Volume 8

Ok, Again, ANY FUCKING SHIT YOU'LL THROW AT ME IN PRIVATE WILL BE POSTED IN THE TENDER FOR LAW GROUP...

What the fuck do I look like ? :(

A FUCKING LAWYER ?? :(

I AM USING THE SURETY OF THE PERSON TO DISCHARGE PUBLIC FUCKING CHARGES/DEBTS SENT TO THE PERSON.

Do I look like a fucking PSYCHOLOGIST ??

Are you fucking nuts or what ?? :/

_________________________________________________________

Laurent VH

hey pete, i think i will need your advise. It's for my sister. She has a daughter with a man, they have had relationship problems for over a year. they broke up ,because he slept with another girl, but are now back together. now this man is using the daughter for blackmail.

The only thing he's paying is half for the loan they did for the house, my sister has to pay for everything else, water, electricity, gas, food for 3 (her and her 2 kids.)

i don't have all the information i need yet, i'm waiting for her to send me the scans of everything. that might be relevant.

i'm going over there on friday to talk to my sister.

My question was if you could be able to help me and my sister. i'm willing to send you some doge for your time.

i'll let you know once i know more

can you keep this as private conversation for now. i'll talk to my sister if it's ok to post it on TTFL.

Laurent VH 09:45

ok i have some more info. what she wants is this: that the man she is with agrees to sell the house they bought together (or buyout her part of the house), and she wants custody of the girl they had together.

i'm meeting with my sister on friday

Pete Daoust 10:00

And in WHAT sense can I help in this ?

Laurent VH 10:00

i don't know i thought you might have some idea how i can help her

Pete Daoust 10:02

Does she have a gun ??

Laurent VH 10:02

no, but i have thoubght about that too lol

thought*

she just wants to sell the house but the guy she is with is being a dick

trying to blackmail her. he only agrees if he can have the daughter every other week

but he is never at home and the kid will be at his mum's house all the time

i just want to know if this thing goes in front of a judge, how i can turn it in favor of my sister

as i ,myself don't have kids i have no idea how to handle this

i'm going over there friday so she can tell me the full story of what happened

Good Morning Folks, At the risk of being shot full of holes, I am attaching a sample Affidavit for federal filing. Please review it, and send your thoughts, and/or bitches and/or rants.

...investigators were �not allowed� to communicate with police because of confidentiality rules...�I don�t agree with it. I think you should be able to provide the police with information and documents if necessary to assist,� he said. �We�re supposed to be protecting the little guy, and yet we�re really protecting the lawyer � It�s disheartening to see.�

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N65uFX6Kvpw

Ricki's got the idea... ;)

Fucking landlord just entered my residence without notice. This is a serious problem. I know he did not snoop around as it was a water emergency but for fuck sakes they have my phone number and know I do not tolerate violations to our agreement. I just informed him that as the beneficiary of a trust ( it pays the rent each month) I must report this incident to the trustee and I'm not sure if he will get a warning notice or an invoice for breach of trust. They are now in a panic, they brought me a litre of wine and begged that I not report them to the trust. Do I give up this sweet spot, not sure, I just moved here (I hate moving). do I send a shot across the bow with a warning notice and fee's in the event they breach the trust again. I am livid!

check this out.....parking ticket collections now go to the California Franchise Tax Board....or Mafia basically

this guy challenging jurisdiction.....judge walks out!!

What if someone in my family got her �PERSON� stolen and/or used FRAUDULENTLY? We found out it was going on only because a credit check (Equifax) was made, and that is 2 years ago so we can sign a lease. On the Equifax report, most of employment of her career were not on the record, instead unrelated one were written, we assumed they are the employments of the fraudulent user living on her "PERSON". On top of this, it seem like the fraud was ongoing, because some contracted loans were in good standing with the credits with the banks, to the exception of a few REALLY neglected loans. A mortgage was in good standing, a car loan too.

To this point, there is a big status-quot, no news from no one and no research made to know where the case is it. For many reason, one of which is the bank's investigation is �on its way� and there is no information given out. Secondly, because it�s a stressful topic it physically hard to bring the facts up without really sever anxiety striking and at this point, her health does not allow anymore stress.

I sometime suggest taking the bull by the horn to make sure there is no blow back in the future, if the banks try to identify her as PERSON on action she did not take.

I see its important to be sole ADMINISTRATOR of the PERSON and that requires BEING and ADMINISTRATOR in GOOD FAITH. The fraud started long time ago, when the she was a minor living at her parents and was ongoing since only recently (2 years ago). The bank has only once gave sign of the case moving forward, by calling and giving a court date for her to appear as a witness. Then the date was postponed and since than, no news at all, that was last September, 2013.

The lawful owner of the person has no access using her name to anything, buying property or anything at all. What do you guys think of all this?

Is there any significant action I can take has the HUSBAND of the woman that was stolen her PERSON. *Edited some Frenglish*

Scott's Legal/Courtroom Gold Nugget of the Month:

ALL LEGAL CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES, ARE PROHIBITIVE.

Read that carefully. When you understand that:

A LICENCE IS PERMISSION TO PERFORM AN ILLEGAL ACT. Therefore IN ORDER FOR SOMETHING TO BE LICENCED, IT MUST FIRST BE DECLARED ILLEGAL.

Discuss until you establish that these two things are FACT.

...GO!

The system is designed to hide any breach of trust, protect the servant, and ensure folks continue to be harmed.

�The police don�t work for and serve IBM or Walmart. They work for and serve the public,� said criminal lawyer Reid Rusonik. �How can we ensure they are using the power we entrust in them to jail us honestly if the processes of reporting, investigating and determining whether they have perjured themselves aren�t transparent?�

I have refused a water meter in my home and the town has shit my water off. How can they do this when there is no contract? I did send them a notice of no consent. In there order to comply they said they would terminate the water sept 4th. So when that didnt happen I thought maybe my letter had some merit. Then they show up Oct 1st.. Fucking pissed...

Ok, I need some insight...LARRY received a notice of garnishment and a form to sign to garnish wages....it was returned with cause. The payroll lady said she phoned the court house and was instructed that she was to garnish the wages with this paperwork (the notice had a court clerks signature and the court stamp on it). This relates to the default judgement he lied to receive and the zero balance statement I have. The court file has been liened, a notice of mistake was sent, a request for a bill (again) was sent to the liar, is there anything that has been missed?

Scott Duncan if I was going pursue an exparte order, the liar lives in Toronto, could I pursue it in Durham Region or would I have to take it to Toronto?

so they are not really lending you any thing they are providing you with promissory notes

8] Jowitt�s Dictionary of English Law (1959), vol. 1, p. 201, provides in part:

A bank note is a promissory note, made by a banker, payable on demand, and intended to be used as money.

See also Byles on Bills of Exchange, 22nd ed. (1965), pp. 389-90; 3 Hals., 3rd. ed., p. 240; Raphael et al. v. Governor & Co. of Bank of England (1855), 17 C.B. 161; The Queen v. Brown (1854), reflex, 8 N.B.R. 13 (C.A.); Re Toronto Beaches Election, 1943 CanLII 79 (ON SC), [1943] O.R. 787 at p. 792, [1944] 1 D.L.R. 204 at p. 209; Suffell v. Bank of England (1882), reflex, 9 Q.B.D. 555; Gillett v. Bank of England (1889), reflex, 6 T.L.R. 9.............................

This is now using the new "LaNi Black" algorythm. :D

Review of the game "Democracy 3"

OK, so one of these dumb-ass threads, I made the mistake of setting up a SKYPE call, where I had various group members in, asking questions, getting answers and yelled at. It was quite the success.

Since then people are messaging me asking if I RECORDED it. I laugh at their negligence, and presumption. :D

They then ask when the NEXT one is. It appears there might be a demand for this shit! So if you want to make it a weekly thing, I will do it.

All that's left is to choose the day. CHOOSE WISELY!

WE GET LETTERS:

Today we have a cowardly free-dumber making idiotic declarations, under a pseudonym!

He didn't give me a dollar. :(

think I#m going to order one of these.....................................

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUow1DhAubA

Happening in Quebec...

Just to make a short resume of my friend Denis's shit...

Denis use to run a business named Amusement 911 Inc, that business was specialized in repairing old pinball machine, and arcade games.

Denis had in stock ALL these obsolete parts to repair these machine, he had that business for 15 years, and had a pretty decent inventory.

In 2008, the building where Denis had his business went on fire, the whole building burnt down, and, of course, Amusement 911 Inc had NO insurance for that, so Denis went crazy a bit for a while, he�s been trying to collect the landlord insurance, he is still working on that case, anyhow, that event put Denis in a very bad position financially.

He tried very hard to keep up with business, but without his inventory, it was impossible.

So in 2011, he decided to start a complete different business, he started Camera 911 International, he registered that one, it�s not a INC, but a REGISTERED name. He supply cctv shit...which has nothing to do with pinball shit...

Revenue Quebec Agency keeps sending DEBTS to Amusement 911 Inc, since 2008, Denis told them, and supplied proof, that the business burnt completely, ALL the papers and everything, and he keeps telling them to fuck off�but of course, QRA invented a debt of 80k, and sent it to Amusement 911 Inc, Amusement 911 Inc is still alive because it might collect something from the lanlord�s insurance, Denis can�t close it for that matter�.

Anyway, the Baillif who takes care of that 80k, decided that Camera 911 International was Amusement 911 Inc, and he decided to come to Camera 911 International, to seize 80k of stock.

Camera 911 International and Amusement 911 Inc has 2 different addresses, and that tard showed up at Camera 911 Registered, to seize stuff in regards of Amusement 911 Inc.

When he showed up, Denis told him he was at the wrong address. The bailiff didn�t listen and wanted to enter the place anyway, Denis said NO, the bailiff called the cops.

When the cops arrived, Denis didn�t even had the time to pronounce one word, and he was arrested :D , so They brought Denis to the cop�s shop, to finally bring him back home, after 2 hours. (Denis yelled for 2 hours, WHERE IS THE SURETY) even though Denis has an arrest warrant on his person for one unpaid ticket (He used the surety of the person to discharge that ticket), he wanted to show them the proof that the debt was discharged, but they didn�t want to talk about it, they just wanted to get rid of Denis, for some reasons :/

In the mean time, that bailiff hired a locksmith, and entered Denis�s place to take an inventory, he then named Denis�s person as the GUARDIAN of the inventory, (without Denis�s authorization of course) and said he would come back in a month with buyers to sell this stuff�he came back, but the cops didn't want to ASSIST him this time, so he had to go back home, with his 20 buyers.... :D HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Of course when Denis got back home, I was there waiting for him :D

Today, after having followed the step by step method, that bailiff has a $5 million dollar lien to deal with, so as the cops, and so as the locksmith.

In a couple of days, this will be published in the newspaper, the baillif�s order will receive a copy of the lien, and he won�t be able to practice baillifery until he fix that shit�.

Denis asked twice for the cop's bond, and the baillif's bond, they refused to supply it....

The city of Mirabel is already investigating�. (Denis was really sharp with the Notice of Claim) He did explained WHY and pointed out everything....no one rebutted.

And the locksmith is going bananas�. :D

I wonder if some LAWYERS will get in the way !!! :D

Steps: 1). Notice of Claim. 2). Invoice. 3). Notice. 4). Default Notice. 5). Liens.

To be continued� :P

SGMI, my landscaping company, has been ordered to buy a public debt because one of its agents put a vehicle in a handicap parking space. We got their offer, but its a copy. How can SGMI buy a copy of a public debt?

Interesting

Judiciary branch: bought and paid for.... Wonder how? The "CAFR" perhaps? Why we never seem to get ahead of our personal and governmental debt.... It's ALL related..........

Shit, everybody will know that I AM NOT SURETY :(

PSSSST: "A PERSON IS ONLY A SURETY AND AN ORGANIZATION."

�The conduct and competence of judges is of enormous public interest,� Star lawyer Paul Schabas said. �The public has a right to know how the judicial council deals with complaints, especially when the complaint results in remedial action. The process must be transparent if the public is to have confidence in our judges, and in the judicial council.�

Apparently legislation has been drafted in Ireland that will require single mothers to name the father on the birth cert.

It's being sold as a good way for kids to know who their real father is etc...

Theres obviously an omitted agenda behind it. Any thoughts?

Are people authorised to divulge personal information other than their own? Or is it just more fraud?

Tonight I learned I am wasting my time.

Fuck all of you and your celebration of ignorance.

You've made your choice.

Further contact with me is now billable at the rate of $320 per hour with a minimum of 4 hours. Cash up front, or pay with your cunt.

I'm backing up facebook data, and leaving.

Copy what you can.

...Here it is.

This guy just sent a spam for HIS broadcast...even though he's "never heard of me".

https://www.facebook.com/jamiebopalot.barnes?fref=ts

Do you all know this guy?

http://itccs.org/2014/10/10/hell-never-get-out-of-here-common-law-activist-dean-clifford-adopted-as-international-prisoner-of-conscience-after-his-year-long-incarceration-without-charges-or-trial-in-a-canadi/

At 1:46, Keith says: MUCH LIKE YOU ARE AN ADMINISTRATOR OF THIS AH....THIS COURT.

Why ? ... :/ why not giving that guy the TRUSTEE role, and all the powers that comes with it ?

I woke up this morning as a Human Being, having the right to my person's surety, my person's integrity and my person's liberty.

So I get to be the SOLE authorized Administrator for this person that I have.

Because it's the LAW... :P

And I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT ANYONE'S "OPINION" about it...

(Source: Quebec Charter, article 1.)

The day Men and Women from Quebec will understand that, the party will be over, for those incompetent sack of shit PUBLIC TRUSTEES.

SOVEREIGN:

You keep seeing Free-Dumbers using the LEGAL term SOVEREIGN. I just had one of YOU idiots use the word too...

...and you don't know what the word means.

Under CONSTITUTIONAL SOCIALIST MONARCHY, a SOVEREIGN TAKES ORDERS.

ELIZABETH WINDSOR TAKES ORDERS from Parliament.

SOVEREIGNS TAKE ORDERS.

If you DON'T TAKE ORDERS then YOU AREN'T SOVEREIGN.

SOVEREIGNS TAKE ORDERS.

If you can conceive of morality without god, why can you not conceive of society without government? ~ Peter Saint-Andr�

We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. ~ Gene Roddenberry

Who wants to have their own crypto currency in here ?

:-D

. . . . CRUMBLING EDIFICE

LOOK AT ALL THE NEW WORDS

How the ONTARIO BAR ASSOCIATION wants members to generate income using child persons

EAMONN O BRIEN has received a summons regarding this... :/

Last I heard about it was in July when I sent the accepted letter which I authorised for process.... I had sent a notice of mistake in response to their first letter to which they acknowledged their receipt of...

They did not reply disputing that course of action at all but have now issued a summons regarding it...

Should I file a brief affidavit with copies of these with the court showing how I dealt with it along with another notice of mistake...?

�We have determined that there�s not a single piece of evidence that linked David McCallum or William Stuckey to the abduction of Nathan Blenner or his death...� McCallum had 30 fucking years stolen from him while Stuckey didn't survive.

I am helping a friend who is a contractor to get paid for the work he did at a clients house.

The guy he did work for was sent a NOTICE OF CLAIM which was notarized, and an invoice in addition to other paperwork. He did not respond as indicated/insructed and therefore I'm about to send him a NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE.

However, he has hired a lawyer and the lawyer sent a letter to my friend, even though the previous registered correspondence indicated he was to address . all correspondence to me via registered mail.

Therefore I will send the above to my friends client and this to the lawyer he retained.

Am I on track? Any suggestions and advice?

*************** . lMr. Useless Air Breather

I have been forwarded a letter you and Samford and Sons sent via unregistered mail to Bernard Carroll. You will find said letter attached to this correspondence and marked RETURNED WITH CAUSE � WRONG PARTY.

In good faith, I can only assume that Tom Kerekes failed to inform you, and Somerson and Sons, that Tom Kerekes has been previously informed that any and all correspondence pertaining to invoice # 123455, (delivered to Tom Kerekes, and, or his agents, and or, representatives, and, or persons acting on his behalf, via REGISTERED MAIL on August XX) is to be addressed exactly as follows:

Sole Authorized Administrator for: Harry Nosed Wombat AT: 123 Someplace Street AT: Buttfuck, Ontario Non Domestic - Outside Canada

Please address all further correspondence as instructed above and note that any and all correspondence pertaining to the private matter between Tom Kerekes and Bernard Carrol which is not addressed as indicated, will be deemed insufficient to address the matter.

Additionally, you are to take notice that while we are willing to recognize that you may have a contract with Tom Kerekes, you are hereby made aware, and, or, reminded that you and Somerson and Sons do not have a contract with Bernard Carroll, or me, and are therefore rightfully and correctly deemed to be third party interlopers, without standing in the private matter between Bernard Carroll and Tom Kerekes. However, despite the above, please also be advised that should you, and Somersons and Sons, wish to become a party in the above referenced matter, you are certainly invited to state your willingness to do so at your earliest convenience as we sincerely welcome any and all opportunities to add additional parties.

For your consideration, and as a courtesy, you are hereby also notified that we do charge for our time. As this is a PRIVATE matter, to which you and Samford and Sons are not a party to, failing a written and signed affirmation clearly and unequivocally expressing your, and Samford and Sons, wish to contract with Bernard Carroll, and, or, myself, and, to become a party in the matter referenced above, written under the letterhead of Samford and Sons; you are hereby notified that any and all correspondence and, or communications, sent to, and, or directed at Bernard Carroll, and, or me, will indicate your, and Samford and Sons will, determination, and acceptance to contract with me, and, or Bernard Carroll and to be billed at the following rates:

Receipt of, and, or, response to a letter or any communication initiated by you, and, or Samford and Sons: $5,000.00 CDN Receipt of a Telephone Call: $5,000.00 CDN Phone Message to Bernard Carroll or me: $5,000.00 CDN Receipt of a court action initiated by Tom Kerekes, and or you and, or, Samford and Sons: $25,000.00 CDN

I look forward to doing business with you and Samford and Sons should you and Samford and Sons continue to be so inclined.

Sincerely,

Sole Authorized Administrator for: Harry Nosed Wombat WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

If a trusted person places a lien on a court file/account, is there anything the trusted person needs to do if there are proceeds received into the liened account?

Francisco Dami�n Folch Torres, do you "believe" "Jesus-made-up-by-the-nobility-Christ" is your "Lord and saviour"? Do you actually BELIEVE the "bible" is from "god"? :/

WWEEEE !!!!!!!!! :D

A 'Bey'....

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/sovereign-citizen-gets-7-years-for-targeting-judges-prosecutors-with-bogus-100b-liens/comments/#disqus

Skype Conference 2014-10-17.

Resume in this thread, with not more than 15 words, what you've TOOK from that conference call :)

The problem is trust. do we trust those we elected and does that extend to their appointees? do we trust ourselves in our selections? did we even "elect" anyone in the first place? i ask these of myself as another "apparent" crisis is afoot. Are y'all all Ebola out? So many viewpoints and speculation out there but we each have to dig, research, query.... or not.... in order to determine for oneself. But here's another perspective..... though there are many links, I came across some included below that got me thinking about the ever present proverb: Follow the money trail. Fabrication of a crisis is one way to "legally" invade another country's borders to make them do your bidding. Legalizing bullying invasive tactics, theft and murder one might say. Synopsis: 1) Nigerian oil preserves, 2) Nigerian oil preserves 3) In Sierra Leon the miners there are on strike to protest life-threatening working conditions. The diamonds must flow again somehow! BTW, diamonds are actually worthless because there are lots and lots of them worldwide. In order to inflate their pricing, they are sold to only a select one or few to make them appear "rare" gems. Supply and demand 101 baby, 4) Who owns the patent to the Ebola virus and subsequent money-making vaccines? The CDC, NIH and the Gov't all stand to gain monetarily. BTW, these agencies have Dun & Bradstreet #s, which mean they are private for profit corporations. The last time I checked, corporations are for making lots of profit, not to save lives. 4) No matter how much we wish it not so, there are evil doings going on behind our backs and in front of our eyes. These are people who are very good at lies, manipulations and control.... But instead of using their intelligence for creative life-affirming solutions for all, they are bent on creating destructive Agenda of mass control and ultimately mas genocide of human beings that they themselves as greedy, ignorant and destructive. Funny how they don't carry a two-way mirror..... The Georgia Stone was put in place as a glorious reminder for them to work hard to accomplish that agenda..... http://www.theeventchronicle.com/.../ghana-ebola-real.../ AND http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyU7OJOHlcI AND http://www.theeventchronicle.com/.../cdc-owns-patent.../

This can`t be good ......................

WHERE IS THE SURETY ? :P

Denis is still waiting for them to come back with the surety :D

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Satoshi Nakamoto is a "CHICK" :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :D

Just got banned from Dean Cliffords page...

Silver: $19.50 an ounce! Divest away people! If you have any spare useless paper lying around, turn it into something half useful!! https://silvergoldbull.com/silver?utm_source=GAW_SE_NWCAN_WKD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=silver_sales_phm&c1=GAW_SE_NW&source=CAN_WKD&cr2=Search__-__NW__-__Canada__-__Weekend_Silver__-__Sale__-__PHM&kw=silver_sales_phm&cr5=14851724816&cr7=c#silver;;;price;asc

Silver Gold Bull - Silver Bullion Coins, Rounds, Wafers and Bars, buy silver eagles, best place... Silver Gold Bull provides Silver Bullion Coins, Rounds, Wafers and Bars, buy silver eagles, best place to buy silver. SILVERGOLDBULL.COM LikeLike � � Share 4 people like this.

Jessie-Neil The-Man cant eat silver either 38 mins � Like

Rich Wolf Bitcoin has more upside as a speculation and a currency....much easier to cross borders with too...gold and silver are fine stores of value, but inferior currencies to bitcoin...bitcoin is the future.... 33 mins � Unlike � 1

Jessie-Neil The-Man bitcoin is useless when the power goes out.. plus you cant eat bitcoin either, nor burn it for fuel or heat. 32 mins � Like

Jessie-Neil The-Man but I see the point in the short term to stop using gubbermint currency. 31 mins � Like

Dean Clifford All I'm saying is, silver is dirt cheap right meow..its going to likely triple, the price cannot be manipulated forever, quick easy way to make money, and not a huge investment, the average joe can put a few bucks into it here and there, see what happens. 22 mins � Like � 3

Rich Wolf U can't send food or firewood across the world, instantly for free, so its useless lol....ur words are useless bro... 17 mins � Like � 2

Jessie-Neil The-Man I don't plan on travelling across the world.. 15 mins � Like

Rich Wolf Short the japanese yen, go long on gold, silver and bitcoin....and as these economies collapse you will actually profit from it... 10 mins � Like

Dave Orzech I have a whole bunch at $32/oz shouldn't have believed the hype about $50 silver thats for sure. 6 mins � Like

Chris Evan The stupid on this page hurts....it really does. 2 mins � Like

Dave Orzech troll ^ 1 min � Like � 1

Rob Phillips It has been $50/oz in the past which means it will surpass that figure in the future as they continue to print. 1 min � Like

Chris Evan First of all, the intent is greed. Second, why would you advocate an archaic storage of value? Third, you clearly can't see the difference between a medium for exchange and a storage of value.... Just now � Like

Chris Evan Dave, that seems like a very easy way to not have to use you brain....ad hominem. Just now � Like

Rob Phillips Short of a complete global cashless system being implemented, I expect silver to do very well. I will still be buying the next time it hits $50. Just now � Like

Chris Evan I am not a troll, I was actually at the seminar in which Dean was kidnapped at. I am simply trying to inject a little bit of reason into this page.... Just now � Like

The Tender for Law that money provides...

What does it mean?

Well, we know that this is the place to "Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected." We know that Scott has said on numerous times that he pays his bills because of this tender.

Another dead soldier...interesting to see officers running without cover down the middle of the hallway with live gunfire sounding

Here's something I'll bet you retards didn't know:

Wikipedia has a special "Retard's Edition" JUST for simpletons like you! Yes, it's true! There's a wikipedia with no big words! :D

Can't get a straight answer from the US Postmaster, so I'm passing along the question to y'all. Are postal money orders backed by fiat or not? There seems to be no connection with the Federal Reserve here.

Finally recieved the written notice of no bill. Notice of mistake the Champ Still undefeated.

Admiral Scott Duncan, US and Canada have common law, and the law of estates. You have spoken about TRUST, and the mechanics of operating in that realm, in that jurisdiction.

In CIVIL LAW jurisdictions, there seems to be something different with the mechanics of TRUST. Or maybe I am wrong? I cannot put my finger to it. :/

I have been researching information about TRUST here, but everyone wants to send me to a lawyer.

What is different here, Admiral?

Some stuff I need to read, and re-read :/

THE TENDER FOR LAW: AGENCY (ARTIFICIAL PERSONS) FOR IDIOTS [ DRAFT! ] (c) 2014 ROGUESUPPORT INC. 15 juillet 2014, � 02:11 THE TENDER FOR LAW: AGENCY (ARTIFICIAL PERSONS) FOR IDIOTS (c) 2014 ROGUESUPPORT INC. under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION. It's the ultimate artificial person. To understand what this means you should refer to my earlier articles. The Criminal Code of Canada states, inter alia [Source R.S., c. C-34, s. 2 "INTERPRETATION"]: �every one�, �person� and �owner� � quiconque �, � individu �, � personne � et � propri�taire � �every one�, �person� and [Ed. NOT 'or', it's 'and'.] �owner�, and similar expressions, INCLUDE [Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius] HER MAJESTY AND [Ed. NOT 'or', it's 'and', AGAIN!] AN ORGANIZATION; Before we cover HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION it is vital to remember why ARTIFICIAL PERSONS exist in the first place. The sole purpose of a PERSON is to act as a LEGAL AGENT. Remember that for later, it will become important as all PERSONS recognized LEGALLY are by their very nature AGENTS. In THE TENDER FOR LAW, we often define LEGAL as "it's all accounting and surety". Accountants set PUBLIC POLICY, and that policy determines which AGENCY pays. There are no PERSONS involved, only AGENCY. If you are acting as an employee for WALMART or an employee for the FBI, you are in fact an AGENT, not a PERSON. This would mean that WALMART or the FBI would be the SURETY for that AGENCY. This would mean WALMART and the FBI are SURETY for their AGENTS. My article on SURETY has already been published and if you haven't read it you probably should do that now - instead of reading this. Many of you are learning the hard way that the LEGAL MATRIX acts on PRESUMPTION. This is why your full name, address and date of birth are requested in all interactions with the government. You, the "NATURAL PERSON" along with an ORGANIZATION (the ATTORNEY GENERAL/government), form AGENCY. When you IDENTIFY yourself in this fashion you are accepting JOINDER, and henceforth you are HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION, just as an employee for the FBI IS the FBI. That is what AGENCY is. FBI agents tend to IDENTIFY themselves as "Special Agents". (I assume they make this declaration for the same reasons the Special Olympics do; it's like the regular Olympics...only they're retards. On that note, if an FBI agent ever calls you a "Conspiracy Theorist", remind them that coming from the people who brought us ABSCAM, that's pretty ironic. Look up ABSCAM - you'll get the joke). I've really tried to "dumb down" AGENCY as much as I could. An AGENT is a slave that represents the MASTER. The master is always SURETY. When you accept JOINDER by IDENTIFYING yourself with your first name, last name, address, and date of birth, you become HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION. You are now SURETY, and you must follow the rules of the organization. Otherwise, you have committed an OFFENCE. Many of you are "offended" by what I say, especially piece-of-shit Christians (see what I did there?). When they cry about how offended they are, they seem to think that this "offence" give them some higher "victim" status. Here in reality the declaration, "I'm offended!" is simply whining. Now let's shift over to a different JURISDICTION. If you are on an AQUILAE vessel, and I'm "offended", that could be fatal. It's a different JURISDICTION, and as of this writing I am the highest authority in that jurisdiction. This means if I'm offended, you're likely going overboard. You already consented to those rules when you found yourself on board one of my vessels. If you're dragged onto one of my vessels against your will, you're definitely going to die anyway, and if you're given any hope of survival it's very likely someone's just fucking with you. ;) Try not to miss the point here! If "offence" is legislated, and you identify yourself as HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION, being an AGENT thereof, you are subject to all the rules. Look at the Criminal Code. Notice it doesn't say the "Criminal Law". It says CODE. You will see that it refers to "A general collection of laws". When someone refers to a "secret code" they are referring to a "secret collection of laws". Codes usually refer to specific subject matter such as Criminal Code, Code of Ethics, Probate Code, Penal Code. These things all apply to HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION. In the UNITED STATES you are acting as AGENT for the current TRUSTEE. At this writing it's "Homeland Security". If you look at a passport stamp from the United States, you will notice that the stamp says, "Homeland Security", and not "UNITED STATES". The TRUSTEE has AUTHORITY to grant or refuse entry into the JURISDCTION, while that JURISDICTION is in RECEIVERSHIP. Since the UNITED STATES is running trillion dollar deficits, with absolutely no consequence, you very quickly realize that the UNITED STATES is in receivership (and has been since 1933). Within a generation, the United States went from "Republic" to "Nation of Trustees" - and nobody noticed. Research Woodrow Wilson and "The New Deal" with the knowledge you've gained from THE TENDER FOR LAW, and you will see the crime that has been visited upon you. I fear with the apathy and ignorance of Commonwealth Subjects, the same fate soon awaits us in CANADA. UNITED STATES citizens have failed to notice that their country no longer produces anything except POLICY; policy set by accountants. These particular accountants are not working in your interest. They don't care about PERSONS, they don't care about individuals. They care about balancing the books, accounts and agency; in that order. Now let's cover your "ARTIFICIAL PERSON". In earlier articles we covered the fact that your birth certificate is a security. It is also a bond, which affords you certain RIGHTS and PRIVILEGES. Chief amoungst those is your right to ACT as AGENT for HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION. While we're on the subject of the birth certificate, a very disturbing trend is happening, and no one is noticing. Until recently all birth certificates had TWO SIGNATURES on them. This afforded you the AUTHORITY to sign as AGENT. Three signatures = BINDING LEGAL TRUST. Now I'm seeing examples of birth certificates that have only ONE SIGNATURE, so I sent my blood hounds after some answers, and what they returned was very interesting. Somewhere on these new pseudo-certificates with one signature, there is universally a DECLARATION, usually at the bottom. It DECLARES that it is a "FOUNDATION DOCUMENT". It really is that simple. Use of the birth certificate is acceptance of that fact, just as use of a $10 bill is acceptance of a TENDER FOR LAW. In this case the law in question is SURETY AND ACCOUNTING, and all the "codes" attached. Now that we have a basic understanding of an "artificial person", and we have established the global truths about all artificial persons, we can cover specific artificial persons. In order to "act" LEGALLY, an artificial person is created. When you are issued a traffic ticket, you do not write your name down, an AGENT does. That agent, in this case a "Policy Enforcer" is TESTIFYING as to how you identified yourself. The identification you provide happens to contain your full name, address and date of birth. The only way you could have obtained this licence is either through a birth certificate, citizenship card, or valid passport. All three of these are revenue streams to Policy Enforcers. I'm hesitant to publish anything regarding "driving" vs. "travelling", because I don't want to give the FREE-DUMBERS ammunition. If you want to travel without a licence, use public or commercial transport, a livery service, or a horse and buggy. All three options require that somebody pays insurance - the third option is something you must pay. Paying an insurance POLICY is paying an artificial person to accept SURETY under certain conditions (codes). Here's where the FREE-DUMBER argument falls down regarding travel and property. You will hear these arguments from one of two sources. The first being natives and/or "aboriginals"; when they explain the law regarding travel and property, they are telling the truth. They have LEGAL STANDING to make this declaration, because it says so in countless TREATIES. When Robert Menard and Dean Clifford make this CLAIM they are simply lying through ommission; because if you are one of the invaders, which you are if you're not native, you benefit from ongoing commercial warfare. Like it or not, if you are going to share the road with your fellow humans, the issue of SURETY is going to come up, especially if there's an accident. A deadbeat like Robert Menard is never going to be able to support the needs and medical bills of someone he may have crippled while drunk driving one night. Here in reality his "100% responsible declaration" is bullshit by any LEGAL standard, and no-fault insurance only applies when both parties are insured. Even a horse and buggy needs a bare minimum of $1,000,000 liability insurance. I know this because I was once the owner of a horse, and a buggy. If you haven't read "Insurance for the Inept" (appointed by Gail Blackman), you should stop and read it now. Since 1982 I have run a private navy. The trust that holds that navy, also has its own currency. In 2010, the AQUILAE cryptic currency was commissioned, and the need for FIAT currency disappeared, except as regards insurance. When you accept that the term "LEGAL" is all SURETY and ACCOUNTING, you quickly realize that everything LEGAL has a monetary value. There are no exceptions to this rule. Let me repeat that so your empty head will absorb it. All things legal have a monetary value attached, including SURETY. The FREE-DUMBER says he can drive without a licence, and he is telling the truth. The lie of ommision is that you cannot get insurance without a driver's licence. In Common Law Jurisdictions LEGAL ACTS and STATUTES do not acknowlege your RIGHT to property; whereas in Civil Law Jurisdiction, the RIGHT to property is absolute. The LEGAL consequences of Robert Menard getting drunk and injuring somebody whilst "travelling with his property" will not be accepted by any other party; and the "wake up and be a FREE-DUMBER" line doesn't really work when it comes to medical expenses and basic needs. Some highways are semi-private, and if a FREE-DUMBER drives down those they can expect to have a SWAT team arrest them and seize their "property". This has happened on the 407 ETR more than once. Like everything else in LAW, FREE-DUMBERS lie through ommission. It is very easy to produce case law showing the courts acknowledge that use of the roads is in fact, a RIGHT, not a privilege. There are even high-risk insurance companies that will insure a vehicle without a driver's licence, but the premiums will be $30,000 a year. Back to "ARTIFICIAL PERSONS". In my first article regarding PERSONS, we covered the fact that NATURAL PERSON = "Picking up the Tab". Accepting and/or identifying yourself as an "INDIVIDUAL" means you are deemed to be a NATURAL PERSON. If you identify yourself as an INDIVIDUAL you are ACCEPTING SURETY by default. Since you're picking up the tab, the government AGENT, attempting to impose commerce on you, will of course order the most expensive items on the menu. The courts recognize the government as a PRIVATE PERSON. If you are in court against your will you might find it useful to demand proof that the government has STANDING as a PRIVATE PERSON. This also applies in the UNITED STATES. If the court refuses to provide proof, INFORM the court that you intend to offer as PROOF FOR APPEAL an objection to this presumption of "PERSONHOOD" that the court has arbitrarily granted the government, and a demand for $1,000,000 SECURITY FOR COSTS. In Western Society, SECURITY FOR COSTS is a well-documented RIGHT. You are basically demanding insurance. Since it was offered as PROOF FOR APPEAL, and presuming the Appelate Court is following the rules, it virtually guarantees the case will be thrown out on appeal, for exactly the same reasons the government seizes Dean Clifford's property; if it interacts with, and affects others, and it is not insured, it is the government's mandate to remove it from the PUBLIC domain. If there was nobody on the road except you, it would be ok to drive without insurance. But there is...so it isn't. I too can travel the highways without a licence or insurance, because it turns out there are lots and lots of people who will happily drive you anywhere you want to go in exchange for worthless FIAT currency. Some of them are even good at it. One of my captains used to make a "hobby" out of collecting drivers's licences, and had the bragging rights of claiming he's one of the few people in ONTARIO that has an AZBM licence. This means if it travels on the road, no matter what it is, he can LEGALLY drive it. The "B" designation is apparently the hardest, because it required learning to drive a school bus. Apparently the test is rigid but he "aced it" because in reality he was just driving a big yellow truck designed to carry children without seat belts. From a transport perspective children really aren't that heavy a payload. ...I digress. When the courts were still following the rules, I always got a big kick out of the fact that you can sell SURETY ahead of time; and the government is compelled to buy it. If a JUSTICE grants SECURITY FOR COSTS the ATTORNEY GENERAL had better have the budget to cover it, or the case does not move forward. One PARTY is attempting to affect another, without insurance, just like when a FREE-DUMBER drives without insurance. Many of you still cannot grasp cryptographic currency from a practical standpoint, yet none of you seem to have any trouble grasping the concept of CANADIAN TIRE money. CANADIAN TIRE money is issued as coupons that ACT as an internal currency. In many accounting circles this is often referred to as "brown currency", as it is always circulating internally. Think of the concept of cryptographic currency as you would your own CORPORATION'S version of CANADIAN TIRE money. Large purchases can be made with CANADIAN TIRE money, but it cannot be exchanged for cash. However, you are free to exchange CANADIAN TIRE money for any purchase you agree to. Bars, during charity events, often accept CANADIAN TIRE money at par. This has the benefit of not being taxable, allowing the business to write-off the consumables as a CAPTIAL LOSS and/or INVESTED CAPITAL depending on the product and/or service being purchased. Keeping this in mind will remove any confusion you may have regarding creating your own bank/currency. If you have accepted THE TENDER FOR LAW which FIAT currency provides, you will accept that the LEGAL MATRIX will deem it fact that the FIAT currency in question is good for "all debts public and private". This is another "lie of ommission" that Robert Menard attempted to pipe out in his latest video about me. If you do not accept the currency in the creation of a debt, then that law doesn't really apply. I will do absolutely nothing in commerce, especially for government, in exchange for FIAT currency. I simply do not accept the creation of that debt and/or contract as I have as a matter of PUBIC RECORD RESIGNED from government service. The INDIVIDUAL and all its titles are LEGALLY CLAIMED under the AQUILAE TRUST. This means that if the government wishes to impose commerce on me, they must pay that debt first. They can pay me in LEGAL TENDER, but that's a quarter of a billion dollars; and if I'm given a quarter of a billion dollars worth of economic power over night, 100% of that worthless currency will be used to collapse the banking system and start a war. Let that serve as a warning to anyone who happens to be seriously considering giving us large amounts of money. I will work like a slave for any contract that pays me in AQUILAE currency. AQUILAE currency is valuable money, and the TENDER FOR LAW attached to it, is whatever I say it is. Why? Because "fuck off that's why"...it's MY currency! If you don't like it, go shop somewhere else. Besides, the FREE-DUMBERS say I'm mean. In their heads, "nice but inept" is far better than the truth. Apparently truth = mean. As actual legal knowledge starts bleeding out from THE TENDER FOR LAW, and the people from the "first wave" are starting to teach others, the revenue streams of the FREE-DUMBER gurus are in serious jeopardy. Robert Menard and his now notorious "Scott Duncan is wrong" Youtube Video, shows the desperation, because now the victims of the FREE-DUMBERS don't have to suck-up the FREE-DUMB excuses like, "You just payed for my time", and other bullshit platitudes to deflect SURETY. Now they have a weapon that hurts. That weapon is the declaration "Scott was right again". That will cause the victims to come seeking real answers from a MEGA-PERSON...and that's the last kind of PERSON we're going to discuss. Menard can lie about what words mean, and beg for FIAT, while those that listen and understand what I'm desperately trying to hammer into your stultified brains, will the first of the pioneers. The Pioneers PROFIT, and the NEW economy will be YOURS TO COMMAND, but if you fuck it up, you will destroy yourself, just like Menard, only with less alcohol. :D We'll call it a pseudo-LEGAL term to make the courts happy; and over the next year it's going to make the courts beg for the "good old days" of the FREE-DUMBERS. MEGA-PERSON will be the only real PARTY in Open-Source government. As you read this now, this sounds as incredible as making your own currency and bank, and learning to administer your affairs so you profit. The base framework has been layed out over the past 18 months. Some of you have casually studied, some of you were compelled to study through external forces, and a precious few of you dedicated every last free minute of time to study. Those precious few of you who fall into that category are the first to scratch their heads when people describe me as "mean". You can call any of the AQUILAE officers or crew 24-hours a day, and all of them are mandated to have the utmost patience and to stay on the phone as long as they're needed - and that's just the "overflow" policy. I personally handle the bulk of the calls. It's those precious few people that actually keep me going. When you understand what a PERSON is LEGALLY, and you UNDERSTAND what SURETY is, and who has it, all your concerns about money should just vanish. It is July 2014. It is my least profitable year ever. It has pushed the entire navy and every officer into personal debt, but we maintain the course because we know we have the answer to everything. We have computer science. Computer Science is going to replace government. Observe the wild ride of BITCOIN over the long term and you can observe computer science affecting reality. The block chain always maintains its regulated growth. Banks have tried collective pump-and-dump scams; and it immediately returned to its original growth value. When you look at BITCOIN over its entire existence, the "unstable" nature of cryptographic currencies becomes a lot less clear. There is a measurable straight line. It's math; and 2 + 2 always equals 4. It doesn't matter what you believe. Over the next few weeks I will be introducing the component parts of the "MEGA-PERSON". This LEGAL monster will be yours to control. It's intent is hostile, and its purpose is to destroy millions of dollars in minutes (if it has to). This will implement governmental change. A MEGA-PERSON will have the economic power to destroy currency, because I intend to port government and law into the realm of computer science, just as currency already has. A "dress rehersal" is playing out today. Two competing currencies - one is debt and joinder, sold as "value", the other is value with no debt attached, and temporarily no TENDER FOR LAW either. Etherium is going to change that. Etherium is THE TENDER FOR LAW attached to a cryptographic currency; and you have an unambiguous way to write the law. It then becomes evolution through natural selection. If you write "bad law" you have "bad currency", and the market will automatically reflect that. This will plant the first seeds of "Open Source Government". Policy Enforcers will be tasked with the integrity of POLICIES and the rules set out in real time by the people. You can repurpose these dumb thugs to follow orders enforcing laws that are generated in real time, and the dumb thug in question will be able to verify its authenticity instantly, and to deflect all SURETY for his actions. The law is written for Etherium, and once implemented, becomes verifiable at each step in any transaction. The fact the currency is being exchanged means there are two agreeable PARTIES with the computerized government/bank as the TRUSTEE. We will then make the system compatible with all cultures. You could write Sharia law into an Etherium contract, and computer science will determine if it's compliant. Mullas will absolutely love that they can produce mathematical proof that his "flock" are "good Muslims". Open Source law has to work for everyone; even those whose cultures and ideologies I personally loathe. Otherwise it's just more tyranny deployed from someone of noble birth. If you think things are getting "hairy" with competing currencies, wait until a herd of MEGA-PERSONS form a competing government. All of this has already started. Think of me as the anti-Christ of all PERSONS. Little niche services are already paying participants for their contribution. Name Coin is a good example. This is a robustly trading currency that pays you for providing DNS services. Each query that hits your contributing piece of hardware, whether it's your phone, your iPAD or your desktop computer, will pay you in Name Coin. The payment comes with the query. The transaction is instantaneous, meaning your phone or your computer pays you for essentially being "turned on". As connectivity becomes more and more standardized, off-the-shelf phones, tablets, laptops and computers can suddenly be a device that pays you instead of costing you. Staying in the realm of cryptographic currencies, a lot of money can be made by running a currency exchange. To avoid legal entanglements it is vital that no cryptographic currency that passes into your PERSON's custody ever be converted to FIAT currency. Accepting the currency is accepting the terms. The terms are "LEGAL", and it has been "TENDERed" with PROPER NOTICE. The JURISDICTION therefore is "LEGAL"; and ACCEPTING this currency ACCEPTS THE TENDER FOR LAW attached. Yes that even applies to MEGA-PERSON; and as we construct MEGA-PERSON you will learn why that LEGAL BINDING alone turns MEGA-PERSON into a dreadful LEGAL weapon. So let this article serve as PROPER NOTICE that we are constructing MEGA-PERSON; since its mandate is by its very nature hostile and destructive to any and all PERSONS, PRIVATE and/or PUBLIC, who participate in FRAUD OF ANY KIND. This includes banks and government. If the government can make slave PERSONS, so can you. I'm building an Empire of Math, and I don't care if you CONSENT, because reality doesn't care either. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. Those are your RIGHTS under Open Source Government until it's deployed. The law will quite literally be written by the people. The Common Law will be integrated as much as possible, but more importantly the first wave will only exist to make it easy for the second wave. Just like in THE TENDER FOR LAW, only on a global scale. At the moment it sounds ridiculous, but I remind you that two years ago all of you thought that having your own bank/currency was ridiculous too. I know many of you have actually been affected by my writing/teachings at a very (dare I say?) PERSONAL level. And to those who feel that way, know that you are the "first wave". You will teach those that follow. This is a time of war, hence my Churchill-like demeanor, but notice Churchill was immediately booted from office once the war was over. The same fate awaits me. The power I'm building for everyone cannot be in my control after all of us have won. As my beloved Tara has publicly announced that she seeks world domination, one of the first mandates of Open Source Government is to make sure that woman NEVER has control. Just trust me on this people - of the two of us, I'M the NICE one. Anyway...over the next year, we shall be putting these pieces together. We are all going to draft law in controlled environments (for this we will use Etherium Alpha). We are going to leverage open standards for profit (like binding a Facebook account to its own currency), and we are going to put all these pieces together into something you can immediately use for your own personal gain and profit. This entire process is designed to excessively reward the "pioneers". This is a double-edged sword. If you attempt to profit off of others, with no consideration (like current banks/government), the market automatically crashes your currency. Core laws and principles will be determined through universal consensus. Assembling legal contracts will become as simple as assembling Lego blocks, with the contracts and/or undertakings being as simple, or as complex, as the parties agree upon. I end this article with a thought that I wish you to ponder. If all PERSONS have a monetary value attached to them, along with undertakings to various degrees, and like myself you have liened the LEGAL PERSON as PROOF of RESIGNATION from Government Service, and you have affixed a monetary value to that name, and it is now a fact under LAW until you (the Supreme Authority) say otherwise, you can take that value and LEGALLY UNDERWRITE (insure) your own PERSONAL currency. ...and that's coming up this year. I'm going to teach you what the FREE-DUMBERS couldn't...how to monetize your PERSON. As with everything else I teach, I do not charge money. Ever! All you have to do is (NOTE: I'm only writing this to make the FREE-DUMBERS sqwak and cackle), SHUT THE FUCK UP AND DO WHAT YOU'RE TOLD. NOTE: You really DO HAVE TO SHUT THE FUCK UP AND DO WHAT YOU'RE TOLD! The price of admission is the acknowledgement and acceptance that all of my AXIOMS are TRUE, and the very first AXIOM is YOU THINK WRONG AND VALUE THE WRONG THINGS. Over the past 18 months I've shown you why that's true, and how it came to be. Now we're going to do something about it. When I'm done everyone will think right, and will value the right things, and if they don't a computer will make them. Imagine making law that says you specifically must be left alone, and your government enforces it. Imagine if everybody thinks right, and values the right things. Natural Law will become written law, all on an exponential curve to evolve our species. To evolve our societies, and above all, to evolve each and every PERSON.

-Scott Duncan

Discussion on the legal ramifications and wording of future blockchain Identities/documents, Passport/Citizenship

They figured the Hostages were in on it.... Kill'em ALL,SAVE THE MONEY!! ......................https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=346386598819715

Hey Scott, I have a question, but let me think about it for a few hours, ok ?

:D

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/160-old-bank-crashes-warning-142700380.html

I am in! I am already enrolled, and reading! :D

Ok, I often read "the surety OF the person". That would mean that the person HAS a surety.

But I re-read Scott's article tonight "Persons for idiots" and toward the end it reads:

"The person IS, in reality, a security."

So which is it and why? :)

If the person IS surety it can't HAVE it at the same time? :/

Immediately thought about the TTFL when I read this. So many quotes to choose from, I thought this snippet was funny "...the COUNTRY as a whole was a victim of his crimes". Which snippit had you laughing with everything the Admiral has taught in the TTFL?

Just called a CPA who had never heard of Bills of Exchange or Lawful Money, and didn't know the proper accounting for Trust Holding Companies...but he sounded like an expert in taking my money and giving it to the IRS

�Smart Meters� and most digital utility meters meet the legal definition of unlawful surveillance devices and they are designed and intended to record events and activities within private structures and properties which constitutes violation of Canadian Law including the following examples: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 8 �Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.� Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 7 �Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.�

Canadian Criminal Code INTERCEPTION 184 [1] Every one who, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, wilfully intercepts a private communication is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.

. . . . Between the ever larger population overbearing on the earth's resources and "elite" restricting the flow of resources to the "lower classes", I can foresee a collapse of the social system presently intact in North America.

I'm attempting to determine a short list of key events that are the "most-likely-to-happen" and now I'm encouraged and compelled to introduce the blockchain into the mix.

What ideas in this regard are there with the members of The Tender For Law?

So I was engaged in a conversation (I do this from time to time to test my understanding) with a woman on a friend's thread about this article where folks condoned the violent response this actor received because "words cause emotional injury". My response to this woman gave me such a profound understanding of what Scott Duncan means when he says "All belief is evil". I had struggled to fully grasp and comprehend this until now.

This woman commented "I hope we are not teaching anyone that just because you can't prove or show immediate effect of emotional injury that makes it okay" to which I responded"

"Kate I am only pointing to the FACTS here. A fact is not an opinion. An opinion does not require any facts to support it nor need to be proven or verifiable. Whether something is "okay" is an opinion and misses the point. I try sticking to the facts because the facts are all that matter. It is the only thing that is real. If it can't be proven it is not a fact. If it isn't a fact then it is not real and therefore no wrong has occured."

And then the big A-Ha! occured after I wrote

"This is critical thinking and logic. If someone claims there is an "emotional injury" then the burden of proof rests with them to show there is an actual injury; that an ACTUAL wrong has occured. Otherwise it is just conjecture, an opinion and utter nonsense based entirely on belief (which is the end of thought) and emotion. This ultimately only diverts attention away from the facts. The man that threw the punch was not injured/harmed by the actor's words (fact) because the words were not directed at him (fact), but the actor was injured (fact - see bloodied face) by this man's fist because the man who threw the punch was offended by and believed (opinion) this actor's words (or the actor's opinion) were harmful (another opinion) and therefore justified (in his opinion) harming the actor who had caused him no harm. See how that works?"

I realized that everything based on opinion (or belief) was NOT real and resulted in VIOLENCE. No opinion/belief, no violence...this is seriously profound.

Here's what it feels like trying to teach you idiots.

RE:"explaining that the man and the person cannot be separated"

THEY CAN"T!

It has been stated to me, by a trusted source, (as a direct result of this post) that you idiots are missing some key points.

1: "The Man" is:

a) a "Natural Person

AND

b) HER MAJESTY

2: "The Legal Person = A CROWN ORGANIZATION

HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION ARE TWO PARTIES IN A TRUST FOR WHICH YOU ARE AGENT AND TRUSTEE. NOT AGENT OR TRUSTEE. AGENT AND TRUSTEE (And the trustee MUST perform) for THE PRINCIPAL

BOTH ARE LEGAL FICTIONS.

HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION CANNOT BE SEPARATED, and YOU are surety FOR MAJESTY under the CROWN AGENCY ACT.

Time to play "Let's ask questions" with Capitaine Pete :D When I spoke to the MASTER of questions a couple months ago Pete wished he could do this again for his kids because he would take a very different approach. He would have lots of quesions to ask the government . A few members of the TTFL now have new babies so I think doing this right is an important undertaking so our kids, using Pete's words, will be "fucking powerful!"

I received these in the mail this week...first from the Ministry of Health, who got the "Child's Date of Birth" wrong, and then from the Office of the Registrar General (which is in the Ministry of Government Services). So how does the government know a baby was born? Well the midwife INFORMED them.

Apparently the VITAL STATISTICS ACT "requires" a man/woman to register his/her child (LEGAL term) within 30 days of the DATE OF BIRTH (ADMIRALTY term) lol! Notice that it says "You can't get a birth certificate for this child until the birth is registered" :( According to the midwifery clinic the birth was registered by them. Apparently there are two parts, they did the first part.

So as Captain Pete wisely suggests I'm not saying that I won't register my little girl, but before I do I have some very important questions that I require the REGISTRAR GENERAL to answer first. So what questions would you be asking folks? :D

After talking to a Computer service owner that had a client coming to him for advice, It made me think of something...

The client had his computer hacked and the hacker is asking for a � 2.5 Btc in ransom.

So the client, who doesn't know anything about chryptocurency, brings the computer to his local computer service store and asks for help.

The store owner has a few questions, not knowing a lot about chrypto... as well! :/

So the store owner wants to know if it's better to download a wallet on the client's computer to buy the Bct on e-bay afterward

or

Can he download one himself and do it, for the client? (which in this case, he is afraid that the hacker could link his way back to the store owner's system and be exposed to the hacker as well).

And my reflexion on this incident is, and please tell me if I am mistaken:

It's a good thing to have everything backed-up (of course) but to leave your computer empty of any important data does that make it still possible for hackers to get access to this data on a back-up hardrive, does that make sens? :/

Thanks!

OK, I want this clear...

...I'm just posting this as bait.

Ignore it (for now).

AFFIRMATION

I, being the Sole Authorized Administrator for the legal person named PIERRE DAOUST, a person with the registration number 11966XXXXXXXX, affirm the following.

On or about October 28, 2014, at 8: 20AM, a patrol car Police of Terrebonne, its lights flashing lights behind the car in which I am.

Since we are on Highway 40, in Repentigny, I do not feel concerned by the patrol car, because I'm not a criminal, and no crime has been committed.

A few seconds later, I begin to understand that this patrol car wants me to pull on the side, but I am committed to the Charles de Gaules bridge, which connects Repentiny and Montreal, and I think it would be safer for me to park on the other side of the bridge.

The policeman, and / or tax collector, and / or creator of public debt approaching with a firearm on him, is very aggressive and asked me to give him the name of the legal person that I have. I refuse to GIVE him, because it is mine, and I do not want to enter into business relations with the police and / or collector of taxes, and / or creator of public debt, since no crime was committed on my part.

He decides to kidnap me and put me and put some chains on my wrists, and bring me in a cage, and all the time I was in kidnapping mode by him and his partners kidnappers, they absolutely wanted me me to identify as a LEGAL PERSON, I categorically refused, and at this point, all I ask is the surety of the PERSON

The police and / or tax collector, and / or creator of public debt, claim that I am REQUIRED to cooperate, but the definition of cooperate says exactly the opposite,

cooperate: Action method by which individuals or families with common interests is a business where the rights of all are equal and where the profit is distributed among the only partners in proportion to their participation in the associative activity.

Who can force me to go into business with him / her?

The police and / or tax collector, and / or creator of public debts, tells me that not only will they violate my right to the surety of the person, but the JUDGE will do the same.

Indeed, they were right, they carry me to the courthouse in St-Jerome, and in no time I could not make my right to the surety of the person in this place, I was treated like a slave and that until I identify myself as a legal person, a stranger to even take the right to enter a plea of non-guilty for my person, which seems to me quite fraudulent, everything I wanted, is that you can point me where was the surety of my person, so that we can generate $ 150,000.00 to provide a reasonable defense for my person, that is MY right, under Article 1 of the charter of Rights and freedoms of Quebec.

I spent more than 32 hours in captivity, and I had no choice but to identify myself as a legal person and / or fictitious, and / or legal status in this place, yet it is a lie, and it is cLEARLY written in the Charter of rights and Freedoms of Quebec.

CHAPTER I FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Every human being has the right to life, as the surety, integrity and liberty of His person. It also posesses legal personality.

possession: 1. Have to self, have a master of (something), and can benefit and enjoyment.

So the truth is clear and unambiguous: I have a person, and I am entitled to the SURETY of this legal person.

So I'm Pierre, and / or Gilles, and / or Joseph, the three names were given to me at my birth, and I can only understand that I am the only Authorized Administrator for the legal person named PIERRE DAOUST with the number registration 11966XXXXXXXX.

And no one has the authority to attach the name derived from a public document to me.

Appendix A: Notice of absence Appendix B: Proof of security of person (Birth Certificate)

I'm not one of those stupid sovereign citizen (besides the two words can not even go together) and I'm not one of those stupid freeman on the land, I have no spiritual belief, and no religious belief any.

I want to OBEY the law, for all must obey the law, and that no one is above the law, and the law begins with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms of Quebec.

I am only a man, and I have a person, and all I can really do is administrate that person. And I am NOT surety for that person.

BY: ______________________ Sole Authorized Administrator All Rights Reserved / No Prejudice

Just wanted to apologize to all for the skype/cellphone fuckup on friday...

Took some time to figure out it could be my fault - seems the App wouldnt mute even if muted, the call would reconnect every single time I quit the App until I restarted the phone - so please forgive, me I'll make SURE it wont ever happen again :/

Scott Duncan As you know there is a liar who is intent on punishing me as an example for all others. Is it possible to offer a claim against him up for your takings or someone you know? I'm having difficulties with this and I feel that the only way for this clown to really appreciate the system he defends so viciously is to feel it's Wrath to the fullest. Would this be acceptable or of interest to you or one of your Captains?

Whilst writing in another post I mentioned that Australia has no Bill of Rights/Charter of Human Rights or any such instrument as other countries have.

It seems, in Canadia (<--See our Prime Minister for that), you guys can point to a body of words that specifically mention Security of Person or similar which appears to send Government into a panic.

Over here we have no such thing. As such, the result I have with my local council is the Mayor effectively saying she has no idea what the hell I am on about when I mentioned surety/security of the person. The only instruments I could point to for Australia is the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Both of which, from what I understand, Australia helped create and are a signatory to and both mention Security of Person.

I'm curious if anyone from Australia has had a similar experience and how they dealt with it or indeed if Scott or anyone can point me in the right direction on how to deal with this.

Because of the Mayors lack of knowledge regarding Surety/Security of Person I'm not quite sure on how to proceed

http://www.freedomadvocates.org/agenda-21/

Scott Duncan, is the UN Agenda 21 Program one of the agendas you are preparing to fight / politically conceded / hence why you are now the Admiral with war drums beating? I can see why traffic issues etc are not such a big deal. In Ireland everything in planning and development has to go through the regional development agencies / plans before getting approval from local County Councils. The depopulation of rural areas, immigration to Cities and emigration to other countries (becoming second class citizens and celebrating), cutbacks in hospitals, closures of police stations, the rise of CCTV towers etc. There are strategies in place for the last 10 years or so(before the last recession) planning Ireland for 2020. This has been rolled back to Ireland 2030 (NCB Stockbrokers are one company that advised on its publication if anyone interested). Its not just planning, its population growth / control, prosperity, living standards etc. In the video Michael Shaw is speaking on how it is being implemented in Santa Cruz, CA, under the cover of different federal agencies and how to try and take the power back. I assume the power will not be taken back politically. I look forward to the launch of Thetenderforlaw.com website later this month and further educating myself on and / or combating what 'lies' ahead. Pardon the pun. B

Has anyone heard from Capitaine Pete? He is rather conspicuous by his absence.

Fuck! I just learned something new. Look how gay they look together :) If you wonder why they feel they're entitled it's because they are. It's all about the titles. "But Tory said the title of his favourite premier will always be his mentor � and Wynne�s grandfather � former premier Bill Davis..." Remember it's club house rules....and you're not a member!

Fuck, competition ! :(

I've created a group called "Lawful Money of the United States". It is open to anyone who wishes to learn about the redemption of Lawful Money.

[If the Admin here don't want to accept this post, no worries]

We (myself and others) are curious as to WHY some new parents wish the EVENT of their child's birth to be undocumented. Are there advantages to be had by not documenting your child's birth? If so, please share.

(Fixed that for you Chris.<./flipping the bird with both hands>)

1 --> WHY? 2 --> ADVANTAGES?

Acts and Statutes in Qu�bec are ILLEGAL :P

http://ici.radio-canada.ca/regions/ottawa/2014/11/06/002-enquete-barreau-quebec-michel-le-brun.shtml?isautoplay=1

So.....

Chartered Accountant who knows what money is

AND

Private Banker

:D :P

https://www.facebook.com/CollectiveEvolutionPage/photos/a.10151198752138908.475684.131929868907/10152591491758908/?type=1

Happy Birthday Bud

Hi everyone, On April 19th, LIAM VILLEMAIRE�s cellphone was stolen in Nicaragua. The bill was raised to 3,800$. On May 14th, I came back. On May 19th I Spoke with a Telus agent when Internet became operational at my new apartment. May 22th, Telus reduced the debt to $ 1,900 because they are UNDERSTANDABLE. I will avoid all the unecessary details that happen through May and September considering that it�s useless for you� I asked in Aug. 15th to an agent to send me a detailed INVOICE. He told me �perfect� and "changed the account address for the new one." On September 15th, I didn�t receive anything and the girl from customer service told me that it was leaving that day and that it would take 10 working days. 2 weeks later I did not receive it and they told me that it was because they sent it to the wrong place. He sent me another one and I received it on October 18th. With this bill I wrote my letter to Telus and completed, with good faith, the bill of exchange. On October 20th, I received a letter from a collection agency informing me that the account had been transferred to them. I have no experience with this kind of situation, someone has an idea? Should I give the bill of exchange duly completed to the collection agency because Telus says I have to go through them? Do I have to deal with Telus because LIAM VILLEMAIRE has no contract with the collection agency? Do I cry in a corner ?? :P Thank you in advance !!

Please help here, Janick Paquette, Will Bed, Steph Boucher

The Notice of Mistake was translated in French, by me.....I did the best I could, and got some help from a professional translator

This part: "WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal"

I am pretty sure that I have translated it correctly, but not at 100%, and I would like to have your thought....

"DE QUELLE PREUVE DISPOSEZ VOUS pour affirmer qu�il existe un MANDAT consenti par le mandant?"

Thanks Pete.

. . . .

Scott N Tara, please tell me if this is a ploy, a bait and switch.

Wont making the internet a PUBLIC UTILITY allow government to have legal jurisdiction to create regulation, monetize and tax the shit out of it?

"Yet, a cursory search of court judgments using terms such as �untruthful,� �fabricated,� �collusion� or �misleading� reveals the extent of the problem. Some officers embellish, stretch or shade the truth to conceal their investigative errors or to enhance the chances of securing a conviction." Yup it's better to tell them to go fuck themselves because that what these policy enforcers are paid to do and normally to you!

. . . . . . . "Once upon a time there were a lot of stupid people and they were folking and had lots of children who grew up and were also stupid. So then there were more and ever more stupid people who learned how to feed themselves and not shit in their beds.

Somehow a few of them were smarter and the smartest ones "declared" to the stupid ones that the smartest fellas owned everything and all the land under everything because the mother of all gods gave it to the smart fellas to take care of. The smart fellas called this "divine right".

Some of the stupid people (especially the fellas) were convinced (gifts and "privileges" were involved) by the smart fellas to help the smart fellas intimidate, dominate and thus control the rest of the stupid people. They were called police, clerks, lawyers, politicians, agents, bishops, priests, ministers, monks and snipers. This system was known as feudalism or slavery.

The smart fellas found out that some smart nerds invented writing, numbers and weapons and realized that they could use writing and numbers to more easily control more stupid people. This was called Accounting and Surety (and Religion). The smart fellas generally only used the weapons on the smart asses who figured out their game or refused to play along. . . and this was called Policy Enforcement.

The smart fellas created certificates, mortgages, licenses and money. The money they encouraged the people to use to trade among themselves with and pay taxes to the smart fellas. The smart fellas also created the banks to store the money the people weren't using and to further control the stupid people by secretly and openly creating more money without most people noticing.

If any people got smart and created there own money the smart fellas would harass, kidnap, torture and/kill them to keep competition for control and wealth to a minimum.

The smart fellas had children of their own and traded the females off to other smart fellas on other land who had also "declared" that they too owned everything and by the same methods controlled many slaves themselves. In this way the smart fellas spread out around the world mostly worked together with the occasional attack and robbery of other smart fellas' Accounting and Surety games.

This worked really well for the smart fellas even though some had declared that "slavery is abolished" and the "people have rights" because the people still "believed" that they were free and that the smart fellas had "divine right" given them by the same god that the people "believed" existed but was invisible and didn't answer their frequent begging for help or relief (there were fees charged by the clergy for such begging).

The stupid people "believed" all was well and the smart fellas "knew" all was really really well . . . for the smart fellas.

One day, seemingly out of nowhere, some smart-ass, shit disturber invented a computer software device he called the Block Chain." . . .

To be continued . . . . . . . .

Can someone please tell me why I would attend "NOTICE OF EXAMINATION?" They want my help in Execute a judgment.

Scholar taxes.

I needed them to send a zero balance statement within a couple weeks, no time to waste with incompetent or ignorant people there, so I sent BOTH the bill of exchange AND a cheque, telling them they had to carry on their legal obligations in regards to the bill of exchange and if they cash both instruments they'd have to send a CREDIT to the person...

They banked the cheque and returned the bill of exchange with no explanation or refusal notice.

I sent the bill of exchange back to them, along with all the info/instructions (which they already received) in regards to their legal obligations.

They had their liars send a demand letter that the person stops annoying them with communications or they'll sue !!? WTF ? I guess someone feels rather uncomfortable with all this !??

First time I ever have to deal with threats from 3rd party interlopers...

Is the proper thing to do, in this case, to keep copies of everything they sent and send the original papers and envelop back to them ? I guess it is necessary to void these papers ?

The scholar board still holds the bill of exchange and surety bond. I obviously want those back.

Is the proper thing to do to require from the liars that they make sure their client fulfills its legal obligations and return the documents ? It seems going directly to the scholar board would only upset them even more and I have no intention of creating controversy... And I certainly do not want to imply any commerce with them liars...

Ok, here it is�.

I give power of attorney to 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, to take care of PIERRE DAOUST�s administration.

Because, Obviously, I CAN�T do it my self, and no one will tell me WHY :D

Then, when a bill is picked up in PIERRE DAOUST�s mailbox, well that bill will be brought directly to 9111-1111 Quebec Inc.

Same thing with �money�, if money is sent to PIERRE DAOUST, for ANY reasons, well that money will be brought to 9111-1111 Quebec Inc.

Now, 9111-1111 Quebec Inc will PAY these bills, by keeping the originals, and make photo copies, and will have to send PIERRE DAOUST a statement of account, with a remittance voucher attached to that statement (same shit we receive) to PIERRE DAOUST at each end of the month, because 9111-1111 Quebec Inc needs to balance its books.

Then this remittance voucher will be turned into a Bill of Exchange by �ME�, and will be sent to 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, it will be done EXACTLY the same as I am doing right now.

Then, 9111-1111 Quebec Inc will go see his Chartered Accountant, so this guy can verify if everything is true, and will then CERTIFY that bill of exchange. (this step was pulled right from my ass, because I think it�s a logical step, I will know soon if it�s true)

And then, 9111-1111 Quebec Inc will deposit that Bill of Exchange, with its Private Banker, at the CIBC, because this shit seems to need to stay in PRIVATE. (This also was pulled right from my ass, we�ll see as well :D )

Of course, PIERRE DAOUST�s security is NOT damaged, in that scenario

I wonder HOW many �persons� 9111-1111 Quebec Inc can ADMINISTRATE like this� :D

These are NOT legal advices, it�s for entertainment only

By: ME All Rights Reserved / No Prejudice

:D

Scott Duncan I really wanted to get the info you started talking about. I dont know how many people listening/learning you feel is enough VALUE for your time, but please start it all over add people one by one so we can id the guilty device/listener... I know my cell phone did ruin one call. I promised to never cause this again. I know how it feels to feel guilty for it. Is it possible a device, even muted, could cause noise without the listener knowing ? Im not on the cell btw. I have a feeling tonights call was going to get into some very important info :(

Someone send this man a NOTICE OF MISTAKE...I'd love to see the entire country OFFENDED when he got off :P So who's going to reach out to this man before the bleeding hearts tear him apart ;)

Scott, why is there so few Chartered Accountants in the United States? Has this always been the case?

If you say nothing, they've got... Nothing!

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ad6_1416106189

Hi all, I have received a fine in the mail for allegedly traveling 51 in a 40 zone. Due to be paid by tomorrow. What is the process for paying / not paying these fines? I've checked the search section but a few different suggestions were discussed but nothing clear on fines sent to by mail via camera. And couldn't find anything specific in the 'Files' section. It has been suggested I call to "use the surety of the person to discharge the debt" Thanks for your support

I personally enjoy observing how uncomfortable a lack of control makes governments and their pathetic agents. I heard about the efforts the City of Toronto is taking against UBER citing "PUBLIC safety" lol! Yes folks need protecting. Why not start with protecting folks from government/state fraud, threats, and coercion?

Rick Hiltz, have you scrap that thread ?

The " Rick Hiltz no one knows WHY he deleted that precious thread" thread :/

Rick Hiltz 5 hrs today the lovely folks at Revenue Canada sent along an invoice to the estate of my recently deceased father for the amount of $102.25 for 2 checks issued under the Ontario Trilium Benefit program . I am currently in possession of both checks . I have had conversations where i was told i would be issued an invoice if i did not return the checks . ME will you be requiring the return of the checks You sent to my deceased dad Fucktard: yes please return them ASAP or you will be invoiced for the amount issued Me; Why would you invoice the estate for something they never exchanged for legal tender?Do you have any reason to believe that your books do not balance? Fucktard it doesn`t matter you need to return the checks Me ok are you going to forward me the postage and pay the invoice for my time and effort to perform for revenue Canada Fucktard No if you don`t return them you will be billed for them ME how can you bill me for something still in revenue Canada`s possession the money is still in your possession the checks have not been cashed and since you refuse to pay for my services then the checks shall remain here in such times as a Revenue Canada employee shows up at the door showing valid ID and picks them up and issues a receipt for doing so Fucktard that will not happen Me ok so I will just shred them i don`t give a fuck about your books balancing have a nice day LikeLike � Aladdin Sane and 2 others like this.

Pete Daoust You think WRONG 4 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust They are doing with you, the EXACT same thing I am doing with them....

These BILLS OF EXCHANGE you have in your possession, is the actual VALUE, this is CASH......and you HOLDING this CASH and you have no rights to do so.......See More 4 hrs � Like � 2

Pete Daoust Fuck....you have the PROOF, and you don't even notice it 4 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Chris Evan, Gail Marie, look at this 4 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Rick Hiltz, tell me you have this recorded, and/or in writing !! 4 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Beverly Berta Braakschmack, do you see it ? 3 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust For FUCK SAKES !!!....where's everyone ? 3 hrs � Like � 1

Chris Evan I see it 3 hrs � Like � 2

Aladdin Sane I see it too! 3 hrs � Like � 2

Rick Hiltz yes i have the money according to the financial administration Act Pete a check is money. But unless the check is endorsed its just a pc of paper the physical money is still on their books until it gets cashed . Their books have showed they paid it out in order for their books to balance they need the check returned even though its never been cashed . they need it yet I don`t work for free go to gov`t and try to get them to do something for you and it usually ends up costing you money they don`t want to pay me for returning them so they can pick it up. 3 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Ok, I don<t give a fuck about your tantrum, I just want to know if you have this shit in WRITING, and#or recorded 3 hrs � Like

Rick Hiltz its recorded some where in my vault i never talk to them unless it is 3 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Ok, can you share ? 3 hrs � Like

Rick Hiltz fuck now i have to search will try to find it 3 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Every time I receive a call from them, I listen to the audio at least 20 times.....in fact, I am shocked sometimes, on one word they might have used....I thought everyone were doing that :# 3 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Here<s an example...

I spent 18 minutes with a tard from the city of Montreal, trying to get this bill of exchange back......fo about 10 times during the conversation, he repeated @ WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERYTHING YOU'VE SENT TO US......at least 10 times h...See More 3 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust SUSPEND THE FUCKING RUNNING OR OPERATION OF 2 hrs � Edited � Like

Rick Hiltz going to take a while to sort thru the folder and find I`ll post it when i find it Pete 3 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Do you get it, Rick ...you are SUSPENDING THE FUCKING RUNNING OR OPERATION OF THIS THING, and you<ll get INVOICED by doing so

In other words, the City of Montreal are waiting for the invoice 2 hrs � Like � 3

Pete Daoust They rather get INVOICED, than to RUN this bill of exchange 2 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Right, Scott Duncan 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust TRUST me, but verify with Scott 2 hrs � Like � 1

Aladdin Sane Are you an executor of the estate, Rick? 2 hrs � Like

Aladdin Sane You can have fun with them, but if you are executor, you have duties. 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust No, tell them...

I<ll rather SUSPEND THE FUCKING RUNNING OR OPERATION OF this BILL OF EXCHANGE, and get invoiced.... 2 hrs � Like � 1

Aladdin Sane I like what Scott said a while back. "I'm sorry, I'm not authorized to answer any questions." I can't wait to use this. 2 hrs � Like � 2

Pete Daoust And follow with...

I<ll do the same to you, when you<ll choose to SUSPEND THE FUCKING RUNNING OR OPERATION OF those bills of exchange I send you ...See More 2 hrs � Like � 2

Pete Daoust This thread is AWESOME 2 hrs � Like � 2

Pete Daoust In French, it<s fucking SEXY

De suspendre le cours OU LE FONCTIONNEMENT DE CETTE LETTRE DE CHANGE ...See More 2 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Dear Fucktard,

Since you have chosen to SUSPEND THE FUCKING RUNNING OR OPERATION OF this bill of exchange, here<s the INVOICE 2 hrs � Like � 2

Pete Daoust Needs to give NOTICE first, I guess, and penalty and administration fees, I guess :# 2 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Holy mother of Jesus Christ crying out loud !!!!! 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Hellos !!! 2 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Fuck me, thanks for this thread, Rick Hiltz 2 hrs � Like � 3

Pete Daoust Shit, I have 32k of invoice to send 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust wait....35k 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust plus fees and penalties, I have no idea how much these two things could be 2 hrs � Like

Aladdin Sane The most detailed part of the invoice should be the penalties and fees section. 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Eamonn O Brien, Mackximus Minimus, Maximus Legis.....check this out 2 hrs � Like � 1

Aladdin Sane That's where you can cash in big time. Or, I should have said, coin in big time. You are busy and this is costing you time. How much is yours worth for frivolous matters? 2 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Rick Hiltz, I hope you are not going against any oaths by revealing this kind of shit 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust I don<t know Aladdin Sane, that part is complete mystery to me 2 hrs � Like

Rick Hiltz i don`t take oaths and any duties i have are to my dad not Gov`t 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust Anyway, 2 hrs � Like

Pete Daoust This is priceless, I am going to pee in the fucking corner 2 hrs � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Question Rick Hiltz, is it an obligation to PAY the debt before doing this, or I can invoice before the debt is paid ? 2 hrs � Like

Rick Hiltz if they want the checks back then all they have to do is pay me for time materials gas wear and tear on the vehicle and services rendered as the executor of his estate i can charge an administration fee to the estate so if the gov`t wants me to assist them then they pay me for it i return the checks ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,so far they say no not going to happen ..............I say ok no problem your checks will be here waiting ........then he tells me they will bill me for the checks that have not been cashed .............so I`m saying the debt doe not exist period and they need to come and get their property before its considered abandoned 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz and any amount they bill me i will bill them the same for storage 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust !!! ...you are worse than them 1 hr � Like � 1

Rick Hiltz Pete i tell them u[p front I`m a fucking asshole so they know 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust Yes, and you will have to GIVE these thing back, or PAY for them 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz itrs just a number on a page thats all Pete and they want it lets see if they want to charge interest first 1 hr � Edited � Like

Pete Daoust But please keep precious care of the audio, and/or all communication you have on this matter, I will NEED it, so I can do the exact same thing to them, that they will do to you !! 1 hr � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Thanks Rick Hiltz for dancing for little pPete 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz will do i need to do a better job labeling these recordings 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust Will Bed, keep this in file somewhere

"De suspendre le cours OU LE FONCTIONNEMENT DE CETTE LETTRE DE CHANGE" 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust This NOTICE will be so short and sweet, unbelievable !! 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust Oh, they might LIEN some shit, that could be fun.... 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust Tell them that you have to SAVE everything they send you 1 hr � Like � 1

Pete Daoust In French Will Bed, it's:

Nous devons CONSERVER tout ce que vous nous envoyez 1 hr � Like � 1

Pete Daoust CONSERVER 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust suspendre le cours OU LE FONCTIONNEMENT DE 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust SACRAMENT !!!! 1 hr � Like � 2

Rick Hiltz what can they lein for a hundred bucks the toilet 1 hr � Like � 2

Pete Daoust They'll find something, no worry 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust They don't give a shit about this part, Will Bed, they can COUNT on YOU, for surety 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust There's 35 millions "surety" out there to COUNT on 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz when they show up to take the property they leined i just hand them the checks 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust Well, it won't be the same amount then, Rick Hiltz 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust You think WRONG 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz no physical cash has changed hands Pete they still have all the money in their accounts it only looks like its been paid out on paper ......the actual money is still in their account waiting to be reassigned from debit to a credit 1 hr � Like

Chris Evan Pete...please refresh my memory. Was $35k the amount they have that you sent them back in 2012? 1 hr � Like

Will Bed A cheque Ais a bill of exchange Rick Hiltz, it IS money. 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz its only money after it has been endorsed the individual it was made out to is deceased 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz so they are offering it as having value and the other party has not signed accepting it as having value 1 hr � Like

Will Bed Last week I think, I posted somewhere here that a cheque is just a promise to pay, if you lose it or burn it, no money is lost... So it's NOT cash... WRONG. Let me track down what Scott Duncan said... 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz there is case law that has been ruled on where if a bill of exchange or promissory note has been destroyed in a fire the courts will alow the bank/institution to create another one 1 hr � Like

Rick Hiltz this party doesn`t see it as having any value unless he gets paid to return it 1 hr � Like

Pete Daoust Same with these bills of exchange they are saving, they have value for me, not them, that's the effect SAVING them does.... 1 hr � Like � 1

Pete Daoust Ok, you fucking miss the point, Rick Hiltz....so fuck off, I am out... 1 hr � Like � 1

hmmmm...this reads very much like an author who I have spent a lot of time reading....

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-pension-board-used-offshore-scheme-to-skirt-foreign-taxes-1.2824959

"Oh sorry aren't allow to do what we screw the commoners for???"

Above the "law"...makes my blood boil! And this in La Belle Province Capitaine Pete.

I remember Dean Clifford saying they try to tell you things in films. Whether or not that was just his perception I don't know, but here's a little snippet from "Gangs of New York" that I'm sure most of us would have missed pre-Tender for Law days... :D

�The government does not pay the legal costs of citizens who are acquitted, let alone someone who is found guilty...� Read this article. Surprisingly it's full of many nuggets that confirm the rules don't apply to them and if you read carefully removing jurisdiction is a simple matter of resigning/retiring.

They are celebrating by letting loose their video seminar for FREE! I can't wait to watch this for freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedumb

So tomorrow i go to court for not having enough money to pay the collection agency collecting for not being able to pay my compulsory Dutch health insurance !

So finally i'm joining the front line to get some experience to teach others ...

I want to charge for my time - as a newbie i feel a bit scared - do i need to charge by sending registered post letter to the courts address first declaring my intentions? or send to the collection agency address?

Also is there a file in here somewhere for a general courtroom ABC baby steps to getting these f$% of my back?

Here are my steps: - Prep: letters sent to bailiff (bring with me) - ID - passport only - no birth certificate (should bring) - Send registered post to courtrooms informing costs for my time (too late now? - can this be done on the day?)

Entrance: - Declare common law war! - (how do i reserve my rights?) - State i'm the S.A.Administrator - Ask to see the invoice ... - (Do i ask to discharge the debt by surety?)

What should i expect and how do i leave the courtroom with the debt discharged?

I'm willing to start paying health insurance again when they PAY ME to be able to do so! as a negotiation is this sensible?

Thanks

Is thetenderforlaw.com still a go?

spoke with CRA they confirmed the legal person is created on the registration date

Cop Block should have come to Tender For Law years ago.

Lol!

I intend to have an affidavit verified by a commissioner of oaths/solicitor for the upcoming court date I will attend.

I will probably be asked for ID by the solicitor. Should I just produce a passport/driving license or should I bring a Birth Cert to show I am lawful holder in due course and therefore administrator as that is how I am presenting myself on the affidavit...?

Mainstream News in Ireland, The banks know that they are doomed !!

I have a question about cheques. Is there any reason that a "counter cheque" would not be a proper form of payment on a loan account? I've just had 2 of them returned to me... :/

Question, hummm...

I have heard, and/or red somewhere in the Tender for Law, that this thing could be liened....

Now, it makes perfect sense to me, but I Wonder if it's true... :)

Because if it is, I may have to register a lien on this :/

Thanks Pete.

This seems to me to be more than the media wants to let on when you consider that Police Service websites were also successfully targetted within the last week. I'm left with the feeling that these were proverbial "shots across the bow" and that if Anonymous or the SIA wanted to make it worse they could do so with minimal effort. What do you see Admiral Scott?

Why is the following popping up, like herpes in tards FB profiles? As Scott has stated UCC does not apply to individuals, how much more bullshit can be detected from this magi spell?

"Due to the fact that Facebook has chosen to use software that will allow the theft of my information , I declare that: On this date of 27 November 2014, in response to new guidelines from Facebook and under Articles L .111 , 112 and 113 of the Code of intellectual Property , I declare that my rights are attached to all my personal data , drawings, paintings , photos, texts etc ... posted on my profile . For use ... Commercial foregoing my written consent is required at all times. By this statement, I tell Facebook that it is prohibited from disclosing , copying, distributing , disseminating , or taking any other action against me based on this profile and or its contents . The above mentioned measures also apply to employees, students , agents and any other personal or under the direction of Facebook . The content of my profile includes private information. The violation of my privacy is punishable by law (UCC 1-308 1-308 1 -103 and the Rome Statute ) . Facebook is now a publicly traded entity. Those who read this text can copy / paste on their Facebook wall. This will allow them to place themselves under the protection of copyright . All members are invited to write a review of this kind. Beware, if you have not released this statement at least once , you tacitly allow the use of items such as your photos and the information contained in the profile update."

So, this is unfolding. Yet another ass-hat who wants to kill me.

Cops, are just fine, but I should die for telling the truth....

...no really!

From TORONTO. To good to be true folks...read this article. It takes a brave man to beat another man who is handcuffed and defenseless. So let me see if I am understanding this Admiral Scott...it is okay to make a mistake as long as you COP to it :D This thug reported the crime to a superior, did not try to cover up his actions, wrote a letter of apology to the victim and pleaded guilty which equals showing remourse and taking responsibility for one's actions.

And the best part is that this thug had long disciplinary record including but not limited to 3 assaults and pleading guilty to discreditable conduct.

�We want you to come forward when you make a MISTAKE, so we don�t have the problem of police officers going underground and doing all the horrible things we don�t want them to do: falsifying reports, going to trial and lying under oath,� -Ontario Court Judge Howard Chisvin.

Note to JUSTICE Chisvin: They already do ALL of these horrible things. A couple weeks ago we saw precedence of Justice's using the surety of the PERSON and this week we have thugs making MISTAKEs. So much precedence available for administrating the person we have :D

I wonder where did I first heard this? Oh, wait! :D

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/mastercard-attacks-bitcoin-australia/

:-D

Simu-Drones - 2015 edition

If it's FREE, then you are the product, <<==MOST RELEVANT THING YOU WILL EVER READ -Scott Duncan

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/740119249357343/

http://countercurrentnews.com/2014/12/judge-gets-special-treatment-dwi-charges-suddenly-dismissed/

I think that this fits into the "judicial corruption" category.

I swear it is becoming more and more clear that goverment doesn't want anyone stealing from folks except them :P

Some hubbub lately surrounding Lizzy's "Fealty" contracts...

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/appeal-court-upholds-oath-to-queen-in-citizenship-case/article20032155/

�The oath to the Queen of Canada does not violate the appellants� right to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience because it is secular; it is not an oath to the Queen as an individual but to our form of government of which the Queen is a symbol,� the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled.

�Understand that in the police hierarchy, you have to follow orders..." Yup! Better to do wrong and have a job than do the right thing and lose it. I think Nazi soldiers were only following orders too.

I have never heard of such a thing...What is a PERSONal Corporation Admiral Scott? :/

Today the Tax Fairness for Realtors Act, 2014 was introduced in the Ontario Legislature by Prince Edward-Hastings MPP Todd Smith. If passed, the Act would allow real estate salespeople to form personal corporations. Currently, the Real Estate and Business Brokers Act, 2002 (REBBA), prevents real estate salespeople from operating their business through a personal real estate corporation (PREC).

The ability to incorporate would allow a REALTOR�, depending on their level of business income, to save money on their income tax by taking advantage of the lower corporate tax rate. In short, PRECs will help REALTORS� do better business.

This legislation is an important step in aligning the rights of real estate salespeople with other regulated professions in the province. Many other regulated professions in Ontario, including chartered accountants, lawyers, health professionals, social workers, mortgage brokers, insurance agents, architects and engineers, can all form personal corporations. It�s time REALTORS� were treated the same.

We want the government to allow personal real estate corporations in the upcoming 2014 Ontario Budget. The budget will be introduced in a few weeks so we need your help now. Please tell the Minister of Finance that it's time Ontario treats real estate professionals fairly by allowing them to form personal real estate corporations.

Ha ha ha...extortion anyone? Of course the Toronto Police would never come out and say "Pay us more and we'll help you steal more money from innocent folks". It's only commerce and the TPS wantsfair and just compensation for the muscle they provide to extort money from folks.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

We have a special treat tonight. Whilst dealing with the daily crises, both local and abroad, and innocently managing my little empire (that's right, I'm innocently trying to collapse the banking system and start a war), I received a private message from one of our regular members. This is a man who survived two purges...so I tend not to ignore such messages when I receive them.

The member in question, having survived the aforementioned purges, may benefit from several presumptions, prime amongst them is that he is not an idiot. You can presume this as "idiots" tend not to survive purges.

This is a man who has accepted, or is well on his way to accepting "actual reality". This means he has learned the Number 1 Rule of the Universe: Scott is ALWAYS right. This is not arrogance, or hubris, it is simply a fact. Against all odds it's proven time and time again. You don't need to figure out IF I'm right; you simply need to figure out WHY I'm right. I don't possess any mental powers that you don't, so there's obviously some "secret" that allows me to be right...

...I mention this because we have, as a result of the aforementioned communication, acquired a new member.

For your consideration I present to you, Carol Elizabeth Catalano . I am making this post of course to welcome her to the group. That never goes well. Veterans of THE TENDER FOR LAW know that sometimes it's good to get the ADMIRAL's attention long after you've joined; but it is never good to get the ADMIRAL's attention the second you have joined.

This only means one thing.

Our little island of actual reality is about to be attacked with an incoming orbital strike of exploding bullshit. But don't worry folks. I didn't get to be ADMIRAL by abiding bullshit, and my CAPTAINS would really appreciate it if I kept my job. I've got this one covered.

...let's see. How shall I handle this one?

Should I carve her LEGAL bullshit up on the autopsy table? Or should I just come right out and call her a fucking liar, right after I give away the ending? Giving away the ending (for newcomers) is totally my schtick. If you think "spoilers" are a bad thing, do a search in this group and see if you can find why I think this is stupid. That will give you something to do besides lying to people.

Carol Elizabeth Catalano has conjured into existence a fabricated "elite birth", and our longstanding member passed me documentary evidence that allegedly supported this position. He did this with the intent of authenticating this document with an expert. I informed him he made a wise decision and wished him luck in finding an expert. I then went, "Oh wait...that's me!" and then additionally informed him that he does not need my expertise to determine this document is fake as hospitals do not, can not, and will never have the AUTHORITY to CERTIFY ANYTHING! Hospitals are not LAW offices. Hospitals are not GOVERNMENT. The LAW SOCIETY and the GOVERNMENT (or HER MAJESTY and an ORGANIZATION) are the ONLY LEGAL entities with AUTHORITY to CERTIFY anything. Hospitals give NOTICE of the event. The REGISTRAR GENERAL RECORDS and CERTIFIES an event. That event is a RECORD and CERTIFICATION that a CROWN ORGANIZATION was ORGANIZED on that date.

Anyone telling you otherwise is lying to you. Anyone claiming a hospital CERTIFIES anything, is lying to you.

Therefore, Maximus Legis, Carol Elizabeth Catalano is lying to you. This of course gives her the dubious distinction of being the very first member of THE TENDER FOR LAW that has lied without typing a God-damned thing! What kind of a parasite mentality does it take to accomplish an amazing feat like that?

...no really, that was a serious question. :/

Ok, this is the " Chris Evan wants his money back thread"

:-D ....go, shoot Chris....

Look at the religion of government at work. It's ALL based on belief. :D

"Molly was apprehended at birth, according to the judgment, �when the mother would not sign a temporary care agreement� so she could �attend for drug treatment and secure housing.� " So this woman did not have a chance to register her child so by what authority is the state able to kidnap her kids Admiral Scott?

I wonder if one could refuse service on the grounds that "You are a stupid useless sack of shit" and my atheist "religion" dictates that I do no business with stupid people and/or "believers"? It could be used to refuse all government "services" perhaps...

Too bad there wasn't a link to the actual bill in the article...

The following is a few emails sent to the General Registrar Office. The photo attached is, well....

Hi Anne,

I can not break the question down any further. I need the General Registrar Office to confirm if, I, am the Sole Authorised Administrator for the LEGAL NAME LEE EDGELY, that was created on the 20th October 1977. If you do not understand what I am asking, can you please forward the question onto a superior.

Kind regards,

lee.

The following is a copy and paste of what I have sent to you already:

To whom it may concern, My name is lee and my birth date was the 07/10/1977. My parents informed the Registrar of my birth and my parents received a Birth Certificate from the Registrar on the 20/10/1977. What I would like to know is, am I, the sole authorised administrator for this legal name LEE EDGELY that was created on the 20/10/1977? Kind regards, lee.

When you are hurt on the battle field and being treated by medics or triage, it is important to make aware of ALLERGIES & BLOOD TYPE or other medical information.

I was perusing this site when I seen "a patch" the Admiral might require if faced with this situation.

It could save his life!

http://pocomilitary.com/catalog/images/stupid-allergy.jpg

So how are they going to cover this one up???

From the "All laws are prohibitive" and "A license is permission to do an illegal act" department.... "If a government authorizes anti-competitive behaviour, then it�s not illegal, according to the �regulated conduct doctrine� that emanates from previous court cases..."

So tomorrow is "my" court date.

My documents are filed in the case file, affidavit, questions for the court and exhibits.

I will bring a copy of them all with me and I also have a birth certificate to bring along.

I don't know what to expect. Hopefully I'll be back online at roughly 12pm UTC to update anyone who's interested.

Hopefully all will go well... :/

Okay so it seems the Toronto Start is running hit pieces against the CAS admiral Scott :D

"Patricia was charged with numerous counts of assault with a weapon, involving multiple incidents. A landed immigrant, she says she was advised by her legal aid lawyer to plead guilty to some charges to avoid possible deportation. In a blur, she agreed. As a result of her criminal record, she lost her job as a caregiver for the elderly. Unable to pay the mortgage, she lost her home. And her granddaughters. �Everything fell apart,� she says. "

I know that the topic of infiltrators has come up on occasion here, and, I came across this page.... I figured I would pop it up over here in case anyone wants to have a look, it might have some use to someone in the group.

Just back from court.

Name was called, I said I was here on that matter. My name is Eamonn and I'm here by special appearance....

J: What's your name? Me: My name is Eamonn J: So you're Eamonn O Brien? Me: No, my name is Eamonn today, nothing more, nothing less. J: But I won't speak to you unless you tell me your name. Me: I've said, my name is Eamonn. By what authority can you tell me that is not my name? I'm administrator for the Eamonn O Brien account.

J: What does that even mean? Me: It means I'm in charge of that account. I have paperwork filed in the case file if you want to view it.

J: (Tells guard/cop/plaintiff to read out the facts of the alleged offence) Me: I also have questions for the court and until they're answered I can't understand the nature & cause of these proceedings.

J: So you're not Eamonn O Brien? Me: My name is Eamonn. I can give Eamonn O Brien into custody of the court if you'd like?

J: (Asks another Guard to call outside the court for Eamonn O Brien) Me: For the record, if Eamonn O Brien is not in the room then clearly I am not the Eamonn O Brien you are looking for...

J: So you're not Eamonn O Brien? Me: No I am not.

J: Then I'll just have to fine Eamonn O Brien �250 and give him 1 month to pay.

I grabbed my coat and walked out...

I started out alright but fuck me did I start shakin! Was great to see the judge squirming a bit once he couldn't get past the name... I know there could have been plenty of questions for me to be thinking of on the spot but trying not to shake really got in the way of my thought process...

Thanks to Lee Edgely for coming down. I also knew another guy in the court so there are 2 witnesses that are eligible to affirm that it was confirmed on the day that I am not Eamonn O Brien... No doubt there'll be more paperwork down the line... There is still no evidence that I am surety...

Awesome 13 minutes about the inevitable present future. :)

Audio from court yesterday... The little girl you can hear is me... :p

Oh !!!!... Dean Kory is BACK in The Tender for Law ? :)

Welcome BACK Dean.... :D

So...

How many of you cowardly twits are here from QUATLOOS?

I've been letting that elephant lounge in this room for a while. It's time to have a chat, and to issue a few warnings to those who publish the name "Scott Duncan". You assholes like to associate me with all the "Freeman gurus", because you frankly don't know any better. You also look at Africa as a Country too, I imagine.

This is why you have been welcomed here in a VERY public manner, many months back. You mock me on your forum by quoting "scott is always right", and never once pondering why I make this VERY grandiose claim. If I tell you I'm right because of computer science, then you'd brand me a "kook", and never once apply the scientific method to it.

If you've been reading, you should have changed your position by now. By this point there should be NO MISTAKE. By this point, you should know as well as every piece-of-shit christian, that I am NOT a "Freeman-on-the land" or any other version of that bullshit.

I'm the ULTIMATE in LEGAL ENTITIES, and I OBEY THE LAW. I got shit on for my trouble. Now I'm going to collapse the banking system and start war. I am Satoshi Nakamoto!

...what the fuck have YOU done lately?

So... Let me lay out for you something you CAN quote without defaming me through your self-imposed ignorance:

I am not charging money for ANYTHING YOU ARE READING AND NEVER WILL. In fact, if you did ANY reading here, you would see just how much contempt I have for those who do. We're kindred spirits on this issue, except I'm a bit more zealous with my convictions. You think they should be "exposed". I think they should be harmed. You are under no obligation to feel as I do, and I do not fault you for not feeling the same as I do, but that doesn't mean you get to lump me in with them.

QUATLOOS' intent is to expose fraud. You do that best by GETTING YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.

If you DON'T get your facts straight, you will become someone else's mechanism for disinformation. I've BEEN that "someone else", so I know what I'm talking about here. I ONLY tell the truth. I'm ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO DID ALL THIS TO YOU.

You've been robbed and all of you are too ignorant to see what was stolen from you. Associating ME with delusional Piece-of-Shit Christians, and fraud artists helps the wrong people. Stop it. The ONLY thing you accomplish is delaying those seeking answers. Your existing credibility makes it REASONABLE to take what you say as truth... except it isn't, and those seeking answers will notice. They will NOW remember THIS message, and you won't get to claim the "innocence of ignorance" in your defence when they call you to account for the time you stole from them.

I'm here to tell the truth. I promised to. I swore an oath and unlike ALL of you, I actually take that seriously. You, of course will suddenly have "expertise" to clinically diagnose me with a "mental illness" invented by a professional name-caller tho explain that... What? You get to make presumptions about me! I'm simply returning the favour!

If you MUST apply a "mental illness" to me, I confess I have C.D.O.

CDO is like OCD... only the letters are IN THE RIGHT ORDER! AS THEY SHOULD BE!

...I digress.

If you MUST "focus on my crazy", quote me when I say I am COLLAPSING THE BANKING SYSTEM AND STARTING A WAR. I mean COME ON! That shit's simply BEGGING for the "crazy" label! You should be quoting that shit into the next decade!

...which should give you pause. I REALLY want you to do that. WHY?

No matter.

Just get your facts straight. In the end, we're both about what's true. Feel free to shit on yourselves. Don't stain me while you do it.

Ok, quick question...

Is it a good idea to SIGN an invoice, and to do like this...

True & Verified BY: (insert signature here) Sole Authorized Administrator.

Thanks Pete.

http://www.rogerstv.com/page.aspx?lid=237&rid=16&sid=3431&gid=219569....................starting at minute 102:20, Chief Blair, Mayor Tory, rest of the Toronto Police Services Board, bunch of other high-ranking officers and the packed-house in attendance, have the definition for "PERSON" in the Criminal Code explained along with just WHO IS the SURETY for "the person," by yours truly..Derek Moran

Michael Webb !!!

Were you not banned from this group ? :D

Oh look, a plagiarizing piece-of-shit christian! He did Dean Kory one better, he took the title, the Tender For Law reference, and the Creative Commons license out and has passed Scott's words off as his own.

Have fun kids :D

https://www.facebook.com/spnuxoll/posts/806256069439378

"While the Law Society can investigate and discipline prosecutors, legal observers say complaints against prosecutors are often dealt with INTERNALLY by the ministry � investigations that are kept secret and, now, evidently not tracked." Exactly why making a complaint is a futile exercise and waste of your time.

Here is what I think . Sino General for prime minister Scott N Tara minster of justice.

me<Fuckyou

Think about it...

Hey, "Dan Wilson," what have YOU been doing lately? :D

So I asked many questions to the scholar board over the past few months, regarding the PERSON�s SURETY and the fact that they seemed to ignore or refuse to respect some of their LEGAL obligations.

They had their liars send a demand letter to the PERSON I have, basically trying to order ME to shut the F up and not ask one more question to their pretended client.

I slapped all of this back in an envelop, their original demand letter marked REFUSED / NO CONTRACT with a 5 page communication rebutting all their bullshit claims, and I copied the Bar association and Minister of Justice on this.

I made it clear I WISHED they return the SURETY BOND and Bills of exchanges with certain conditions, and told them that if they were indeed mandated by the scholar board - which didnt want to even touch the subjects about which I was questioning them - to reply to me, I required that they answer the questions their pretended client didnt want to answer, it seems they would know what I�m talking about�

I got a reply today. Their first letter seemed to use a pretty aggressive and authoritarian language, This one, VERY POLITE ACTUALLY.

They MARKED that COMMUNICATION with a red CONFIDENTIAL stamp. Seriously, I dont UNDERSTAND what�s so important in this that they marked it as CONFIDENTIAL. I might very well let them know that I really see no justification for that�

NOW, what is the LEGAL implications of this red CONFIDENTIAL stamp ? Does it mean ONLY THEY can AUTHORIZE the release of the content of this letter ? I mean you see CONFIDENTIAL all the time in the footer of emails, basically saying if you�re not intended to receive this communication, you are not AUTHORIZED to disclose the content�

If so, Could a Creative Commons license be used to AUTHORIZE the release the content ?

How's this for a fucking bribe? :D "Travellers who have undergone the special NEXUS screening program with the United States can use those cards to speed through airport security lines.They won�t have to take off their coats, belts or shoes or pull out their liquids or gels from carry-on bags."

So if the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is "the trap", the DRIVER LICENCE "the cheese" (as Ceit Butler put it so accurately), and your photo next to the PUBLIC NAME/LEGAL PERSON on the driver's licence is DEEMED to be evidence that you are the LEGAL PERSON (still a PRESUMPTION based on FRAUD) then what the fuck do you call it when these sheep volunteer their BIOLOGICAL info with a photo and signature?

They really think it's their RIGHT to kill you. It's ok to kill them.

Ok folks, I've got another dumb question.

I am sure it won't be the last, but if I can find the complete answer, perhaps it will be the last dumb question I post here.

Why is Scott ALWAYS right?

We have all heard him say (figure of speech, because he actually typed it):

It's all about Surety and Accounting. TRUST but Verify. Figure out WHY I'm Right. Computer Science is the answer to EVERYTHING. The Majority is ALWAYS wrong. Etcetera.... (There are tons of examples)

I have not seen anyone pose this question though in all of the posts I have read on the Tender for Law group.

He has told us plenty of times however that he has not been blessed with any sort of special powers, he has the same mental faculties that we have.... So HOW does he do it?

What mechanism does he employ to solve a problem, or answer a question, or identify and dismiss bullshit that crosses his desk? And, how can I do that as well? How can I employ a systematic process of mental evaluation for any subject matter or topic that will give accurate results EVERY time?

Even more important to me though is, How can I instill that method into my offspring to ensure that they are able to think their way out of any problem on their own?

Now all of the regular contributors here have shown examples of how they work through specific questions, define the words used, cite sources, legal maxims, logical fallicies, etc. I am wondering if all of that can be wrapped up into a concise method to cut through all the crap and interference that comes up and focus on what is important.

Can computer science methodology be applied to our own brain?

I doubt that there really is a clear answer to this (frankly rather rambling) post, but this concept has been rolling around in my brain for some time now.

I am sure you have all heard the old saying about "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him forever." What if the same thing was applied to thinking critically?

Feel free to cut this to shreds guys.

Scott, I found this on your page. If this man was using the Creative Commons, could this have ended differently?

From the PEOPLE WHO NEED A GOOD SWIFT KICK IN THE FACE, DEPT:

Presumptions about me, and my initiative, and THIS douche:

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=661915007

I mention this because he called me the other day. This segues into the point that if you CALL me, you should PROBABLY learn a bit about who you are calling, lest you end up like THIS twit.

First let me Cut/Paste his last post and we shall describe the events leading here. Most of you will see the idiocy straight away.

.................................................................................. Lets look at the truth, and people that think they are helping this world by wanting to spread the word about law truths... If you are being an angry human being, one that is paranoid , selfish, ignorant, wanting to fight and start wars. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK YOUR GOING TO GATHER MANY??? ARE YOU ANY BETTER THAN THE SYSTEM YOUR SAYING YOU ARE WORKING AT EXPOSING< >>>What is your goal??? The truth is the truth... FOR many to wake up and understand this people need support in a nice way, maybe sometimes some ruff edges are cool. Though when one is angry that is s dead give away of FEAR! So when someone wants to spread truth, is it going as far through anger, through a massive ego, through threats, ignorance. THIS IS SIMPLE AND YOUR GOING TO DESTROY YOURSELF JUST LIKE THE SYSTEM YOU SAY YOUR WORKING AT CORRECTING .... LOVE AND PEACE> CANT NO SOLVE WAR WITH WAR>>> .....................................................................................

This is, of course, about me.

I'll Do the courtesy of answering each of his questions!

1: No. I don't need many. Sheep are easily slaughtered and requires little manpower. OH LOOK, yet another sack of shit calling me "Ignorant", even though he's butt-hurt that I want to kick the living shit out of him for phoning me (uninvited) and being such a little fuckwad.

2: My goal has been made clear MANY times and if you don't know my goal, why the FUCK do you want to be part of this group?

3: Your "Love and Peace" bullshit is one of the biggest destructive lies in history. NO time in history has "love and peace" EVER CHANGED ANYTHING! STOP CLAIMING IT CAN! Look ANYWHERE IN NATURE! The "peace and love" animals BECOME FOOD.

So, anyway as you can see, this stupid twit is YET another, in the legions of the cast-outs, who will whine and cry and talk about me as if they know ANYTHING about me....yet he will still want what I have.

He called expecting to meet with me to "feel my energy" (I'm NOT making that up).

I ask why he wants to meet.

"To learn" (What?)

I tell him to read the group.

"I want to help people"

I tell him that it would be criminal to presume to have the ability to help people at his level of demonstrably profound ignorance.

He then says he wants me to help him with his charges, which when asked, were purportedly "P4P", like that's a good thing to say to me. He said it means "Possession or the Purpose"...Fuck off.

...anyway, after laying out these grandiose plans for which I am expected to participate, I asked the basic question: HOW DO I BENEFIT?

His response? "What do you want"?

...just so we are clear; This piece of shit CALLED ME, making demands, and THEN demands I engage in contract negotiations. I hung up because I REALLY WANTED TO HURT HIM at this point. NO communication with this defective child would be productive.

I screened him out after the PURGE. He did not get back in.

Look at this sack of shit, and don't EVER do this.

He also wouldn't identify himself, like I was supposed to meet up with an asshole who won't say who he is. I DON'T HIDE.

Notice that EVERYTHING he's accuse ME of, he's actually guilty of.

NO MORE NEWBIES! YOU MUST BE INFORMED TO A USEFUL LEVEL IF YOU ARE EVEN GOING TO SPEAK TO ME.

DON'T ASK QUESTIONS I FUCKING ANSWERED TWO FUCKING YEARS AGO!

DON'T THINK I'M A FUCKING DEAN FUCKING CLIFFORD, OR ROBERT FUCKING MENARD, WHO'S TIME YOU CAN BUY! NONE OF YOU HAVE ANY VALUE! WHAT THE FUCK MAKES YOU THINK THAT ANY OF YOU HAVE ANYTHING I WANT?

READ THIS PROFILE AND USE IT AS A CAUTIONARY TALE.

You do NOT want to be booted out in 2015. Trust me.

P.S. for Admins - Since they "liked" this douche's post, do not admit "Christopher Lee" or "Bill Fazackerley"