Stuart Stone
Dec 16, 2014 10:38 AMHere you go Mackximus Minimus:
Dan Wilson How can I lie about something so well known? Scott promotes notice of mistake, liens, trusts, etc etc. "Lawful remedies" very much akin to the notices and liens freemen do, and I'm telling you this serves NO PURPOSE and in fact is simply playing with fire, dipping in and out of surety. Why would a judge set you free when you clearly don't know how to get out and stop touching their shit?32 mins � Edited � Like
Daniel J Wentz Scott promotes no such thing. Stop lying.33 mins � Like
Daniel J Wentz In the past 4 years he has taught 1000 people how to make their own currencies and banks. He has shown how to get out by destroying money.
My own ship is debt free because of him. What do you do? Who benefits from your lies?...See More28 mins � Like � 1
Dan Wilson If you claim rights you're done. If you say "I wrote this" you're done. They control all law, all PAPER, all fiction. You have no claim for damages. You have no grounds for an invoice. Any superior position you THINK you have THEY OWN. IT'S ALL THEIR LAW. Wake up.23 mins � Like
Stuart Stone So Dan Wilson, what is your solution?
You say that our ONE move is to opt out...yet offer means by which to achieve this end....See More20 mins � Edited � Like � 2
Dan Wilson Why do you need a NOTICE on paper under THEIR law when you can simply NOT respond to the name? You can opt out any second you feel like it no matter what exists or doesn't exist on paper. Like I said, your freedom is INHERENT, NOT lawful. So stop playing with paper bullshit like it matters.13 mins � Edited � Like
Stuart Stone In what context?
It is my understanding that their game is based upon presumption...how do you plan to rebut the presumption if/when you are, for want of a better word, assaulted and/or kidnapped?...See More15 mins � Like � 1
Daniel J Wentz Yes, I should ditch all I have, because of Scott Duncanbecause this schmuck says he's got the answer. Fuck you.14 mins � Like
Daniel J Wentz Oh my! Look at Stuart Stone! 13 mins � Like
Dan Wilson "we have not been paid for the value added to the person" What? They created a person, you used it. You get what THEY decide to give you for it, period.11 mins � Like � 1
Daniel J Wentz Actually that part is true.10 mins � Like
Stuart Stone
I used to race yachts offshore...the golden rule (besides one hand for the boat, one hand for you), was only step UP into a lifeboat.
My ship seems pretty robust so far...and no Dan, I'm not seeing your lifeboat dude.10 mins � Like � 1
Stuart Stone Which ties back in with the joys of dicovering that, when we create our own currency, we get that lovely warm realisation that we have no value...(you're right Dan, their currency has no value either)
but still Dan, there is a question still hanging:...See More7 mins � Like
Dan Wilson They might dismiss a case when you file some such Notice or whatever, but while you operate under those laws or make any other lawful claims they have discretion. The less you claim the more free you are. The Notice of Mistake could be used as a courtesy but it should be understood to have no binding lawful effect and there are more subtle ways to clue the judge up that you're wise..6 mins � Like
Daniel J Wentz He will lie through ommission that you are PRESUMED to be using the name in its LEGAL capacity. NOTICE must be given so they have a record of the intent.
Only liars from the government, and Christians, think it';s OK to demand respect for their juris...See More5 mins � Unlike � 1
Dan Wilson Which is greater, real or fiction? Why "must" the real give notice to the fiction? It is fiction that must beware the real.3 mins � Like
Stuart Stone Hang on, you just stated that the only way is to opt out of their system...and now you're talking about judges (sic) justices...so which is it, in or out?
This isn't a 16 year old girl in the back seat of a van on a Saturday night Dan, so which is it, in or out? or once you're in (using the context of your judge comment) are you later going to claim that you were date raped?
But again, we digress...there is still a very obvious question still left unanswered:
But more importantly, in this context, what evidence do you have, besides the laughable Meads v Meads drivel, that Scott Duncan could possibly fall under the category of a Freeman on the Land?2 mins � Like
Stuart Stone and another one...just for fun:
Did you ever use the moniker Fukyiropinion?
Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 16, 2014 10:38 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: