The fucking Judge said oh thats your name, I said its not about my name its about who is SURETY for name. I said you didnt answer my question and disrespecting me. I said i wasn't a ward of the court, like the other sheeples there. Thats when they escorted me out. So Monday I get to do it infront of a jury. The State attorney whispered to her partner drop the case. So most likely Monday will end it. I said I administer the name. It was pretty fun to see how much of a threat I am to save me for last. Then I overheard the judge say oh why wasn't he warned. He thought I was gonna say something to incriminate me....boy the look on their eyes was priceless.
Monday eh, and you will go there willingly? Or will you send a certain someone with zero liability to ask the question again? Going back in "person" after letting the cat out of the bag may not be the best Idea.
He will go back there on monday, as the SOLE authorized Administrator, not in fucking "PERSON" :D and will surely say
I am here to ADMINISTRATE the legal person named.....
And I came because it's OBVIOUS that some of you, wants to fuck around with the person's surety :P
Now, where is the surety please.....I wish you can point out to me, on where is the surety ....
:P
Micheal, Didn't you administrate this case previously? Why did you go to court? And why will you go Monday?
Disregard previous questions....just noticed the date.
No this is a new case. Going to make sure its over cause I don't want them to have any excuse to come and kidnap me again. Also its gonna be a different judge. But its gonna interesting to have jury and full court room. They already called the victim and said not to come Monday. So they're already changing their minds. They just hate admitting it in person.
Update case was closed yesterday. Got a call at 4pm on a Sunday. State Attorney said they weren't going to prosecute. My last words in court were you never did answer my questions of SURETY. Notice of Mistake hell yeh
No this time I didnt get a chance to mail it cause they wouldn't tell me who the judge was going be and I got my Birth Certificate late from NY so I only had that one chance before trial to get it filed. So I read it out loud and on the record in court. So funny was the judge advising me that state was present and that everything I say will be used against me... hahahahaha I said yes make sure your recording everything I have to say. Then the moment of silence in the court room. Judge was like who the fuck is this guy and I wasn't he warned. Hahahaha
I've been following this charade Michael A Rivera for a while...in fact it's one of the storylines which peaked my interest in the TTFL. I did not follow this from the beginning brother and was wondering How did the state obtain the name of the PERSON? Did they search you? Or was it from government issued ID i.e. a driver's licence?
Oh now that's some fucking interesting shit. Bare with me for a moment Michael because this is important. So following this line of thinking, that "driver's licence" with your signature and photo, became evidence that proved (no longer DEEMED or PRESUMED) that you were the PERSON named on that government ID. And yet you were abe to use the NOTICE OF MISTAKE to remove SURETY even though state agents used the Driver's Licence (previously refered to as the cheese in another post when compared to the Birth Cirtificate) to IDentify you. Fascinating! :D Do you see where I'm going with this Capitain Pete?
Well David-Paul Sip thats why its called a NOTICE of Mistake. I administer the person but SURETY for the legal name falls on the government because of the Birth certificate.
Oh I'm really fucking thinking now. I've read that the driver's licence is evidence of a contract, that not only did folks ask for this licence, they agreed that they were the PERSON named when they signed, and when they provided their signature they become SURETY. That this licence is evidence that YOU are the PERSON and is proof and no longer PRESUMPTION. Of course in Michael's example the "driver's licence" was used to IDentify him in a criminal matter, not a traffic matter. Does this really matter though? Am I thinking wrong or is this a shit stain?
Birth Certificate is the key David-Paul Sip. The Legal Name on the Birth Certificate with the sole signature of the government makes them SURETY always.
My thoughts exactly and this example seems to confirm this beeeeautifully. I could go into the validity of the contract created by the driver's licence (namely disclosure) but that doesn't seem necessary if "The Legal Name on the Birth Certificate with the sole signature of the government makes it the SURETY always." I had a reason for asking you my original question brother. It also makes me think about Chris Evan and his experience up in Slave-chussettes. A different jurisdiction I know and a very different outcome. I just want to be certain my thinking isn't flawed here :)
Since Michael did not volunteered that license or any information, nor signed anything at all, the cops/state incurred in the crime of FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE, among other crimes, attaching a LEGAL NAME derived from a PUBLIC DOCUMENT to a MAN, without him volunteering that information. Without CONSENT.
That is why is ALWAYS better NOT to talk to cops.
Oh I did not know that Admiral Scott! Valid, supended, expired...it seems these fucking AGENTS like to rape the shit out of the licence so they can hide behind COLOUR OF LAW and sink their claws into man :/
These policy enforcers consistently use coercion, threat and duress to get folks to hand over the licence and obtain the name Mackximus. When I did so I stated explicitely that "I am not operating in this capacity and do not wish to contract with you today". The policy enforcer replied "I do not care what capacity you are operating under". Fortunately I have it ALL recorded. :)
When I would not provide proof of owernership and insurance he called for a supervisor (in one of those unmarked Dodge Challengers) who proceeded to try and force entry into the car, order me to unlock the doors (which I refused) and then threaten that she would steal my property and kidnap my son if I did not COMPLY.
I was able to defuse the situation by telling both of them outside the car "I mean you no harm" with my recording device in hand. She noticed this and her entire demeanor changed. I also told her "I do not recognize you" to which she replied "Of course you don't". She knew exactly what i was saying :o I then handed them the documents telling then they were being provided under protest, threat and duress. Amazingly I drove away that day with an "expired tag" and one of their NOTICEs.
<<coercion, threat and duress>> What the fuck is that? :/ Threats with words? Why would any sane man will talk to strangers with guns, that are violently looking to get information from you, to HURT you? Even if there is a gun to my head, what is the point of talking or signing anything, if it will be used to HURT ME? Shame/fear of not responding/obeying? FUCK THAT!
These people are attempting to commit crimes against ME, demanding any information. Fuck their codefied slavery! Who says I have to do/say anything? By what authority?
You are correct and I know that now brother Mackximus Minimus. I was fortunate that day and know that it likely would have turned out differently if it had not been a cold day and my son was not there.
That is another thing, IF driving, make sure your tags, insurance, and inspection are in order. An expired tag, broken tail lights, tinted windows, all that shit is like a sign saying "STOP ME, PLEASE!"
Also, if driving and you are not planning to comply with the codes or having a driver license, drive by YOURSELF, alone. Do not drive with passengers, family, or folks that will most likely act as witness against you, when confronted with questions from "authorities." You may also put them in danger, if you are planning to go bananas on the cops. If you are with family or friends, have SOMEONE ELSE drive for you, problem solved.
I had to step away and could not complete my reply. Btw, "<<coercion, threat and duress>> What the fuck is that?" The truth.
"Unlawful pressure exerted upon a person to coerce that person to perform an act that he or she ordinarily would not perform."
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/duress
"The intimidation of a victim to compel the individual to do some act against his or her will by the use of psychological pressure, physical force, or THREATS. "
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/coercion
"Threats with words"...really? Know with whom you deal. We all KNOW these policy enforcers begin with words, then call for back up, escalate the situation, fabricate evidence and LIE in court. They will and do act unlawfully all of the time. These are the facts which prove they are only words until they act upon them and these policy enforcers have shown consistency in doing this.
plenty of "coward" out there (the majority is always wrong), its the reason they operate under the assumption, that's why we must lead by example. I am not required to carry identification of ANY SORT and the piggies must not use force to compel information. What can they do other that to create the conditions for a breach of the trust and an invoice. You say 2 things and then remain silent, By what authority do you ask me for a private name and if you have set yourself up as directed.... I am not authorized to answer your questions. If they use torture and extortion, it is THEIR WILL to cause you harm. It's your will vs. their will, who will win, not you if you are a coward. AM I FREE TO GO! You bet I am, I am a me, not a YOU :P
Seeing as I was threatened with arrest by this "supervisor" no less than 3X and STOOD MY GROUND brother I know who I am and they knew it too. This was the point where I said "I mean you no harm" To which the lying bitch replied "We mean you no harm either". She even asked "Why am I not being compliant?" To which I answered "Am I required to be?" Ultimately I chose my battle and decided that a more controlled environment where my boy's safety was not at risk was wiser. This is always the RIGHT choice.
Great points David Vilaca...tha's the next move. All of this happened pre-TTFL but I now know the third things to say is "Am I being detained? AM I FREE TO GO!"
I wonder if one remains staring into a blank space, and says nothing... will they carry you for "staring at a blank space, and not saying a word?" What is the charge, being an IDIOT? Hahaha! Oh men.
I like the word IDIOT. If they DEEM anyone to be an IDIOT that's a good thing because it also means they can't proceed
" Idiots are incapable of committing crimes, or entering into contracts." :D
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Idiot
You dont have to say shit......never! Its all in your mind that makes you feel like you must speak to be cooperative. DON'T! Do not be scared to spend a few nights in jail. You will come out stronger than ever. Vengeance will be sweeter
- "What's your name, sir?"
- "I am ME, but you may address me as IDIOT for the purpose of this conversation, which has just come to an end." (Stares at blank space, drooling for extra IDIOT effect)
:D
I know brother Mackximus Minimus...I want everyone to KNOW what it means because LEGALly it isn't a bad thing :D The whole driver's licence joinder thing should be enough for all folks to call themselves IDIOT. ROTFL...Exactly!
ROTFL! AWESOME video Mackximus Minimus :D
Grasser? Was this a typo Michael? Yeah I saw that definition plus this one http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/grasser