The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Oct 12, 2014 11:38 AM

Pete Daoust

I woke up this morning as a Human Being, having the right to my person's surety, my person's integrity and my person's liberty.

So I get to be the SOLE authorized Administrator for this person that I have.

Because it's the LAW... :P

And I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT ANYONE'S "OPINION" about it...

(Source: Quebec Charter, article 1.)

The day Men and Women from Quebec will understand that, the party will be over, for those incompetent sack of shit PUBLIC TRUSTEES.

Read Comments

Gerry Odonothing

I was never taught Latin in public fool but my Maths teacher used to instruct us only to use Q.E.D. when we were SURE the solution was correctly demonstrated and could be understood by ANYONE on inspection. That was ages ago and It's nice to see it again.

Gerry Odonothing

It wasn't my idea. When I was working in a bottling plant on the night shift, at about 2 o clock in the morning I said to my youngest brother (who was working there too) fuck the job, let's go for a smoke and we did. While we were there having the reefer the intercom crackled and the voice said " F----- O'donothing go to line one and I nearly pissed myself laughing; it was a call for my brother to go fix the labeller or some other machine (he's a sparks) and it was just his buddies taking the piss. I stole the name for facebook.

Pete Daoust

Understanding

A general term referring to an agreement, either express or implied, written or oral.

The term understanding is an ambiguous one; in order to determine whether a particular understanding would constitute a contract that is legally binding on the parties involved, the circumstances must be examined to discover whether a meeting of the minds and an intent to be bound occurred.

Gerry Odonothing

That bloke doesn't mince his words. He calls a spade a spade and you have to know that about him if you are going to cross him; because if you do and you are wrong he will put you away with sentences that you would never thought were possible. I've seen him point lots of people on here, who are unwilling to not knuckle under the slave system, in the right direction with success. Where would you get that?

Pete Daoust

Article 332 of the Civil Code of Quebec

332. Any interested person may intervene in the proceedings or contest a judgment which, in fraud of his rights, has attributed juridical personality.

1991, c. 64, a. 332 ; 2002, c. 19, s. 15 .

What the fuck does that mean ? :(

Pete Daoust

attribute verb :

accredit with, adsignare, ascribe, assign, charge with, connect with, consider as belonging to, impute, point to, predicate, set down to, tribuere Associated concepts: attribute a cause to an individual

David-Paul Sip

332. Any interested PERSON may intervene in the proceedings or contest a judgment which, in fraud of his rights, has attributed juridical personality.

Is it just me or is this obscure logic intended to confuse? Seems similar in intention as the Canadian Income Tax Act which defines an INDIVIDUAL as a PERSON other than a corporation :/

Will Bed

It seems that Article 332 confirms that the RIGHT of a MAN/WOMAN to the PERSON's SURETY MUST be juridically recognized if anyone has forced the PERSONNALITY upon a MAN or WOMAN who can PROVE he is NOT the PERSON, to constrain him/her to act as SURETY (pay or rott in a cage)...

I guess using a PERSON you TRUST may be necessary, because courts dont recognize MEN and WOMEN... But in French they don't use the word "PERSON", they use "int�ress�" which means whoever has something to lose... A MAN sure has a lot of TIME to lose...

But I'm going to have to try and see if they define "int�ress�"...