of both worlds" and being "open minded" to Piece-of-Shit Christians while trying to "integrate" MY work (The RIGHT answer) with MY ANCESTOR'S work... the Buy-Bull.

You're fucking fired...

http://youtu.be/A7qpXdbOh04

Scott Duncan

Notice the only comment on THIS one, is by another Piece-of-Shit Christian. He doesn't notice that his question is answered "YES" because BOTH are true! :D

https://www.facebook.com/dean.kory/posts/10205177323490135

Dean Kory

"Crawling back?"...I chose to leave to focus on my own priorities and did so without ill will or issue...I came back to catch up on things and see now that ego, paranoia, and shit slinging is still the modus operandi...call me names and make your unsubstantiated accusations all you like, Im here to learn and share whatever I can with people that truly need this information...

Scott Duncan

I have NEVER been silent about Piece-of-Shit Christians and how I feel about them. Piece-of-Shit Christians are NOT ENTITLED TO BE HERE.

That's right in the "ABOUT" section.

So yes, it's still the policy to PURGE THE PIECE-OF-SHIT CHRISTIANS. WHY did you think that policy would change?

Scott Duncan

Fuck off with your evasion. That's your LAST warning. My questions are YES and NO. Not some whiny watery bullshit.

I will ask ONE MORE TIME

...as a courtesy:

I've PROVEN that I AM ABOVE YOU, and ABOVE GOD.

Do you agree?

Ceit Butler

So... explain this:

"Whereas neither the government, nor its agents nor its representatives or employees are God, or above God! Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; that they are God; that they are between me and God; or that they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God. Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful. Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an Unlawful act of fraud and/or extortion!"

Copied from your timeline, posted BY you.

Scott Duncan

That is a few more words than YES or NO.

LAST TIME. I'm giving you a LOT of wiggle-room here, because you're stupid (That's why piece-of-shit christians are toxic) so try ONE MORE TIME! You will be banned if you do not comply. No appeals, and I will have ZERO fucks to give when you whine to piece-of-shit Christians.

SO, it's THEM or ME. Answer the question. YES or NO.

ANY other answer will get you banned. SO:

I've PROVEN that I AM ABOVE YOU, and ABOVE GOD.

Do you agree?

Pete Daoust

"Just cuz it ain't my thing doesn't mean I wont use it to get my point across in some other manner they can absorb..."

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT COPS DO......for fuck sakes fuck shit

HOW IN THE FUCKING WORLD SOMEONE CAN SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT ?

David-Paul Sip

Wow! Admiral Scott called his sorry ass out shortly after I got involved in the TTFL and he asks to come back having obviously learned nothing. "Stupid is as stupid does" seems fitting Capitaine Pete. You can't make sense of non-sense :/

Steph Boucher

I tried to read Dean's wall and it's mixing me up. I feel like I'm eating at a fusion restaurant of all possible culinary tradition at once. And the comments make even less sense. To much new age and Freedumb going around. He does sounds like he's a repressed SDSD (Scott Duncan Simu-Drone).

I enjoy reading TTFL. I feel stupid but I feel like I can get to an understanding and every article make it clearer and more concise in my brain.

Sue Rakestraw

I'm not blocked :D Let us see if he accepts the "friendship". I do not know whey I'm doing this.......I give a rat's ass! However, D. Kory is misleading one of my "dear" friends. So....if I can show her how she is being misled, that will be a good day for me.

I want to add her to TTFL, yet I hesitate. Perhaps she is ready for Scott's truth...I do not know. "Sigh"...

Yes, I did note "Dan Wilson" miraculously appears. Chris, isn't he your "specialty"? ;)

Stuart Stone

Man, I drop out of the loop for a while n miss all the fun!

...Ok, time to get back up to speed...Dean C is still holed up in the fortress of remand & Dean K is a lying sack of shit Christian/plagiarising douche...what else have I missed?

Daniel J Wentz

Dan Wilson appeared. He keeps lying about Scott Duncan in a post where Scott Duncan's work is being passed off as someone else's.

I don't speak up often, but I'd better see a lot of people making a lot of noise there. Scott Duncan doesn't really care about being lied about, however I care when people do it to him.

Why don't any of you?

If you can't answer that, let me spell it out for you: You don't pay for this. Earn your keep. You owe a debt to a man who dares to tell you the truth. He asks nothing in return.

When someone you owe a debt to, is slandered, or libeled, you speak the fuck up.

I hope I am making myself clear, because the next step is to direct the ever-diligent Pete Daoust to ban anyone who was too apathetic, duplicitous, or just plan cowardly to speak up.

I've watched pieces of human garbage like this, attack Scott Duncan for 40 years. No more.

Yes, i knew Scott Duncan at 8 years old.You can see why this is a bit of a sore point for me.

Stuart Stone

Here you go Mackximus Minimus:

Dan Wilson How can I lie about something so well known? Scott promotes notice of mistake, liens, trusts, etc etc. "Lawful remedies" very much akin to the notices and liens freemen do, and I'm telling you this serves NO PURPOSE and in fact is simply playing with fire, dipping in and out of surety. Why would a judge set you free when you clearly don't know how to get out and stop touching their shit?32 mins � Edited � Like Daniel J Wentz Scott promotes no such thing. Stop lying.33 mins � Like Daniel J Wentz In the past 4 years he has taught 1000 people how to make their own currencies and banks. He has shown how to get out by destroying money.

My own ship is debt free because of him. What do you do? Who benefits from your lies?...See More28 mins � Like � 1 Dan Wilson If you claim rights you're done. If you say "I wrote this" you're done. They control all law, all PAPER, all fiction. You have no claim for damages. You have no grounds for an invoice. Any superior position you THINK you have THEY OWN. IT'S ALL THEIR LAW. Wake up.23 mins � Like Stuart Stone So Dan Wilson, what is your solution?

You say that our ONE move is to opt out...yet offer means by which to achieve this end....See More20 mins � Edited � Like � 2 Dan Wilson Why do you need a NOTICE on paper under THEIR law when you can simply NOT respond to the name? You can opt out any second you feel like it no matter what exists or doesn't exist on paper. Like I said, your freedom is INHERENT, NOT lawful. So stop playing with paper bullshit like it matters.13 mins � Edited � Like Stuart Stone In what context?

It is my understanding that their game is based upon presumption...how do you plan to rebut the presumption if/when you are, for want of a better word, assaulted and/or kidnapped?...See More15 mins � Like � 1 Daniel J Wentz Yes, I should ditch all I have, because of Scott Duncanbecause this schmuck says he's got the answer. Fuck you.14 mins � Like Daniel J Wentz Oh my! Look at Stuart Stone! 13 mins � Like Dan Wilson "we have not been paid for the value added to the person" What? They created a person, you used it. You get what THEY decide to give you for it, period.11 mins � Like � 1 Daniel J Wentz Actually that part is true.10 mins � Like Stuart Stone

I used to race yachts offshore...the golden rule (besides one hand for the boat, one hand for you), was only step UP into a lifeboat.

My ship seems pretty robust so far...and no Dan, I'm not seeing your lifeboat dude.10 mins � Like � 1 Stuart Stone Which ties back in with the joys of dicovering that, when we create our own currency, we get that lovely warm realisation that we have no value...(you're right Dan, their currency has no value either)

but still Dan, there is a question still hanging:...See More7 mins � Like Dan Wilson They might dismiss a case when you file some such Notice or whatever, but while you operate under those laws or make any other lawful claims they have discretion. The less you claim the more free you are. The Notice of Mistake could be used as a courtesy but it should be understood to have no binding lawful effect and there are more subtle ways to clue the judge up that you're wise..6 mins � Like Daniel J Wentz He will lie through ommission that you are PRESUMED to be using the name in its LEGAL capacity. NOTICE must be given so they have a record of the intent.

Only liars from the government, and Christians, think it';s OK to demand respect for their juris...See More5 mins � Unlike � 1 Dan Wilson Which is greater, real or fiction? Why "must" the real give notice to the fiction? It is fiction that must beware the real.3 mins � Like Stuart Stone Hang on, you just stated that the only way is to opt out of their system...and now you're talking about judges (sic) justices...so which is it, in or out?

This isn't a 16 year old girl in the back seat of a van on a Saturday night Dan, so which is it, in or out? or once you're in (using the context of your judge comment) are you later going to claim that you were date raped?

But again, we digress...there is still a very obvious question still left unanswered:

But more importantly, in this context, what evidence do you have, besides the laughable Meads v Meads drivel, that Scott Duncan could possibly fall under the category of a Freeman on the Land?2 mins � Like Stuart Stone and another one...just for fun:

Did you ever use the moniker Fukyiropinion?

Daniel J Wentz

I'm not speaking of the "Regular posters" here. I am speaking of the LURKERS. Those that only read the group, and say nothing. SPEAK OUT ABOUT IT! NOW!

Your willingness to let parasites steal from people is what caused you to be here in the first place. I will not let Scott Duncan do all this work, only to have lower life-forms claim they made it. Fuck that.

Anibal Jose Baez

You posted these in your wall, did you not, Chris Thornton?

***Print this out and post it on your fridge... read it everyday!!! you will need is someday.. 1. A workman is worthy of his hire (Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: "It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property"). 2. All are equal under the Law

(God's Law--Ethical and Natural Law). (Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: "No one is above the law.", "Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few."). 3. In Commerce truth is sovereign (Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; Matt. 6:33, John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: "To lie is to go against the mind." 4. Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12). 418 5. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce (1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: "He who does not deny, admits.").

6. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce (Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in a court, tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or "duel," of commercial affidavits wherein the points remaining unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.). 7. A matter must be expressed to be resolved (Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: "He who fails to assert his rights has none."). 8. He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default (Book of Job; Matt. 10:22. Legal maxim: "He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it."). 9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility

(One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear an oath that he consents to claim against his commercial liability in the event that any of his statements or actions is groundless or unlawful, has no basis to assert claims or charges and forfeits all credibility and right to claim authority.) (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen, maxim: "He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.").

10. A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter-affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment (Gen. 2-3; Matt. 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: "If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved."). All law in Canada and United States can be reduced to the above ten listed maxims.>>

<<... As it turns out the person is the legal mechanism by which we have all been taken into involuntary servitude, robbing us of our freedom and our birthright and our natural wealth, over which we are given dominion or supreme authority by our CREATOR...>>

<<... Obama is the puppet and because you all act like PERSONS you have NO god given rights!!!...>>

Anibal Jose Baez

Are you sure, Chris Thornton? I will give you a last chance to come clean. If you posted these things in your wall, just say so. Maybe you no longer believe in that kind of stuff.

It would be embarrassing if I showed a pdf shot of your wall showing what I posted. You then would be banned for good.

Anibal Jose Baez

Either I am LYING, or Chris Thornton is LYING. I asked Chris if he had posted bible stuff. He says no. I asked again, he denies. I post pictures of his wall, he still denies, and ignores pictures of his wall.

Lies vs Wall Pics = Wall pics WIN!

I will let the pertinent "authorities" deal with this matter. I rest my case!

:D

Xrisjuice Xris

that is me communicating to the sleepy heads.. that is all. I did not deny anything or accuse anyone of lying.. I have realized that it's NO use to do this anymore.. as you can see from all the other posts on my wall.. chill out guys.. I am not hiding anything or working different accounts or anything stupid.. I appreciate being here.. I feel like a dog being fed table scraps.. so I keep my mouth shut and learn.

Steph Boucher

I do that too. But once in a while asking question to see if my stupid still lives give me fire power to eradicate unacknowledged believes that may sleep in dark corners of my mind. If you survive this post, I invite you to participate more. I speak frenglish, and my recent start in this study of truth makes everything against me to drop a shit stain once in a while. Fortunately Admiral Scott, Captain Pete and the group get that cleaned as fast as its dropping. Don't be shy and put your ass on the line once in a while is my suggestion.

Rodrigo Dan Darius

Dan Wilson removed his comments. You are most likely not banned. He needs folks to read his comments for his agenda to have any sway. He and/or his handler will be back.

Oops: seems he has deactivated the profile instead.

Pete Daoust

I explained my point to a LAWYER, not too long ago;

Lawyer: well, it's not the way it works Me: well, how the fuck does it works ? :/ Lawyer: YOU gotta PAY for the electricity Me: Well, I own it, no ? Lawyer: Yes, but YOU gotta pay Me: WHO THE FUCK IS *YOU* ? Lawyer: Gone.... :(

Anibal Jose Baez

Kory posted this in his wall 4 hours ago. "My belief is my conviction" comes to mind. Anyways, I will just quote a noble prophet that said: "Brave and stupid are often companions.

<<Your Honor I am a Living Being. The Flesh lives and the blood flows. I ask humbly for Remedy. Judge Leaves because he does not want to give remedy, but stay in honor. Judge comes back establishes the court again and goes on like nothing has happened. The court transforms in to a maritime court, a higher court of jurisdiction. You must re-establish your standing once again: Your honor I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. Your honor I humbly ask for cure and maintenance. Because you are in an Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction court now you ask for cure and maintenance.

The Judge may be totally freaked out at this point and leave again if you are in a Federal Court. If comes back again, he comes back as a priest, so you are in a Temple now. When the judge comes back on the third time he is a priest under Cannon Law. Thus you say the following:

Your honor I wish to establish that I am a living being. The Flesh lives and the blood flows and we are sovereign and nothing stands between myself and the divine. If you do not do this then you have no standing in court and are treated as cargo going to a warehouse, thus Chattel Property with no rights.>>

Notice no credit to the author is given.

Anibal Jose Baez

I am not sure, but it sounds something Frank O'Collins, or something like that, would had said. It was/is some "guru" of the Internet for a bit, a while ago.

I found the video. DISCLAIMER: THIS IS BULLSHIT! Listen at your own peril.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHk9KUFlk2M&feature=youtu.be