The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Nov 08, 2014 4:40 PM

Michael Webb

We (myself and others) are curious as to WHY some new parents wish the EVENT of their child's birth to be undocumented. Are there advantages to be had by not documenting your child's birth? If so, please share.

(Fixed that for you Chris.<./flipping the bird with both hands>)

1 --> WHY? 2 --> ADVANTAGES?

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

They want a new person, to fucking put it in collateral over that fucking public debt, you just want to know WHO IS SURETY for that new person, to make sure your kid won't be presumed SURETY, and therefor, a fucking SLAVE over that public debt :D

Age Thomson

The other little detail for me, is that I want to drag it out a bit so that the date that the person is created is well over a month from the day that the baby was born, so that when I show him later when he is older, it will be clearer for him to understand. But I don't think that is really necessary.

Michael Webb

I understand what you're saying Pete, and surety IS identified on every certificate by the signatories. We want to understand WHY some "new parents" are trying to avoid the birth registration, and certification process.

Surely they have reasons WHY... and we would like *them (*new parents whom are currently fighting this and/or considering fighting this) to share these reasons.

Gerry Odonothing

Once surety is established an authorisd administrator can use that thing to get free electricity in Quebec. I don't know how many electrons a day that is but if you have the hardware it would be a lot of free mining, thank you very much Mr and/or Ms Birth certificate.

Scott Duncan

Let's cover something IMPORTANT:

As you know it is royal and/or holy law that if you are FEMALE and you wish ANY benefit from me, you have to put out. No exceptions.

It has come to my attention that there are those who are OPTING OUT and NOT CONSENTING to this!

So answer me this:

1 --> WHY? 2 --> ADVANTAGES?

...oh wait. I just answered OP's question by asking! :D

Idiots. >:(

Scott Duncan

I just don't get it.

OH, and as an addendum to the existing royal and/or holy law, when you sign a birth certificate for a female, you agree to surrender the little slut to me when she's legal, so I can deflower her...

WHY would you opt out of THAT? EXPLAIN!

1 --> WHY? 2 --> ADVANTAGES?

Scott Duncan

ANOTHER question...

WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers has chosen to think there is "advantage" to selling children, and thus has opted INTO the realm of ethically bankrupt sack of shit. So I ask:

1 --> WHY? 2 --> ADVANTAGES?

David-Paul Sip

:D

Are there advantages to be had by not documenting your child's birth? If so, please share.

1 --> WHY? 2 --> ADVANTAGES?

How about it's none of your fucking business, that's why lol! No LEGAL NAME no fucking AUTHORity and/or jurisdiction. Still wondering about "advantages"? I think being able to live with yourself knowing you haven't volunteered your kid into a system of codified slavery is high up there. That seems like a pretty significant advantage in any kid's favour, no?

Pete Daoust

Hellos Dears Registrar,

Do yous minds that by the times you are trying to figures out the SURETY issue concerning my daughter's person, that I uses the birth certificate I happen to have to send my daughters intos school ? :D

Michael Webb

RE: "WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers has chosen to think there is "advantage" to selling children, and thus has opted INTO the realm of ethically bankrupt sack of shit."

Just to clarify, this is not something I have chosen to think, it is something I've chosen to inquire about the existence of, ergo the question posed in the original post -->> "Are there advantages to be had by not documenting your child's birth?"

And the "opting into" statement leads me to yet another question Scott, did you "sell" your child or were you able to avoid the process?

David-Paul Sip

"She actually used her grandfather's name in commerce"

Do I have the ability top correct the mistake we made when we REGISTERed the "event" of my little boy being born in 2010 Scott?

I recall reading somewhere that I have 7 years to correct this MISTAKE under MARITIME SALVAGE RULE since our little boy is considered abonded cargo/lost at sea. Is this Free-duuuuuuuuuuumb that needs to be purged from my brain?

David-Paul Sip

Really? So are you saying that the NOTICE OF MISTAKE can be used after a new PERSON is created to nullify the REGISTRATION of a baby like it never happened? While I would like to PRESUME that I can use the NOTICE OF MISTAKE in this situation I suspect not.

David-Paul Sip

That's the question I'm asking myself. While it was a mistake to REGISTER my little boy I do not think that a NOTICE OF MISTAKE is the tool for this Capitaine Pete. I think this is a matter of "what's done is done" but I certainly do not want my little boy considered "abandoned at sea"

David-Paul Sip

:D I had to let the cat out of the bag here Who-are You Frisbey. This should also make it EXPLICITLY clear that a NOTICE OF MISTAKE is not used in regards to the REGISTRATION of a CHILD. Your shit stain "shows me YOU have not read and do not comprehend the notice of mistake" :P Just saying :D

David-Paul Sip

:/ Okay...Did you read the Capitaine's question? "WHAT mistake would you want to NOTIFY in regards of your little boy/girl's person?" This is what some folks might call a hint. Did you not just read and I quote "FORMAL RESIGNATION. PERIOD." Seriously, what do you think this means? Do you recall the Admiral EVER saying that a NOTICE OF MISTAKE can be used to NOTIFY the Registrar General regarding the birth certificate? And NOTIFY them of what...that I did not understand what I was doing when I didn't know that your VITAL STATISTICS ACT only actually applies to the PERSON and not a man?

Ken Hatt

To(whoever's signature is on the birth certificate), As sole authorized administrator for MY babies,I hereby resign from You. If I can use the surety(YOU)to discharge public debts then disregard this notice. I require of YOU to put in writing confirmation of Who surety is for Your persons. Signed administrator.

Steph Boucher

Or a registration that included a letter of the WHO is surety for the new created person. Which should not be really useful considering if Scott have it his way, the banking system will crash and probably the party who has surety of ALL legal Person too... just saying.

Steph Boucher

To inquire for ourselves the ethical bankruptcy of the legal system and the tender for law fiat currency provides. So that we start valuing the right things and think the right way. A boil down, that a man may get to by himself after verifying, after hard work and studies what it all means. The castle of card is going to come down. You don't want to be in it. The tool is the notice of mistake is make it possible to not be in the falling castle... that's what I think.

Pete Daoust

Hey Wal Mart,

There was a Mistake, I am not really the one who works here, if I led you to believe I was an employee in here, that was a mistake and please forgive me, so here is my resignation letter :/

Does that makes any sense ? :(

I don't THINK so :D

David-Paul Sip

"No, first the NAME needs to be liened, and then a RESIGNATION LETTER needs to be sent ... with the LIEN hooked to it "

I have not read anywhere in the TTFL that a NOTICE OF MISTAKE is sent when resigning from government service. Did you pull this out of the library of your ass Who-are You Frisbey? Seriously read what Capitaine Pete wrote. The answer to your question is right there. Fuck don't you think (and I'm presuming a lot here to say that you think) if more needed correcting the Admiral would have corrected the Capitain on more than just "The Mayor has nothing to do with the people who created (and therefore underwrite) the name." Seriously, enough with the shit stain already.

Pete Daoust

"In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused"

Fuck, did this Member of Parliament, to whom a resignation letter needs to be sent, "accused" anyone of anything ? :/

Pete Daoust

Ok, I will ask again Who-are You Frisbey.....answer by YES or NO.

"In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused"

Fuck, did this Congressman, to whom a resignation letter needs to be sent, "accused" anyone of anything ?

David-Paul Sip

Do you realize that Capitaine Pete is Master for a reason Who-are You Frisbey? If you can't acception direction from the Master why the fuck do you think the Admiral would even piss on you? YOu think wrong and worse yet are not teachable. You refuse to acknowledge the answers put before you acting like an entitled fucktard who believes only an answer from the Admiral is acceptable.

Scott Duncan

When you resign from an employer, you may CHOOSE to give 2 weeks notice, but it's not necessary.

All of you seem to focus on bullshit you make up, and don't bother listening to what I say.

NOTICE OF MISTAKE is a DOCTRINE not a DOCUMENT.

The Fender has issued 40 (YES, FORTY) such notices in ONE HEARING. Each one was NEW and specific.

You should be able to respond immediately and know WHEN to use it.

Giving unnecessary notice, draws unnecessary attention.

In future, Mr Frisbey, if you see me NOT answering a question, it means it was a stupid and/or nonsensical question.

Chris Evan

Doctrine A legal rule, tenet, theory, or principle. A political policy.

Examples of common legal doctrines include the clean hands doctrine, the doctrine of false demonstration, and the doctrine of merger.

The Monroe Doctrine, enunciated by President James Monroe on December 2, 1823, was an American policy to consider any aggression by a European country against any western hemisphere country to be a hostile act toward the United States.