The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Oct 11, 2014 3:03 PM

Pete Daoust

At 1:46, Keith says: MUCH LIKE YOU ARE AN ADMINISTRATOR OF THIS AH....THIS COURT.

Why ? ... :/ why not giving that guy the TRUSTEE role, and all the powers that comes with it ?

Judge Bows To Kate Of Gaia (SUBTITLED) [09/01/2010]

youtube.com

Recorded On September 1, 2010 Transcript: http://kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/court-transcript-for-judge-bows-video.pdf "The key is simply know who...

Read Comments
Unique ID: 462493170453287_731600073542594
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/qBSJC0XTNJk?autoplay=1
Type of Post:
video
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

Ok, Scott, I NEVER experimented this, but here's what I would have said.

"I am the SOLE authorized Administrator for the person you seems to have in custody, now, I know your role is the TRUSTEE's one, and I need you to point out to me, where is the SURETY, so we can settle this matter ?"

What do you think would have happened with this, Scott ?

Eamonn O Brien

Pete, id imagine they would have you support your claims with evidence.

Might be better cementing your claims via questions they can't rebut. "Am I not the sole authorised administrator?" "Does anyone have any evidence that Im not?" etc...

Steph Boucher

Because in both case he would be serving into the courts jurisdiction. By standing her ground, she brings them in hers? She then says "Like you are the administrator of this court" if she is also and Administrator... that means... my head hurt... i need to think that through before i talk more

Steph Boucher

SURETY IS THE KEY. The judge wants to know if he is ''an agent'' or ''HIM'' so there is is a SURETY to ACCOUNT for. If there is none, there is no CONTRACT or/and COMMERCE possible? Where is the SURETY in this case, NOT in that room, there is only 2 Parties having no VALUE to be TRADED.

Rick Hiltz

I do not believe the judge bowed to Keith /Kate, he/she uses both names depending on what he/she is doing. When flying to Ireland for instance he uses the masculine, I believe the judge, as all officers of the court do , was bowing to her majesty before leaving the court ...............he still lost the house

Gerry Odonothing

Having watched that video a few times and having taken into account what the Admiral said i.e."SIR (Addressing his Superior), YOU are either HIM (The name), OR His AGENT" is the judge affirming what the Admiral said by bowing down to the Sovereign before he leaves the court?

Steph Boucher

So, if the Attorney General of Canada is in charge the jursidiction and everyone else answer to him, we are trying to emote him in a lawful and/or legal manner (he lost his way along the process of colonization including pissing you off for unclear reasons to me yet) yet he must have the Trust of the Queen...

Steph Boucher

I'm trying to find a reference for exemple. Obviously Scott can't talk too much cause he's as an Oath he can't break, which make perfect sense. Now who in the Court system is operating in a way we can (not emote I guess I meant immulate) emulate... So that Scott makes the fine tuning and or point direction without breaking his Oath. Everything is possible to be learned we gotta find a good match for comparison...

Steph Boucher

I think that is freewill apply to this ethical question, we should leave the option to humans, the same way they should choose to contract or not, whether they want to be part in an "experience" professional any sort where suffering or death can result.

David-Paul Sip

In case anyone missed it "His job is to attorn us to government jurisdiction which does not seem to be in the best interest of the beneficiary. So, we want to replace him with a mechanism that attorns us more to our liking?"

Steph Boucher

So if suretry is "accountable" and the objective is to not let them do it for us by associating our legal person to the men/women we are, and that also our Time is our only way to create value. Our Time spent under their systems is lost to us, if we are to account for this, do they owe us money? Does the "vessel" we possess they have cleverly contracted with, this whole time worth money cause of its capacity to create value, or does it have intrinsic value, hence the SURETY?

Pete Daoust

Ok, I'll try this... :D

The government, a huge TRUST with 35 millions PERSONS in it.

Me = Beneficiary of one of these PERSONS.

Those who works for the government are TRUSTEES.

They fucked up my brain so I can become one of these TRUSTEES.

I even APPLIED to be one of them trustees, without KNOWING the FACTS.

Complete ignorant of the FACTS.

Today, I decided to stop being one of these TRUSTEES, and became the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR of that PERSON, I happen to have.

I am also the beneficiary of that person.

Unless someone wants to say otherwise IN WRITING :P

Steph Boucher

Before blowing my mind Joelle Spirit, please warn me... :( There is MORE then one legal person going on?! For All Gov Contract... Shit I thought I was starting to wrap my head around it all. It appears that it's not the case...

Anibal Jose Baez

Steph Thefrenchman you are evidently missing some material already covered. I highly suggest you visit all of these links, and read.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/679793502056585/

Steph Boucher

Yah, I'm reading a bunch ( on page 30 of 800 page of group tread) ... Read all the pinned post, i should give them another go... I'm on it. The call is also extremely beneficial. Thanks to all, it's what i gotta say.

Howard Posehn

Just remember this: Who the fuck are you? Where is the surety? I demand that all parties be present, where is the principal? Are you trying to esculate this? Excuse me for one moment please, I have to call Scott Duncan!

It was funny. When I was arrested in court, they took all the papers and went through them. I had a printed paper with some Scottism's and the name Scott Duncan was prominent on two printed pages. The cop wanted to take me, but the prosecutor was very adamant in wanting me out of the building and set free. I like to think of it as my skills, but maybe, just maybe, that name on those printed papers played more to the fears than I realize.

Howard Posehn

I sent Registered mail too. It doesn't matter to them. Demand answers as to why you were ignored on this matter. You take this very serious and your time is priceless. Prepare to be arrested. Do not resist in any matter. The cops will try to get you to resist. Don't.

Scott Duncan

FOCUSING BACK ON THE POINT: "SIR (Addressing his Superior), YOU are either HIM (The name), OR His AGENT". - That is the most important and informative sentence spoken in this video.

The court can ONLY RECOGNISE ONE OR THE OTHER.

David-Paul Sip

NUGGET ALERT: "The court can ONLY RECOGNISE ONE OR THE OTHER." :D So very true...the court can't recognize a MAN. It's like I wasn't even there to the fucktard Tom McKeogh but his actions confirmed tht I am not the name lol!

Eamonn O Brien

Agent definition form Black's...

"Generally speaking, anyone can be an agent who is in fact capable of performing the functions involved. The agent normally binds not himself but his principal by the contracts he makes"

Pete Daoust

"So when the judge says you are either him or his agent..."

Well dear justice, No one ever asked me to be his agent, I never really chose that ROLE, but if it can help this court, I am a very good administrator, just point me out on where is the party with SURETY, and I will ADMINISTRATE any debt/charge this court may want to create...

I have brought ALL the tools with me, to ADMINISTRATE :D

Eamonn O Brien

In the video when the judge says that "you are either him or HIS AGENT..." it is after saying the agent's name (THE name)... Obviously he's not going to say the name of the principal. So if the name is the agent's name how could "Keith" be agent for it (an agent)?Or am I just complicating things now? :p

Pete Daoust

It's all coming back to the basic fact that ALL BELIEFS ARE EVIL.....

Seriously, I see it so clear.....I was 16 days when this legal entity was organized, and some tards told me that I WAS THAT LEGAL ENTITY, and I believed them... :/

Pete Daoust

PIERRE DAOUST = AGENCY = SURETY

Pierre Daoust = Agent of the AGENCY, and by ACCEPTING being Agent, he is fucking surety

But if I am forced to ACT as an agent, I will definitly ask WHERE is surety, because hey, IT'S NOT MY FAULT :P

pierre daoust = chimp

Eamonn O Brien

agency. (17c) 1. A fiduciary relationship created by express or implied contract or by law, in which one party (the agent) may act on behalfof another party (the principal) and bind that other party by words or actions.

Eamonn O Brien

So EAMONN O BRIEN represents the arrangement between the head of state and me (the agency) that I am authorised to act on his behalf... When I do I am agent Eamonn O Brien, with surety more than likely...

Pete Daoust

This one :/

So EAMONN O BRIEN represents the arrangement between the head of state and me (the agency) that I am authorised to act on his behalf... When I do I am agent Eamonn O Brien, with surety more than likely...

Pete Daoust

The one who signed that thing, is saying that he is the principal of a TRUST, and the Beneficiary of a TRUST, and that trust has been named the Michael Anthony Riveira TRUST......good for him, but I have no idea why he has to say this to that court ? :/

Derek Hill

scott feel free to correct me on this.

"you are either him or an gent for him"

if you are him then you just admitted that you are a person and it gives them jurisdiction to administrate you because you just offered yourself as surety.

If you are an agent then you there on behalf of the principle...which is the fraud.

Either way they fuck you over. they will not hear you until surety is accepted.

So witht he assumption of everything i said is correct. how would one go about retrieving trust property(trust is ratified) and that you wish for property to be returned to you at once as you are the trustee to the propertry held in trust.

replevin is still viable for this kinds of deliveries?

not going to court is preferred

Scott Duncan

Ok, well first I'd like to remind you how fucking annoying it is, when I am misquoted. I SPEAK VERY PRECISELY! THERE IS A REASON I USE THE WORDS I USE. NEVER CHANGE THEM!

This goes double for when I quote someone else who HAS to speak precisely.

So.

YOU ARE EITHER HIM, OR HIS AGENT.

IT IS NOT THE SAME THING as "agent for him", as much as you "believe" it is.

Derek Hill

cool. so say oyur agent, demand the principle of the name to be identified and let the court know that they can make all the order they want and that im just simply going to administrate...since you know who the party with surety is :)

Lei Gh

Hey Pete, Who liked your comment "Yeah Scott, feel FREE to correct him". When I look at a like it drops a like. A few comments in this thread are like it. Which fucktard has me blocked in THE TENDER FOR LAW? 33 members and I see 25. :/

Derek Hill

Let's say I make a post.

3 people like it. One of those people block you.

The code will still show 3 people but when you hover or do anything with the button it then loads the block list. It then lowers to 2 since one person blocked me after the fact that they liked the post.

Basic coding 101

Michael Atkins

Ok. So Pete's actual question was: Why not give the trustee role to the numb nuts on the bench. What would that entail? "Point of Order. At this time I reserve all rights!" Point at the judge. "You! Mister you act as trustee!"

Lei Gh

"Let the record show that Mr. Supernumerary and the Crown have violated my rights. I reserved all rights. Ye have no standing for speaking. Crown, are YOU SURETY in this matter? I assume Crown is SURETY in this matter as we are proceeding as I have negated any understanding in this matter nor consent. Who would be SURETY in this matter?"

The Judge stated the Crown was not surety in this matter and refused to answer who was SURETY when I wished for SURETY to be identified, twice and asked many times.

Pete Daoust

Scott said: I notify a captain. 3-5 years later, when nobody is looking, then we deal with it privately.

Derek Hill parroted: Hence your "wait 5 years if you want to kill them. If you still do then they prolly deserve it" paraphrasing ofcourse

Who talked about killing anyone one here ?

Why is it you add words in what Scott is saying ? :/

Derek Hill

Sorry are you an expert on my life? What's that? No? Thought so. That bitch nearly destroyed my life in family court almost to the point where I had a fucking child sexual assault hanging under my name.

She lied and lied and they kept believing her.

And we all know how family court is now do we? Mother gets all father gets jail. Pretty fucking sure there's a housing meme.

Scott Duncan

Why do you think that is the same as someone trying to kidnap you?

I endorse lethal force against those attempting to kidnap ANYONE; I don't care what magic costume they may be wearing.

You want to kill someone because they used LEGAL PROCESS (Commerce). Children are not PROPERTY, but BOTH of you did it of your own free will. Nobody's life or liberty is in jeopardy in the pathetic self-constructed delusional hell that is your life, Derek Hill.

The fact that you think we share the same views on lethal force is just offensive. You don't kill people over hurt feelings. If you want people who think that's ok, become Piece-of-Shit Muslim.

Scott Duncan

You actually wanted to kill someone because of "hurt feelings".

You actually try to imply that I endorse that.

He're something I've said, and will say again and again; You have NO BUSINESS having ANYTHING to do with a child's upbringing. Your contribution to that child was the biological equal of "sneezing inside her".

I don't get to demand "half" of what the people who built companies/products off my work, because THEY DID ALL THE HARD WORK. THEY took the risk. THEY laboured. THEY made what I thought, INTO REALITY. I "sneezed" an idea at them. They brought it to life. They are grateful, but that is all the obligation they really have.

YOU did not give birth to that child. YOU did not carry that child. YOU left semen inside her; The end.

...and for that, you think she should die?

THIS. THIS is why I get to think/behave like I'm better than you... THIS. Study it carefully. It's PROOF that I am in EVERY MEASURABLE WAY, BETTER THAN YOU.

Jesus Martinez

One of the worst things to do is to pretend one knows. I am very happy, nowadays, with "I don't know. Let me shut the fuck-up, observe, and listen for the first time." Maybe one can learn something this time around.