The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Oct 18, 2014 4:12 PM

Pete Daoust

Skype Conference 2014-10-17.

Resume in this thread, with not more than 15 words, what you've TOOK from that conference call :)

Read Comments

Rodrigo Dan Darius

1) It's ALL FICTION.

2) "Derek Moran-types" are worse than "average dumb ass" because they sound smart and appeal to our love of "magic words".. clubhouse rules..

3) Blockchain is the future.

4) Masons are NEVER free. They're expensive.

5) Rothchilds, Russell Brands, folks in black dresses... They're ALL strangers. These strangers take up precious space in one's mind. Stop paying them mind.

Janick Paquette

- To do list:

1) Know what money is 2) Creat a TRUST 3) Resign from Gouvernment Services 4) Learn all you can about the Blockchain

Questions to ask yourself:

What is the concept of aging? How would the Blockchain profit you? What happens if YOU succeed? What is YOUR Plan? What is Money? Why isn't Scott a FREEDUMBER?

... not necessarily in that order! :D

Will Bed

Makes sense, money deposited in trust is not income...

But that sparked something in my brain... That whole writing "for deposit only" on checks being deposited in a checking account thing is only freedumb theories, right ?

Chris Evan

Scott also said before that ACCOUNTING only happens on land. Therefore, I see this as DEPOSITS aren't accounting until the vessel DOCKS on LAND! I think that will happen when I die, and hopefully, when I die, I still have vessels that are transferring CARGO at sea.

Xrisjuice Xris

It has been suggested to Stop using the word Employed, you get income from employment, whereas contracting is a private undertaking. the jurisdiction is narrower than you think. Government only has claim to income. Income is pay from employment, or gains through money of account. Deposits are NOT part of government jurisdiction. It is recommended to put For Deposit Only in the memo section of any cheque being deposited. Deposits are not income. It is all accounting and the name is an account. I recall these words in one of the articles.

Anibal Jose Baez

Will Bed, there are no synonyms, nor homonyms in LAW. I think your confusion lies in the definitions of the words. The definition of the words INCOME, and DEPOSIT cannot be the same. You have not heard of the "DEPOSIT Tax Act," but perhaps the "INCOME Tax Act."

Having said that, in LEGAL world, INCOME is TAXABLE, DEPOSITS are NOT taxable. DEPOSITS are HELD in TRUST. But you may still withdraw funds AFTER being DEPOSITED, by way of ATM, as Chris has mentioned.

Scott has mentioned one may write "FOR DEPOSIT ONLY" in the instruments. NOT only for tax purposes, but also that way you avoid acting as SURETY for that INSTRUMENT, by NOT placing your signature.

Anibal Jose Baez

The signature card that you sign to open the account, Chris? If so, I never heard Scott say anything about that here, but it makes sense that if necessary to give a signature, one must show INTENT of reservation of rights.

August le Blanc

1) Vitalek Buterin and Gavin Wood are innovators and very smart, learn from them. 2) Think from another vantage point, beyond commerce. 3) Move from consumer mentality to provider mentality; For example, Provide a 3D printing service that only excepts its own currency for services provided.

Anibal Jose Baez

<<... a DEPOSIT, which comes from a check in exchange for an INVOICE for service provided, still seems to fit the definition of INCOME>>

There are NO SYNONYMS in law. Is this is true, and it is, how can you insist a DEPOSIT "still seems to fit the definition of INCOME? :/

Will Bed

Alright, It seems the piece of paper - which is the check - does fit the definition of income as a "return in money from one's labor". If you claim otherwise, please provide proof to support your statements.

The only possibility would then seem to be that writing FOR DEPOSIT ONLY is what makes it NOT INCOME...

I just try to figure out why he's right... Sorry if I dont blindly believe ;)

August le Blanc

I do know the why of all of the actions taken in the past 18 months by a trusted person, it all stemmed my initial goal to learn the truth. To hold to account the person responsible for harms caused wrongfully. To find out it is all MAKE BELIEVE. Agent in commerce, has raised some moral and ethical programming issues, Which began when I questioned everything growing up However, due to the insurance of things, its either be bought out or die it seems. The agent in commerce was to fine the wrong doer and then hold the funds in trust and exchange as needed and spending it on tools to provide a IT based service in multiple locations, utlizing crypto currency as the medium...

Pete Daoust

Now, once this is done.....these funds were MONEY OF ACCOUNT for DEPOSIT ONLY, right ?

Then, you can run to this ATM, and this fucking machine will give you MONEY OF EXCHANGE.....and you can do what the fuck you want with it....

So, NO INCOME appears in the equation....

Will Bed

Thanks for that Pete. For some reason the money of account vs exchange didnt come to mind :(

Now, if a check is for deposit only, does that mean the bank has to keep it, making it impossible for the corp which wrote it to claim back ? As in non negotiable anymore ?

I guess youd keep copies of those checks...

Pete Daoust

That info was useful for those who receives paychecks.....EMPLOYEES....

If they would follow this process, no fucking "income" would exist, so ZERO would be the amount to write on that INCOME tax return.... :D

Pete Daoust

Ok, lets start learning the block chain :/

Block Chain.

1. (Mach.) A chain in which the alternate links are broad blocks connected by thin side links pivoted to the ends of the blocks, used with sprocket wheels to transmit power, as in a bicycle.