Took the article down. Is that an issue? It did not seem that the thread was producing anything of value. Specifically, the last three posts related to someone's choice in venue for sexual relations.
You speak/type as you have been here before. You were added by Scott just last Friday. You drop in with allegued charges about Jason Moreland, you publicly say to contact you, if any questions, and then you decide to delete the thread because "It did not seem that the thread was producing anything of value"? Really?
Whenever a thread is gone, with all of our comments, is like being stolen of something that belonged to all in the group. I think it was a relevant thread. Even the Admiral had given some input. YOU posted the information/thread, so it must had been important. So, why delete it?
You never answered the question if you also use the account of the name Bildo Schmildo. Who are you, and what are you doing here, Simon Templar?
The thing here Captain Pete is that, unlike yourself, Simon Templar has "joined Facebook" in Friday, August 8th 2014, magically requested to join the group that same day, drops in a quite controversial manner, and fails to answer basic questions, then deletes the thread, I mean... really? Who is this character? :/
Simon, you still have not answered.
Deleting threads also creates other problems. The alleged "evidence" that Simon, at least partly, bases his decision to delete the thread is now gone. <<It did not seem that the thread was producing anything of value. Specifically, the last three posts related to someone's choice in venue for sexual relations.>>
There is no way to verify this now. Almighty Simon took the decision for US of to decide what actually had VALUE, or not. (Whatever the fuck he really meant with that). If there was any knowledge in that thread, he TOOK IT away from US. What a presumptuous fucktard.