The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Oct 12, 2014 11:41 AM

Scott Duncan

SOVEREIGN:

You keep seeing Free-Dumbers using the LEGAL term SOVEREIGN. I just had one of YOU idiots use the word too...

...and you don't know what the word means.

Under CONSTITUTIONAL SOCIALIST MONARCHY, a SOVEREIGN TAKES ORDERS.

ELIZABETH WINDSOR TAKES ORDERS from Parliament.

SOVEREIGNS TAKE ORDERS.

If you DON'T TAKE ORDERS then YOU AREN'T SOVEREIGN.

SOVEREIGNS TAKE ORDERS.

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

Dear Elizabeth Windsor,

As a Man, having a LEGAL person, what could I do to help you, so you can have all the POWER back, so you can kick some asses a little bit ?

By: Sole Authorized Administrator for the LEGAL person named PIERRE DAOUST.

:D

Pete Daoust

:D ....because in Canada, WE BELIEVE !!! :D

In Canada the amount of mail sent to Santa Claus increased every Christmas, up to the point that Canada Post decided to start an official Santa Claus letter-response program in 1983. Approximately one million letters come in to Santa Claus each Christmas, including from outside of Canada, and all of them are answered in the same languages in which they are written.[13] Canada Post introduced a special address for mail to Santa Claus, complete with its own postal code:

SANTA CLAUS NORTH POLE H0H 0H0

Mike Lamb

^ Pete, that may or may not work. Chris, glad to hear that you have not had problems with their "delivery". I am not quite there (though, I use a Non Domestic address). Some of my communication has gotten very delayed or has disappeared (< rare).

Kawni Gilroy

yea I agree Scott....I raised it since then....that was a couple years ago when he harassed me in the park when my small dog was off leash...there was no one around and he drove up the sidewalk on the grass to harass me

Kawni Gilroy

funny story Pete....my ex was walking my dog when she was a puppy..they walked by this old grumpy man sitting in a chair at Starbucks, she went up to him to say hello and he kicked her, my ex didnt think twice, kicked the motherfucker in the chest and knocked him out......my guess is he will never kick a dog again....I would do the same if someone kicked my dog on or off a leash.....if a dog is biting thats a different story then its fair but not a sweet dog just saying hello.....most people who have dogs that bite do not let them off leash unless they are complete idiots.....I was biten by a dog a few years ago that was on a leash and my back was turned so I do know it hurts like hell

Kawni Gilroy

i guess in answer to your question, probably more than 50% idiots here....unfortunately I have to admit that.....but I will say in my neighborhood we are more responsible than most....and I do have those boots!!! haha.....I wear them to work! but Stellos work fine for kicking anyone who kicks my dog!!! or Ill take them off and beat them with the heel!! :p

Kawni Gilroy

I said Boots!!! Not boobs!!!! But since u brought them up...Actually you wouldn't know how spectacular my boobs are Pete Daoust and will never know! Not to mention no amount of bet u make will ever get u laid! Lol!!

Anibal Jose Baez

<<Section 2. The government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico shall be republican in form and its legislative, judicial and executive branches as established by this Constitution shall be equally subordinate to the sovereignty of the people of Puerto Rico.>>

Anibal Jose Baez

The Contitution here says "the people" is the sovereign. So "the people" may take orders around here, I guess.

It also says this: <<Section 12. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist except in the latter case as a punishment for crime after the accused has been duly convicted.>>

Anibal Jose Baez

The difference in that, as a CUSTOMER going to do business with Walmart, we have all the elements for a VALID contract. In the case of a "CONSTITUTIONAL SOCIALIST MONARCHY" or other forms of government, they want to force services that you don't want. There is no "meeting of the minds," consideration, etc.

Kirsten Carlstrom

Scott Duncan I've heard the following several times..... For Canadians " Sovereignty rests with Elizabeth Windsor" and for Americans..."Sovereignty rests in the Republic," and these statements dovetail with taking oaths. Your thoughts on this please.

T?lis B?auns

Scott Duncan, In UK a Public school and a "Public house" are in private juridiction. The school is funded by private sources and the 'Pub' restricts the public from breaking the law (lic. sale of intoxicants, public drunkeness ). The "Pub" operates a 'commercial premise' to be fair to their patrons and respectfull to the laws (commerce, criminal). What status and title do Publicans have that commoners don't, the first is loyal to the Sovereign the later is submissive? Is this a reason why the clubhouse was set up in Temple Bar?

Mike Lamb

"The State: Elements of Historical and Practical Politics (1898)" by Woodrow Wilson, Page 609.

Describes a sovereign as

"... a determinate person, or body of persons to whom the bulk of the members of an organized community are in the habit of rendering obedience and who are themselves not in the habit of rendering obedience to any human superior."

Chris Evan

I don't understand this: "... a determinate person, or body of persons to whom the bulk of the members of an organized community are in the habit of rendering obedience and who are themselves not in the habit of rendering obedience to any human superior."

What am I missing....?

Mike Lamb

Maybe my thought process is off wack, and I do value the clarity in this group when it comes to definitions and the origins of words (I really do), but if one man/woman says that "so and so" means 'this' and another man/woman disagrees and says that "so and so" means 'that'. Does one man/woman's definition stand above some other man/woman's definition? I don't think so.

Rodrigo Dan Darius

Yeah. It's a "huge inconvenience" to be dead.

It SHOULD be out of fear. They believe it's their right to kill you. ..for your own "protection".

One of the many "benefits" we may have unknowingly signed up for..

Mike Lamb

Escalated confrontations, of course. I'm very up front about not getting my head blown off. But if it is a stupid checkpoint, I can be a good little slave, show them a piece of plastic, and continue to progress to my destination (i.e. work, appointments), and NOT be late. I pick and choose my battles. I'd rather expend time and energy administrating the PERSON properly, versus arguing with an ignorant EMPLOYEE who takes huge offense to questioning (and not consenting) his fictional authority, because he is violating my right to simply go from point A to point B.

Maybe some of you are "there" and can confidently tell a COP to screw themselves. I'm not there, yet.

Scott Duncan

This is why the only REAL answer is to form armed mobs and kill them all at the side of the road.

...I figure 3 of those would deter them from forming "checkpoints" any further, and the whole issue becomes moot.