The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Dec 07, 2014 3:02 PM

Read Comments

Chris Evan

I had 3 cases all Operating after Suspension. One case was settled for $500 plus fees, one was settled for $400 plus fees, the last was $1000 plus fees. As Scott pointed out, my issue was not resigning. However, it seems that no matter which way you look at this, I could ONLY have been an AGENT of a PRINCIPAL. So, as AGENT, I would like to be reimbursed for my expenditure.

My expenses were also a shitload of registered mail, days in court, days in jail, etc....

I wrote to the Governor while this was going on seeking protection because of what their fancy Constitution says. He declined to "get involved with citizens legal issues".

I have ALL the receipts because I knew I would do something with them...I was just not sure what! Now....I think I should send this to the Registrar along with an invoice for reimbursement. Then..of course, statement, default, lien. I've liened the Security and I've liened all the court files.

Chris Evan

Here is how I see it....my bookkeeper for SGMI buys stamps sometimes. She submits the receipt to me as President of SGMI. I review the receipt to determine if the receipt was obtained while she was acting as an AGENT of SGMI and to further the goal of SGMI. if I determine that both criteria are met, I offer her consideration in the amount of the receipt.

Pete Daoust

Notice of Claim...

1) 72 hours in jail at $2000.00 per hour 2). $400 for this 3). $500 for that 4). $1 million for this 5). BLA BLA....

If I am wrong in one of these statement, please ADVISE as soon as possible, so I can correct that claim....

:P

Pete Daoust

So PfuckingBDDY need to send a Notice of Claim to those ( The State of Mass.) who made YOU "WORKED" (see the legal definition of the word "work" please) by VIOLATING all your fucking rights (Let them tell you that you have no rights).....

I know, rights is something that we may don't have, but LET THEM TELL YOU THIS.... :D

So, that Notice of Claim is just business as usual, just send it, and let see what they will do with it....

Do NOT invoice anyone at this point, just NOTIFY them your intent to do so....

Chris Evan

Why should I? Well, for starters, they COULD just kill me, then there is the torture they will most likely send their goons to inflict on me, etc. I am scared to fucking death of what they will do. And rightfully so! Which is why I haven't put much more into this and focused on other things....

Chris Evan

Pete, this makes ZERO sense in my brain. I just want to be reimbursed for the expenses incurred while representing one of THEIR legal persons. What the fuck does a CLAIM have to do with it? I send the receipt, they are obligated to send the reimbursement. If they dont', then PBIDDY liens.

Pete Daoust

A Notice of Claim is NOT an ATTACK, it is a Notice, notifying a party your intent to claim, in regards of something....

It might be contest and/or challenge.....in fact, the goal of this Notice is for them to CHALLENGE it, so your claim can be destroyed......this is a NICE and Honorable thing to do.....you are telling them that you have good reasons to claim, but giving them ALL the latitude to DESTROY your claim....

It's NOT offensive.......

Pete Daoust

Fuck Chris, what I am telling you is the ONLY thing you can do, there's nothing else to do.....

and it's fucking easy, I did it 3 times for my friend Denis, he has a Holding Corp with 14 millions in its book value, he has a meeting next week with a Chartered Accountant to certify his book......and then a PRIVATE BANKER will meet with him....

Pete Daoust

Ok, I need a cigarette..... Chris Evan, please stop and THINK, just THINK this...

Notice of Claim Wait Invoice Wait Statement Wait Notice Wait Final Notice Wait Default notice Wait Lein Certify Books Private Banker Leverage

David-Paul Sip

Each step is only executed once these fucktards fail to respond and/or remian in honour. The invoice is sent when they fail to respond to the NOTICE OF CLAIM. When they do not settle/respond to the INVOICE then a STATMENT OF ACCOUNT is sent. WHEN they fail to respond or settle the account then a NOTICE reminding them of the amount outstanding is sent. When they fail to respond to the reminder NOTICE then a FINAL NOTICE is sent as a COURTESY. Then when they fail to respond or settle the account then they are in DEFAULT and a NOTICE of the FACT is sent to them. End of the road. TIME to LIEN any ASSETS they may have.

Age Thomson

Notice of Claim (Informs them What and Why you are claiming) Wait (Provides time for them to challenge or refute your claim) Invoice (No Challenge, so claim stands) Wait (Time for them to pay the invoice) Statement (Reminder of outstanding account) Wait (Time to pay the invoice) Notice (Informs them that there is an outstanding debt that requires action) Wait (Time to pay the invoice) Final Notice (Informs them that you are going to act on their iinaction) Wait (Time to pay the invoice) Default notice (Action on the unpaid invoice and last chance to cure) Wait (Time to pay the invoice) Lein (Secures your claim) Certify Books (Accounting is verified) Private Banker Leverage

Is this correct?

Chris Evan

I don't think its the STATE. i think the COURT is holding the Money of Account. I think that is what to go after...i originally thought it was the Money of Account that the Registrar was holding, but I am beginning to doubt that

Pete Daoust

So far, that Salem District Court is the one to send a Notice of Claim to...

As far as LIABILITIES, you'll figure this out AFTER the Notice of Claim has been responded to....

IF, there's no response, THEY ARE FUCKING LIABLE :P

David-Paul Sip

They = The SALEM DISTRICT COURT. Think about this Adrian....if everyone had the bond number or name of the insurance company then it would be very expensive for the SALEM DISTRICT COURT to obtain a bond. Why would they self inform?

Age Thomson

"They = The SALEM DISTRICT COURT. Think about this Adrian....if everyone had the bond number or name of the insurance company then it would be very expensive for the SALEM DISTRICT COURT to obtain a bond. Why would they self inform?"

I see where you are going with that thought, but I don't see the point in wasting time chasing that. Most likely, there will not be a response, and it is only a courtesy to copy the claim to them (Insurance provider)... The SALEM DISTRICT COURT is the one responsible. If you get the bond they (SALEM DISTRICT COURT) are using today, they can switch insurance providers tomorrow... So it is their (SALEM DISTRICT COURT's) responsibility to get their insurance provider to pay, not yours.

Will Bed

"ok...Thank you! AND WHO is the MAN or WOMAN acting as The District Court of Salem? the Clerk?"

Who cares about a man / woman which doesnt exist in the LEGAL world ? Any AGENT of the FBI IS the FBI... Any AGENT of the District Court of Salem IS the District Court of Salem...

Anibal Jose Baez

Those receipts belong to the PRINCIPAL, the way I see it. And the PRINCIPAL needs those to do the ACCOUNTING. Especially if, as an AGENT, you incurred in any cost on behalf of the PRINCIPAL, it would legally wise to return the property of the PRINCIPAL. But, what do I know? :/

Anibal Jose Baez

Adrian Thomson, if you incur in some EXPENSE as an AGENT for a company/PRINCIPAL you "work" for, I think is prudent for the PRINCIPAL to see proof of that EXPENSE. I am sure there are administration, and accounting rules for this, but I have no clue of what those are and/or the mechanics of them. :/

I mean, that ORGANIZATION does NOT belong to ME. It's tied to ME (by FORCE, and/or IGNORANCE, and/or both), but I am under the impression that, since LEGALLY all property belongs to the government/PRINCIPAL, one must return all property to it's "rightfully" OWNER.

Pete, does this makes sense?

Anibal Jose Baez

Yes, I am in accord with that! But what I am saying is that the need to CLAIM, for RIGHTS violation, and cost, as ONE claim/invoice. But the REIMBURSEMENT of an EXPENSE incurred by an AGENT on behalf of the PRINCIPAL, I see it as a separate claim/invoice. The process of collection is the same, notice, invoice, etc. Do you see, what I see? :/

Anibal Jose Baez

I am really confused now. :/ I honestly thought, after reading the AGENCY article from Scott, that as SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATORS we are in in fact acting as TRUSTEES, AND AGENTS for the PRINCIPAL and/or AGENCY. Scott Duncan, please correct me if I am wrong. But I feel very strongly about this one. If not, I really want to know.

The "remedy" within the codified slavery is that we may address we are only acting as AGENTS of the GOVERNMENT, the government being the PRINCIPAL and/or AGENCY, having SURETY. Because... it is US that give anything to that "government." That is the Tender for LAW that money provides, which none of us are getting any more.

We did not asked for it, nor they make it any easy to "not play." I DID NOT CREATE THE PERSON! Does this make any sense?

Will Bed

Fuck. Me. I'm no AGENT. If anything, they can tell me I'm a SLAVE. But I'm not a fuckin AGENT.

Even if the Drivers license PRESUMABLY makes ME an AGENT, there never was full disclosure, so no consent / no contract. I have an AGENT for which I'm not SURETY. And the SURETY seems to be running away from every responsibility......... I dont think that may even be LEGAL...

I'm the source of VALUE they've been STEALING and it's time to STOP THAT THEFT. Unless I really am a SLAVE ??

And it's not MY JOB to do that accounting.

Anibal Jose Baez

If you ever are in front of a JUSTICE, and state you are the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, you are both TRUSTEE, AND AGENT. You are a "friend of the court" in "special appearance", because you are just an AGENT that was acting on behalf of the PRINCIPAL, and the PRINCIPAL is in FACT the summoned PARTY, and also the party with SURETY. The birth certificate is PROOF of WHAT/WHO is the PRINCIPAL and SURETY for the ORGANIZATION.

Pete Daoust

If you ever are in front of a JUSTICE, and state you are the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, you are both TRUSTEE, AND AGENT

NO, I am the SOLE authorized ADMINISTRATOR.....the justice is the TRUSTEE, and the party with surety is the Crown, and that tard that represents the crown is the agent, working for the trustee....

Will Bed

If I ever am in front of a JUSTICE, it only means I've been kidnapped. They can CLAIM whatever they want, if they cant PROVE that ME have been hired by the principal, ME is not the AGENT they're looking for. The TRUSTEE is the JUSTICE.

Pete Daoust

NOTICE OF MISTAKE

In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe by responding to �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive me. As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT ADDRESSING me as such? As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter? As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter? As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE. AUTHORISED BY: ***End NOTICE OF MISTAKE

Anibal Jose Baez

Admiral Scott Duncan, I require your clarification on this matter.

One of the "many ways to skin the cat" that Scott has mentioned, if brought in front of a JUSTICE for a criminal matter, you can state you are acting as an AGENT for the PRINCIPAL, you are submitting a Motion to Dismiss, for one of the parties, the PRINCIPAL, is not present. Because the whole LAW of AGENCY thing, remember? So, that is why I mentioned this.

Another way to "skin a cat" in criminal matters, where one DID NOT ASKED for those CHARGES, and/or you want to exercise your person's right not to contract, you also have the Notice of Mistake. This DOCTRINE is our most studied one. The burden of proof is on the accuser, and we know it's all surety, and what/who accounts for it.

When you analyze this in this context, that is why I say when I read the Notice of Mistake, it is so clear to me. Remember, the Notice of Mistake is a DOCTRINE, it is NOT a document. Also, take into account the LAW of AGENCY.

When you are doing something on behalf of the PRINCIPAL, like filling INCOME TAXES, we have the AGENCY relationship. Filling is something one MUST do, if your person generates INCOME. The reason you sing by: in the signature is to show INTENT that you are NOT the PRINCIPAL, but acting as AGENT. Therefore, the PRINCIPAL is the responsible party.

So, yes, there is mixing of things, but it all depends in the way to "skin the cat" one chooses to use.

Admiral, I would appreciate your correction on this matter, if needed.

Anibal Jose Baez

<<I think you are still not grasping AGENCY. That PERSON is an ORGANIZATION.

The Registrar General, LIES in the same way Menard does (used to... now he just lies) and says to those who ask, that they merely record EVENTS. What they DON"T say, is WHAT the event was.

The event was a CROWN Organization, BEING ORGANIZED. When you use that PERSON, you do so in the CAPACITY of CROWN AGENT.

Her Majesty AND an ORGANIZATION>>

<<You are ALWAYS signing as AGENT. Qualifying only CONFIRMS that fact.>>

-Scott Duncan

Anibal Jose Baez

<<The sole purpose of a PERSON is to act as a LEGAL AGENT. Remember that for later, it will become important as all PERSONS recognized LEGALLY are by their very nature AGENTS...

If you are acting as an employee for WALMART or an employee for the FBI, you are in fact an AGENT, not a PERSON. This would mean that WALMART or the FBI would be the SURETY for that AGENCY. This would mean WALMART and the FBI are SURETY for their AGENTS>> Scott Duncan

https://www.facebook.com/notes/scott-duncan/the-tender-for-law-agency-artificial-persons-for-idiots-draft-c-2014-roguesuppor/986073134792492

Anibal Jose Baez

<<Many of you are learning the hard way that the LEGAL MATRIX acts on PRESUMPTION. This is why your full name, address and date of birth are requested in all interactions with the government. You, the "NATURAL PERSON" along with an ORGANIZATION (the ATTORNEY GENERAL/government), form AGENCY. When you IDENTIFY yourself in this fashion you are accepting JOINDER, and henceforth you are HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION, just as an employee for the FBI IS the FBI. That is what AGENCY is...

... An AGENT is a slave that represents the MASTER. The master is always SURETY...>>

THAT article cleared-up many things I did not understand on why/how things happen in the legal matrix. I strongly recommend we all read it again.

Anibal Jose Baez

Admiral Scott Duncan, this particular thread has raised a few issues that may need clarification. Personally, I feel some confusion. If you could read the comments/discussion, and give your clarification/input, I will very much appreciate it. I am sure a few other members may have some doubts raised from this discussion.

Sue Rakestraw

In light of this convoluted thread, Chris, the SALEM DISTRICT COURT is a SUBSIDIARY of the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Now, that would make this Court a "sub-corp" OF the COMMONWEALTH. The Salem District Court is a "sub-division" of the STATE/ COMMONWEALTH.

Does this make sense to you?

Now, the Court is NOT a PERSON. It is a BUSINESS TRUST; under the STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. (Look at mutual funds in this state for an example and how they are handled.)

Now, WHO is in control of these funds at the local level? The Clerk of Court from SALEM DISTRICT COURT...MUST account and balance these funds from the court....these funds are not normally held in a local bank; therefore, they MUST BE transferred to the STATE level. And......my computer just froze on this line....

Sue Rakestraw

My understanding is the Bond # is not the Docket #....My understanding is the Bond # is for "civil damages" which would be statutory. The bond for so-called "civil servants" in the States, are for "civil rights" violations. That is another animal......

Back to where my connection froze.......the Clerk of Court transfer the court funds to the STATE level (i.e., Clerk tranfers MOA to CRIS funds at the State level. The State then invests these "funds"). CRIS = Court Registry Investment System. This is very common of FEDERAL Courts located in each State; in fact, the Clerk at the Federal District Courts transfers these funds directly to the US Treasury and do NOT use a local bank. They have a direct account with the US Treasury facilitated by the Federal Reserve. These US District Courts tender a digital transfer and receive T-Bills as their investments. Yes, funds are tendered IN and OUT of this system via the court.

Scott, I would love to hear your input on this from the US point of view and how the courts operate here.

All TTFL folks, I am very tired, so if I have screwed this up...rest assured that Scott will clean up this stain shit. :D

Maximus Legis

I don't know much about much but what I do know I fucking DO KNOW because of Scott Duncan and his guidance. He is always right and I will not attempt to get involved in shit I do no fully comprehend. Many do the opposite and that's when we get threadshit never mind shit stains ?

Anibal Jose Baez

That is what I've said! <<I honestly thought, after reading the AGENCY article from Scott, that as SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATORS we are in in fact acting as TRUSTEES, AND AGENTS for the PRINCIPAL and/or AGENCY. Scott Duncan, please correct me if I am wrong.>>

That has been one of the issues, Admiral Scott.

Anibal Jose Baez

This ^^^ is what I said.

Then Captain Pete said <<NO, I am the SOLE authorized ADMINISTRATOR.....the justice is the TRUSTEE, and the party with surety is the Crown, and that tard that represents the crown is the agent, working for the trustee....>>

And then the main confusion arises from this. That is why I required your clarification.

Maximus Legis

Ha! If you find it hard you're doing it wrong or shouldn't be anywhere near the subject in question at the particular point in time. When you ignore that simple rule and try to look like you have knowledge beyond that which you actually do, it becomes obvious and make yourself look like a RIGHT BAWBAG. See Scottish Urban Dictionary for the definition of Bawbag ?

Chris Evan

A commonwealth is properly a free state, or republic, having a popular or representative government. The term has been, applied to the government of Great Britain. It is not applicable to absolute governments. The states composing the United States are, properly, so many commonwealths. 2. It is a settled principle, that no sovereign power is amenable to answer suits, either in its own courts or in those of a foreign country, unless by its own consent. 4 Yeates, 494.

Scott Duncan

That's generalizing a whole group of people based on their language. It's a generalization that is both irrational, and wrong! I will not stand for it, and so I speak up! It's my DUTY to correct this wrong by pointing out that it's just the fags who do that, Pete! :D