Oct 31, 2014 3:02 PM

My question is WHY respond to this polite REQUEST? (rhetorical question)

ServiceOntario is ASKING you to do specific things BEFORE IT CAN issue a fancy plastic card. It's a REQUEST for performance NOT a demand.

And ServiceOntario has REQUESTED you continue to use the paper record of the childs health number UNTIL you receive said fancy plastic card.

Seems to me the paper record for INFANT SIP, will function just fine. :P

I would agree JessicaDawn AndOthers...but you ignored the other document from the Office of the Registrar General. That too is a polite request at the moment but when agents for the state begin quoting Acts like it is mandatory you know that can only last so long.

Upon review of the other document, one could use the information from INFANT SIP's paper record (accurately) to comply with the Office of the Registrar General.

OR... name her NON ASSUMPSIT. :D

Ha ha ha! I was thinking of ALL RIGHTS RESERVED or better yet telling them we have a shorlist of 15 names and are unable to decide so we wish to register all of them :D

We wish to GIVE all of them...

Fuck...

Yes Capitaine....GIVE :(

I'm going through the same thing David, only in BC.

How can "The Vital Statistics Act" be used to compel the PERSON I have to register that a baby was born Admiral Scott? A LEGAL PERSON can't create life so I don't see how this could ever be enforced. :/

When you use their hospitals, you are deemed to be the person. You are VOLUNTARILY asking for the SERVICE. Hospitals are GOVERNMENT SERVICES.

It was a homebirth Mackximus Minimus with Midwives attending :D

So, how do they know about that baby?

The midwife informed since they are licensed by the state

There are two parts to the birth registration process...they are still waiting for the second part :)

Ha! A registered midwife? It's like bringing the hospital at home. :/ That is why.

Not quite Mackximus Minimus...Midwives are not nurses or doctors. If there were an emergency they could suggest an ambulance and going to the hospital for medical intevention. Still doesn't change the fact that the baby is not a PERSON until the baby is registered. I should have them ask the baby to register herself when she can understand them and if she wants to :D I sure as hell don't understand.

Is not about the baby, it's to the GUARDIAN of the INFANT.

Ummmm what infant? That infant can't even be legally identified. That baby has no LEGAL PERSONality. Remember it has no name :D They want a name so they can gain jurisdiction and lable the baby and INFANT/CHILD but there is no INFANT without a NAME it seems to me.

Is this a massive shit stain so far Admiral Scott?

Is there anyone on here that has not registered their little humans? I didn't, but they are pressuring me now as well. Must be someone that can chime in....?

No humans has been registered, only EVENTS :P

You are right Pete

What are these statistics? Who are they vital to? and what does this have to do with your baby girl?

There must be some creative way around this..... They are saying its mandatory to register the event. How to stop them from using this foundation document and creating a PERSON is my question....

The system has been hijacked, Brad No.

If everyone would follow the rules, the system would work fine.....

I am asking one, and only one question, can I use the surety ?

And the highjackers just IGNORE my question, because everything is about SURETY and ACCOUNTING.

Scott Duncan taught us THE secret, it's a TOP SECRET issue.

If we were told the truth, the highjackers would have to go in jail, and charge with, at least, breach of TRUST.

*Hijackers :P (sorry) :D

Now, what will it take to stop this ?

I have no choice but to say:

Collapsing the Banks Start a war :(

I TEND to agree

I tend to SEE it :(

I think collapsing a banking system might be illegal

:D

Maybe I can help under a Creative Commons 4.0Attribution Non Commercial NonDerivs License

Everything we need to do, on a daily basis, is PROHIBITED :D

We need two to three LICENSE, to put some food on the table :/

Our right to LIFE, has been hijacked, and is PROHIBITED :(

Their scam is so well designed that they don't even have to kill folks, folks are doing it them selves .....check out the suicide statistics...

Anyway, I have a 45 minutes DRIVE to do, "pray" for me guys please :D

<<Everything we need to do, on a daily basis, is PROHIBITED.

We need two to three LICENSE, to put some food on the table.

Our right to LIFE, has been hijacked, and is PROHIBITED>>

When I think about LICENSE, that's what I see. Slavery. PERMISSION TO LIVE. :/

Well I the man, separate from the fucking PERSON because JUSTICE Tom McKeogh agreed that I'm not a PERSON ain't REGISTERING any "event" without specific answers to my questions If my questions are not answered and should the PERSON I happen to have decide to register the "event" then the INFANT's name will be "None of You Fucking Business - All Rights Reserved" :D

Pray? would a dance around the fire with the child do instead?

Who/what is "Your daughter"? RETURN TO SENDER. NO CONTRACT. NO SUCH INFANT. :D

Lol Mackximus Minimus! :D

If for legal purposes there is no INFANT as of yet, who could "Your daughter" be? They are making a claim. The burden of proof is on them.

And who are YOU to reply to such notice IF you have no INFANT, as of yet? :D

RETURN TO SENDER. NO CONTRACT. NO SUCH INFANT.

Who is it being addressed in the envelope? Does the envelope has a clear window?

The one above is addessed to INFANT SIP. This is for the health card. The other letter regarding registration was addressed to my lady's PERSON.

My woman just delivered too, 12 h ago

Oh....the products of mating seasons. Congrats.

Mating season?? I have nothing to show for that! :-D

Chris, you need a mating season license.

Congrats Steph...what did your woman deliver? :P

A baby girl! ;)

your daughter has been registered and named without your consent and/or against your will. ask them "by who's authority" ?

name it, Without Prejudice !

I made sure we don't fill out anything during our hospital stay. But, I have to also roll with the punch of life; a woman that has her person contracted in contract with mine, and she wants the product of her womb to be able to have a person too so she can travel... that is the paradox of slavery with no leash ;)

I once read a tread about filling as many names for the person as possible. To give the person "Amelia Anh Elisabeth Nicole Ho Boucher" a lots of choice later in her life. I think Pete Daoust has mentioned that in a previous tread...

Just ask WHO will be SURETY for that new person.

Tell them that since EVERYTHING seems to be SURETY and ACCOUNTING in this LEGAL world, it's impossible for you to sign anything before you have an answer on WHO will ACCOUNT for SURETY for that new LEGAL person the state is about to create for this new human being.

And watch their faces after you say that :-D

If that does not get me a passport as per the request of the person my person is married to, I may get in a lot more immediate trouble than the state would get me. But man I would feed on the "face" they would give me upon that question.

Why you say this ? :O

Why do you ANTICIPATE ?

Why ???!..... :-(

It is no anticipation. I have kept her posted on my research and finding. Something is clear, she wants to travel still...

That has NOTHING to do with this....

Maybe my understanding is too limited. Requesting an answers about who will account for the Surety of the new legal Person that the state creating for the new human... ( brain start to think properly) you know what. I think I see what you are saying. It has nothing to do with "using the surety of the person to discharge public debt" it is a whole other question... thanks Pete. You are making me think better.

:O