Me: "Is it TRUE that I have the RIGHT to administrate those public debts through the PERSON's SURETY ?"
Yes or no ??
Public TRUSTEE: Unfortunately, we cannot handle your request, because if we say YES, we are cooked, and if we say NO, we are cooked too.....so, we choose to IGNORE the question... :/
Me: I am NOT a taxpayer, I have one....
Public TRUSTEE: Yes, but we can't say that, because if we do, this debt system will crash, so......shut the fuck up and pay :D
Start Dropping my name. :D
Tell them Scott Duncan raised these questions and now you are really worried that you may be the victim of an organized fraud network. :D
Criminal breach of trust
336. Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole or in part, of another person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a use that is not authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 296.
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-165.html#docCont
Arrest without warrant by any person
494. (1) Any one may arrest without warrant
(a) a person whom he finds committing an indictable offence; or
(b) a person who, on reasonable grounds, he believes
(i) has committed a criminal offence, and
(ii) is escaping from and freshly pursued by persons who have lawful authority to arrest that person.
Marginal note:Arrest by owner, etc., of property
(2) The owner or a person in lawful possession of property, or a person authorized by the owner or by a person in lawful possession of property, may arrest a person without a warrant if they find them committing a criminal offence on or in relation to that property and
(a) they make the arrest at that time; or
(b) they make the arrest within a reasonable time after the offence is committed and they believe on reasonable grounds that it is not feasible in the circumstances for a peace officer to make the arrest.
Marginal note:Delivery to peace officer
(3) Any one other than a peace officer who arrests a person without warrant shall forthwith deliver the person to a peace officer.
Marginal note:For greater certainty
(4) For greater certainty, a person who is authorized to make an arrest under this section is a person who is authorized by law to do so for the purposes of section 25.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 494; 2012, c. 9, s. 3.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-285.html#docCont
"who is authorized by law to do so for the purposes of section 25."
FUN FACT: Section 25 was repealed in the 1980s. The irony: Menard and his "Peace Officer crap, would have been valid. They simply REPEALED the "right".
Other fun fact: Woman who seem "pretty" over the phone are frequently overtly ugly or hugely obese. If I had to guess I'd say it involves over-compensation, or some kind of weird resonance like that of a base drum. Many people who talk to me by telephone assume they're talking to a man. This is mildly encouraging :D