The Tender For Law

Volume 8

Oct 03, 2014 5:52 PM

Ok, I need some insight...LARRY received a notice of garnishment and a form to sign to garnish wages....it was returned with cause. The payroll lady said she phoned the court house and was instructed that she was to garnish the wages with this paperwork (the notice had a court clerks signature and the court stamp on it). This relates to the default judgement he lied to receive and the zero balance statement I have. The court file has been liened, a notice of mistake was sent, a request for a bill (again) was sent to the liar, is there anything that has been missed?

Read Comments

Gail Marie

The attachment to the notice, as I saw it was for consent to garnish? I spoke with the payroll lady and said it was a notice you received not an order, you require an order to do this. She just said she called the court and they told her she must do it. NOTHING is right with any of this. :/

David-Paul Sip

Where is the ORDER? The payroll lady should ask the court to put that in writing or provide an ORDER. I would advise the payroll lady that she could be held liable for being a party to fraud. A NOTICE is not an ORDER. And no LARRY does not CONSENT to GARNISH....since they seem to be asking for PERMISSION :D I smell a rat Capitaine Pete! I wonder what the Admiral would say about this?

Gail Marie

yes.I do Pete..I returned the notice "returned with cause" to the liar nothing was signed...the the original claim was voided and new originals were created...what appears to be happening in my limited experience is that he is pulling a fast one and the payroll lady likely didnt ask the right questions of the court

Gail Marie

Between the time the original "notice" was sent and today, I have sent a number of things to the court file notifying them that all has been sent tot he principal debtor. I think the purpose of the liar sending the notice to the company in the first place was to shame larry and hope that the payroll lady would fall for it. The payroll lady has fallen for it, I'm not clear when she spoke with the court clerk, so I'm not sure if the new filings were taken into account or not. Deception and omission is a tool this liar (officer of the court *cough*) has used in all his dealings to date

Gail Marie

Funny I had this passing thought...I wonder what would happen if the liar had a number of liens placed against him....how could he deal with so many at one time....he would have to spend alot of money and waste alot of time and not be able to earn his income from fraud....just curious, if someone in the US liened a canadian liar...how would someone like say a liar go about dealing with that?...anyway just a passing thought :P

David-Paul Sip

"I would advise the payroll lady that she could be held liable for being a party to fraud. A NOTICE is not an ORDER. And no LARRY does not CONSENT to GARNISH....since they seem to be asking for PERMISSION" Call that payroll lady Gail Marie and tell her this or better yet send her a NOTICE telling her this :D

John Gessas

opinion= a view or judgement formed about something ,not necessarily based on facts or knowledge! I know that justices have no knowledge and rarely rely on facts as they don't serve their agenda's. I have seen this many times first hand so my opinion is not only based on fact but it is steeped in it!

Sino General

Gail I may have mentioned this I may have not but ... have you failed your lien with you the Toronto Sun newspaper in the financial section ? Go have a look at how they do this and call them and have them place your notice of lien on the lawyer and firm and whoever else is part of your lien-? This gives public notice ... shud really ruffle some feathers :)