For Fuck Sake Laurent VH you should pack up your tent and go gracefully :-(

The government wont be long taking the kid off their hands, as they are the rightful owner. Birth Certificate is proof.

Are you saying that these kids are SURETY for their fucking persons ?? :-o

:/ No Leigh Collins! First the gubment does not deal in "kids", boys, or girls. Only children. Children is all that is LEGALly defined.

Second The Birth Certificate is proof that an ORGANIZATION was organized...authorizing the creation of a PERSON.

the most important for now is that she wants to sell the house, or that he buys her share back but he won't do that

they are not married

So move out and lien it. She will get hers when it does sell

Or before it can sell?

He has every right to see his child half the time, and whether he leaves said child with his mom or not, she also has a right to see the child half the time. Quit fighting over the kid. He isn't using the child as blackmail, your sister is too controlling over the situation. Fuck sakes, at least he WANTS to see his kid!

See...see what happens "when you stick your dick in crazy" :D

Nailed it! Beverly Berta Braakschmack...the mom doesn't OWN the child....the child has her own rights...including continuing a relationship with her dad (no matter how much the mom hates him).

i was only reporting what my sister said. I know he has the right to see his kid.

Ask her to think about that. They have a child and now she has about 18 years of him in her life. If she wants to sell, and he won't agree unless he gets the child every other week, just agree and make her life easier. You can't control everything.

thanks for the input.

....Pssst! THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A CERTIFICATION THAT A CROWN ORGANIZATION WAS ORGANIZED! ...pass it on!

"The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is NOT A PERSON, it's a FOUNDATION DOCUMENT that AUTHORIZES the CREATION OF A PERSON (Account)." Scott Duncan

So I have to give my daughter to him every other week even if he's not taking care of her?

Why not?

"give him MY daughter"?

She's his daughter as well...

Why do you stupid women fuck these losers and get knocked up in the first place?

Even in my WORST relationships, I have NEVER said ANYTHING bad about the ex. EVER. Ladies, you can save yourself a LOT of grief by NOT BREEDING WITH LOSERS!

What kind of people are you for judging me when you don't know the situation?

What kind of IDIOTS are you to spew that kind of information on the internet to a fucking strangers that lives 5000km from you ?

The kind that have SUCCESSFUL REWARDING relationships, where we don't have to publically acknowledge that our choice of mate was a lot on the loser side. We're the kind that remember that even if the relationship failed, there was something that brought us together and we CERTAINLY are the kind that would never bring a life into the world, with somebody we knew wasn't for the long-term. We're the kind who know more, think more, do more, and actually know what love is. ...Who are we to "judge"? BETTER THAN YOU. THAT'S WHY YOU CAME HERE!

I didn't do it! It was my brother. I didn't know that he will do something idiot like this.

Do you have 2 guns ?? :D

Lol...

That's right. I said that. I, Admiral Scott, do hereby declare here and now, THAT I AM BETTER THAN YOU. I DON'T BRING INNOCENT LIFE TO MAKE IT SUFFER MY IDIOCY/MISTAKES. Can YOU MAKE THAT CLAIM? I CHERISH THE TIME I SPEND WITH THOSE WHO DEEMED THEIR TIME WORTHY OF ME! I DO NOT SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT EXES. EVER. CAN YOU MAKE THAT CLAIM? I ACTUALLY READ WHAT I SIGN, AND DON'T SELL CHILDREN FOR COMMERCIAL INTERESTS, AND DECLARE THE CHILD IS OF "UNKNOWN PARENTAGE". CAN YOU MAKE THAT CLAIM? I DON'T CONSIDER CHILDREN "PROPERTY". You CAN'T make that claim, Ms. "MY DAUGHTER"... ...so if I present the offensive position, that I am BETTER than you... ...IT'S BECAUSE I'M BETTER THAN YOU! Any questions? :D

Fuck, are you ever rude, Scott :D

Christelle van Hal i posted this (well pete did) to try to help you. The answers i got here is pretty much what i expected. You have to settle with him out of the courts. once you go to court anything can happen.

Yes, out of courts, with a gun... :P

If you are seeking the perfect firearm, may I suggest you leverage your own talent! http://www.wired.com/2014/10/cody-wilson-ghost-gunner/

"I ACTUALLY READ WHAT I SIGN, AND DON'T SELL CHILDREN FOR COMMERCIAL INTERESTS, AND DECLARE THE CHILD IS OF "UNKNOWN PARENTAGE". Admiral Scott Is this referring to registering the birth with the state?

Yes. The STATEMENT declares that the child is of "UNKNOWN PARENTAGE". NONE OF YOU READ WHAT YOU ARE FUCKING SIGNING!

Ha! I have read this before, in the context of the mother giving birth to a bastard child, as I recall. My lady just gave birth to a baby girl and we have chosen to wait as long as possible before registering this EVENT.

Can I request an article on this topic Admiral Scott? Where would I find specific reference to "UNKNOWN PARENTAGE" and can this be corrected after the fact?

It's RIGHT ON THE FORMS YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO SIGN WITH THE DOCTOR.

Really eh? Hmmmm....well no forms signed as it was a home birth with midwives and all info pertaining to the birth only reference "Baby Girl Sip". Yes we had a name chosen but felt it was none of their fucking business :D

Read the forms!

Would that be the Infant Registration form?

I don't know. Once the disgusting thing claws its way out of your vagina, you and the doctor sign a form. Whatever that one is called.

My question (if anyone has answers) is how do you get your new baby medical care if they won't let him/her see a doctor without a birth certificate and MSP coverage?

I have a baby due any day, and I will not be signing anything that will lead to an organization being organized!

Come on guys, don't be so fucking greedy !!! :P

I don't like to share

What kind of medical care could a healthy baby need?

OK, here is what you do: 1) READ AND UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING. 2) TAKE A LESSON FROM ChiefRock Sino General! See the word UNKNOWN, change it to KNOWN (Red ink: Red LEGALLY means there is a ERROR and it needs CORRECTING) and YOU set the terms. THEN sign it. HOWEVER: In Ontario (and probably the whole country) they slip it in through DEFINITIONS, making redaction problematic. According to my experts, the DEFINITION of "PLACE OF BIRTH" is where they do the "unknown" thing, and that's in their DEFINITIONS. Good luck finding it. The BRITISH COMMONWEALTH has all of these forms standardized. Look in OTHER commonwealth jurisdictions for definitions. AND DON"T FORGET, YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE OPTION OF RESCINDING YOUR SIGNATURE UNDER THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE OF "MISTAKE". (Hence "Notice of Mistake") Courts will ONLY recognize MISTAKE and FRAUD as a remedy. Remember that. Nobody will question "Place of Birth", which is why they can "redefine" it in some obscure commonwealth tome. It's THEIR LANGUAGE. THEIR RULES, and YOU CAN NEVER understand what they write on their forms. It's just that you "believe" you know what the words mean on that form.

Term no.1 This baby is NOT surety for any public debts/charges The end :D

So by THEIR definitions does this mean they are internal and will not be defined in any Act/Statute/Legislation?

They ARE defined, but in OTHER parts of the commonwealth. It's all STANDARDIZED. It HAS to be. The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is the ONE UNIVERSAL DOCUMENT found EVERYWHERE the IMF touches.

All belief is evil. Don't believe anything. The paperwork for newborn babies in Manitoba is called a "statement of live birth" and I left the name blank and we left the hospital.

Well then I see two ways to approach this 1) Do not complete any forms before definitions for every word/term on that form is provided or 2) search the commonwealth for these definitions beginning with mother England. I prefer to have these fucktard public servants do all the work. I suspect it will be quite some time before I complete another form. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/concepts/definitions/birth-naissance-eng.htm

"It's just that you "believe" you know what the words mean on that form." Another reason why the majority is always wrong?

Ignorance.

The STATEMENT declares that the child is of "UNKNOWN PARENTAGE". I've been thinking about this comment from Admiral Scott and sifting and sorting through the Free-duuuumb bullshit I have previously seen trying to connect the dots. This comment seems to confirm that the birth registration abandons the child. I am wondering if it is TRUE that under ADMIRALTY/MARITIME SALVAGE Laws once the child is considered abandoned cargo that there is a limited amount of time (was it 7 years) to lay claim to the cargo? Or is this fucking remnants of some Free-duuuuumb bullshit that needs to be suctioned from my brain?

WHERE IS THE FUCKING SURETY ?