https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MjC218kH5I

Keep us updated! I live close by, let me know if support is needed.

Support ? :/

You read my mind, hahaha!

You want to pay these 3 bills, Steven Sharp ? :D

If your knee goes bad, I will travel, and give you support on that leg. :D

There is actually 2 for $5millions and change, and one for 4millions and change.. :D

Depends how things go, but if any of this ends up in court, having witnesses can be helpful.

You're a good man Pete Daoust.

Denis's rate is $3000 per hour, so if they want a business meeting over that shit, he will be there.... :/

If he has to bring a business CONSEILLER with him, in any business meeting, the rate goes up at $6000.00 per hour :-o

And he will have to bring a business CONSEILLER if ever a business meeting is being called over that shit.... :D

All this is NOT DENIS'S FAULT :D

"He wanted to show them the proof the debt was discharged" How can you PROVE it !?!? The fuckers here go silent, never reply, and the PERSON will soon need a PROOF that municipality taxes were discharged because there's a fuckin mortgage to renew :(

Nice work!! I love it!

I concur, Chris.

Excellent work Pete!

:D I think I need to charge more for my time Capitaine Pete lol!

Will Bed, the proof is the registered mail number...they received the bill of exchange, so the debt is settled, unless they have sent you a notice of refusal and the original bill of exchange back. Have they ? :-\

Pete,do you expect the lien to be monetized?

I think Denis's expectation is for them to PAY their bills....

Fuck, they got the bills of exchange, but they did send an account statement with interests/penalties added 3 months ago... No reply to my last 4 communications... They wont return my call or even pick up the phone, it's always a fuckin voicemail... So now here I am preparing another of those long communications loaded with FACTS to force them to send over a zero'ed account statement... The fuckin mortgage "lender" will be asking for this, so I need it ! Plus I want PROOF so all the other fucktards start obeying the law with no fuckin around, and so I can show others that it's indeed how it's supposed to work.

:-D

Pete, what was in Denis's notice of claim?

Oh, I will have to translate this, later...

Here, do the translation your self :P Montreal, le 27 Aout 2014. PAR FAX: POLICE SERVICE ET AGENTE : ET : AGENT : OBJET : ENTR�E ILL�GALE ET AVIS DE R�CLAMATION TOUT DROITS R�SERV�S / SANS PR�JUDICES Prenez avis que Cam�ra 911 International Enr a toutes les bonnes raisons de croire que le service de police de Mirabel, par l�entremise de son agente xxxxxxx, et de son agent xxxxxx, a particip� � un acte ill�gal mardi le 26 aout 2014, en assistant une compagnie nomm�e PHILLIPPE & ASSOCI�S HUISSIERS, et Jean-S�bastien Philippe, et Serrurier Bertrand, a p�n�trer, sans autorisation, dans un local louer par Cam�ra 911 International au 14880 Vermette.. Prenez avis que Cam�ra 911 International, et/ou Denis Michaud, de par son seul administrateur autoris�, songe s�rieusement � r�clamer au Service de Police de Mirabel, et son agente XXXXXX, et son Agent XXXXXX, des frais pour dommage et int�r�t. Nous souhaitons recevoir le num�ro de police d�assurance / cautionnement, ainsi que le Nom de la Compagnie d�Assurance couvrant vos responsabilit�s civils, et ce, dans 3 jours ouvrables suivant cet avis. PAR : Seul Administrateur Autoris� Pour Camera 911 International.

Take notice that Camera 911 International Rec has every reason to believe that the police Mirabel , through his agent xxxxxxx , xxxxxx and his agent , participated in an illegal act Tuesday, August 26, 2014 , in assistant company named PHILLIPPE & ASSOCIATES SERVERS, and Jean- Sebastien Philippe , and Locksmith Bertrand, entering without authorization in a local rent from 911 to 14880 Vermette International Camera .. Take notice that Camera 911 International, and / or Denis Michaud , through its sole authorized administrator seriously considering calling the Police Department Mirabel, and Officer XXXXXX XXXXXX and his agent , charges for damages and interest. We request the number of insurance / surety police, and the name of the Insurance Company covering your civil responsibilities , and , within 3 business days of such notice .

So basically, "These fuckers trespassed, give us their details so we can let them know we mean business..."

Beautiful

In the name of ALLAH... :o- https://www.facebook.com/Denis.Nineoneone.International/posts/10204003596383617?notif_t=close_friend_activity

allegedly

Eamonn O Brien... On the invoice it says 1). Violation of the person�s private life : $1million (Persons have that right in Quebec :P ) 2). Violation of the integrity of the person : $1million 3). Put in danger a Human Life : $1million (Denis have a serious heart disease, and really thought to have a heart attack that day and die, it�s in his medical file now) :P 4). Illegal entrance in a private place : $1million 5). 6 hours at $3,000.00 for Denis�s time: $18k 6). Instead of ACTING as �peace officer�, the cops decided to ACT as private thugs for that private company who wanted to steal Camera 911 International�s stuff that day, so Denis feels he needs to bill $1million for that too : $1million. This has been decided by Denis, I have noting to do in this.. :D Same invoice has been sent to the baillif, minus no.6, but he added something else, I don't remember what :/ Same to the locksmith minus no.6

8. No one may enter upon the property of another or take anything therefrom without his express or implied consent. 1975, c. 6, s. 8. http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=2&file=/C_12/C12_A.html

No express or implied consent has been given that day :D

Received in private from Mike Jones.... :D Re: Your friend Denis and his million dollar fees. When the law is broken the courts decide what is reasonable compensation. You can't just make up numbers, they have to be recognized as reasonable by the courts, either as dictated by statute or decided at common law. Considering Denis suffered little to no damage from an unauthorized inspection, the damages awarded likely wouldn't be much. Further, liens are not the way to recoup damages for such violations. Denis needs to bring a lawsuit as the person or company violated. Liens are also not how you enforce alleged contracts. You have to sue in court. Snap out of the freeman bullshit. Sincerely, Your friendly neighborhood law examiner

"You can't just make up numbers, they have to be recognized as reasonable by the courts" What courts ? .....there's no need for a court !!! :/

And from Denis's stand point, these numbers are very reasonable ! :/

If EVER they want to make an offer, Denis will listen to it....no big deal :D

Mike Jones = Dan Wilson

Mike sounds like a bowl of dicks :-P

I know, I just wonder WHY he read this group, WHY not just do something else ? :/

Simple....he has an oath to uphold.

So Mike Jones is a lurker that likes to circle jerk to club house rules? :D Mike also BELIEVES the courts determine his value lol!

He is on another facebook profile, girl brain :P

Pete....therefore, there is an unknown lurker here....expect Denis to get an all out assault on these liens. Just like Gail had

:D

Ok, Chris Evan :D

Awwwww :( It's been a while since the ban hammer was exercised and this fucktard needs to be exorcized :D

Do you mean a LAWYER will get in the way, Chris Evan ? :D

You have a crystal ball, Joelle Spirit ? :P

No, he used ANOTHER fucking fb profile, to send me this fucking private message.....fuck.....you can create 200 facebook fucking profile, what's wrong with you, Joelle Spirit ? :(

There is around 200 silent members in here, he is one of them, and I don't know which one......he might even post every now and then....

Here's a question for you, Mike Jones. WHERE IS THE FUCKING SURETY ? :D

Scott Duncan, can I ban everybody, except those that I will not ban ?

I thought Mike Jones was a hippy who sang songs like HeY Hey I'm a Monkey"...

Lotta trouble to fuck people over, even having Santa outfits tailored and fitted!

Gerry Odonothing The Monkeys' Jones :)

No you're both wrong, its *Monkees

Mike Jones, why if someone defaults on an obligation do I have to take them to court so the court can decide if I am right when that isn't the burden for the IRS? Why can the IRS lien and/or levy based on a default, but I can't? They are no different than me....actually, at least my person wsa created by them...thats more than I can say for the IRS....answer me that you fucking coward

IT'S THEIR MONEY, THAT'S WHY!

Fucking lawyers are a standing Army.

Just bullies who maintain the status quo for their masters.

From Mike Jones :D "Why don't you show up in the group?" That's a dumb question, Pete. I was a member until I was banned for asking too many questions, trying to verify what you and John claimed about the Income Tax Act, and otherwise continuing to think for myself. PS. I have made Mirabel aware of the cases http://canlii.ca/t/fnk4t and http://canlii.ca/t/g8zcf and encouraged them to contact the bailiff and locksmith so they may know how to counteract any potential "terror" or other harm induced by Denis's improper and illegal PPSA processes. Perhaps when he is assessed thousands in costs, like your member Gail, you will finally consider you might be doing it wrong and learn better. @Chris Evan, "why if someone defaults on an obligation do I have to take them to court so the court can decide if I am right when that isn't the burden for the IRS?" They do not have to follow the standard laws of contract because all citizens, residents, corporations, even stateless individuals with no birth certificate as long as they are in the area claimed by Canada, are considered participants in Canada and subject to Canadian legislation, such as the Income Tax Act, that dictates how they can affect those persons. :D

My answer... HAHAHA !!...that is soooo nice of you I am in Quebec, not Canada....sorry you've missed that part :P

bahahaha...ok...let me quote this.... "They do not have to follow the standard laws of contract" then there is a because. I had no idea that we weren't all created equal. I had no idea that another person could just confiscate my shit with out a court order.

Mike Jones, did being born in a geographical area make me a slave?

I think Mike needs to eat more of those MONKEE cornflakes.

We should make "Reasons we need a kick a lawyer in the face day" page.

I just blocked this rat, hopefully someone in the AQUILAE crew will find who this guy is, one day :D

What facts or evidence is there to support the claim that just because I am physically located in Canada, that the acts and statutes apply? Marc Stevens.

You're not physically IN Canada. You live ON the land which an ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITY declared to be CANADA... I asked a govt employee once, why dont they tax bears or beavers, just to see if he could get a grip on his own bullshit......

It does apply, to LEGAL persons, and you are DEEMED to "be" one of these LEGAL PERSONS

How can a legal person be physically anywhere ?

The one I happen to have is DOMICILED in Quebec

I got thinking about that after I posted. The paper person can be physically anywhere the paper is.

I'm supposed to think before I post. Duh!

Yes, good idea :-D

Stop watching Marc Steven's videos, or stop reading this group......your brain will get all fucked up if you do both

Fun fact, I do not watch/read anything else..... :-P

KEN !!! YOU are NOT KEN HATT !!! YOU GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT NAME !!! NO-fuckin-THING ! This NAME is MEANT to HARM YOU !!!

Will, I understand the difference between Me and a LEGAL PERSON.

Well, your last posts shows the opposite :-D

How can you write something like that if you know ? :-\ What facts or evidence is there to support the claim that just because I am physically located in Canada, that the acts and statutes apply? Marc Stevens.

And this ? :O How can a legal person be physically anywhere ?

I didn't presumed the meaning of physically, before I looked it up.

I presumed.

Yes Pete Daoust. The marc stevens forgets the simplest question. He might be right about other stuff. But it is irrelevant now.

You just don't know, Ken Hatt, why is it so hard for you Englishes to admit your are clueless morons ? :(

It's not a crime !!! :/

Don't forget what CANADA INCLUDES, and by including what it EXCLUDES :D

Icbeonne Senama where do you get a DEFINITION stating what CANADA INCLUDES ??

I forget what book of clubhouse rules it was in. I will look now Will Bed.

Sec. 35 INTERPRETATION ACT Under DEFINITIONS look for CANADA

Business Address CANADIAN EMBASSY 501 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20001 613-947-2353 Mailing Address DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 140 O'CONNOR STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO Z4 K1A 0G5 http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000230098&owner=exclude&count=40

I remember this also: "for greater certainty" is usually an indication that in the past a decision was determined to be undesirable and PARLIAMENT had to clarify the meaning... so my take on it is .... There is no land of CANADA. Just some FICTIONAL idea or something. Show me what it REALLY is.

:D Okay Icbeonne Senama this is a very telling and important share..."�Canada�, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada. The word includes means to the exclusion of everything else. So "Canada" does not include any land Will Bed. Therefor according to this definition Canada only exists on the water...hence Admiralty Law :o Am I correct Admiral Scott?

Yeah but what water?

All of this is just distraction. Who is your master? How are they your master? Prove it? WHERE IS THE FUCKING SURETY? Am I right?

By what fucking authority?

The IMAGINARY water, Icbeonne Senama :D

They have raised the sea level equal to the cn tower :P

I can't disagree Icbeonne Senama...I was in court on Monday and after I read my affirmation stating that "I am a Man" the justice could no longer see me :o I'm not kidding...he had the PERSON paged even after quoting "Meads vs Meads". Talk about IMAGINARY....I had read about this shit but to experience it was fucking funny.

So my real question Pete Daoust is: Who exactly are THEY?

If you would have said: I AM THE ADMINISTRATOR of that NAME DAVID-PAUL SIP, ... :D

Nobody, Icbeonne Senama :D

Agents from some agencies :P

Magical "authority'!

In some very special occasion, they become some mysterious PRIVATE PERSONS :D

Yeah. Who AUTHORIZED all of this FICTION?

The crowd... :/

The QUALIFIED voters :D

Magic! I am not kidding. Just like the whole religion thing. :/

THE FUCKING "PEOPLE" !!! :D HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Even if the person "votes," that does not entail ownership of men, and women. Voting is a distraction. But it is bullshit. Hahaha, secret voting, hahah! Ballots counted by strangers in dark rooms, hahaha! One has to be stupid.

I did say that I AM THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for DAVIDPAUL SIP Capitaine Pete :D But once I declared that "I am a man" the justice wanted a PERSON really badly. He even had that PERSON paged after telling Me "Meads vs Meads" ruled that the Man and the PERSON are the same lol! I am still laughing about this :D

Did you deposit the surety bond in court David-Paul Sip ?

I hope he did not handed that security himself in court... :/ If someone mentions to me the birth certificate in court, I would say "What is a birth certificate?"

I said "I have evidence of SURETY" holding up the birth certificate and a photocopy of it Will Bed. The justice ignored this because he could not see or hear me at that point...the justice can only recognize PERSONS and I told him I was a man lol! Much Magic ROTFL!

The AGENT was there, if you held THEIR DOCUMENT. I think you gave them enough to believe you were indeed the AGENT. Why would you have that document, if you were not an AGENT? :/

I think you send the security registered mail, but you want no ties with it once it's even mentioned in a court room.

I was given the PERSON and it is not my fault :/ "I think you gave them enough to believe you were indeed the AGENT" No Mackximus Minimus...if this were true then the justice would not have continued to call me SIR. Of course I attempted to present this to the court while or just after the justice rambled on about "Meads vs Meads" and entered the conviction against the PERSON.

"I think you send the security registered mail, but you want no ties with it once it's even mentioned in a court room" Makes sense Mackximus Minimus. I only thought about it after I sent my question to the court via registered mail.

What's done is done...don't want to highjack this excellent thread.

Its hard to accept one has been wrong. But it's the only true way to learn from a "mistake." ;)

Indeed Mackximus, I meant a registered deposit of the surety bond to the court...

While I will never appear in a courtroom again this one experience was worth it..the justice's actions made clear that he agrees that I am not that PERSON either :D And I even recorded it but the justice is difficult to hear though :(

I was just gonna say that David. If you are not the person they want then you are free to leave...

Can we hear the recording?

I am not the PERSON you are looking for. I wish to leave. I wish for CONSIDERATION for my time wasted here. Does that make sense? Time is VALUE afterall.

Nope, it makes no sense ...

Ok. The reason for having another PERSON to trust is to DEMAND CONSIDERATION then?

Where were you these past two years, Icbeonne Senama ? :-(

The PERSON I trust I TRUST to have control over the PERSON DAVID PAUL SIP so the state has none :D

Here and there Pete. I know I am my own master. I am still hung up on the procedure and or processes of using another NAME. And why I must conform in ANY way with IMAGINARY things...

Okay fuck...because a 3 dimensional man can't interact with the 2 dimensional PERSON. Why do you think the justice could not see or hear me the man?

If you intend on using the PERSON to your advantagve then you must protect that PERSON from those PERSONs that mean your PERSON harm.

Where the fuck is the MEGA PERSON? :D Thank you justice Tom McKeogh...through your actions, and your words too, YOU agreed that I AM not the LEGAL PERSON. You know not what you have done Tom :D

The MEGAPERSON would therefore have five dimensions am I correct in my thinking i.e. 3+2.

How can they prove their imaginary system is greater than me? Fuck their system. Use MY fucking system or fuck off.

My system only deals with crypto currencies

Too me this is sounding religious. My IMAGINARY FRIEND in YOUR IMAGINARY SYSTEM is better than THAT IMAGINARY FRIEND. PERSON anywhere = IMAGINARY yes or no?

Person = thing = piece of paper with name on it.

Prove it

Look in your pocket Icbeonne Senama for that piece of paper called a birth certificate which authorized the creation of a PERSON.

But you said a person IS a piece of paper. Do you still stand by that assertion? IF so show me. If not the question still stands.

I have a piece of paper that says David-Paul Sip is going to give me 1 000 000 BTC. Want to see it?

What's a birth certificate? Who Authorized it? What does it have to do with ME?

Someone sent me a birth certificate. There must have been a mistake. If you sent me this birth certificate by mistake, please identify yourself so that I may return it to you as soon as possible. I have no idea what to do with it. If you don't want it back can I sell it to someone who can use it?

Icbeonne Senama, there IS slavery. That is part of what the Admiral has helped some of us uncover. He is showing us how to get out of that situation, for it helps his agenda. The person is REAL, and it does not just dissapears, because you hide your head in the sand. Learn about it, and use the person system to your advantage.

You don't like your current person? Create another one, pull the old one out of commerce, and problem solved.

So I am a slave? How is the person Real. A piece of paper says so?

I have learned a lot here. I am now aware that because of stupid people I am being harmed and made to play a stupid imaginary fucking game. Thanks cunts.

You think the person does not bring concecuences to the man, even if it is in paper? Try to leave the administration unattended, and watch what happens! You are not the person, but things work on the presumpion that we are deemed the person. Now you know about accounting, and surety. If you do not know that, you could not fix a problem the proper way. And yes, everything runs on BELIEFS. There is no proof for anything. Just because some "law" says so.

But I did not put the old one in commerce. If I did it was a mistake and or because it was not fully disclosed to me that i was participating in fucking fraud. Take the fucking name and stick it up you fuckin poop shoot.

So its all as real as fucking jesus

It's an imposed system, using codified slavery.

We are brought into it, it is not our fault. But we have been given the keys to properly navegate that sea of crap.

Codified on paper. Are you suggesting THEY did not know they were committing fraud by sending me a piece of paper and telling me that it was me? So now we all know its fraud THEY started.

Do you want to use the vessel they sent to me? I don't understand how I can use it without being a party to the FRAUD.

You can become a "Sir Mika," damage the security, and roam with a guitar, in a crapy van with "freedumb" tags, until it gets stolen by police. Thats an option! :D

I accept many types of crypto currencies now.

So FRAUD or life in a crappy van? What a fucking joke.

I think I really understand why Scott really wants to kill people. Let's get 'er fuckin done!

No, the Admiral is showing us how to create new value using only cryptos as a medium of exchange. The slavery part is just hitting you. It makes you angry for a while, then you start thinking solutions.

The more I learn, the angrier I get. :p

Use/channel that the proper way. Aquire knowledge.

Heads on pikes is my solution. I will accept crypto for heads... :P

And yes, be very pissed. Pissed it's good!

http://m.youtube.com/?#/watch?v=WINDtlPXmmE