F_{n} = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}-2 = FUCK IT

Exactly WHO is equivelant of HER MAJESTY in the States?

Yes this post is the result of a comment I made in another thread (Ex-Citizenship Judge Jailed) about JUSTICE Tom McKeogh referring to "Meads vs Meads" and explaining that the man and the person cannot be separated. Then Tom had the court clerk page the PERSON before deeming the PERSON to have not appeared. :/

Here is the definition from the slaveachusetts clubhouse: Twenty-third, "Person'' or "whoever'' shall include corporations, societies, associations and partnerships.

They never would tell me which I was being accused under

If I remember correctly, you applies to everyone until it is claimed. My experience is they haul you in there by force and demand you be surety to the "CHARGES" they just pulled out of thin air.

Oh...right....I am!

There is no Nobility in the US. Article 1 Section 10 http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei Who? Me? I'm not A "YOU" and I am a "me". I am not a THING either. Now.. [Civil: Where is the contract that compels "me" to perform? or Criminal: Who has been harmed? ] HERE IS A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF MISTAKE published on: xx/xx/xxxx leave "me" alone.

Section 10. No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

This is very hard to get my head around after reading in other posts there is a distinction between the man and the PERSON, they are not one in the same, like John Gessas comment in this thread on August 17th, 2014 (I loved this contribution John) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10204413544518686&set=gm.707988202570448&type=1 John's experience with the D/L seems to contradict ""explaining that the man and the person cannot be separated"...THEY CAN'T!" Can you clear this up Admiral?

A man has to act as the person or there is no person.

Yes. RESPONDING to the NAME in ANY WAY makes YOU that "person".

So if, in a court room, the justice asks for THE NAME/PERSON and you respond: "I am here in that matter" = you are the person? :/

I just administrate the matter. Where's the contract or who has been harmed? [Unless they kidnap you and put you in chains by force which really sucks. So always make sure someone knows that you are going and what to do if they do kidnap you..] Just my 2 sense..

Yes, prepare kits, that's better :-D

Crown Agency Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER C.48 Consolidation Period: From April 1, 1999 to the e-Laws currency date. Last amendment: 1998, c.15, Sched. E, s.8. Definition 1. In this Act, �Crown agency� means a board, commission, railway, public utility, university, manufactory, company or agency, owned, controlled or operated by Her Majesty in right of Ontario, or by the Government of Ontario, or under the authority of the Legislature or the Lieutenant Governor in Council. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.48, s. 1. Status of Crown agency 2. A Crown agency is for all its purposes an agent of Her Majesty and its powers may be exercised only as an agent of Her Majesty. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.48, s. 2. 3. Repealed: 1998, c. 15, Sched. E, s. 8. ______________ Fran�ais Back to top

legal fiction n. a presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience, consistency, or to achieve justice. There is an old adage: "Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions."

I came across this in my search of WHO HER MAJESTY is.... http://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/institutional-portfolio/her-majesty-the-queen-in-right-of-the-province-of-alberta-as-804398

Comprehending the Legal (fictitious) Person and the fact that it is not yours, deflecting joinder / surety etc is TTFL 101! I revert to that gold nugget regularly to remind me how simple it all is. All else stems from it.

. . . Thank you Scott Duncan.

In the United States, the STATE is "her majesty"

Other shit to keep in mind: PERSON=AGENT <---ALWAYS! NO EXCEPTIONS. YOUR LEGAL NAME <---YOU ARE NOT THE PRINCIPAL. YOU ARE AGENT. THE PRINCIPAL IS ALWAYS CHARGED. YOU SIMPLY ACCEPT SURETY.

Thanks Daniel, but then what is the CROWN?

Corporation Chris Evan

In the States though...

Organization actually. That is what the Birth Certificate REALLY is.

The Birth Certificate CERTIFIES that a CROWN/STATE ORGANIZATION was ORGANIZED on a specific date.

Whats the difference between HER MAJESTY and the CROWN?

Agency.

What's the difference between AQUILAE and Admiral Scott?

Same thing.

Agency

:D The CROWN is an agent of HER MAJESTY, like a dept in a corporation

The Agency article just jumped right back into my head

Let me see if I have this correct.... From the OP, 1.) refers to my birth right to Sui Juris status. correct?

Fuck it....this post is confusing the shit out of me

If someone actually understands this, would you please help me? Here is where I am at: 1: "The Man" is: a) a "Natural Person (agreed) AND b) THE STATE (agreed) 2: "The Legal Person = A CROWN ORGANIZATION (who cares? why is this worth their time? Who is the CROWN? When did I ask them and why are they involved in my life?)

I am going to go out on a limb here and state that NO ONE is understanding this...prove me wrong.....

why would they give a man who is 18 days old an organization?

They don't GIVE the organization. THEY ORGANIZE IT!

ok....they organize an organization for a man who is 11 days old...why?

YOU DO NOT OWN IT, AND IT IS NOT GIVEN TO YOU! I am the SUPREME AUTHORITY on board the Copernicus, but it is NOT MINE and is NOT GIVEN TO ME. YOU are the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR of the BIRTH CERTIFICATE bearing your NAME, but you DO NOT OWN IT. It is NOT YOURS and is NOT GIVEN TO YOU. ONLY THE NAME is given to you. NAME+CERTIFICATE OF AN ORGANIZATION BEING ORGANIZED=ORGANIZATION.

Give was a terrible choice...in my head I was envisioning my parents being handed a Certificate....but yes, I understand this.

So.... 1: "The Man" is: a) a "Natural Person (agreed) - full liability AND b) THE STATE (agreed) - limited liability I still don't know who the CROWN is or why they are involved....

In the United States you are ether an AGENT of the STATE or you are PROPERTY (Indian).

Is the Crown the principal? They financed the operation to colonize North America.

That is where I am lost....

Yes. The Crown/State is the principal. That's why I said to demand the principal attend all hearings, in legal matters. :D ...she's really busy. She has 9 dogs. :D

Is the principal in Ireland the President? Head of State? He's never busy... Does fuck all actually... :p

so...the principal here is the Governor?

The viceroy = gov general. Highest Authority

So head of state, president of the Oireachtas (Irish parliament) is surety for all debts whilst in office... :D

"YOUR LEGAL NAME <---YOU ARE NOT THE PRINCIPAL. YOU ARE AGENT. THE PRINCIPAL IS ALWAYS CHARGED. YOU SIMPLY ACCEPT SURETY" If we wish to yes?

Before this post happened, I was sure that the Secretary of State of massachusetts was the principal debtor. I was sure that one of his agents signed for him. Now, I have no idea....

If it's the President of Ireland here, wouldn't it be Obama there? Head of state? Holder of that office?

I have no clue anymore...thought I did

Chris, in the States the principal would be "The Commonwealth of Massachussetts, or which ever State issues the Birth Certificate. That is why Scott suggests to get the principal to attend. And we know it never will. Here, when a PERSON gets a SUMMONS, it reads "THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" The PRINCIPAL(or equal to THE CROWN) is THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, if the organization/person was created in this jurisdiction.

That is how I understand it. But there is always the possibility of being wrong.

This just doesn't add up....

If LEGALLY the government is the owner of all PROPERTY (including ORGANIZATIONS/PERSONS), then is has to be the fucing government the PRINCIPAL. Scott Duncan, am I wrong?

WHICH OFFICE?

And what is the purpose of this ENTIRE exercize...why are they going through ALL of this trouble? This is just not adding up....and what does this have to do with a bank?

To make it legal Chris Evan.

Obama is President of a company yes? He holds that office... So he's the principal while he's in office... I'm just comparing that to Ireland...

Massachusetts is a republic...just like Ireland....

The President is the Head of State. S/he acts on the advice and authority of the Government but performs a limited number of functions after consultation with an advisory Council of State. S/he receives and accredits Ambassadors. Every law made by Parliament is promulgated by him/her. Bills passed by both Houses of Parliament require his/her signature for their enactment into law. S/he may, before signing a Bill, seek a Supreme Court ruling on whether it is repugnant to the Constitution . On the nomination of the D�il the President appoints the Taoiseach (Head of Government). On the advice of the Taoiseach and with prior approval of the D�il, S/he appoints the other members of the Government. On the advice of the Taoiseach she accepts the resignation or terminates the appointment of members of Government and summons and dissolves the D�il, but S/he has discretionary power to refuse to dissolve the D�il on the advice of a Taoiseach who has ceased to retain the support of the majority in the D�il. This power, which has not so far been exercised, would force the Taoiseach to resign and give the D�il the opportunity to nominate a successor. The supreme command of the Defence Forces is vested in the President. S/he is not answerable to either House of Parliament or to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and functions of her office. S/he may, however, be impeached for stated misbehaviour.

Puerto Rico is ALSO a republic, with a republican form of government.

Ok... I learned the other day that Ireland is LEGALLY a republic. And earlier that the President of that republic is the principal... So I'd probably apply that template. Ignore the mention of Obama then...

I cannot remember one mention of the President or Obama in this group ever.... :-/

ok...some lady squirts out a meat suit. Then the STATE comes in to limit the liability created. So far, is this correct?

WHO THE FUCK IS THE CROWN? AND WHY ARE THEY INVOLVED IN MY BUSINESS?

Powers and Functions of El Presidente The formal powers and functions of the President are prescribed in the Constitution. The President, who does not have an executive or policy role, exercises them on the advice of the Government. There are some specific instances where the President has an absolute discretion, such as in referring a Bill to the Supreme Court for a judgment on its constitutionality or in refusing to dissolve D�il �ireann (lower house of parliament) on the advice of a Taoiseach (Prime Minister) who has ceased to retain a majority. Additional functions can be conferred on the President by law. A special (Presidential) Commission acts whenever the President is absent. This is on a website called www.President.ie

Yes, but under international law its a free state still, so does this mean The Taoiseach is the Principle?

Banking and an Estate have to fit in here somewhere....and somehow, some people called THE CROWN (although I still don't know who they are) are involved....

You're confusing Chris more Bart... "WHO THE FUCK IS THE CROWN? AND WHY ARE THEY INVOLVED IN MY BUSINESS?" Except in the US, they took the ball, and all of you are still planning to play soccer, as if you still had it... SD

Sorry guys, Im confusing myself :(

So...does ANYONE know who the CROWN is?

Is the Trust in which we are Trustees. It's a corporation of which our "persons" are agents. Correct?

http://thelawdictionary.org/crown/

and in the US...?

Its funny that NO ONE has the answer...the OP is correct.

The Legal Person = A CROWN ORGANIZATION If I'm not mistaken, the word ORGANIZATION used here is a verb...

You are not mistaken.

The act of organising...

How does this involve ME?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/-tion

"The Crown/State is the principal" How can this be? We have established that the State = HER MAJESTY here. Now, the Crown = the State too?

ehhh...fuck it

It involves YOU because by using the ALL CAPS (Commercial) NAME, you have, in fact, accepted a... ....wait for it. That's right! A TENDER FOR LAW.

You are now AGENT and TRUSTEE for Chris Evan... or more precisely; CHRIS EVAN.

Ive never seen the disclosure

None of this makes any sense...not one bit! Why aren't these scumbags doing this hanging in the streets?

You are one of the few who even know THIS much. Ignorance and apathy are what forms the foundation of their defense.

Because American Idol is on... :p

If we are currently using the name for any reason. We are bound to Legal.Correct?

Yes.

I wonder if that scumbag Dan Wilson knows this

resignation effectively removes the AGENT and TRUSTEE status they foisted on me, correct?

Also...NONE of this is written in massachusetts. MGL ch 4 section 7 defines person. " Twenty-third, "Person'' or "whoever'' shall include corporations, societies, associations and partnerships."

How the fuck do you resign from a 30 year mortgage?

^ A pack of matches and a good solid alibi ken!

I'm PISSED. And not the way you Irish or Aussies think PISSED, in the Bostonian way!

You might as well get pissed so... ;)

Is resigning, pissing you off Chris? :P You really wanted to keep the "job", right? :/ :D

no...its not that. Its that I have to in order to not be a slave of some fucktards that I've never met

That's why they're trying to take your guns away...

I know, hein? What a nice courtesy they gave us! :/

Therein lies the problem. What is the alternative? Trust me, we're working on/building the answer as we speak. We have at our disposal, things that we, as a species have NEVER had. You take it for granted, that you can communicate INSTANTLY with someone on the other side of the planet. I didn't have that as a youth... so I built it. ...so did hundreds of others. We formed FIDO-NET... I could send a message to the other side of the world in 3 days, through an anarchy of BBS's. Even with 3 days' delay, I found I was more aware of current events, worldwide, than those around me. I learned that NEWS is mostly lies, and half-truths, that way. I learned that we have the shittiest form of government on the planet..,. with the exception of...all of the other ones.

One man cannot change the world, despite the fairy-tales you are told. One man, and his NAVY, can. :D

OMG...those fucking cocksuckers scumbags....how in the hell didn't I see this until just now...UGGGHHHH Twenty-third, "Person'' or "whoever'' shall include corporations, societies, associations and partnerships. The last part is missing a fucking COMMA. It says AND. There is the GRAM-MAR. wow....the lengths to which they go....

Scott: "Trust me, we're working on/building the answer as we speak." ...but until then.... let's resign! :/ (sigh!)

After you resign, do you want to be my boat-bunny, Janick? :D

:D

Shit got real! :D

We need to understand this to understand why we need things like ethereum.

Fuck! All this from Tom Mckeough quoting Meads vs Meads and stating the person can't be separated from the man? Lol! :D

The person can't be separate from the Man, of course it can't, what would be the use of it, without a Man "backing" it.... :/

And since we are in a Trust, you can't take things out of it... separating from it would be... unlawful/ a break of trust no?

Which lead me to ask, how can you lawfully without breaking trust, resign from one? As previously mentioned, by creating a Trust of our own, and liening the person to it (unsure of grammar here) Sounds incomplete in my understanding. Or is this possible to do BECAUSE the Trust in which we are is breached by it originators/creator?

I am NOT in a trust !!.....where have you got that idea, Steph Boucher ? :/

I really do understand what you are trying to do, but to what end? Playing the game by their rules doesn't spell victory. Please explain?

I can't...sorry...I am too mad at the moment. Call back tomorrow, I can show you how to bank. :-D

And NOT playing the game at all = jail :D

The person can't be separate from the Man, of course it can't, what would be the use of it, without a Man "backing" it Ha ha ha Capitaine Pete. Well Justice Tom Mckeough had the PERSON paged and deemed the PERSON to have not appeared with me standing right in front of him. So it seems the PERSON can be separate from the man :D Judge me by my actions not by my words.

And remember this was after I affirmed that I was a MAN and had the PERSON which I was Sole Authorized Administrator for, and that I use the PERSON to sustain and maintain my life :D If they can't be separated then why not call me MR. SIP or DAVID instead of obeying my wishes to be called Sir or Administrator only?

Correct me if I am wrong here, but these CROWN people, whoever they are, seem to only exist because we let them...?

They FORCES us....remember ? :D

JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN is in a trust.

this confuse the hell out of me.

I understand the the person that Pete administrate is not in a Trust but the person that Admiral has, JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN is in one. They are 2 different person and obviously administrated by different man. Is it the only difference or am I missing something. I thought we were all in one, and that we wouldn't ''make it and/or survive'' without one. Captain Pete is working hard at creating is own money so that he can too create his trust or the other way around? Obviously you can have a trust without currency that is a silly question, I retract it... but I still don't understand quite the mechanics here.

There's 8.2 million persons that are being kept in trust in Quebec....

Can you be in the Trust AND be a Sole Administrator of that PERSON?

*sigh* :-(

You are the BENEFICIARY....

im telling you, that tread + my sillness + few comments above really messed the little understanding I had. Okay so being the BENEFICIARY of what the PERSON provide. The man is the SECURITY/SURETY of the PERSON.

If the man RESPOND as the PERSON he is BENEFICIARY, if you ADMINISTRATE you don't BENEFIT. oh man ... gotta go read some of the basic, i feel like I'm losing bearing

^^^ Eh... no.

ugh :/

Indeed, dry bearing.... :-\

Public (Government) Trust is broken. The one Person are into... 8.2 millions of them in QC. My person is also one of them, it is beneficiary of that trust but the man I am is the Administrator of the person. I do not want to be the SURETY of that PERSON. I do not want to be SURETY of any PUBLIC DEBT. Just so I understand. Pete, that means you gave notice that your person is resigned form the Trust, correct? Do you happen to have a few minutes on Skype, just to beat the shit outta my none sense?

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.treasury.gov%2Fresource-center%2Fsanctions%2FDocuments%2Ftwea.pdf&h=SAQE1cb4y

Art. 37. The United States acknowledge and protect, in hostile countries occupied by them, religion and morality; strictly private property; the persons of the inhabitants, especially those of women: and the sacredness of domestic relations. Offenses to the contrary shall be rigorously punished. This rule does not interfere with the right of the victorious invader to tax the people or their property, to levy forced loans, to billet soldiers, or to appropriate property, especially houses, lands, boats or ships, and churches, for temporary and military uses

Art. 38. Private property, unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military necessity, for the support or other benefit of the army or of the United States. If the owner has not fled, the commanding officer will cause receipts to be given, which may serve the spoliated owner to obtain indemnity.

The Birth certificate is the receipt.

Art. 43. Therefore, in a war between the United States and a belligerent which admits of slavery, if a person held in bondage by that belligerent be captured by or come as a fugitive under the protection of the military forces of the United States, such person is immediately entitled to the rights and privileges of a freeman To return such person into slavery would amount to enslaving a free person, and neither the United States nor any officer under their authority can enslave any human being. Moreover, a person so made free by the law of war is under the shield of the law of nations, and the former owner or State can have, by the law of postliminy, no belligerent lien or claim of service.

Just to clear up all confusion... :-D I am a MAN and I have that person...actually, I am the only MAN authorized to use it, but I am not surety for that person. Regardless of what happened on this thread, that is the answer! Further, I require all parties be present, is the party with surety here?

If the principal is CHARGED, then the principal can ANSWER the charge. YOU are merely an AGENT. Please note that I used ALL CAPS in some of the words that are important, because you kids have a total nerd-gasm when the Admiral does it. :D

<<nerd-gasm> Dang, I totally do have one. :/

who is the principal debtor ? the queen

HER MAJESTY :D

I think there's also an ORGANIZATION involved :P

I keep finding myself coming back to this post, It should be up near the top again!

HUGE load of crap!

I took the post down had to much crap in it Chris

If I remember correctly, that same guy, in one of his videos, was trying to pass off the idea that the "includes" that follows the definition of "Canada", was merely inclusive rather than also exclusive.

He's also fidgety. ...liars do that. :P

I am correcting him on the video

He called me "Big boy"...do you think he is hitting on me? :-P

Or he just watched some pictures of you :-D

What video, by who?

Wake Up Productions guy, Steve Bates, video on the Birth Certificate. I didn't want to post the link for fear of adding to clutter and distraction.

Hey Pete...go fuck yourself!

Also: the FIRST red flag should have been his title: The "Real" Truth.

Man.....this idiot has a lot of beliefs. I bet he is a Christian...anyone? Does anyone know if this guy is a Christian?

Rodrigo, is this guy a Christian?

No idea. However, he seems to respect Alex Jones a great deal. ...so pretty much the same thing. Love of bullshit.

You guys should look and see the Robert Menard grade omission he is spewing over there!

Then calling me a "moron". Although he is correct :-D , in this case, he is clearly the ignorant one!

Steve Bates answers questions and letters. example: What is the solution?? 1 - Avoid contracting with the government as much as possible. 2 - If you have contracted with the government, HONOR that contract - do not go into DIS-HONOR !!! 3 - If you have contracted with the government, READ and understand the RULES of the contract (statutes). 4 - Always remain an honorable MAN in law, and an honorable PERSON in legality. 5 - Avoid contracting with the government as much as possible !!! /www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHGPezwFoIY

Ok...preliminary evidence was this guy is an idiot because his name is not Scott Duncan. This has been confirmed. :-D Check out this idiot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYwezphVAJE

hahaha Kate has a gapping hole?? quit jamming dicks into it!....

The major issue I see in the video from Steve BATES is the he equates the LEGAL PERSON with a NATURAL PERSON which is disappointing because he seems to have gotten a few things like not using the LEGAL NAME and entering into private contract instead is prefered to using the SIN.

Re:"KATE OF GAIA HAS A GIGANTIC GAPING HOLE" - PHRASING!

Hey wait... REAL truth is MY schtick!

KATE OF GAPE ?

So Steve Bates discredits Tranny Kate, dislikes Dean Clifford, and has renounced Free-dumbers. He was doing so well and then he gives Menard credit for being a true "Freeman" :/

Steve Bates, I was sure this guy was a guitar player.... !! :/

Before his 16th birthday, he was MASTER Bates... ...just sayin' :D

He has very little wrong.

Filling gaps in one's knowledge with made up shit makes one a liar, a fucking dangerous one at that!

Hahaha. MASTER Bates. :)

Steve Bates, who the heck is he ?

Wake Up Productions. We frighten him a great deal.

Is Wake Up Productions the guy who is like the TMZ for freedumbers? Same guy?

TMZ ?

Yeah....its some TV paparazzi program

Yes. Same guy. :D

Why be afraid of us ? :/

I bet it has to do with LEGAL TENDER and having no value outside of that!

He thinks I have the answers, but he also thinks I'm crazy.

So he won't start a YouTube program on us !! :D

Should I start a "Youtube Program"? :D

YES!!

With boat bunnies and everything :p

I don't wanna do it if Diddy did it.

LOL

Speaking of teaching YOU idiots, can someone help me with this? I have some fiat that I need to exchange to BitCoin, but its larger than most exchangers can do. And if I break it down into smaller transactions, the services such as Money Gram take a very large portion. Can you recommend an exchange that might be suitable for this type of transaction? OR should I simply nickle and dime this to death?

Don't USE an exchange! BECOME one.

Ahhhhhh. Ok. I see :D

https://localbitcoins.com/

You privatise through CROWDS

...Diddy did it.

It's nice that they mention "... including Canada."!

If Diddy did it... Oh, wait!

I know, right?! What DIDN'T Diddy do?

Ok, I think I missed that "Diddy" thing/thread/post! So, WHO THE F*CK IS DIDDY! :D

Oh Janick...now you've done it.

https://youtu.be/M0yIXirn49s

Pouhahahaha! :D

Oooooh THAT Diddy! :P

Here's one of the messages from a user: "RIPPERS BEWARE ***** I got scammed once and never again So anyone trying funny business, know that coins will not be released unless is CASH DEPOSIT. Creative fraudsters here but don't waste you time. If your a genuine buyer, read on Contact hours: business bank hours LOCAL DEPOSIT TO A RBC BRANCH TO A BUSINESS ACCOUNT WILL NEED PROVE of DEPOSIT WITH A PICTURE OF DEPOSIT SLIP AND YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER WRITE NO REFUNDS on the SLIP 10 MIN wait from the time i RESPOND THANK YOU :)" :/

Too "wordy". "CA$H UP FRONT. OR PAY WITH YOUR CUNT" <--MUCH better.

That's the clossest I got to the "Scottism": __________________________________________________ Meeting preferences: Tim Hortons, McDonalds etc.. This advertisement is only for cash trades. I can meet you anywhere around the chomedey area in laval and i can move a bit to montreal. Thanks _________________________________________________ :D

You privatise through CROWDS. How can you privatise through CROWDS? :/

You just posted how. :P

:o (y)

Quebec "dumb" is so much cuter than Ontario "dumb". <3

Well, at least I got THAT going for me! :/ :D

We can make porn and sell it to the Free-Dumbers. :D You have that too!

You're so sweet! Thanks for thinking of options for me! :P

Yes. I am awesome.

Just memorise your lines: 1: "That hurts, Mister" 2: "Do it harder" 3: "I've been a bad girl" ...and that porn option is ALWAYS open. :D I wrote the script myself, so you KNOW it's from the heart! <3

Your awesomeness is dwarfed by your humility :D

Use the 3 lines alone or in combinations. Its so easy even i can do it! I could totally write porno.

*Bump

6 July 2015 at 12:39 was the last post... ...and it's STILL true. I'm fucking awesome. #ScottIsAlwaysRight